Protected Species and Marine Aquaculture Interactions

Recommendations

Info

Table 4 Effects of Shellfish Aquaculture on Protected Species Habitat use (adapted from Clement 2013) Effects Scale Management Options May exclude or modify how marine SPATIAL Site selection to minimize or avoid mammals use critical or sensitive Local to regional scale the likelihood of spatial overlap with habitats. The nature of the exclusion Avoidance may be only from species’ home ranges, critical depends on the type of culture method the farm area itself but most breeding and foraging habitats and the particular marine mammal likely will involve a bay or and/or migration routes. species in the cultivation area. region,depending on species and population dynamics. Whales and particular dolphin species TEMPORAL Continuous monitoring of presence tend to be more sensitive to such Short to long term (and absence) of marine mammal disturbances, while pinnipeds and Exclusion may be temporary species in the vicinity or general region other dolphin species (such as common for migrating species or until of the farm site is recommended. and bottlenose dolphins) may actually resident species habituate Monitoring could also include be attracted to the novel structures to the structure and/or detailed observations of time spent and/or habitat. activities or avoidance may under or around the farm structure, be for the farms’ duration to which may later be compiled and permanent. analyzed by experts.
fully or partially excluded from areas nearshore where mussel farms are located. Markowitz et al. (2004) found that during five years of observations, dusky dolphin Lagenorhynchus obscurus groups entered mussel farms located
Page 1 and 2: Protected Species and Marine Aquacu
Page 3 and 4: CAROL SEALS PRICE* NOAA Affiliate |
Page 5 and 6: Humpback whale
Page 7 and 8: tory agencies may look to informati
Page 9 and 10: Introduction SPRING BAY SEAFOODS Th
Page 11 and 12: FEDERAL Human Health APPROVED Biodi
Page 13 and 14: Table 1 ESA species under NMFS’ j
Page 15 and 16: Table 3 Sources of information (n=1
Page 17 and 18: (A) (B) Figure 2. Representative sc
Page 19 and 20: The site specific features of the f
Page 21: GABRIEl BARATHIEu activity (Keeley
Page 25 and 26: Table 6 underwater noise caused by
Page 27 and 28: Table 8 Global cases of protected s
Page 29 and 30: overlap with any protected species
Page 31 and 32: 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 Applicatio
Page 33 and 34: eported by the farmers as more effe
Page 35 and 36: Research results support the views
Page 37 and 38: Bottlenose dolphin An ecosystem mod
Page 39 and 40: kAllERNA assessing overlap with act
Page 41 and 42: any loose lines or floating equipme
Page 43 and 44: individual level, but requires perm
Page 45 and 46: Table 10 Overview of potential effe
Page 47 and 48: turtles and seabirds from marine aq
Page 49 and 50: uoys associated with fishing gear a
Page 51 and 52: dian waters was 3.85 right whales,
Page 53 and 54: equaling 19- 29 deaths per year (Ro
Page 55 and 56: In the U. S. northeast region, sea
Page 57 and 58: northeast and southwest were not av
Page 59 and 60: Table 11 Fishery gear impacts to pr
Page 61 and 62: Table 12 Fishery gear modifications
Page 63 and 64: into aquaculture gear development f
Page 65 and 66: use of visual deterrents and prelim
Page 67 and 68: Knowledge Gaps There is still much
Page 70 and 71: References Alston DE, Cabarcas A, C
Page 72 and 73:
.ufsc.br/index.php/biotemas/article
Page 74 and 75:
enclosures for growing algae (OMEGA
Page 76 and 77:
Marine Mammal Commission, February
Page 78 and 79:
Otts SS, Bowling T (2012) Offshore
Page 80 and 81:
Scholl MC, Pade N (2005) Salmon far
Page 82:
PENNY PRITZKER Secretary of Commerc
show all

Protected Species and Marine Aquaculture Interactions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?