16.01.2017 Views

Reversing the decline of small housebuilders

HBF_SME_Report_2017_Web

HBF_SME_Report_2017_Web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

39<br />

The reality <strong>of</strong> back garden development prior to <strong>the</strong>se<br />

changes in policy and land use classification was ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

different. DCLG statistics show that in 2010, garden<br />

development accounted for 1 in 15 new homes 13 and built<br />

at an average density around half that <strong>of</strong> developments on<br />

comparable sites.<br />

14<br />

Building homes on residential garden land had long<br />

been <strong>the</strong> lifeblood for some <strong>small</strong> developers. Usually<br />

requiring good local knowledge and an appetite for<br />

<strong>small</strong>er schemes, this was a niche through which SMEs<br />

could thrive unencumbered by competition from larger<br />

companies. It would <strong>of</strong>ten involve demolition <strong>of</strong> a single<br />

dilapidated dwelling, or a group <strong>of</strong> run-down properties<br />

and <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> several more using land much<br />

more efficiently.<br />

The planning framework we have today should provide<br />

<strong>the</strong> appropriate level <strong>of</strong> protection from inappropriate<br />

development without an explicit reference to preventing<br />

housing coming forward on residential garden land be<br />

it classified as brownfield or greenfield. Decisions as to<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r a scheme is sustainable should be made at a<br />

local level. In many cases a <strong>small</strong> development which<br />

incorporates some degree <strong>of</strong> garden development will<br />

be a sustainable option in helping to meet local housing<br />

demand. Sustainable development is a fundamental<br />

guiding principle <strong>of</strong> our planning system and should be<br />

able to apply to any site on which much-needed housing<br />

could be built, including what would broadly be classified<br />

as ‘gardens’.<br />

‘Back gardens was ano<strong>the</strong>r big negative: Reclassifying<br />

gardens as greenfield. I think around 80% <strong>of</strong> what we used<br />

to build was back garden-related. Sometimes it involved<br />

knocking <strong>the</strong> original house down, sometimes you would try<br />

not to, sometimes it meant relocating a garage or something<br />

so you could get <strong>the</strong> drive in. It was a sledgehammer to crack<br />

a nut on a problem much more south-east oriented and I<br />

think it has really hit delivery <strong>of</strong> new houses.’<br />

(Housebuilder interviewee, May 2016)<br />

13<br />

6.8% <strong>of</strong> new homes in 2010, DCLG Live Tables P221<br />

14 <br />

Garden development at an average <strong>of</strong> 22 dwellings per hectare<br />

compared with ‘Urban land not previously developed’ (46 per<br />

hectare) and ‘O<strong>the</strong>r non-previously developed’ (45 per hectare),<br />

DCLG Live Table P223 (discontinued).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!