Criminal Story of a Prevention - Ukrainian Anti Cancer Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ings benefits to patients.’ He continues, ‘The good tolerance to Ukrain which is described in almost all reports should be regarded as just as unproven as the efficacy described.’ Then follows the amazing passage: ‘The conclusion of the above-mentioned considerations is that it is impossible to evaluate correctly the benefits and risks of Ukrain. I must expressly state that this negative judgement is not based on the fact that the benefits and the good tolerability claimed for Ukrain are inadequate for the drug to be registered – on the contrary, the benefits claimed for it must be described as spectacular – but that the data provided is dubious.’ 45
Obstruction Intensifies Not only medical experts and the courts, but even the secret service became involved with Ukrain. Not however in order to obstruct it, but to deal with the extremely suspicious events taking place in connection with this anti-cancer drug. One evening, a member of the secret service, Johann Wagner, turned up at Nowicky’s flat and told the baffled inventor that it had been reported that the secret service of a Mediterranean country had given the order to liquidate Nowicky. However, the hired assassins had confided in the Austrian authorities. This occurrence, which took place in 1996, was again brought to mind in spring 1998 when a registered parcel arrived at Nowicky’s Ukrainian Anti-Cancer Institute in Margaretenstrasse in Vienna. On the parcel was written that the sender was the headquarters of the tax office for Vienna, Lower Austria and Burgenland in Vienna’s third district; although the parcel had been sent from a post office in the ninth district of the city. At the time, Nowicky was at a medical congress in the USA, so the packet was opened by the vice-president of the institute, Tibor Nemeth, who happened to be present when it arrived. Inside a normal shoe box was the skeleton of a lobster. Nowicky associated this with mafia messages such as the horse’s severed head in ‘The Godfather’. Nowicky would have let it rest at that and just filed it under ‘terror’ if his accountant, Peter Obermayer, had not urgently advised him to report it to the police. Nowicky went to the police with the evidence. The shoe box and its contents were photographed, but no other action was taken. Of course, the tax office had nothing to do with the case in its official capacity. On the other hand, Nowicky was informed by his accountant not only that the tax office was about to check his books (which in the meantime was carried out and no irregularities found) but that the tax office had demanded two ampoules of his preparation Ukrain so that they themselves could determine the cost of production, which they suspected Nowicky had stated too high. On the basis of what research the civil servants came to the conclusion that it cost € 20 per ampoule will remain a secret of the tax office. As if this harassment was still not enough, foreign customers who had been ordering Ukrain for a long time and paying via bank transfer to the Creditanstalt bank without any difficulty were now suddenly confronted with Austrian antics. For example, instead of a small amount such as $3000 being credited to Nowicky’s account, the money was returned to the sender without explanation. It is all too easy to understand why Nowicky then changed his bank. At almost the same time very many cheap Ukrain preparations were brought onto the US market, and these also appeared within just one week in England, Canada and Australia. Professor Liepins, who had known Ukrain from the beginning, investigated these cheap products which proved themselves as totally ineffective. The contents of one ampoule also proved not to be sterile. Since then the Food and Drug Administration has warned on the internet that Ukrain is unsterile and even could contain the AIDS virus. A letter from Nowicky drawing attention to this mistake in which he even named the institute whose products in which the AIDS virus was found remained unanswered. The error on the internet has also not been corrected. At the same time as all these unpleasant occurrences, tests on the efficacy of Ukrain were being carried out in Ukraine, the country most damaged by the Chernobyl disaster. It was there that the story of Ukrain began and it was there that on 15 October 1998 the registration of Ukrain was unanimously approved. Austria would be left standing if a miracle did not happen. 46
Page 1 and 2: Eleonore Thun-Hohenstein ANTICANCER
Page 3 and 4: I want to alleviate suffering There
Page 5 and 6: His misfortune is that he can only
Page 7 and 8: Our First Meeting Our first meeting
Page 9 and 10: Nowicky Leaves the Country of His B
Page 11 and 12: ‘Who will inject it?’ asked the
Page 13 and 14: An Uninvited Guest in Vienna Now th
Page 15 and 16: other Ukrainians. Nowicky told his
Page 17 and 18: The Family is Evicted Professor Han
Page 19 and 20: This contact turned out to be a for
Page 21 and 22: In the following period it seemed t
Page 23 and 24: Obstacles and ‘Coincidences’ Pi
Page 25 and 26: Gutmann was about to receive profes
Page 27 and 28: The Law’s Delay Before a medicine
Page 29 and 30: The study had been carried out at t
Page 31 and 32: Science wanted to lend a hand there
Page 33 and 34: experiments at all investigating
Page 35 and 36: Whatever was already scientifically
Page 37 and 38: in several cases, missing relevant
Page 39 and 40: laid out in paragraph 12 of medical
Page 41 and 42: All these cases are too recent for
Page 43 and 44: cannot be proved that treatment wit
Page 45: metastases could be found. That Ukr
Page 49 and 50: Wassil Nowicky is not the first per
Page 51 and 52: your letter of 22.1.1999 addressed
Page 53 and 54: An endless story 28 June 1976 the a
Page 55 and 56: Summary of the Medical History of S

Criminal Story of a Prevention - Ukrainian Anti Cancer Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?