10.03.2017 Views

Journal of Research Analytica

A-Simple-Reversed-Phase-HPLC-Method-for-Quantitative-Estimation-of-Calcium-Orotate-and-Its-Degradation-Products-in-Solid-Dosage-Form

A-Simple-Reversed-Phase-HPLC-Method-for-Quantitative-Estimation-of-Calcium-Orotate-and-Its-Degradation-Products-in-Solid-Dosage-Form

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ology Science<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Article<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Analytica</strong><br />

A Simple Reversed Phase HPLC Method for<br />

Quantitative Estimation <strong>of</strong> Calcium Orotate and<br />

Its Degradation Products in Solid Dosage Form<br />

Abstract<br />

A rapid, simple, sensitive and stability indicating reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic<br />

method was developed for estimation <strong>of</strong> calcium orotate in pharmaceutical preparations and in dissolution<br />

medium. The new RP-HPLC method was validated according to ICH, FDA and USP guidelines with respect<br />

to accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, solution stability, robustness, sensitivity and system suitability. The<br />

method was developed by using an isocratic condition <strong>of</strong> mobile phase comprising ammonium acetate buffer<br />

15 mM (pH 5.5) and acetonitrile in a ratio <strong>of</strong> 60:40 v/v at a flow rate <strong>of</strong> 0.8 mL/min over C-18 (ODS, 250 × 4.6<br />

mm) column at ambient temperature. Recovery was found between 98.0%~102.0%. Intraday and inter-day<br />

precision studies <strong>of</strong> the new method were found less than the maximum allowable limit (% RSD ≤ 2.0 according<br />

to FDA). The method showed linear response over the entire working range with a correlation coefficient (r)<br />

value <strong>of</strong> 0.999. LOD and LOQ were found 0.002 µg/mL and 0.008 µg/mL respectively. Forced degradation<br />

study was performed to establish the specificity and stability indicating property <strong>of</strong> current method. Practical<br />

applicability was checked by analyzing market sample. So this method can be efficiently applied for quantitative<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> calcium orotate salt in pharmaceutical formulation.<br />

Keywords: Calcium orotate; RP-HPLC; Stability-indicating; Forced degradation<br />

Md. Sarowar Jahan 1 , Md. Hadiul Islam 2 , Maksudur Rahman Khan 1 , Abul Hossain 1 , Ruhul Kayesh 2 and<br />

Asma Rahman 3 *<br />

1<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Dhaka, Bangladesh<br />

2<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University <strong>of</strong> Dhaka, Bangladesh<br />

3<br />

Centre for Advanced <strong>Research</strong> in Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Dhaka, Bangladesh<br />

*<br />

Corresponding author: Asma Rahman<br />

Received : October 03, 2016; Accepted: November 07, 2016; Published: November 11, 2016<br />

E-mail: pharma@du.ac.bd (A.R)<br />

Copyright: ©2016 OLOGY Group.<br />

J Res Anal. (2016) Volume 2 • Issue 4 ISSN : 2473-2230<br />

1


Citation: Jahan SM, Islam HM, Khan MR, Hossain A, Kayesh R, Asma Rahman. A simple reversed phase HPLC method for quantitative estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

calcium orotate and its degradation products in solid dosage form. J Res Anal. 2016; 2(4): 108-112.<br />

Introduction<br />

Calcium orotate is the calcium salt <strong>of</strong> orotic acid (Figure 1).<br />

Chemically, orotic acid is 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-2,6-dioxo-4-<br />

pyrimidinecarboxylic acid. It is white to almost white crystalline<br />

powder with poor water solubility [1].This salt is mainly given as<br />

calcium supplement in people who do not get enough calcium<br />

from daily food intake [2,3]. It is also used as medication to<br />

treat conditions caused by low calcium levels such as bone loss<br />

(osteoporosis), weak bones (osteomalacia/rickets), decreased<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> the parathyroid gland (hypoparathyroidism), and a<br />

certain muscle disease (latent tetany) [3,4]. It may also be used in<br />

certain patients to make sure they are getting enough calcium, e.g.,<br />

women who are pregnant, nursing, or postmenopausal, people<br />

taking certain medications such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, or<br />

prednisone [3].<br />

As a source <strong>of</strong> calcium supplement calcium supplement it is<br />

far superior to all other conventional calcium salts now being used<br />

[5]. For example, calcium orotate is absolutely free <strong>of</strong> any side<br />

effects. Conventional calcium salts have certain problems when<br />

applied in osteoporosis with concomitant arteriosclerosis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

