02.11.2016 Views

MILITARY BUDGETS in INDIA and PAKISTAN

Military-Budgets-India-Pakistan-Trajectories-Priorities-Risks-Oct2016.pdf

Military-Budgets-India-Pakistan-Trajectories-Priorities-Risks-Oct2016.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

USD millions, constant 2014 prices<br />

Military Budgets <strong>in</strong> India <strong>and</strong> Pakistan: Trajectories, Priorities, <strong>and</strong> Risks<br />

noted that Pakistan began charg<strong>in</strong>g defense pensions to the civilian budget <strong>in</strong> 2000, <strong>and</strong> began<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g so “for the purpose of one budget dem<strong>and</strong> both for Civil <strong>and</strong> Defence Pensions.” 55 This<br />

practice fell under some scrut<strong>in</strong>y <strong>in</strong> the first years after General Pervez Musharraf left office. In a<br />

2010 meet<strong>in</strong>g of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), some members of parliament argued that<br />

pensions should be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the defense budget. A vocal supporter of this reform was Khawaja<br />

Asif, then a member of the opposition <strong>in</strong> the National Assembly <strong>and</strong> currently the M<strong>in</strong>ister of<br />

Defence. Dur<strong>in</strong>g a meet<strong>in</strong>g of the PAC <strong>in</strong> 2010, Asif reportedly said, “Whom we are try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

fool by show<strong>in</strong>g [the] military pension budget as part of [the] civilian budget [?]” 56<br />

Figure 6: Increased Defense Spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Pakistan 57<br />

10,000<br />

9,000<br />

8,000<br />

7,000<br />

6,000<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

-<br />

8%<br />

7%<br />

6%<br />

5%<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

Defense budget<br />

Defense/GDP<br />

Pakistan’s opaque defense budget raises more questions than it answers. One area of the federal<br />

budget that could be used for off-budget f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g is the category of “cont<strong>in</strong>gent liabilities.”<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the M<strong>in</strong>istry of F<strong>in</strong>ance (MOF), cont<strong>in</strong>gent liabilities “are possible future liabilities<br />

that will only become certa<strong>in</strong> on the occurrence of some future event.” 58 Examples <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

payments associated with natural disasters, or an outst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g government loan. 59 The MOF<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>s that these payments are not shown <strong>in</strong> balance sheets, <strong>and</strong> can either be explicit or<br />

implicit. Explicit cont<strong>in</strong>gent liabilities are “specific government obligations def<strong>in</strong>ed by law,” <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>clude liabilities such as guarantees for private <strong>in</strong>vestments, state <strong>in</strong>surance schemes, <strong>and</strong><br />

umbrella guarantees for various loans. Implicit cont<strong>in</strong>gent liabilities, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, represent<br />

a “moral obligation or expected burden for the government not <strong>in</strong> the legal sense, but based on<br />

public expectations <strong>and</strong> political pressures.” 60 This fund is used to pay defaults <strong>and</strong> failure on<br />

55 Government of Pakistan, “Questions for Oral Answers <strong>and</strong> Their Replies,” August 5, 2015, 20,<br />

http://www.senate.gov.pk/uploads/documents/questions/1438762566_288.pdf.<br />

56 Rauf Klasra, “Military Pension Bill Rs72 bn, Civilian Rs18 bn, PAC Told,” News International<br />

(Pakistan), September 22, 2010, http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-762-Military-pension-bill-<br />

Rs72-bn-civilian-Rs18-bn-PAC-told.<br />

57 SIPRI, “SIPRI Military Expenditure Database.”<br />

58 M<strong>in</strong>istry of F<strong>in</strong>ance, “Cont<strong>in</strong>gent Liabilities,” Pakistan Economic Survey 2009-2010,<br />

http://www.f<strong>in</strong>ance.gov.pk/survey/chapter_10/conti.pdf.<br />

59 Hana Polackova, “Cont<strong>in</strong>gent Government Liabilities: A Hidden Fiscal Risk,” F<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>and</strong> Development<br />

36, no. 1 (March 1999), http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/f<strong>and</strong>d/1999/03/polackov.htm.<br />

60 M<strong>in</strong>istry of F<strong>in</strong>ance, “Cont<strong>in</strong>gent Liabilities,” <strong>in</strong> Pakistan Economic Survey 2009-2010,<br />

http://www.f<strong>in</strong>ance.gov.pk/survey/chapter_10/conti.pdf.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!