23.10.2016 Views

ePaper_2nd Edition_October 12, 2016

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Opinion 21<br />

Will a hard Brexit take<br />

the great out of Great Britain?<br />

So much for taking back control<br />

DT<br />

WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER <strong>12</strong>, <strong>2016</strong><br />

• Azeem Ibrahim<br />

Theresa May has finally<br />

spelled out the future<br />

of the UK in her party<br />

conference speech. It will<br />

be hard Brexit. And it will be a<br />

disaster.<br />

The Article 50 process will<br />

be triggered next year and<br />

the government’s negotiating<br />

position is that immigration will<br />

be prioritised over continued<br />

membership of the European<br />

Single Market.<br />

Of course, the official story<br />

is that curbs on immigration<br />

are the non-negotiable red line<br />

for the government, while they<br />

will also try to get the best trade<br />

relationship with the European<br />

Bloc.<br />

But, in practice, this means that<br />

Britain will be unceremoniously<br />

kicked out of the Single Market<br />

before the end of 2019, and will<br />

have to resume trade with all of<br />

the rest of the world on WTO rules.<br />

Fantasists like Liam Fox and<br />

Boris Johnson will continue to<br />

insist that we will be able to get<br />

favourable trading conditions with<br />

Europe, but their nonsense will be<br />

exposed before long.<br />

For one, nobody in Europe has<br />

any reason to reward Britain for<br />

shunning the European project.<br />

How anyone can look at the<br />

appointment of Guy Verhofstadt,<br />

the federalist former prime<br />

minister of Belgium, as Europe’s<br />

lead Brexit negotiator and think<br />

that France and Germany are<br />

lining up to give the UK a good<br />

deal is baffling.<br />

And the other aspect of this is<br />

that, even if Germany, Holland,<br />

France, and many other countries<br />

would want to give the UK a good<br />

deal, this is not enough. When<br />

the European Union negotiates<br />

such deals, for a trade treaty to<br />

come in effect, it must be ratified<br />

by the parliaments of all member<br />

countries.<br />

Terms of the deed<br />

Back in January, when Boris<br />

Johnson was touting the Canada<br />

deal as a model of what Britain<br />

can achieve in Brexit negotiations,<br />

what he conveniently glossed over<br />

is that the terms of the deal had<br />

been agreed back in 2014.<br />

It was held up for two years<br />

until this year because the Czech<br />

Republic, Romania, and Bulgaria<br />

refused to ratify the deal until<br />

Canada agreed to give their<br />

citizens visa-free access to the<br />

country.<br />

The notion that these, and<br />

other Eastern European countries,<br />

would agree to give Britain a good<br />

trade deal when the UK is leaving<br />

the Bloc specifically so it can<br />

discriminate against their citizens<br />

is, frankly, insane.<br />

The short of it, then, is that,<br />

with her Sunday speech, Theresa<br />

May has effectively destroyed any<br />

prospect of a preferential trade<br />

arrangement with Europe. The<br />

UK will have the same level of<br />

access to the European market<br />

that Ethiopia has. Egypt will have<br />

an easier time trading into Europe<br />

than British exporters.<br />

Even if Germany,<br />

Holland, France,<br />

and many other<br />

countries would<br />

want to give the<br />

UK a good deal,<br />

this is not enough.<br />

When the European<br />

Union negotiates<br />

such deals, for a<br />

trade treaty to come<br />

in effect, it must<br />

be ratified by the<br />

parliaments of all<br />

member countries<br />

And the really fun part is that the<br />

UK loses not only access to the<br />

markets of the EU and the EEA<br />

themselves, but also to the market<br />

of 50+ other countries that we had<br />

access to as members of the Single<br />

Market.<br />

Any takers?<br />

Will there be takers for free<br />

trade deals with the newly<br />

Theresa May’s ‘hard Brexit’ is setting up to be a disaster<br />

“independent” UK? Sure. The<br />

Chinese must already be licking<br />

their lips at the prospects. As are<br />

many of the largest and most<br />

predatory American corporations.<br />

And Putin’s henchmen are<br />

probably already tabulating their<br />

spreadsheets.<br />

Theresa May has just made<br />

this country fully vulnerable to<br />

the caprices of the titans of global<br />

trade.<br />

Next time, neither she nor her<br />

successors will have the luxury<br />

to put a project like Hinkley on<br />

hold for a reassessment for a few<br />

months. Nor will the Chinese<br />

ambassador need to express loud<br />

objections.<br />

Next time, the government will<br />

be told exactly what to do, where<br />

and when. Like Hong Kong in<br />

REUTERS<br />

reverse. So much for taking back<br />

control. •<br />

Azeem Ibrahim is Senior Fellow at<br />

the Centre for Global Policy, Fellow<br />

at Mansfield College, University of<br />

Oxford and Research Professor at the<br />

Strategic Studies Institute, US Army<br />

War College. This article previously<br />

appeared in Al Arabiya News. He tweets<br />

@AzeemIbrahim.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!