09.12.2012 Views

The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an ... - La Caverna

The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an ... - La Caverna

The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an ... - La Caverna

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Next, the person c<strong>an</strong> ch<strong>an</strong>ge their predisposed primitive personality<br />

initially 5 different ways, <strong>an</strong>d this then gives (30)³ or 27,000 different<br />

types. <strong>The</strong> second ch<strong>an</strong>ge c<strong>an</strong> be done on 4 types of modification which<br />

makes for 1,728,000 types. <strong>The</strong>n the programmers c<strong>an</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>r in activity<br />

level, their "Normal" level (intelligence base), age, sex, <strong>an</strong>d education,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d life experiences. In other words, what appears <strong>to</strong> be simple has a<br />

high degree of calibration <strong>to</strong> it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> person who was best with the PAS was its brainchild Gottinger<br />

himself. His intuition along with his PAS system, gave him <strong>an</strong> unc<strong>an</strong>ny<br />

idea of how a person's s mind works now, <strong>an</strong>d how it would work in the<br />

future. He sadistically reveled in putting his skill <strong>to</strong> use programming<br />

children.<br />

<strong>The</strong> actual assessment codes that have appeared on programming<br />

assessment charts which the Monarch child assessment teams have used<br />

<strong>to</strong> evaluate, describe, & assess a child <strong>to</strong> be programmed follow the<br />

st<strong>an</strong>dard symbols created for PAS. Some about Gittinger’s work has<br />

escaped the secrecy of the intelligence agencies. Concerning the<br />

Gittinger Personality Assessment System see "An Introduction <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Personality Assessment System" by John Winne <strong>an</strong>d John Gittinger,<br />

Journal of Community Psychology Monograph Supplement No. 38.<br />

Rutl<strong>an</strong>d, Vermont: Clinical Psychology Publishing Co., Inc. 1973. See also<br />

the Rolling S<strong>to</strong>ne magazine article, July 18, 1974, "<strong>The</strong> CIA Won’t Go<br />

public". Because so little is known about the PAS test, it needs <strong>to</strong> be<br />

explained some.<br />

Observations in relation <strong>to</strong> the Wechsler Intelligence Test provided the<br />

initial ideas behind the PAS. <strong>The</strong> digit-sp<strong>an</strong> subtest of the Wechsler<br />

Intelligence Test, which rates the ability <strong>to</strong> remember numbers forms<br />

the basic test used for the E-I dimension. What Gittinger discovered was<br />

that short order cooks had good number-memory which = Internalizer<br />

personality or "I". A high digit sp<strong>an</strong> in <strong>an</strong>y person tells much about them.<br />

People who don’t separate themselves well from their environment are<br />

Externalizers = E. <strong>The</strong> "I" personality was a good baby. <strong>The</strong> "E" type who<br />

prefers doing <strong>to</strong> thinking is a "<strong>to</strong>o-curious" baby, who will make dem<strong>an</strong>ds.<br />

I’s would often be pressured <strong>to</strong> become more outgoing, <strong>an</strong>d E’s are often<br />

pressured by parents <strong>to</strong> be more self-sufficient, <strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong> progress from<br />

crawling (which they like) <strong>to</strong> learn <strong>to</strong> walk.<br />

Pure Internalizers become more withdrawn after several drinks, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

uncompensated E's are more likely <strong>to</strong> become sloppy drunks, garrulous.<br />

Based on the E-I dimension, predictions c<strong>an</strong> also be made for how LSD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!