11.12.2012 Views

November 2010 - The Bulletin Magazine

November 2010 - The Bulletin Magazine

November 2010 - The Bulletin Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Individuals or businesses are entitled to deduct from their income most expenses incurred for the purpose of earning<br />

that income. Some expenses, however, such as golf membership dues and green fees, for example, are disallowed<br />

completely. Other expenses are subject to limitations, such as the 50 per cent limitation on the deductibility of meals<br />

and entertainment expenses.<br />

<strong>The</strong> law<br />

Tax Tips<br />

Deductibility of Fines, Interest and Penalties<br />

by Ian Hawkins<br />

<strong>The</strong> 2004 federal budget included a measure prohibiting individuals and businesses from deducting fines or<br />

penalties from their income, even incurred solely for the purpose of earning income.<br />

As is often the case, this rule was introduced to overturn a case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC),<br />

specifically the decision in 65302 British Columbia Ltd. v. the Queen. In this case, the taxpayer was an eggproducer<br />

and was only able to produce and sell a certain number of eggs as designated by its quota from the egg<br />

marketing board in British Columbia. <strong>The</strong> company intentionally produced more eggs than it was allowed under its<br />

quota because it wanted to meet the demand of a significant customer. <strong>The</strong> B.C. marketing board imposed a fine of<br />

approximately $270,000, which the company paid and deducted as a cost of doing business - after all, the company<br />

had to pay tax on the additional profits from the sale of the "over-quota" eggs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) objected to the deduction of this penalty arguing that in order for a penalty or<br />

fine to be tax deductible, the jurisprudence to date indicated that the penalty or fine must have been unavoidable<br />

and must not be against "public policy". <strong>The</strong> SCC disagreed and allowed the deduction of the fine, as it saw nothing<br />

in the Income Tax Act that distinguished the deductibility of a fine or penalty incurred to earn income from any<br />

other otherwise deductible business expense.<br />

Clearly the tax man, unhappy with this state of affairs, introduced this measure to eliminate it. As the government<br />

stated, "it is generally recognized that to allow a deduction for a fine or penalty that has been imposed in respect of<br />

a particular act or omission by a taxpayer, diminishes the disincentive to engage in that activity. Generally, therefore,<br />

such a deduction is contrary to overall public policy objectives".<br />

Interest and penalties<br />

Interest and penalties can be charged under the Income Tax Act for late-filing a tax return or late-payment of tax<br />

owing. If a taxpayer files his or her return after April 30 (or June 15 for the self-employed), there is a five per cent<br />

penalty on the amount of tax that was unpaid at the time the return was due plus an additional one per cent per<br />

month penalty on the amount due for each month the return is late (up to a maximum of 12 per cent).<br />

If this is the second time that the taxpayer has been late and he or she was previously charged a late-filing penalty<br />

in any of the prior three years, the late-filing penalties double to 10 per cent of the unpaid amount plus two per cent<br />

continued on next page<br />

www.<strong>The</strong><strong>Bulletin</strong><strong>Magazine</strong>.com NOVEMBER <strong>2010</strong> | <strong>The</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!