08.12.2012 Views

ESMO-mmartin_GEICAM9805_sep14.ppt

ESMO-mmartin_GEICAM9805_sep14.ppt

ESMO-mmartin_GEICAM9805_sep14.ppt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TAC versus FAC as Adjuvant<br />

Chemotherapy for High-risk<br />

Node-negative Breast Cancer:<br />

Results from the GEICAM 9805 Trial<br />

Martín M, Lluch A, Seguí MA, Ruiz A, Ramos M,<br />

Adrover E, Rodríguez-Lescure Á, Grosse R, Calvo L,<br />

Anton A, on behalf of the Spanish Breast Cancer<br />

Research Group (GEICAM)


Background (1)<br />

• Taxanes improve disease-free survival (DFS)<br />

and overall survival (OS) in node-positive breast<br />

cancer<br />

• However, most patients have node-negative<br />

breast cancer at diagnosis, and about 30% of<br />

them are at high-risk of relapse<br />

• The role of taxanes in this setting is not fully<br />

established<br />

• GEICAM 9805 began in 1998


Background (2)<br />

Database from GEICAM (1990-1993)<br />

Colomer R et al, JCO 22: 961, 2004<br />

Probability of DFS<br />

1.0<br />

0.75<br />

0.50<br />

0.25<br />

0.0<br />

Log-rank P = 0.046<br />

Disease Free Survival<br />

N0<br />

CMF Md=NR n=211<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160<br />

Months<br />

FAC Md=NR n=204<br />

FAC vs CMF as adjuvant chemotherapy<br />

for early breast cancer (GEICAM 8701)<br />

Martin M, et al. Ann Oncol 14:833, 2003


Study design<br />

N=1059<br />

R<br />

Stratification<br />

• Menopausal status<br />

• Center<br />

6 x TAC<br />

6 x FAC<br />

Docetaxel 75 mg/m 2<br />

Doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2<br />

Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2<br />

Day 1, every 3 weeks<br />

Fluorouracil 500 mg/m 2<br />

Doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2<br />

Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2


Additional treatment<br />

• Radiotherapy<br />

– Mandatory after conservative surgery and<br />

recommended for patients with tumors >5 cm<br />

• Tamoxifen<br />

– For 5 years to all patients with hormone<br />

receptor-positive tumors<br />

• Primary prophylactic G-CSF mandatory in TAC arm<br />

– Protocol amendment after first 237 patients<br />

randomized


Main inclusion criteria<br />

• Age 18–75 years<br />

• Curative surgery for unilateral T1–T3 breast<br />

carcinoma<br />

• No axillary lymph node involvement<br />

– At least 10 lymph nodes examined<br />

• At least one St Gallen 1998 high-risk criterion<br />

– Tumor grade 2 to 3<br />

– Tumors >2 cm<br />

– Age


Main exclusion criteria<br />

• Previous history of cancer<br />

• Abnormal renal, liver, or hematologic function<br />

• Other serious illness or medical conditions<br />

• Abnormal cardiac function (normal LVEF required)<br />

LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction


Objectives<br />

• Primary<br />

– DFS after a minimum follow-up of 5 years<br />

• Secondary<br />

– OS<br />

– Safety<br />

– Prognostic and predictive value of molecular markers<br />

– Quality of life


Statistical considerations<br />

• DFS was defined as the interval from randomization<br />

to the date of breast cancer relapse, contralateral<br />

breast cancer, other primary malignancy or death<br />

from any cause, whichever occurred first<br />

• With 511 evaluable patients in each arm, the trial<br />

has a 90% power to detect an absolute 7.5% DFS<br />

increase (87.5% vs 80.0%) with TAC at 5-year<br />

follow-up


Patient characteristics<br />

TAC FAC<br />

Randomized patients, n 539 520<br />

Median age, years (range)<br />

Age 2 cm<br />

Tumor grade, %*<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Menopausal status, %<br />

