03.11.2016 Views

Patent Assertion Entity Activity

xktHF

xktHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

as quickly as possible. For Portfolio PAEs, 83.7% of licensees included only a lump-sum payment,<br />

13.5% had only a running royalty, and 2.8% included both a running royalty and lump-sum component.<br />

Table 3.2: Percentage of <strong>Patent</strong> Licensing Agreements with Given Characteristics<br />

Portfolio<br />

PAEs<br />

Litigation<br />

PAEs<br />

Cross<br />

License<br />

Contract Terms<br />

Field of<br />

Use<br />

Restriction<br />

Geographic<br />

Restriction<br />

Lump<br />

Sum<br />

Only<br />

Payment Terms<br />

Running<br />

Royalty<br />

Only<br />

Both Lump<br />

Sum and<br />

Running<br />

Royalty<br />

Components<br />

4.4% 71.8% 6.0% 83.7% 13.5% 2.8%<br />

0.0% 1.9% 1.9% 99.2% 0.3% 0.5%<br />

Note: Total Portfolio PAE licenses reflected in the table is 252 for contract terms and 215 for payment terms<br />

(payment terms were calculated only using data for licenses reporting positive revenues). Total Litigation<br />

PAE licenses reflected in the table is 2,463 for contract terms and 2,149 for payment terms.<br />

License Terms Typically Extended Until the Licensed <strong>Patent</strong>s Expired<br />

Responding PAEs had to report the dates of termination of all licenses identified on behalf of themselves<br />

and their Affiliates. 241 Most Responding PAEs indicated that their licenses terminated when the licensed<br />

patents expired. The prevalence of this contact term was likely due to settled law holding that a patent<br />

license that extends beyond the expiration of the licensed patent is unenforceable. 242 When the effective<br />

date of the license extended beyond patent expiry, it typically extended six years beyond the expiration<br />

of the last patent to expire, presumably to address the six-year window for recovering patent damages. 243<br />

241<br />

Appendix C: PAE Special Order, Specification H.3.l (“State the duration of the License agreement?”).<br />

242<br />

See Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29, 32 (1964) (holding that a patent holder cannot charge royalties for the use of his<br />

invention after its patent term has expired); see also Kimble v. Marvel Ent’t Co., 135 S. Ct. 2401, 2405 (2015) (holding<br />

same).<br />

243<br />

35 U.S.C. § 286 (2012) (“Except as otherwise provided by law, no recovery shall be had for any infringement committed<br />

more than six years prior to the filing of the complaint or counterclaim for infringement in the action.”).<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!