17.05.2017 Views

*updatemag

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Who LET<br />

My fish<br />

Loose?<br />

MAY 2017<br />

issue #1<br />

JapaNese House P.22<br />

Exhibition about life and Archtecture in Japan<br />

and why it those are ideas are still relevant today<br />

Use of theory by art and<br />

use of art by theory P.14<br />

Professor Boris Groys compares advertisment<br />

principles to critical theory.<br />

OOHo Warter and how to<br />

make your own P.18<br />

Work in progress solution to reduction of plastic<br />

bottle waste


Who Let My Fish Loose?<br />

about<br />

It is important to stay aware<br />

With this magazine I wanted<br />

to make a fun way to be engaged<br />

with critical thought<br />

and critical theory. It is not a<br />

call for actions, but a hopefully<br />

entertaining way to<br />

read something that does<br />

not point fingers.<br />

In this edition, I have looked<br />

at great minds such as Slavoj<br />

Zizek and Boris Groys, to<br />

share their thoughts and<br />

ideas.<br />

There is also a section on<br />

current events, such as the<br />

Japanese House exhibition,<br />

that is up at the Barbican<br />

center, and the Ooho bottle<br />

recipe.<br />

This magazine will try not<br />

to be political, but there is<br />

a section on psychology of<br />

a narcissist, with now president<br />

Trump in mind, as well<br />

as a section addressing the<br />

refugee crisis.<br />

I hope you enjoy.<br />

Dea<br />

Khalvashi


in this issue<br />

Who are liberal<br />

communists<br />

T r u m p a n d<br />

Narcissism<br />

Refugees &the<br />

power of image<br />

p. 4<br />

p. 04<br />

p. 8<br />

USE OF THEORY BY<br />

ART<br />

P l a s t i c<br />

waste<br />

Japanese House:<br />

life after 1945<br />

p. 12<br />

p.16<br />

p. 20


Issue 1<br />

May 2017<br />

LIBERAL<br />

COMMUNIST<br />

AS EXPLAINED BY SLAVOJ ZIZEK<br />

AN EXCERT FROM HIS BOOK "VIOLENCE".<br />

The exemplary figures of evil today are not ordinary<br />

consumers who pollute the environment and live in<br />

a eating organic food, taking holidays in wildlife<br />

4<br />

10 commandments of the<br />

Liberal Communists<br />

Accoring to: Olivier Malnuit<br />

1. Give everything away for free<br />

(free access, no copyright …); just<br />

charge for the additional services,<br />

which will make you even richer.<br />

2. Change the world, don't just sell<br />

things: global revolution, a change<br />

of society will make things better.<br />

3. Be caring, sharing, and<br />

aware of social responsibility.<br />

4. Be creative: focus on design,<br />

new technologies, and sciences.<br />

5. Tell it all: there should be no secrets.<br />

Endorse and practise the<br />

cult of transparency, the free<br />

flow of information, all humanity<br />

should collaborate and interact.<br />

6. Don't work and take on a<br />

fixed nine-to-five job. Just engage<br />

in improvised smart, dynamic,<br />

flexible communications.<br />

7. Go back to school and engage<br />

in permanent education.<br />

8. Act as an enzyme: work not only<br />

for the market, but trigger new<br />

forms of social collaborations.<br />

9. Die poor: return your wealth to<br />

those who need it, since you have<br />

more than you can ever spend.<br />

10. Stand in for the state:<br />

practise the partnership of<br />

companies with the state


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

which breed fundamentalist terror.<br />

So their goal is not to earn money,<br />

but to change the world, though if<br />

this makes them more money as<br />

a by-product, who's to complain!<br />

The exemplary figures of evil today<br />

are not ordinary consumers who pollute<br />

the environment and live in a<br />

violent world of disintegrating social<br />

links, but those who, while fully<br />

engaged in creating conditions for<br />

such universal devastation and pollution,<br />

buy their way out of their own<br />

activity, living in gated communities,<br />

eating organic food, taking holidays<br />

in wildlife preserves, and so on.<br />

Liberal communists are pragmatic. They hate<br />

a doctrinaire approach. For them there is no<br />

single exploited working class today. There are<br />

only concrete problems to be solved: starvation<br />

in Africa, the plight of Muslim women, religious<br />

fundamentalist violence. When there<br />

is a humanitarian crisis in Africa - and liberal<br />

communists really love humanitarian crises,<br />