Pre-menopausal<br />

Post-menopausal<br />

Hormone receptor status, %*<br />

ER+ and/or PR+<br />

ER– /PR –<br />

50 (23–74)<br />

42 (7.8)<br />

52.9<br />

47.1<br />

7.1<br />

40.1<br />

48.1<br />

54.4<br />

45.6<br />

63.8<br />

35.6<br />

*Data unknown in a few cases<br />

49 (23–73)<br />

33 (6.4)<br />

47.9<br />

51.9<br />

6.5<br />

44.2<br />

44.2<br />

55.0<br />

45.0<br />

67.1<br />

32.5


Safety


Treatment Exposure<br />

TAC-pre<br />

n=114<br />

TAC-post<br />

n=414<br />

FAC<br />

n=519<br />

Completed 6 cycles, n (%) 103 (90.4%) 396 (95.7%) 505 (97.3%)<br />

Relative dose intensity<br />

Median 0.99 0.99 0.98<br />

Median cumulative dose, mg<br />

Docetaxel 445 448 –<br />

Doxorubicin 298 299 300<br />

Cyclophosphamide 2998 2995 2998<br />

5-FU – – 2998


Grade 2 or greater hematologic and<br />

nonhematologic toxicities<br />

Hematologic toxicity, %<br />

Grade 2–4 anemia<br />

Febrile neutropenia (protocol) *<br />

Febrile neutropenia (NCI-CTC)<br />

Non-hematologic toxicity, %<br />

Asthenia<br />

Anorexia<br />

Myalgia<br />

Dysgeusia<br />

Nail disorder<br />

Stomatitis<br />

TAC-pre<br />

(n=114)<br />

47.4<br />

24.6<br />

27.2<br />

64.0<br />

11.4<br />

14.9<br />

7.9<br />

7.9<br />

35.1<br />

TAC-post<br />

(n=414)<br />

27.5<br />

6.5<br />

7.5<br />

48.1<br />

3.6<br />

7.7<br />

3.1<br />

1.4<br />

23.2<br />

FAC<br />

(n=519)<br />

7.5<br />

2.3<br />

3.1<br />

33.3<br />

2.9<br />

1.2<br />

2.3<br />

1.3<br />

24.5<br />

P value<br />

(TAC-pre vs<br />

TAC-post)<br />


Safety<br />

• There were no toxic deaths<br />

TAC FAC<br />

n % n %<br />

P value<br />

Cardiac toxicity 6 1.1 5 1.0 0.81<br />

Hematologic<br />

neoplasm<br />

1 0.2 1 0.2 1


Efficacy


DFS events<br />

• 142 DFS events as of the cut-off (18 April 2008)<br />

– 58 in the TAC arm<br />

– 84 in the FAC arm<br />

First DFS event TAC (n) FAC (n)<br />

Breast cancer recurrence 44 58<br />

Second breast malignancy 3 11<br />

Other second malignancy 8 12<br />

Deaths without event 3 3


DFS<br />

Survival distribution function<br />

Median follow up: 67 months<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

Number of patients<br />

Events<br />

HR=0.67 [95% CI, 0.48–0.94]<br />

Stratified log-rank p=0.0181<br />

91%<br />

86%<br />

0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96<br />

Disease-free survival (months)<br />

TAC FAC<br />

539 520<br />

58 (11%) 84 (16%)


DFS<br />

Median follow up: 67 months<br />

Survival distribution function<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

HR=0.67 [95% CI, 0.48–0.94]<br />

Stratified log-rank p=0.0181<br />

86%<br />

FAC<br />

0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96<br />

Disease-free survival (months)<br />

80%


DFS<br />

Survival distribution function<br />

Median follow up: 67 months<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

HR=0.67 [95% CI, 0.48–0.94]<br />

Stratified log-rank p=0.0181<br />

91%<br />

TAC<br />

0.0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96<br />

Disease-free survival (months)<br />

89%


Risk reductions<br />

• 33% reduction in risk of relapse with TAC<br />

(HR for DFS: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48–0.94; P=0.0181)<br />

• 30% reduction in risk of death with TAC (HR<br />

for OS: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.41–1.22; P=0.21),<br />

