31.10.2016 Views

artenol0416_sm_flipbook

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MAKE ART GREAT AGAIN<br />

WORKSHOP IN THE WOODS<br />

The Kopkind Colony is an educational summer<br />

residency program that provides opportunities<br />

for independent journalists and community organizers<br />

to meet, discuss current<br />

issues and participate in seminars<br />

and presentations by guest<br />

lecturers. Located in Guilford,<br />

Vermont, on the site of the Tree<br />

Frog Farm, the long-time residence<br />

of renowned author and<br />

journalist Andrew Kopkind, the<br />

kopkind.org photo<br />

Kopkind<br />

Colony seeks to mentor young and not-so-young<br />

reporters and writers in the social and political<br />

journali<strong>sm</strong> that Kopkind practiced throughout his<br />

career. Previous presenters during the Colony’s<br />

summer session have been community organizer<br />

Kevin Alexander Gray, author Dr. Donald Tibbs<br />

and activist lawyer Pamela Bridgewater Toure.<br />

More about the Kopkind Colony and its various<br />

programs, past and present, can be found at<br />

kopkind.org.<br />

We have a website which is called “Freedom from<br />

Art,” at freedomfromart.org. On it, we say that art<br />

should be stripped of its nonprofit status – that will<br />

change everything overnight. We also say we should<br />

also stop coercing people, stop telling people, from<br />

children to adults, how good art is. But economics are<br />

the most important part. Donations to art institutions<br />

should not be tax-deductible. People say to me that a<br />

lot of museums would then have to close down, and<br />

I say, OK, that’s very good. A lot of museums should<br />

be closed down. But here’s something that I discovered<br />

lately that I want to share with you. Every museum,<br />

every art institution, every artist, every collector,<br />

everyone has these huge storage rooms where they<br />

keep art. I estimate that 99.9 percent of art that has<br />

been created, and is being created now, is destined<br />

to be locked up in a warehouse somewhere. That art<br />

has little or no chance of ever seeing the light of day.<br />

The vast majority of art produced today will be stored<br />

face-to-face in huge, dark rooms, and it’s a waste. A<br />

kind of pollution. Art production can be seen as a true<br />

form of pollution – physical pollution, of course, but<br />

also intellectual pollution. There are now hundreds<br />

of thousands, maybe millions, of artists making art<br />

around the world, if you take China, Russia, you<br />

know. What is that about? Why are they doing this?<br />

What’s the chance that their work will ever be seen?<br />

There is no chance. But everyone desires to seen, to<br />

be shown. My works, with my ex-collaborator, are<br />

in every major museum – MoMA, the Guggenheim,<br />

the Met, you name it – but I haven’t seen those works<br />

in years. They’re somewhere, stored away. But we’re<br />

lucky artists – we’re in those museums. Most artists<br />

are not in any museums – they’re nowhere. It’s like<br />

over-production, like a totally senseless machine that<br />

just produces certain things.<br />

Tell us about Artenol, because if you want to destroy art,<br />

it seems nonsensical to put a magazine out.<br />

It’s about art being nonsensical. I need to prove that<br />

to people. It’s like the magazine The Masses. They<br />

were trying to prove that the existing social system is<br />

wrong. That it needed to be replaced or destroyed. We<br />

want to do the same thing, but culturally.<br />

Art, before it was subverted by those with privilege and<br />

money, was used as a vehicle for community work, for the<br />

people. To say that it should be destroyed, doesn’t that<br />

disregard the other ways that art can be used?<br />

Your first statement, that money that came into art<br />

and destroyed whatever came before, destroyed its<br />

connection to the community – let me tell you, there<br />

never was a time “before.” Artists have always been<br />

the lackeys of the ruling class; they’ve always served<br />

the ruling class. There was a time before, when art<br />

was made for the church, for the religious public. The<br />

rich people subsidized it, of course, but they were<br />

giving money to the church, not to artists. An important<br />

difference was that God was behind the art of that<br />

period. There were teachings, the Bible, the story.<br />

Artists were the illustrators of the religious system’s<br />

story, which was totally ingrained in people’s minds.<br />

You couldn’t ask a medieval person if he believed in<br />

God – it was a given. If God exists, art exists. If there’s<br />

no God, no art. In modern times, though, art itself<br />

took on the function of religion. Artists became the<br />

priests, the agents of God’s will. With the demise of<br />

traditional religion, the rich people, the elite, began<br />

putting their money into the new art religion, and<br />

they co-opted its priest class, the artists. I was just<br />

lecturing at the Clark Art Institute in Williamstown,<br />

Mass., and they had a show from the Prado collection<br />

in Madrid of paintings of naked women, of Venuses.<br />

Read a<br />

Washington Post<br />

story on how<br />

Donald Trump<br />

might make art<br />

great again at<br />

artenol.org.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!