Reform in Canada Pretense & Perils
Pretense%20&%20Perils%20FINAL
Pretense%20&%20Perils%20FINAL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
If justice perishes, human life on earth has lost its mean<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Immanuel Kant<br />
Cannabis Law <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>: <strong>Pretense</strong> and <strong>Perils</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>es the Canadian<br />
government’s campaign to legalize cannabis for recreational use. The government’s<br />
stated case is that the contraband trade poses a serious threat to cannabis users<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ‘kids’), and that a legal, regulated <strong>in</strong>dustry will provide protection. This report<br />
draws upon research on the contraband trade, our established legal drug <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />
(alcohol, tobacco, pharmaceutical), and government efforts to regulate these <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />
This <strong>in</strong>vestigation concludes that the government’s case, on all counts, is weak. It’s<br />
depiction of the contraband cannabis trade amounts to little more than unsubstantiated,<br />
vestigial reefer madness. Our legal drug <strong>in</strong>dustries engage <strong>in</strong> a relentless,<br />
<strong>in</strong>discrim<strong>in</strong>ate, and sometimes illegal, pursuit of revenue with substantial harm to the<br />
public’s health and to the Canadian economy. Early <strong>in</strong>dications warn that an ambitious<br />
cannabis <strong>in</strong>dustry is on a similar trajectory. These <strong>in</strong>dustries are enabled by permissive<br />
and <strong>in</strong>effective regulatory oversight by government.<br />
Cannabis Law <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>: <strong>Pretense</strong> and <strong>Perils</strong> recommends immediate<br />
decrim<strong>in</strong>alization of m<strong>in</strong>or cannabis-related offences to curtail the crim<strong>in</strong>alization of<br />
large numbers of mostly young Canadians. It also supports the legalization of cannabis<br />
for recreational use, but strongly asserts that the prevail<strong>in</strong>g profit-driven, poorlyregulated<br />
paradigm is a dangerous one. The legalization of cannabis <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong><br />
provides an opportunity to try a different approach – a not-for-profit cannabis authority –<br />
function<strong>in</strong>g with a genu<strong>in</strong>e public health priority.<br />
2