which bring out the best in them!-there is no<br />

point in engaging in old-style anti-imperialist<br />

rhetoric. Instead, all of us should just concentrate<br />

on what really does the work of solving<br />

the problem: engage people, governments, and<br />

business in a common enterprise; start moving<br />

things, instead of relying on centralised state<br />

help; approach the crisis in a creative and unconventional<br />

way, without fretting over labels.<br />

5<br />

Above all, liberal communists are true citizens<br />

of the world. They are good people who worry.<br />

They worry about populist fundamentalists<br />

and irresponsible, greedy capitalist corporations.<br />

They see the "deeper causes" of today's<br />

problems: it is mass poverty and hopelessness


Issue 1<br />

May 2017<br />

Rise in Narcissism and<br />

Trump<br />

Text by Michail Theodosiadis Illustration by Dea Khalvashi<br />

publicity. Donald Trump<br />

is one of the saddest reflections<br />

of this corrosive<br />

culture.<br />

6<br />

Christopher Lasch and<br />

Narcissism<br />

Almost three decades ago,<br />

in his book The Culture<br />

of Narcissism, the iconoclastic<br />

American thinker<br />

Christopher Lasch wrote<br />

that in postwar America<br />

emerged a certain type<br />

of being, which in clinical<br />

terms falls under the<br />

category of “narcissistic<br />

personality disorder”, a<br />

pathology characterised<br />

by carelessness and an<br />

excessive need for admiration<br />

and attention.<br />

Lasch identified manifestations<br />

of this disorder in<br />

various aspects of social<br />

life, and especially in the<br />

world of celebrity. Now<br />

celebrities have invaded<br />

the political sphere, the<br />

entire political world is<br />

becoming dominated by<br />

people who lack “common<br />

decency”, who resort to<br />

a faux populism in order<br />

to serve their thirst for<br />

From the day he joined<br />

the race for the Republican<br />

nomination, Trump<br />

used the same modus<br />

operandi: attracting<br />

public attention. Just as<br />

Lasch wrote, the narcissistic<br />

logic Trump applies<br />

to politics is embedded<br />

in the same “enterprise<br />

culture” with which he is<br />

so closely identified. As a<br />

successful entrepreneur,<br />

Trump not only acquired<br />

the skill of promoting his<br />

brand but turned himself<br />

into a commodity, using<br />

all available techniques<br />

to put himself at the


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

centre of as many endless discussions<br />

as possible.<br />

Ignorance is a bliss<br />

The sight of people amassing at<br />

airports to protest the executive<br />

order, many waving placards<br />

bearing Trump’s name, is paradoxically<br />

exactly what a narcissist<br />

craves. Worse still, the dissent<br />

emanating from leading Democrats<br />

and celebrities robs these<br />

protests of some of their grassroots<br />

edge, turning them into<br />

what Lasch presciently called the<br />

“revolt of the elites”.<br />

It all flatters Trump’s message<br />

that the protesters care not a<br />

bit for the hardships of ordinary<br />

Americans. It also makes him a<br />

model for thousands of his fans;<br />

as he himself chases the spotlight,<br />

they compete with each<br />

other for public attention. His extreme<br />

egocentricity poisons the<br />

public sphere; norms of common<br />

decency and sense are replaced<br />

by a mob mentality of mutual<br />

recriminations and insults. This<br />

atmosphere not only safeguards<br />

Trump’s power, but more importantly,<br />

may contribute to the<br />

emergence of a similarly toxic<br />

demagogue in the future.<br />

So the narcissist’s trap is set, and<br />

those campaigning against Trump<br />

need to get out of it. So long as<br />

they make their ultimate goal the<br />

downfall of Trump’s presidency,<br />

they will never break his hold<br />

on the public imagination. What the US and the<br />

rest of the world need is an open public dialogue<br />

aimed at solving any number of critical problems,<br />

such as migration, unemployment, and mass<br />

“uprootedness” – the sense of disconnection that<br />

writer Simone Weil identified as an incubator of<br />

authoritarianism and demagoguery.<br />

Without facing these problems head on for what<br />

they are, critics will end up trapped in a close orbit<br />

around Trump himself – mired in toxic discussions<br />

