10.12.2016 Views

RADICAL TEFL

2hqhXJd

2hqhXJd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

work; by the British philosopher Stephen Toulmin (1990); and the origins in the USA<br />

are explored by Paul Croce (1995).<br />

We find in these protests against claims to objectivity and to certainty (which James<br />

and Dewey encapsulated in their 'pragmatic' description of enquiry) some essential<br />

elements of some post-modern ideas about 'subjective' enquiry such as: (1) helpful<br />

enquiry is local and context-bound; (2) enquiry as working from a standpoint,<br />

eschewing the stance of a dispassionate and 'objective' spectator; and so (3) exploring<br />

the potentialities of 'subjective enquiry'; (4) an approach to enquiry aimed at helping<br />

individuals find knowledge-for-themselves through their own solutions to their own<br />

problems. A focus on such subjective approaches to enquiry, starting from a particular<br />

standpoint, is influential in much social and educational research now.<br />

However, Dewey would have argued that exclusively subjective enquiry risks being<br />

insecure, because subjective strategies can easily lack both a rationalist/reflective, and<br />

a self-correcting (validating) component. Dewey's theory, arguing for the unity of<br />

enquiry, implies that it is unnecessary to choose between a 'scientific / experimental'<br />

and a 'subjective' approach to enquiry. Rather, his theory seems to open the way for<br />

the dual approaches of, on the one hand, 'scientific'/ experimental (which are selfcorrecting)<br />

and on the other hand, 'subjective' strategies (which respect the local) to be<br />

combined, and so to reinforce each other. This could result in a reliable and selfcorrecting<br />

understanding of problem-solving teacher enquiry, well-suited for local<br />

situations, based on teacher and student experience, and where there is no ambition to<br />

make claims beyond finding solutions to the difficulties, problems and failures of<br />

one's students. The way to achieve this synthesis, Dewey argued (and to summarise<br />

his theory) is by welding 'experimental / reflective' enquiry to a local standpoint and<br />

to a local problematic situation.<br />

Summary and link to a follow-up study I presented Dewey's understanding that<br />

there is a unity to enquiry. I then explored implications of his theory for teacher<br />

research. Dewey regarded learning, also, as enquiry (1910), and this insight could be<br />

an entry point for an exploration of how his observations and arguments on enquiry<br />

might be extrapolated to an understanding of how second-language learning takes<br />

place. 45 A study in preparation will draw from Dewey's understanding of enquiry, as<br />

introduced here, in a study of learning and failing to learn EFL, and will draw also<br />

from literature in mathematics education on learning and student failure.<br />

%%%%%<br />

E-version : November 2016 / 23 RES 100<br />

(The e-version is the same as the print version, apart from some minor corrections and additions)<br />

<strong>RADICAL</strong> <strong>TEFL</strong> 4, MARCH 2017<br />

45 Learning as a process. In his Studies in Experimental Logic, (1916, EMEREO reprint, pp. 24, 43, 46 &<br />

50).), Dewey understands the learning as a process which includes (paraphrased in bold, and in italics<br />

for direct quotes): guessing; classification of new information; reflection against other data;<br />

“running over various ideas; developing new suggestions; comparing with one another”, carrying<br />

out “thought experiments”; experimentation and trial and error; hunting for insights and for<br />

unifying principles; looking for analogy with what is already known; comparison; and<br />

abandoning attachment to an idea.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!