however data not yet mature<br />

– 53 deaths; TAC 22, FAC 31


DFS subgroup analysis<br />

Menopausal status<br />

Hazard ratio (95%, CI)<br />

Overall DFS 0.67 (0.48, 0.94)<br />

Hormone-receptor (HR) status<br />

HR + 0.59 (0.36, 0.95)<br />

HR – 0.73 (0.45, 1.16)<br />

Post-menopausal 0.73 (0.44, 1.20)<br />

Pre-menopausal 0.63 (0.40, 0.99)<br />

Number of high-risk features<br />

1 0.64 (0.30, 1.39)<br />

2 0.69 (0.47, 0.99) ≥<br />

0.2<br />

0.4 0.6<br />

Favors<br />

TAC<br />

0.8<br />

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6<br />

Favors<br />

FAC


Conclusions<br />

• First trial of purely high-risk, node-negative breast<br />

cancer patients to show an efficacy benefit with taxane<br />

treatment<br />

• TAC is superior to FAC, resulting in a 33% reduction in<br />

risk of relapse at 5 years<br />

• TAC side effects are mainly hematological and are<br />

manageable with primary G-CSF<br />

• GEICAM 9805 confirms BCIRG001 that TAC is proven<br />

effective both in node positive and in high risk node<br />

negative early stage breast cancer


Acknowledgments<br />

• We thank the 1059 patients who participated in<br />

this trial<br />

• All participating centers and investigators<br />

• This trial was co-sponsored by GEICAM and<br />

sanofi-aventis


Participating centers<br />

SPAIN<br />

Arnau de Vilanova (Lérida)<br />

Arnau de Vilanova (Val.)<br />

Arquitecto Marcide<br />

Barbastro<br />

Basurto<br />

C.O. de Galicia<br />

C.S. de Terrasa<br />

Ciudad de Jaén<br />

Clinic<br />

Clínica Corachán<br />

Clínico de Valencia<br />

Clínico San Carlos<br />

Clínico San Cecilio<br />

F.H. de Alcorcón<br />

General de Albacete<br />

General de Elche<br />

General de Elda<br />

GERMANY<br />

Klinik und Poliklinik<br />

Klinikum Quedlinburg<br />

GmbH<br />

Kreiskrankenhaus<br />

Donaueschingen<br />

POLAND<br />

Serafín Morales<br />

Vicente Alberola<br />

Laura de Paz Arias<br />

Jesús Florian Gericó<br />

Purificación Mtez del Prado<br />

Manuel Ramos Vázquez<br />

Angels Arcusa Lanza<br />

Margarita Fdez Morales<br />

Montserrat Muñoz<br />

Alfonso Modollel<br />

Ana Lluch<br />

Miguel Martín<br />

José Luis García Puche<br />

Carlos Jara Sánchez<br />

Antonio Fdez Aramburo<br />

Alvaro Rguez Lescure<br />

Cristina Llorca<br />

R. Grosse<br />

O. Boldt<br />

M. Eberl<br />

General de Vic<br />

General Univ. de<br />

Alicante<br />

Germans Trias i Pujol<br />

H. de la Ribera<br />

Insular Las Palmas<br />

IVO<br />

Juan Canalejo<br />

La Fe de Valencia<br />

La Princesa<br />

Lozano Blesa<br />

Marqués de Valdecilla<br />

Miguel Servet<br />

Montecelo<br />

Ntra. Sra. de Aránzazu<br />

Parc Taulí<br />

Puerta del Mar<br />

Puerto Real<br />

St. Marien-<br />

Kankenhaus<br />

Städtisches Klinikum<br />

Universitätsfrauenkli<br />

nik<br />

Rosa Mª Franquesa<br />

Encarna Adrover<br />

Agustín Barnadas<br />

José Miguel Cuevas Sanz<br />

Adolfo Murias Rosales<br />

Amparo Ruiz<br />

Lourdes Calvo<br />

Blanca Munárriz<br />

Amalia Velasco<br />

Dolores Isla Casado<br />

José Manuel López Vega<br />

Antonio Antón Torres<br />

Manuel Constenla<br />

Isabel Alvarez López<br />

Miguel Angel Seguí<br />

José Manuel Baena<br />

Antonio Lorenzo Peñuelas<br />

Matthias Losch<br />

Med. Melchert<br />

Carsten Oberhoff<br />

Poznan (Wielkopolskie) Jerzy Zaluski Wojewodzki Szpital Piotr Koralewski<br />

Ramón y Cajal<br />

Reina Sofía<br />

Río Carrión<br />

Rodríguez<br />

Chamorro<br />

Ruber Internacional<br />

Sant Joan Reus<br />

Santa María Nai<br />

Universitario de<br />

Salamanca<br />

Virgen Blanca<br />

Virgen de la Luz<br />

Virgen de la Victoria<br />

Virgen de los Lirios<br />

Virgen del Rocío<br />

Xeral Calde de<br />

Lugo<br />

Xeral Cíes de Vigo<br />

Universitätskliniken<br />

Homburg<br />

Carmen Crespo<br />

Enrique Aranda<br />

Alberto Arizcun<br />

Marta Navalón<br />

Pedro Aramburo<br />

Amadeu Pelegrí<br />

Manuel Rubén Rodríguez<br />

Amalia Gómez Bernal<br />

Andrés García Palomo<br />

Eduardo Martínez de Dueñas<br />

Emilio Alba Conejo<br />

Amparo Oltra<br />

Luis Iglesias Pérez<br />

José Ramón Mel Lorenzo<br />

Javier Castellanos<br />

Prof. Schmidt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!