that feed political phobias and cultural antipathies.<br />

The narcissist’s trap is set, and those<br />

campaigning against Trump need to<br />

get out of it. So long as they make their<br />

ultimate goal the downfall of Trump’s<br />

presidency, they will never break his hold<br />

on the public imagination.<br />

dr. Michail Theodosiadis<br />

7


Issue 1<br />

May 2017<br />

8<br />

REFUGEES and the power of<br />

image<br />

with the help of JuliaN Stallabrass<br />

There has been a lot of<br />

critisism emerging from<br />

the public regarding the<br />

photographers that take<br />

horrifying photographs<br />

of what is happening in<br />

the ISIS run terrirories.<br />

The argument ususally<br />

boils down to the fact<br />

that the photographers<br />

could have been out<br />

there helping the injured<br />

child rather than taking<br />

a photograph of them,<br />

but there is something<br />

that public is not taking<br />

into consideration. The<br />

powe of image in the<br />

contamporaty world is<br />

significantly higher, and<br />

has the power to have a much<br />

larger impact on the problem,<br />

thus, a photograph of an injured<br />

child has a pontential to<br />

save more children. In order<br />

to understand this concept,<br />

it is important to look at the<br />

Vietnam War.<br />

The Images of Vietnam<br />

War<br />

"Not in our name" is an article<br />

written by professor<br />

Julian Stallabrass. It discusses<br />

the role that photographs<br />

that emerged from the Vietnam<br />

War played in rallys<br />

against the war in Iraq, and<br />

argues, that these anti-war<br />

rallys would not have happaned<br />

if the photographs<br />

did not exist. In Julian Stallabrass'<br />

opinion, people<br />

would not have marched<br />

against the war in Iraq if the<br />

chilling images of Vietnam<br />

War were not spread. Seeing<br />

something like a photograph<br />

seems to really speak one<br />

thousand word.<br />

Temporary refugee camp set up in the center of Munich, Germany


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

""Today's liberal tolerance<br />

towards others,<br />

the respect of otherness<br />

and openness towards<br />

it, is counterpointed by<br />

an obsessive fear of<br />

harassment. In short,<br />

the other is just fine,<br />

but in so far his precedes<br />

is not intrusive,<br />

insofar the other is not<br />

really other... "<br />

Slavoj Zizek<br />

Ifecrisum vit? Ficata deo,<br />

consulin tus inum pratimu<br />

suleste ricit, contidem am,<br />

Cupio egilis o conerfeci<br />

interbi etil vis pro, nique ia<br />

rei perbem nos et L.<br />

United Nations<br />

hires photographers<br />

dedicated to depicting<br />

the refugee crisis<br />

The news that thousands<br />

of refugees and economic<br />

migrants are arriving<br />

on the continent can be<br />

unsettling for a European<br />

public that is still dealing<br />

with the after-effects of<br />

a devastating economic<br />

crisis. “There’s a lot of talk<br />

and fear about refugees<br />

and so it’s critical that<br />

people can see for themselves<br />

what’s happening,”<br />

says Susan Hopper, UN-<br />

HCR's photo editor. “We<br />

choose photographers<br />

who can show that this<br />

refugee is a regular person<br />

who has run out of options<br />

Refugees arriving in Munich central train station<br />

and is being forced to do<br />

something desperate to<br />

protect his or her family.<br />

And when you see photos<br />

of these people’s faces<br />

when they arrive on the<br />

beach in Greece, it clicks.<br />

Seeing how traumatized<br />

and scared these people<br />

are generates empathy<br />

and understanding and<br />

changes attitudes and behaviors.<br />

That’s the connection<br />

we want to make.”<br />

So, going back to the original<br />

ideas by Julian Stallabrass,<br />

what exactly is the<br />

role of an image, and can<br />

these UN-hired photographers<br />

be considered to be<br />

"embaded" journalists of<br />

some sort.<br />

9


Issue 1<br />

May 2017<br />

10


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

11


Issue 1<br />

May 2017<br />

Boris Groys<br />

USe of theory<br />

by art<br />

12<br />

Use of art<br />

by<br />

theory<br />

A transcribed except from the talk by an<br />

art critic and a theoretician Boris Groys<br />

as a part of the Age of Global Transition<br />

conference at the Rietveld Academie in<br />

Amsterdam.


