James E. Tucker, Superintendent, james.tucker@msd.edu Bilingualism and Monolingualism Hearing parents of newly born deaf or hard of hearing infants are often overwhelmed with in<strong>for</strong>mation relating to deafness and deaf education as well as dealing with <strong>the</strong> initial shock and grieving that <strong>the</strong>ir child has a hearing loss. Frequently <strong>the</strong>ir deaf child is <strong>the</strong> first deaf person <strong>the</strong>y have met in <strong>the</strong>ir lives so <strong>the</strong>y need to quickly master a steep learning curve when <strong>the</strong>y read and digest in<strong>for</strong>mation on how deaf and hard of hearing children grow and learn. Sometimes parents meet professionals such as audiologists or speech and language pathologists and receive in<strong>for</strong>mation that does not address language acquisition and development in both American Sign Language (ASL) and English. Too often, parents are given a list of “communication options” such as Cued Speech, Signed English, Pure Oral Method, Total Communication and <strong>the</strong> like. Regularly this list does not include <strong>the</strong> acquisition of ASL. If <strong>the</strong> list includes ASL it often lacks in<strong>for</strong>mation that English is taught along with ASL. Such a list promotes <strong>the</strong> “monolingual education approach”. That is, <strong>the</strong> acquisition and development in only one language is encouraged. Many schools and programs including <strong>the</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Deaf</strong> promote <strong>the</strong> bilingual education approach. The acquisition and development of both American Sign Language and English is emphasized inside and outside of classrooms. American Sign Language is used every day by over 500,000 deaf and hard of hearing Americans and is among <strong>the</strong> most frequently used languages in this country. Psycholinguists and neurolinguists have in <strong>the</strong> past 50 years documented American Sign Language as a bona fide language possessing all <strong>the</strong> requisite 10 THE MARYLAND BULLETIN FALL 2010 linguistic properties as well as <strong>the</strong> natural language of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Deaf</strong> community. In short, deaf people use ASL because <strong>the</strong>y are primarily “seeing” people and ASL is a language of <strong>the</strong> hands, face, and body. Parents are often confused or led astray when <strong>the</strong>y are presented a list of “communication options”. A better way to frame this would be to explain <strong>the</strong> monolingual and <strong>the</strong> bilingual education approaches along with <strong>the</strong> different communication systems available. Too often parents are <strong>for</strong>ced to choose one language over ano<strong>the</strong>r when in fact <strong>the</strong>y can choose a combination of languages. For example, parents can choose <strong>the</strong> development of both ASL and English. Since English may be achieved through any of <strong>the</strong>se communication options, professionals need to start emphasizing “and” ra<strong>the</strong>r than “or”. Parents also need to eventually determine educational placement <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir child. Too often language development is not <strong>the</strong> driving <strong>for</strong>ce behind placement decisions. Many times a cochlear implant or a hearing aid drives placement. O<strong>the</strong>r times <strong>the</strong> misapplication of <strong>the</strong> “least restrictive environment” provision in <strong>the</strong> Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) drives placements in <strong>the</strong> local neighborhood schools. When this happens educational interpreters are <strong>the</strong>n utilized and this sometimes compromises natural language development. At <strong>the</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Deaf</strong>, parents are encouraged to seek educational placements that emphasize language acquisition in both ASL and English. Each child has a right to learn <strong>the</strong> language of <strong>the</strong> country, English; and to learn <strong>the</strong> natural language of American <strong>Deaf</strong> and Hard of Hearing people, American Sign Language. Today thousands of hearing babies are encouraged to sign. The media everywhere extol <strong>the</strong> benefits of learning ASL <strong>for</strong> hearing babies. They are able to express <strong>the</strong>mselves in sign language a few months be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong>y are able to speak, giving <strong>the</strong>m a jump start on language and communication development. While <strong>the</strong> <strong>Deaf</strong> community is thrilled and sometimes giddy that <strong>the</strong>ir language is being taught everywhere, <strong>the</strong>y also grieve that many deaf babies are still <strong>for</strong>bidden to sign… Perhaps it is time to reframe <strong>the</strong> bilingual vs. monolingual education approach debate. There is no research evidence that bilingual education inhibits English language acquisition or <strong>the</strong> development of speech. Many professionals, especially audiologists and speech pathologists, are still ignorant about ASL and its biological roots in deaf people. Bilingualism needs to be seen as an “addition”, and not as a “subtraction” to <strong>the</strong> overall learning experience <strong>for</strong> a deaf child. It is time to rewrite <strong>the</strong> brochures that are given to parents of newly identified deaf and hard of hearing children. Brochures should first detail <strong>the</strong> “bilingual (ASL and English) approach” and <strong>the</strong> “monolingual (English only) approach” and <strong>the</strong>n move on to “communication options”. Parents should always be encouraged to thoroughly explore all options since every child should be given <strong>the</strong> opportunity to explore, grow, learn, and most of all thrive in different environments. Buddha once said, “There are only two mistakes one can make along <strong>the</strong> road to truth; not going all <strong>the</strong> way, and not starting.” It is <strong>MSD</strong>’s sincere hope that professionals who advocate only <strong>the</strong> “monolingual (English only) approach” will consider going to <strong>the</strong> next level in <strong>the</strong>ir profession learning <strong>the</strong> linguistics of American Sign Language and <strong>the</strong> enormous benefits <strong>the</strong> “bilingual (ASL and English) approach” has <strong>for</strong> deaf and hard of hearing children everywhere. MB
WWW.<strong>MSD</strong>.EDU11