16.12.2016 Views

PEACE

2gDMXRh

2gDMXRh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The economic impact of violence includes the following<br />

components:<br />

• Direct costs are the cost of violence to the victim,<br />

the perpetrator and the government. These include<br />

direct expenditure such as the cost of policing.<br />

• Indirect costs accrue after the violent event and<br />

include indirect economic losses, physical and<br />

physiological trauma to the victim as well as the<br />

lost productivity.<br />

• The multiplier represents the flow-on effects of<br />

direct costs, such as additional economic benefits<br />

that would come from investment in business<br />

development or education instead of containing or<br />

dealing with violence. Box 3 in Annex A provides a<br />

detailed explanation of the peace multiplier used.<br />

The model outputs a conservative estimate of the global<br />

impact of violence as it only includes variables of violence<br />

for which reliable data could be obtained. The following<br />

indicators are therefore not counted in the economic<br />

impact of violence:<br />

• domestic violence<br />

• household out-of-pocket spending on safety and security<br />

• the cost of crime to business<br />

• spill-over effects from conflict and violence<br />

• self-directed violence<br />

• the cost of intelligence agencies.<br />

TEN COUNTRIES MOST AND LEAST<br />

ECONOMICALLY IMPACTED BY VIOLENCE<br />

& CONFLICT<br />

The economic impact of violence for the ten most affected<br />

countries is equivalent to more than 25 per cent of their<br />

GDP. All of these countries have either high levels of<br />

internal conflict or high levels of interpersonal violence.<br />

The conflict affected countries mainly suffer from high<br />

consequential costs such as deaths and injuries from<br />

conflict or terrorism, higher population displacement, and<br />

GDP losses. Countries with higher interpersonal violence<br />

are affected by higher costs of homicides, violent and<br />

sexual assault and higher levels of fear of victimisation.<br />

Figure 5 highlights the ten countries whose economic<br />

impact of violence relative to the size of their economy is<br />

the highest in the world. Of these ten, five are suffering<br />

from armed conflict. They are Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan,<br />

South Sudan and the Central African Republic. The other<br />

countries have very high levels of interpersonal violence,<br />

with the exception of North Korea which is a highly<br />

militarised country. Syria has the highest proportion of its<br />

GDP related to violence containment expenditure at 54<br />

per cent.<br />

FIGURE 5<br />

TEN COUNTRIES WITH HIGHEST ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VIOLENCE AS PERCENTAGE OF GDP<br />

While five of the ten most impacted countries are experiencing armed conflict, four of the ten<br />

are experiencing significant levels of interpersonal violence and organised crime.<br />

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VIOLENCE, % OF GDP<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Syria Iraq Afghanistan Venezuela South<br />

Sudan<br />

Honduras Colombia Central<br />

African<br />

Republic<br />

North Korea<br />

Lesotho<br />

Source: IEP<br />

THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF <strong>PEACE</strong> 2016 | Results & Trends 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!