abdominal aorta. Calcium orotate, on the other hand, protects<br />

the body from arteriosclerosis. Calcium orotate can penetrate the<br />

complex cell membranes and therefore, it can compensate for a<br />

disturbed calcium transport through these cell membranes. In<br />

addition, calcium orotate has a special affinity for bradytrophic<br />

tissue (e.g. Cartilage) where it is metabolized [6]. Parallel studies<br />

have shown that a defective calcium transport through the<br />

cell membrane is <strong>of</strong> great pathogenetical significance. So, this<br />

substance is a very satisfactory agent in the re-calcification <strong>of</strong><br />

metastatic defects in the skeletal system and in other calcium<br />

deficiency syndrome [4].<br />

Calcium orotate can be assayed by complexometric titration,<br />

polarographic method, UV or chromatographic method [1]. An<br />

UV method has been stated for estimation <strong>of</strong> calcium orotate<br />

in bulk and in tablets [7]. To the best <strong>of</strong> our knowledge,<br />

there is no HPLC analytical method for its estimation in bulk<br />

or in pharmaceutical formulations. Here, we developed a<br />

rapid, sensitive and stability indicating RP-HPLC method for<br />

quantification <strong>of</strong> calcium orotate and this was validated following<br />

the <strong>of</strong> FDA, USP and ICH guidelines.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Working standard <strong>of</strong> calcium orotate (98.5% potency) was<br />

a kind gift <strong>of</strong> ACI Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bangladesh. HPLC<br />

grade acetonitrile and methanol were obtained from Active Fine<br />

Chemicals Ltd., Bangladesh. For the estimation <strong>of</strong> calcium orotate<br />

formulated as tablets, samples produced by three renowned<br />

pharmaceutical industries in Bangladesh were collected from the<br />

market. These samples were coded as S1, S2 and S3.<br />

O<br />

HN<br />

O<br />

N<br />

H<br />

O<br />

O<br />

Ca<br />

N<br />

H<br />

NH<br />

Figure 1: Chemical structure <strong>of</strong> calcium Orotate.<br />

O<br />

O<br />

O<br />

O<br />

HPLC system<br />

High Performance Liquid Chromatographic system<br />

(Shimadzu-UFLC Prominence, Japan), equipped with an auto<br />

sampler (Model- SIL 20AC HT) and UV-Visible detector<br />

(Model-SPD 20A) was used for the analysis. The data was<br />

recorded using LCsolutions s<strong>of</strong>tware. <strong>Analytica</strong>l reversed phase<br />

C-18 column [ProntoSIL C18, 4.6 x 250 mm, India.] was used<br />

to analyze the standards and samples.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> mobile phase: 1.15 g <strong>of</strong> ammonium acetate<br />

was dissolved in 900 mL <strong>of</strong> HPLC grade water. The pH was<br />

adjusted to 5.5 ± 0.1 with dilute acetic acid or ammonia solution<br />

and then volume was made up to 1000 mL with water <strong>of</strong> same<br />

quality. Then this buffer and HPLC grade acetonitrile were mixed<br />

together at a ratio <strong>of</strong> 60:40 v/v. Finally it was filtered through a<br />

0.22 µm millipore filter and sonicated.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> standard solutions: 25 mg <strong>of</strong> calcium<br />

orotate was taken in 100 mL distilled water and sonicated for<br />

10 minutes to dissolve completely. Thus stock solution <strong>of</strong> 250<br />

µg/mL was found. 5 mL <strong>of</strong> this solution was taken into another<br />

50 mL volumetric flask and diluted with distilled water to get<br />

nominal concentration <strong>of</strong> 25 µg/mL. The stock solution was<br />

further diluted with distilled water.<br />

Sample preparation: Twenty tablets <strong>of</strong> each sample were<br />

grinded to make powder and then powdered tablet equivalent<br />

to 50 mg <strong>of</strong> calcium orotate was dissolved in 100 mL distilled<br />

water by proper sonication. Then 5 mL <strong>of</strong> this solution was taken<br />

in another 100 mL volumetric flask and volume was adjusted by<br />

distilled water.<br />

Chromatographic condition: An isocratic mobile phase was<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> acetate buffer and acetonitrile at a ratio <strong>of</strong> 60:40.<br />

