11.12.2012 Views

Biblical Hermeneutics - National Open University of Nigeria

Biblical Hermeneutics - National Open University of Nigeria

Biblical Hermeneutics - National Open University of Nigeria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CTH 601 <strong>Biblical</strong> <strong>Hermeneutics</strong><br />

It is “the study <strong>of</strong> the ‘forms’ which the material took in the course <strong>of</strong><br />

being handed down.” The concern <strong>of</strong> form criticism is: “How do the<br />

distinct forms <strong>of</strong> literary expression reveal something <strong>of</strong> the origins,<br />

history and meaning <strong>of</strong> the text?”<br />

Therefore, “Form criticism deals with the range <strong>of</strong> literary devices used<br />

in communicating the message and tries to determine the historical<br />

settings in which the forms were employed before they became part <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Biblical</strong> books.” The task <strong>of</strong> form criticism thus ”suggests that some<br />

biblical writers had at their disposal already existing sources in written<br />

or oral form.”<br />

Illustrative Example<br />

Why did Matthew and Luke differ in the order <strong>of</strong> the second and third<br />

temptations <strong>of</strong> Jesus? The temptation to jump down from the Jerusalem<br />

temple was placed second by Matthew but third by Luke (Luke 4:1-13,<br />

Matt. 4:1-11cf). This is a tradition critical concern.<br />

Self-Assessment Exercise<br />

What do you understand by tradition/form criticisms?<br />

3.1.4 Redaction/Canon Criticisms<br />

This is a theological criticism which complements tradition, historical<br />

criticism. “It studies the use which an author makes <strong>of</strong> the material at<br />

his disposal whether received by tradition or otherwise.” The relevant<br />

question <strong>of</strong> interest to redaction criticism is “How has the author shown<br />

his own creativeness in reshaping older traditions to serve his particular<br />

theological purpose?” Therefore, it is concerned with “how the final<br />

author or editor used the sources to address the concerns and problems<br />

facing his audience in their historical setting.”<br />

Canon criticism is an extension <strong>of</strong> redaction criticism. It is a theological<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the completed canon <strong>of</strong> Scripture. The emphasis is not on the<br />

original form <strong>of</strong> the text as it is done in some other critical approaches.<br />

Illustrative Example<br />

How do we account for the difference between the gospel written by<br />

John and the three Synoptic Gospels? His primary intention evidently<br />

was to evangelise non-Christians and to teach new Christians (John<br />

20:31).<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!