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

“Call Now”<br />

In the recent years, this notion of<br />

“life” has become more and more<br />

prominent. The whole philosophy<br />

and theory of discourse in the last<br />

century was about life, not about<br />

thinking like it was before, its quite<br />

a change, and I will be talking<br />

about this change. Why Philosophy<br />

for so long, from Plato up to the<br />

end of 19th century had actually<br />

thinking, logos and reason, for<br />

its main topic, and then suddenly<br />

the theme changed to life as the<br />

main notion. We are always speaking<br />

about reality TV, and all these<br />

things, we speak about life and<br />

we speak about the possibility of<br />

changing lives and exchanging<br />

lives, about imitating life. And all<br />

of this has presuppositions and I<br />

will try to discuss them.<br />

In our time, we are attacked<br />

form all sides by different calls<br />

to change our life. To change our<br />

body, by diet and fitness, to change<br />

our mental abilities by education<br />

and meditation. You know,<br />

now I’m living in New York, as it<br />

was already said, and I always get<br />

accustomed to a certain way that<br />

American TV presents this call. You<br />

know, when you see an advertisement<br />

for new medicine, new practise<br />

or new fitness program, at the<br />

end they always say, with a very<br />

insistent voice<br />

“Call Now!”<br />

“Please call now!”<br />

“Do not wait!”<br />

“Call now!”<br />

"Change your life! Now!"<br />

The society that is only based on<br />

differences is no longer a society, it is a<br />

market economy.<br />

This is what I want to talk about.<br />

What does this feeling of urgency<br />

mean? That we cannot delay it,<br />

that we have to do it now, we have<br />

to respond now. Every such a call<br />

proposes a sort of model that is a<br />

call to imitate socially recognised<br />

beauties, etc. And every such call<br />

for change is a call for imitation and<br />

a call to become somebody that<br />

somebody else already is. But is it<br />

possible to become another person,<br />

to follow a model to radically<br />

change our own identity to imitate<br />

another identity and if it is possible<br />

to follow this, should we follow this,<br />

so is our desire of imitation really<br />

good?<br />

First off, I would suggest that the<br />

desire to become similar to the<br />

others - the “mimetic” desire that<br />

is so criticised by many authors is<br />

actually in a certain way a positive<br />

desire. It is a desire to be social, to<br />

produce sociality. We tend to think<br />

about our society as a society of<br />

differences. We tend to think about<br />

our society as the society of differences.<br />

We have different culture<br />

identity, different professions,<br />

skills, sexual orientations etc. However,<br />

a society that is only defined<br />

by differences seizes to be a society<br />

the space of difference is not a<br />

society but an economy, and specifically<br />

market economy - that means<br />

economy of exchange. Difference<br />

13


Call NOW!<br />

CHANGE YOUR LIFe<br />

NOW!<br />

Professor Boris Groys lecture<br />

On the Use of Theory by Art<br />

and Use of Art by Theory


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

opens a possibility of exchange<br />

and makes it unavoidable. I give<br />

to the others what I have, and do<br />

not have, and the others give me<br />

what they have and I do not have.<br />

A society of difference, is a society<br />

of commodity exchange, but<br />

also, exchange of communication.<br />

Communication as exchange of<br />

information and also a market<br />

of opinions. We exchange discourses<br />

and information items<br />

as we exchange all other commodities.<br />

This operation leaves<br />

our identities unchanged. So an<br />

act of exchange itself, be it in<br />

the market or within the framework<br />

of communication leaves<br />

our own identity unchanged. We<br />

