08.03.2017 Views

ActionPlan

ActionPlan

ActionPlan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pathways Home: Seattle’s Person-Centered Plan to Support People Experiencing Homelessness<br />

on sound business arguments and incentives for participation. More information on the Housing<br />

Resource Center can be found in the Barbara Poppe Report.<br />

Ensuring Good Government and Performance<br />

The City of Seattle and the Human Services Department also have had a significant role to play in the<br />

current state of our homeless response system. The lack of clarity, strategy and formal investment<br />

process is a contributing factor to the disjointed patchwork collection of programs. Routine competitive<br />

funding processes have not happened in over a decade, resulting in legacy funding with little change to<br />

accommodate new directions or models. That type of environment does not encourages innovation.<br />

In order to develop a person‐centered homeless response system, the City must make investments<br />

strategically, based on data and grounded in best practices. HSD commits to conducting routine<br />

competitive funding processes and engaging in performance based contracting.<br />

Implementation of Minimum and Target Performance Standards<br />

In 2013, the Seattle/King County Continuum of Care (CoC) established CoC System Wide Performance<br />

Metrics for: 1) Exits to Permanent Housing, 2) Length of Stay, and 3) Returns to Homelessness that each<br />

program aspires to accomplish. The current CoC targets were developed based on a review of existing<br />

project type data considering sub‐population distinctions. The City of Seattle, King County, and United<br />

Way funding contracts all include the current CoC targets language detailing the quarterly monitoring of<br />

targets and the consequences of projects failing to meet projected targets. While the City of Seattle has<br />

included these targets in contracts, monitoring and contract negotiations do not routinely use targets.<br />

Focus Strategies has recommended that our continuum move away from an approach based on<br />

incremental improvements to our current system to one based on setting standards according to<br />

national best practices. They also recommend that the Seattle/King County CoC adopt minimum<br />

performance standards that determine eligibility for future funding, and adopt two additional<br />

performance measures, utilization rate and entries from homelessness.<br />

The City of Seattle, along with King County and the United Way have agreed to the adoption of the<br />

following performance standards for inclusion in all future funding processes and resulting contracts:<br />

Utilization Rate:<br />

Measures the average daily bed or unit (for families) occupancy of the program. This is<br />

calculated by using HMIS data compared to maximum program capacity. Rapid re‐housing does<br />

not have utilization rate standards because the rapid re‐housing model does not have a fixed<br />

bed capacity to generate occupancy comparisons.<br />

Page | 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!