Flow rate <strong>of</strong> mobile phase was 0.8 mL/min through C18 column<br />

for 5 minutes. The injection volume was 20 µL. Before analysis,<br />

all standard and sample solutions were filtered through 0.2 µm<br />

filter tips. The column eluent was monitored with UV detection<br />

at 275 nm.<br />

Parameters <strong>of</strong> method validation<br />

Specificity: The specificity <strong>of</strong> the LC method was evaluated<br />

to ensure that there was no interference from the degradation<br />

products, excipients or other impurities in the pharmaceutical<br />

formulation [8-10].<br />

Solution stability: The solution stability <strong>of</strong> standards and<br />

samples was established under normal bench top conditions,<br />

normal storage conditions, and sometimes in the instrument<br />

to determine where special storage conditions are necessary<br />

or not, for instance, refrigeration or protection from light.<br />

For this method, stability <strong>of</strong> standard solution was studied by<br />

keeping a single concentration by diluting standard solution in<br />

tightly capped volumetric flask at room temperature (25°C) on<br />

laboratory bench and at 5°C in refrigerator for 72 hours. The<br />

solutions were analyzed by HPLC at 0 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr.<br />

Forced degradation: In this stage, forced degradation studies<br />

were undertaken to degrade the sample (e.g., drug product<br />

or API) deliberately. These studies were used to evaluate an<br />

analytical method’s ability to measure an active ingredient and<br />

its degradation products without interference. Samples <strong>of</strong> drug<br />

2 ISSN : 2473-2230<br />

J Res Anal. (2016) Volume 2 • Issue 4<br />

Ology Science


Citation: Jahan SM, Islam HM, Khan MR, Hossain A, Kayesh R, Asma Rahman. A simple reversed phase HPLC method for quantitative estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

calcium orotate and its degradation products in solid dosage form. J Res Anal. 2016; 2(4): 108-112.<br />

product (spiked placebo) and drug substance were exposed to<br />

acid (0.1N~1.0N HCl), base (0.1N~1N NaOH), oxidizing<br />

agent (10% ~30% H 2<br />

O 2<br />

solution )<br />

, reducing agent (10% ~30%<br />

Na bisulphate solution) and water for 24 hours to produce at<br />

least 10% degradation. The degraded samples were then analyzed<br />

using the method to determine if there are interferences with the<br />

active or related compound(s).<br />

Linearity and range: Five different concentration levels <strong>of</strong><br />

calcium orotate (20 µg/mL, 22 5µg/mL, 25 µg/mL, 27.5 µg/mL,<br />

and 30 µg/mL) were prepared from stock solution. The average<br />

peak areas were plotted against concentrations. The linearity <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposed method was evaluated by using calibration curve.<br />

Accuracy: The accuracy <strong>of</strong> an analytical method expresses<br />

the nearness between the expected value and the value found.<br />

In present study, successive analysis (n=3) for three different<br />

concentrations (20 µg/mL, 25 µg/mL, 30 µg/mL) <strong>of</strong> standard<br />

solution <strong>of</strong> active drug were carried out to determined the<br />

accuracy <strong>of</strong> proposed method.<br />

Precision: The precision <strong>of</strong> the proposed method was<br />

checked by intra- and inter-day repeatability <strong>of</strong> responses after<br />

replicate injections and expressed as %RSD amongst responses<br />

using the following formula<br />

% RSD = (Standard deviation/Mean) x 100%<br />

Robustness: Robustness measures the capacity <strong>of</strong> an<br />

analytical method to remain unaffected by small but deliberate<br />

variations in the parameters <strong>of</strong> the method. Robustness provides<br />

some indication <strong>of</strong> reliability <strong>of</strong> the analytical method during<br />

normal usage.<br />

System suitability: System suitability is commonly used<br />

ensure a method’s adequacy for a particular analysis. The following<br />

parameters are verified in system suitability tests: number <strong>of</strong><br />

theoretical plate, tailing factor, resolution and repeatability at<br />

100% test concentration.<br />

Limit <strong>of</strong> detection (LOD) and limit <strong>of</strong> quantification<br />

(LOQ)<br />

LOD is the lowest amount <strong>of</strong> analyte in a sample that can<br />

be detected but not necessarily quantified under the stated<br />

experimental conditions. On the other hand LOQ is the lowest<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> analyte in a sample that may be determined with<br />

acceptable accuracy and precision.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