require freedom of information<br />

and communication and these<br />

are very important goals. But an<br />

actual, initial goal of theoretical<br />

discourse (and i speak now today<br />

as a theoretician) is not merely<br />

to inform the others about what<br />

opinions I personally have. The<br />

scene of theoretical discourse<br />

does not coincide with the scene<br />

of communication. Rather one<br />

stars a theoretical discourse<br />

with a hope that it will change<br />

the attitude of an audience. The<br />

The Critical theory calls for action.<br />

To change the world instead of<br />

trying to understand it. (a very<br />

famous Marxist slogan) To actively<br />

change life instead of wasting time<br />

for contemplation and passively to<br />

live fully and actively instead of<br />

merely surviving. How is theory<br />

formulated? it is not formulated as a<br />

theory, but as a call.<br />

theoretical discourse wants to be not informative,<br />

but transformative discourse. Thus, every<br />

theoretician is necessarily interested in the<br />

transformative power of discourse as such. In<br />

fact, every theoretical discourse can be read<br />

as the description of the conditions of its own<br />

persuasiveness, and of transformative power of<br />

word in general.<br />

So, an explanation of why a discourse can be<br />

transformative and not only informative. Every<br />

discourse offers a scenario, a set of conditions<br />

under which one can expect that a discourse<br />

becomes transformative. Here, a philosopher,<br />

theoretician, a thinker, discovers an uncanny<br />

similarity between his or her own discourse<br />

and the advertisement that calls its listeners to<br />

change and transform themselves. The theoretician<br />

shares, with the advertisement and fashion<br />

a common possibility of a transformative<br />

call. Transformative word. At the same time,<br />

the traditional philosophy attempts to accuse<br />

all the non-philosophical transformative discourses<br />

of being based not on reason and logic,<br />

but exclusively on seduction and manipulation.<br />

So if you look at the history of religion if you<br />

look at the history of philosophy and theoretical<br />

thought it always operates by this kind of<br />

command:<br />

Come now<br />

Change your attitude<br />

Change your life.<br />

If you go back to Christianity to the period of<br />

enlightenment and you read philosophers like<br />

Deleuze of Derrida, even they suggest similar<br />

things; Don’t think in this direction, begin to<br />

think in another direction and so on. It is not so<br />

much an argumentation to call the change of<br />

your direction of attention and your mind.<br />

There is a common ground between all these<br />

beauty contests and reality shows or what ever,<br />

that we experience in our meditated culture<br />

in a very fundamental attitude of any speaker<br />

including the speaker attempting a critique on<br />

this very subject; Let us not believe them, let<br />

us believe to criticise them, Criticise them now.<br />

Do not delay your critique.<br />

The artists answer this call in its ambiguity.<br />

Why would I say that this call is ambiguous?<br />

15


Issue 1<br />

May 2017<br />

OHOO<br />

The Edible<br />

Water Bottle<br />

16<br />

Modular gastronomy and plastic<br />

The fact that plastic waste is an issue is a point that no longer<br />

needs arguing. Of course, recycling is a solution but it<br />

only seems to work half of the time. On top of that, plastic in<br />

general can be toxic and dangerous for the surroundings of<br />

the production area, as well as the ridiculously large Carbon<br />

footprint that comes with shipping variety of bottled drinks.<br />

While juice can be called a luxury, and the society can live<br />

without, the same cannot be said for water. Water is absolutely<br />

necessary, and since humans need to consume at least<br />

2L of water everyday, it is not something that can be avoided<br />

out of simple good will and the love of environment.


