31.03.2017 Views

Reform in Canada Pretense & Perils

Pretense%20&%20Perils%20FINAL

Pretense%20&%20Perils%20FINAL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.7.2 The Tobacco Industry<br />

The tobacco <strong>in</strong>dustry is a legal, government-regulated commercial drug <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

The legal tobacco cigarette is designed and manufactured <strong>in</strong> strict accordance with<br />

regulator-approved protocols. It is also our most toxic legal consumer product when<br />

used <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>tended manner. Tobacco use is a public health crisis <strong>in</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

substantial morbidity, mortality, and economic loss. Rehm et al. (2006) have provided<br />

estimates for several <strong>in</strong>dicators of the country’s annual harm from tobacco, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2.2 million hospital days and 37,209 premature deaths result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 515,607 years of lost<br />

life (PYLL). The cost to the Canadian economy is $17 billion annually.<br />

A significant contributor to this perennial harm is more than a half century of nefarious<br />

conduct by the tobacco <strong>in</strong>dustry. The reader is referred to two sources. The Canadian<br />

story is told <strong>in</strong> Smoke & Mirrors: The Canadian Tobacco War (Cunn<strong>in</strong>gham, 1996),<br />

while a US account is provided <strong>in</strong> “Ashes to Ashes” (Kluger, 1997). Both books provide<br />

a comprehensive historical account of the epic battle <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the tobacco <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

public health authorities, government regulators and the courts. More recently, a<br />

compell<strong>in</strong>g exposure of tobacco <strong>in</strong>dustry malfeasance surfaced <strong>in</strong> the US landmark<br />

court case aga<strong>in</strong>st Philip Morris USA as provided by Justice Gladys Kessler. After<br />

review<strong>in</strong>g hundreds of depositions and thousands of exhibits, Kessler issued a powerful<br />

condemnation of the <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> her 1,742 page op<strong>in</strong>ion (United States District Court for<br />

the District of Columbia, 2006). Some highlights of Kessler’s f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs follow:<br />

“[This case] is about an <strong>in</strong>dustry, and <strong>in</strong> particular these Defendants, that survives, and<br />

profits, from sell<strong>in</strong>g a highly addictive product which causes diseases that lead to a<br />

stagger<strong>in</strong>g number of deaths per year, an immeasurable amount of human suffer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and economic loss, and a profound burden on our national health care system.<br />

Defendants have known many of these facts for at least 50 years or more. Despite that<br />

knowledge, they have consistently, repeatedly and with enormous skill and<br />

sophistication, denied these facts to the public, the Government, and to the public<br />

health community.”<br />

“Defendants have marketed and sold their lethal products with zeal, with deception, with<br />

a s<strong>in</strong>gle-m<strong>in</strong>ded focus on their f<strong>in</strong>ancial success, and without regard for the human<br />

tragedy or social costs that success exacted.”<br />

“Over the course of more than 50 years, Defendants lied, misrepresented and deceived<br />

the American public, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g smokers and the young people they avidly sought as<br />

‘replacement’ smokers about the devastat<strong>in</strong>g health effects of smok<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

environmental tobacco smoke.”<br />

“The evidence <strong>in</strong> this case clearly establishes that Defendants have not ceased<br />

engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> unlawful activity.... For example, most Defendants cont<strong>in</strong>ue to fraudulently<br />

deny the adverse health effects of second-hand smoke which they recognized<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternally; all Defendants cont<strong>in</strong>ue to market “low tar” cigarettes to consumers seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to reduce their health risks or quit; all Defendants cont<strong>in</strong>ue to fraudulently deny that they<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!