HPLC method development<br />

Calcium orotate is slightly soluble in water and practically<br />

insoluble in methanol and ethanol [1]. It is also slightly soluble<br />

in acetonitrile. The pKa value <strong>of</strong> orotic acid is 2.83 [11,12] which<br />

suggests a pH <strong>of</strong> buffer solution should be 4.83 or above. So<br />

we tried different ratio <strong>of</strong> ammonium acetate buffered solution<br />

and acetonitrile to find optimum condition. Finally, 10 mM<br />

buffer (pH 5.5) solution and acetonitrile in a ratio <strong>of</strong> 60:40<br />

v/v produced well shaped and sharp chromatographic peak <strong>of</strong><br />

calcium orotate at 2.9 minute. The method was summarized in<br />

Table 1. Typical chromatogram <strong>of</strong> standard clcium orotate was<br />

shown in Figure 2.<br />

Validation result<br />

Specificity: The specificity <strong>of</strong> the LC method was evaluated<br />

to ensure that there was no interference from the degradation<br />

products, excipients, or other impurities in the region <strong>of</strong> actives.<br />

The specificity was studied by injecting the unstressed and<br />

stressed standard solutions, samples, and blanks.<br />

Solution stability: Two vials <strong>of</strong> standard solution were<br />

kept for solution stability study. One vial was kept in ambient<br />

condition and another in refrigerator. AUC (area under curve)<br />

changes were recorded by this developed method using the same<br />

machine and column. Day to day area changes were observed<br />

with respect to initial area (0 th hour). Low % RSD indicates<br />

no major variation among the AUC recorded on different day,<br />

which inturn is an indicator <strong>of</strong> solution stability <strong>of</strong> calcium<br />

orotate. Results were shown in Table 2.<br />

Forced degradation: Stressed samples were analyzed<br />

against freshly prepared standard. Degradation was measured in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> AUC change between the stressed sample and freshly<br />

prepared standard. The drug found fairly stable in acidic, basic<br />

and aqueous environment, but it was degraded significantly by<br />

oxidation and reduction. This study substantiates the use <strong>of</strong><br />

water as diluting solution. These data can be proved useful in<br />

formulation development <strong>of</strong> this drug. Results were summarized<br />

in Table 3.The chromatograms <strong>of</strong> degradation products were<br />

shown in Figure 3.<br />

Linearity, range and accuracy: Linearity <strong>of</strong> calcium orotate<br />

was examined over 50% ~ 200% <strong>of</strong> nominal concentration<br />

(i.e. 12.5 µg/mL to 50 µg/mL). Linearity curve was created by<br />

plotting AUC <strong>of</strong> chromatograms against the corresponding<br />

concentration. The method showed good linear response <strong>of</strong><br />

concentration with correlation coefficient (r) value <strong>of</strong> 0.999.<br />

Linear equation was found as below:<br />

y=67622x + 27665; y=AUC <strong>of</strong> chromatographic peak,<br />

x=Concentration<br />

This method followed Beer- Lambert law over a wide range<br />

<strong>of</strong> concentration between 12.5 µg/mL to 50 µg/mL. Accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

this method was calculated from the percent recovery <strong>of</strong> known<br />

concentration calculated by linear equation. The % recoveries<br />

were found above 99% and % RSD among the recoveries was<br />

found very low which indicated accuracy <strong>of</strong> this method. Results<br />

were shown in Table 4.<br />

Precision: Precision (both intraday and inter-day) was<br />

checked in terms <strong>of</strong> %RSD <strong>of</strong> recovered concentrations. The<br />

%RSD values depicted in Table 5 showed that the proposed<br />

method provides acceptable intra-day and inter-day variation <strong>of</strong><br />

the reproducibility <strong>of</strong> current method.<br />

System suitability: All the system suitability parameters met<br />

the acceptance value. Table 6 summarized the results.<br />

Table 1: HPLC chromatographic conditions in developed method.<br />

HPLC Method<br />

Column<br />

Flow rate<br />

Monitoring wave length<br />

Tempearture<br />

Retention time<br />

15mM Ammonium Acetate Buffer (pH 5.5) :<br />

Acetonitrile = 60:40 (%v/v)<br />

C18, 5µm , 250 x 4.6 mm<br />

0.8 ml/min<br />

275 ƞm<br />

Ambient<br />

2.90±0.1 minute<br />

Ology Science J Res Anal. (2016) Volume 2 • Issue 4 ISSN : 2473-2230<br />

3


2.90/ Calcium Orotate<br />

Citation: Jahan SM, Islam HM, Khan MR, Hossain A, Kayesh R, Asma Rahman. A simple reversed phase HPLC method for quantitative estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

calcium orotate and its degradation products in solid dosage form. J Res Anal. 2016; 2(4): 108-112.<br />

uV<br />

150000<br />

Detector A - Ch1<br />

100000<br />

50000<br />

0<br />

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0<br />

min<br />

Table 2: Solution stability <strong>of</strong> calcium orotate with respect to AUC changes.<br />