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

Of course, we can use reusable water<br />

bottles and invest in a filter, but just<br />

taking the demand and need on drinking<br />

water into consideration, all of the<br />

efforts become relatively small when<br />

one looks at a post-marathon site that is<br />

filled with single-use plastic cups.<br />

Ooho has taken the world by storm after<br />

their campaign launched with the aim<br />

to raise 400,000GBP, (They ended up<br />

raising twice the ammount). It is an edible,<br />

raindrop shaped sack that contains<br />

the water inside of its thin membrane.<br />

This "method" has been used for years<br />

and it is called Modular gastronomy. It<br />

is often used to spherify certain deserts<br />

that are too liquidy to take on solid<br />

shape. Ooho is a great idea that can<br />

really help reduce the use of plastic.<br />

The best part about Ooho is, that it has<br />

the potential to be homemade. While<br />

the creators are working and developing<br />

the recipe in such way that it can be<br />

more durable and hygenic, the current<br />

Ohoo recipe can be used at home. The<br />

reason why this is great is because Ooho<br />

edible bottles will have the potential to<br />

be produced locally - with ease of ingridients<br />

that cant be found anywhere.<br />

This, if nothing else will at least reduce<br />

rising carbon footpring that transporting<br />

plastic waterbottle is eifnitly one of the<br />

top contrbutors to.<br />

Nearly half of plastic<br />

bottles used by British<br />

households are never<br />

recycled<br />

17


Issue 1<br />

May 2017<br />

How to make your<br />

own Ohoo at home.<br />

Modular Gastronomy<br />

18


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

Directions:<br />

You will need:<br />

1. Add 1g of Sodium Algenate to a bowl with<br />

one cup of drinking water.<br />

2. Using the hand-blender, make sure you<br />

blend the solution well.<br />

3. Set the Sodium Algenate mixture aside until<br />

all of the bubbles that formed during the<br />

blending proccess dissapear<br />

4. In a larger bowl, mix 4g of Calcium Lactate<br />

and 4 cups of water.<br />

5. Gently stir the Calcium Lactate solution<br />

with a spoon until no more Calcium Lactate<br />

can be seen.<br />

6. Once all of the bubbles in the Sodium<br />

alginate solution are gone, take a spoonfull<br />

out and very gently plop it into the Calcium<br />

Lactate bath<br />

7. Repeat this step while gently stirring the<br />

Calcium lacitate soltion.<br />

8. Stir the soltion for aproximatley five minutes,<br />

and let it sit for two more .<br />

9. With a pasta spoon, or using hands, gently<br />

remove the Ooho from the bath and place it<br />

in a rinsing bowl full of normal water.<br />

10. Let the Ooho edible water bottles rinse in<br />

the water bath for a few minutes, then take<br />

them out<br />

11. Enjoy the 0 impact healthy edible water<br />

bottles.<br />

P.S. Eating the outside of the bottle is entirely<br />

optional, however, it does contribute to<br />

the hydration of the body.<br />

1. Sodium Alginate<br />

2. Calcium Lactate<br />

3. A hand-blender<br />

4. Three medium sized<br />

bowls<br />

5. A deep, round spoon<br />

19


Japanese House:<br />

Architecture<br />

and life after<br />

1945<br />

March 23rd - June 25th 2017<br />

at the barbican center


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

Personal<br />

belongings of an<br />

urban hermit<br />

inside the 1-in-1<br />

recreation of his<br />

home<br />

This exhibition is everything<br />

you would never expect to<br />

see. It is an experience an immaterial<br />

portrait of society.<br />

It is more of a performance<br />

than a simple architectural<br />

exhibit. The centre of this<br />

exhibition is the Moriyama<br />

House. A spacial portrait<br />

of a man who has never<br />

caught a plane, or left Tokyo<br />

- a city where he was born.<br />

The one in one recreation<br />

of the Moriyama House by<br />

an award winning Japanese<br />

architect, Ryue Nishizawa is<br />

a successful, personal and<br />

unique fruit of the relationship<br />

between the architect<br />

and his client, and a story of<br />

how this fruit can grow into<br />

something much greater than<br />

just a building. The Moriyama<br />

House is as much a feeling as<br />

it is a house.<br />

Most of the progressive<br />

reconstruction in Japans<br />

started precisely because of<br />

destruction of everything<br />

and the housing crisis that<br />

arose from their defeat in<br />

WWII. They had to think<br />

practically, but also wanted<br />

to integrate their tradition<br />

and national identity to the<br />

demoralised public, to raise<br />

their spirit. Here, architects<br />

were not only faced with<br />

a constructional issue but<br />

also a social one, and so,<br />

rapid Japanese architectural<br />

growth began. The exhibition<br />

explores precisely this. How<br />

construction and character<br />

can intertwine. The curators<br />

of this exhibition achieve<br />

this by intelligently guiding<br />

the viewers, though time and<br />

