02.12.2016 Views

Surrey Homes | SH26 | December 2016 | Interiors supplement inside

The lifestyle magazine for Surrey - Interiors Supplement, Fabulous Fashion, Delicious Dishes

The lifestyle magazine for Surrey - Interiors Supplement, Fabulous Fashion, Delicious Dishes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Education<br />

Sugar shock<br />

Susan Elkin gnashes her teeth at teachers who use sweets as classroom rewards<br />

Sugar is not good for you, your child or anyone else. Most<br />

doctors and nutritionists are now agreed – although the<br />

evidence presented by John Yudkin and others in the<br />

1970s was suppressed for fear of upsetting the sugar industry –<br />

that it is a major contributor to obesity, heart disease, diabetes,<br />

some forms of cancer and a terrifying range of other illnesses.<br />

Not forgetting calamitous tooth decay.<br />

So how are we to break the deadlock and ease people away<br />

from their lifelong addiction? Not easily, but there’s a great<br />

deal that schools could do to establish different habits for the<br />

future. Some, however, seem to go out of their way to promote<br />

sugar rather than doing everything possible to discourage it.<br />

It is quite wrong – immoral in fact – for teachers to<br />

reward children with chocolate bars, lollipops and the like.<br />

The child who gets full marks for this week’s spellings or<br />

mental arithmetic test should never be given a celebratory<br />

KitKat or Mars bar but it still happens frequently.<br />

Responsible teachers give stars, stickers or little non<br />

edible prizes. Every school should have a no sugar prizes<br />

rule made firmly clear to staff, parents and pupils by<br />

heads and governing bodies. No sensible person wants<br />

children to associate sugar with congratulation.<br />

If teachers personally dish out sugary junk to children<br />

it conveys the subliminal message that whatever lip<br />

service is paid in lessons to healthy eating, at the end<br />

of the day it’s fine to eat trash. It condones unhealthy<br />

habits and children are very susceptible to such ideas.<br />

School dinners have a long way to go too. Jamie Oliver<br />

has tried. So has Leon co-founder Henry Dimbleby, who<br />

was commissioned in 2012 by the Coalition government to<br />

spearhead improvements. Yes, there are fewer chips around<br />

now in school dining rooms than when I taught in a girl’s<br />

school in Kent and the (obese) Head defended the right of<br />

her students to have fried food and puddings every day. My<br />

lone voice attempts to change her views failed dismally.<br />

But if you offer fruit and salad it has to be made<br />

attractive so that the children actually want to eat<br />

it. Manky apples are not the answer. Neither are<br />

limp lettuce leaves and weary bits of cucumber.<br />

Schools are in a unique position to chip away<br />

(pun half-intended) at the sugar culture and give<br />

their pupils a better chance of a healthier future.<br />

It is scandalous that so many still don’t take this<br />

responsibility as seriously as they could and should.<br />

Cranmore School<br />

Independent Preparatory School<br />

for girls and boys 2 ½ - 13<br />

Paint, Play, Party!<br />

Taster activities for Reception<br />

entry September 2017<br />

Friday 27th January 2017<br />

1.30pm - 3.00pm<br />

Contact Admissions Dept. to register a place<br />

01483 280340 www.cranmoreprep.co.uk<br />

admissions@cranmoreprep.co.uk West Horsley, <strong>Surrey</strong> KT24 6AT<br />

wealdentimes.co.uk<br />

124<br />

CranmorePrepS25.indd 1 27/10/<strong>2016</strong> 09:50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!