Figure 2: Chromatogram <strong>of</strong> Calcium Orotate.<br />

Testing Time (hour) AUC <strong>of</strong> ambient sample (n=3) AUC <strong>of</strong> refrigerator sample (n=3)<br />

0 th 1754900 1754900<br />

24 th 1725575 1728495<br />

48 th 1721739 1725106<br />

72 th 1719795 1718489<br />

% RSD 0.950 0.923<br />

Table 3: Result <strong>of</strong> forced degradation study.<br />

AUC <strong>of</strong> standard solution Type <strong>of</strong> Degradation AUC <strong>of</strong> degraded sample (n=3) % Loss Remark<br />

1095920<br />

(n=6)<br />

Acid Hydrolysis 1083416 1.1 % Less sensitive<br />

Basic hydrolysis 1067725 2.5% Less sensitive<br />

Water hydrolysis 1072920 2.0% Less sensitive<br />

Oxidation 356503 67% Highly sensitive<br />

Reduction 673860 38% Highly sensitive<br />

uV<br />

5000<br />

2500<br />

3.10 / Calcium Orotate<br />

3.73 / Degradant -A<br />

4.63 / Degradant -B<br />

uV<br />

100000<br />

50000<br />

Calcium Orotate / 3.1<br />

uV<br />

750<br />

500<br />

250<br />

1 Det<br />

0<br />

0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0<br />

min<br />

0<br />

a<br />

Summary (Compound)<br />

Red 1. lcD<br />

Calcium Orotate / 3.0<br />

Unknown Degradant -B / 4.4<br />

0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0<br />

min<br />

c<br />

Unknown Degradant - C / 6.1<br />

1 Det A<br />

uV<br />

0<br />

50000<br />

25000<br />

0 5 10<br />

min<br />

0<br />

b<br />

Summary (Compound)<br />

Ox 1.lcd<br />

Calcium Orotate / 2.9<br />

2 3 4 5<br />

min<br />

Figure 3: Chromatograms <strong>of</strong> forced degradation: (a) Acid hydrolysis, (b) Basic hydrolysis, (c) Reduction, (d) Oxidation.<br />

d<br />

Oxidized Product / 3.6<br />

1 Det A Ch1<br />

1 Det A Ch1<br />

4 ISSN : 2473-2230<br />

J Res Anal. (2016) Volume 2 • Issue 4<br />

Ology Science


Citation: Jahan SM, Islam HM, Khan MR, Hossain A, Kayesh R, Asma Rahman. A simple reversed phase HPLC method for quantitative estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

calcium orotate and its degradation products in solid dosage form. J Res Anal. 2016; 2(4): 108-112.<br />

Robustness: This method also showed acceptable changes<br />

in robustness study and established its stability and reliability<br />

thereby. Result was shown in Table 7.<br />

Market product analysis: To evaluate the practical<br />

applicability <strong>of</strong> the developed method, three different brands<br />

<strong>of</strong> calcium orotate formulated as tablets by three renowned<br />

pharmaceutical industries in Bangladesh were collected to<br />

determine the assay and dissolution by this method. All<br />

three brands claim 400 mg calcium orotate per tablet in their<br />

formulation. Results were presented in Table 8.<br />

Table 4: Result <strong>of</strong> linearity, range and accuracy.<br />

Injected Conc.<br />

(µg/mL)<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

nominal<br />

Average AUC<br />

(n=6)<br />

Recovered<br />

Concentration<br />

%<br />

Recovery<br />

12.5 50% 862820 12.35 98.8<br />

20 80% 1378895 19.9 99.9<br />

22.5 90% 1542656 22.4 99.5<br />

25 100% 1721739 25.05 100.2<br />

27.5 110% 1896123 27.63 100.5<br />

30 120% 2071599 30.22 100.7<br />

50 200% 3398864 49.85 99.7<br />

% RSD <strong>of</strong> recoveries 0.646%<br />

Table 5: Result <strong>of</strong> intraday and inter-day precision.<br />

Run Order<br />

% RSD intraday <strong>of</strong><br />

variation (n=6)<br />

Day-1,Analyst-1 0.2433<br />

Day-2,Analyst-2 0.5802<br />

Day-3,Analyst-3 1.1214<br />

Table 6: System suitability parameters.<br />

% RSD <strong>of</strong> inter-day<br />

variation<br />

0.2490<br />

Parameter Average (n=6) % RSD<br />

Acceptance<br />

Limit [8-10]<br />

Peak Area 1721739 0.276 %RSD

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!