PEACE
2gDMXRh
2gDMXRh
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The economic impact of violence includes the following<br />
components:<br />
• Direct costs are the cost of violence to the victim,<br />
the perpetrator and the government. These include<br />
direct expenditure such as the cost of policing.<br />
• Indirect costs accrue after the violent event and<br />
include indirect economic losses, physical and<br />
physiological trauma to the victim as well as the<br />
lost productivity.<br />
• The multiplier represents the flow-on effects of<br />
direct costs, such as additional economic benefits<br />
that would come from investment in business<br />
development or education instead of containing or<br />
dealing with violence. Box 3 in Annex A provides a<br />
detailed explanation of the peace multiplier used.<br />
The model outputs a conservative estimate of the global<br />
impact of violence as it only includes variables of violence<br />
for which reliable data could be obtained. The following<br />
indicators are therefore not counted in the economic<br />
impact of violence:<br />
• domestic violence<br />
• household out-of-pocket spending on safety and security<br />
• the cost of crime to business<br />
• spill-over effects from conflict and violence<br />
• self-directed violence<br />
• the cost of intelligence agencies.<br />
TEN COUNTRIES MOST AND LEAST<br />
ECONOMICALLY IMPACTED BY VIOLENCE<br />
& CONFLICT<br />
The economic impact of violence for the ten most affected<br />
countries is equivalent to more than 25 per cent of their<br />
GDP. All of these countries have either high levels of<br />
internal conflict or high levels of interpersonal violence.<br />
The conflict affected countries mainly suffer from high<br />
consequential costs such as deaths and injuries from<br />
conflict or terrorism, higher population displacement, and<br />
GDP losses. Countries with higher interpersonal violence<br />
are affected by higher costs of homicides, violent and<br />
sexual assault and higher levels of fear of victimisation.<br />
Figure 5 highlights the ten countries whose economic<br />
impact of violence relative to the size of their economy is<br />
the highest in the world. Of these ten, five are suffering<br />
from armed conflict. They are Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan,<br />
South Sudan and the Central African Republic. The other<br />
countries have very high levels of interpersonal violence,<br />
with the exception of North Korea which is a highly<br />
militarised country. Syria has the highest proportion of its<br />
GDP related to violence containment expenditure at 54<br />
per cent.<br />
FIGURE 5<br />
TEN COUNTRIES WITH HIGHEST ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VIOLENCE AS PERCENTAGE OF GDP<br />
While five of the ten most impacted countries are experiencing armed conflict, four of the ten<br />
are experiencing significant levels of interpersonal violence and organised crime.<br />
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VIOLENCE, % OF GDP<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Syria Iraq Afghanistan Venezuela South<br />
Sudan<br />
Honduras Colombia Central<br />
African<br />
Republic<br />
North Korea<br />
Lesotho<br />
Source: IEP<br />
THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF <strong>PEACE</strong> 2016 | Results & Trends 12