03.11.2016 Views

Patent Assertion Entity Activity

xktHF

xktHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

assert them against companies that make and sell products, such as firms in the computer hardware<br />

industry. 40<br />

In a subsequent 2011 report entitled The Evolving IP Marketplace: Aligning <strong>Patent</strong> Notice and Remedies<br />

with Competition, the Commission used the term “patent assertion entity,” or PAE, to distinguish patent<br />

assertion firms from other types of NPEs, which include firms that primarily seek to develop and<br />

transfer patented technology, even if they do not practice the patents themselves. 41 Examples of these<br />

latter types of NPEs include universities and semiconductor design houses. 42 In contrast to such NPEs,<br />

“[f]or the most part, PAEs purchase patents, and then sell or license them as assets whose values are<br />

based on the amount of licensing fees that can be extracted from operating companies already using and<br />

marketing the technology, or they facilitate others who make the assertions.” 43<br />

The Commission’s definition of a PAE is integral to understanding the findings and conclusions<br />

described in this report, and placing them in the context of prior studies, because other researchers have<br />

tended to examine the impact of NPEs generally. For example, in one study, Sara Jeruss et al. focused<br />

on “patent monetization entities,” which they define as “those entities whose primary focus is deriving<br />

income from licensing and litigation, as opposed to making products.” 44 The authors tracked<br />

universities in their study separately, however, reasoning that although universities do not make<br />

products, “their core activity involves education and academic research, rather than monetization of<br />

rights.” 45 In another study, John R. Allison et al. sorted patent infringement plaintiffs into 12 different<br />

“entity classes,” including an entity class called “acquired patents.” 46 Eleven of the 12 entity classes<br />

40<br />

Id., ch.2, at 31 & ch. 3, at 39.<br />

41<br />

FTC EVOLVING IP MARKETPLACE REPORT, supra note 1, at 8 n.5, 50 n.2, 60.<br />

42<br />

Id.<br />

43<br />

Id. at 60; see also Colleen V. Chien, From Arms Race to Marketplace: The New Complex <strong>Patent</strong> Ecosystem and Its<br />

Implications for the <strong>Patent</strong> System, 62 HASTINGS L.J. 297, 328 (2010) (defining patent assertion entities as entities that “are<br />

focused on the enforcement, rather than the active development or commercialization of their patents”).<br />

44<br />

Jeruss et al., supra note 2, at 361.<br />

45<br />

Id. at 369.<br />

46<br />

John R. Allison et al., Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated <strong>Patent</strong>s, 158 U. PA. L.<br />

REV. 1, 10 (2009).<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!