02.11.2016 Views

MILITARY BUDGETS in INDIA and PAKISTAN

Military-Budgets-India-Pakistan-Trajectories-Priorities-Risks-Oct2016.pdf

Military-Budgets-India-Pakistan-Trajectories-Priorities-Risks-Oct2016.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

USD billions, constant 2010 prices<br />

Military Budgets <strong>in</strong> India <strong>and</strong> Pakistan: Trajectories, Priorities, <strong>and</strong> Risks<br />

military options have been constra<strong>in</strong>ed. Large-scale conventional military options do not seem<br />

viable. Special operations may now be the option of choice.<br />

Figure 1: Divergent Economic Fortunes <strong>in</strong> India <strong>and</strong> Pakistan 2<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

-<br />

India GDP<br />

Pakistan GDP<br />

India’s preem<strong>in</strong>ent position <strong>in</strong> the region does not dim<strong>in</strong>ish its security dilemmas. Pakistan’s<br />

nuclear capabilities pose an existential threat, while its employment of proxies has been costly.<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a poses more substantial, if not more immediate, threats to Indian security, <strong>and</strong> these<br />

challenges will grow as Ch<strong>in</strong>a develops power projection capabilities. Ties between Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong><br />

Pakistan are thicken<strong>in</strong>g – another strategic concern. 3<br />

India <strong>and</strong> Pakistan are mid-size nuclear powers that cont<strong>in</strong>ue to develop their capabilities. Based<br />

on estimates of its fissile material stockpile, Pakistan’s arsenal is slightly larger than India’s, with<br />

somewhere between 110 <strong>and</strong> 130 nuclear warheads. 4 Pakistan can deliver nuclear weapons from<br />

the ground or by air. L<strong>and</strong>-based ballistic missiles are the ma<strong>in</strong>stay of Pakistan’s nuclear<br />

program, while a fleet of F-16s <strong>and</strong> Mirage aircraft can deliver gravity bombs over targets.<br />

Pakistan shrouds its nuclear doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> ambiguity, based on the assumption that generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>d of an adversary is essential for deterrence. S<strong>in</strong>ce the country has not<br />

released an official document expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g its nuclear policy, many analysts rely on a 2002 report <strong>in</strong><br />

which then-Director General of the Strategic Plans Division (SPD) Khalid Kidwai sketched out<br />

scenarios <strong>in</strong> which Pakistan might use nuclear weapons. 5 He noted that Pakistan ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed the<br />

option of us<strong>in</strong>g nuclear weapons first <strong>in</strong> a conflict, <strong>and</strong> expla<strong>in</strong>ed that nuclear weapons would<br />

likely be used if India were to conquer significant parts of Pakistani territory, destroy large parts<br />

of the Pakistan Army or Pakistan Air Force, conduct economic warfare aga<strong>in</strong>st Pakistan, or<br />

2 World Bank, “GDP at Market Prices (constant 2010 US$),”<br />

http://data.worldbank.org/<strong>in</strong>dicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.<br />

3 “Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s Xi J<strong>in</strong>p<strong>in</strong>g Agrees $46bn Superhighway to Pakistan,” BBC News, April 20, 2015,<br />

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32377088<br />

4 Hans Kristensen <strong>and</strong> Robert Norris, “Pakistani Nuclear Forces, 2015,” Bullet<strong>in</strong> of the Atomic Scientists<br />

71, no. 6 (2015): 59.<br />

5 Paolo Cotta-Ramus<strong>in</strong>o <strong>and</strong> Maurizio Martell<strong>in</strong>i, “Nuclear Safety, Nuclear Stability, <strong>and</strong> Nuclear Strategy<br />

<strong>in</strong> Pakistan: A Concise Report of a Visit by L<strong>and</strong>au Network – Centro Volta,” 2002.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!