03.11.2016 Views

Patent Assertion Entity Activity

xktHF

xktHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Patent</strong> assignments were frequently recorded with the USPTO;<br />

On average, Study PAEs tended to acquire patents several years before their expiration date;<br />

<strong>Patent</strong>s asserted in litigation generally were cited more frequently in other patents and patent<br />

applications than either the population of patents overall, or the full study sample of patent<br />

holdings that were not asserted in litigation; 298<br />

Portfolio PAEs held more patents overall than Litigation PAEs.<br />

This study does not contain a census of all PAE patents. 299 However, the FTC’s sample should include a<br />

substantial fraction of all patents held by all PAEs during the study period. 300 Using <strong>Patent</strong> Freedom’s<br />

estimate of individual PAE patent holdings in 2013, the FTC estimates that patents held by PAEs in the<br />

FTC’s study represent more than 75% of U.S. patents held by all PAEs at the end of 2013. 301<br />

Methodology<br />

Responding PAEs were required to complete a series of questions concerning each patent held, by<br />

themselves or their Affiliates or Holding Entities, at any time between January 1, 2009 and September<br />

15, 2014. 302 The FTC asked for information on the priority date and expiration date of each patent,<br />

reviews of the patent by the USPTO, legal and economic rights to the patent granted to outsiders,<br />

298<br />

The median litigated patent held by Litigation PAEs had 80% more citations than the average patent, controlling for age<br />

and technology category, and the median litigated Portfolio PAE had 30% more citations than the average patent in this<br />

control group. The FTC did not observe that Study PAEs used citation data to analyze their patent holdings.<br />

299<br />

To date, no study claims to identify all PAE patents. Due to a lack of information addressing patents held by PAEs in<br />

general, previous research has focused on either litigated patents, or the holdings of a single firm. See, e.g., Fischer & Henkel,<br />

supra note 98; David S. Abrams et al., <strong>Patent</strong> Value and Citations: Creative Destruction or Strategic Disruption, (Nat’l<br />

Bureau of Econ. Research, Working Paper No. 19647, 2013), http://www.nber.org/papers/w19647.pdf.<br />

300<br />

See Appendix B: Methodology (detailing the sampling algorithm used to select study subjects). The algorithm was<br />

designed to oversample the largest PAEs, measured by patents held and litigations filed, to capture the most economically<br />

significant PAEs. Id.<br />

301<br />

<strong>Patent</strong> Freedom provided the FTC with an estimate of the total number of patents held by PAEs. See supra note 155 and<br />

accompanying text.<br />

302<br />

See Appendix A: Glossary of Frequently Used Terms. “Hold” or “Held” means to possess a Legal Right to a <strong>Patent</strong>, where<br />

“Legal Right” means any ownership interest in, an exclusive License to, or other rights adequate to License or enforce, a<br />

<strong>Patent</strong>, and “<strong>Patent</strong>” means a United States patent or United States patent application as defined by 35 U.S.C. § 101, et seq.<br />

Id.<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!