space. Both, the metaphorical<br />

and physical centre of the<br />

21


Issue 1<br />

May 2017<br />

22<br />

exhibit is the Moriyama house,<br />

however, the viewers are directed<br />

to start the exhibition on the top<br />

level of the space. There, the visitors<br />

are introduced to the important<br />

role that architecture played<br />

in both social and economical<br />

development of Japan after the<br />

total destruction in suffered during<br />

the World War II. The most<br />

interesting being a movie reel<br />

exploring the idea of a home, as<br />

a structure, and how this home,<br />

as a structure can be a reflection<br />

social values in regard to the<br />

family life in Japan. There is the<br />

first ever aired commercial of the<br />

so-called “capsule” apartment by<br />

Kisho Kurokawa, an architect who<br />

was also a part of the prominent<br />

“Metabolism” movement. The<br />

capsule acted as a symbol and<br />

a prediction to the future of the<br />

society in Japan, and the world,<br />

really. It was created on the presumption<br />

that the modern man<br />

will be solitary and focused on<br />

the importance of an individual<br />

rather than the relationship with<br />

others. Around the same time, an<br />

important American historian and<br />

moralist was coming to similar<br />

conclusions as Kurokawa, and he<br />

predicted that there will be a rise of Narcissism<br />

in the public(for further details look at The<br />

Culture of Narcissism by Christopher Lasch).<br />

What is interesting, is that the architects have<br />

managed to come to a similar conclusion as cultural<br />

theorists, and that this was not just a local<br />

issue in Japan, but to an extent, a global one.<br />

The Crazy Family by Soho Ishii, is a literal interpretation<br />

of the idea of destruction of family<br />

relations, as well as the need for a family home,<br />

where the family members, paranoid about the<br />

upcoming termite attack physically demolish<br />

their family home, yelling and screaming in<br />

agony as they do this.<br />

“ The ideal is to create something<br />

that, through its presence, makes<br />

the overall environment look<br />

better, and at the same time<br />

makes your own building look<br />

good by virtue of its relationship<br />

with the surrounding buildings.”<br />

Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa,<br />

Architects at SANAA


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

in contemporary architecture, and their<br />

focus is the cinematic exploration of contemporary<br />

architecture. Through the film<br />

Moryama-San, we follow the touching story<br />

behind Ryue Nishizawa’s masterpiece.<br />

The story went something like this: After<br />

his mother has died, our protagonist, Mr.<br />

Moriyama wanted to tear down their family<br />

house and build a new one, so he wrote<br />

a letter to the architect. “You don’t need a<br />

house, you need your own village”- said the<br />

architect.<br />

A small village inside a forest<br />

The Moriyama house itself is an archipelago<br />

of ten units. These can be used<br />

by the resident himself, or, rented out.<br />

Ryue Nishizawa focuses on creating the<br />

environment that fits within the existing<br />

landscape. In the suburbs where<br />

Mr. Moriyama resides, everybody has<br />

known each other for dedicates, and<br />

the street is often used as a shared<br />

communal area. Nishizawa wanted to<br />

create an unrestricted part of this landscape<br />

that is still unique. He does not<br />

use fences, and uses large transparent<br />

windows and even a glass corridor in<br />

one of the blocks, in order to not create<br />

isolation from the natural landscape,<br />

as well as the communal feeling of this<br />

Tokyo neighbourhood. He also highlights<br />

the importance of soil in a concrete<br />

city like Tokyo. Having soil in his<br />

garden, allowed Moriyama to keep one<br />

of his mothers trees after her passing,<br />

and also use the trees for the utilities<br />

they provide, often using them for drying<br />

his clothes.<br />

We see the intimate, organic relationship<br />

between the house and it’s<br />

inhibitor unfold in a dainty, spontaneous<br />

film by the iconic duo Ila Bêka<br />

and Louise Lemonie, also known as<br />

“Bêka&Lemonie”. Bêka and Lemonie<br />

are considered to be the cult figures<br />

Moriyama-san is a man of exquisite taste<br />

and character. Bêka stumbled into him<br />

spontaneously, and they started talking<br />

about music, which resulted in mr. Moriyama<br />

inviting him to the basement of his house<br />

where he kept his extensive record collection<br />

(parts of which can be found scattered<br />

around the exhibition units) and they<br />

bonded over their liking of Otomo Yoshihide,<br />

one of the pioneers of “noise music”<br />

which Moriyama is very fond of. There is a<br />

line in the film that explains that Moriyama<br />

likes music and film, but he loves reading.<br />

Much of the film is spontaneous, but it is an<br />

interesting, unique portrait of a man and<br />

his house, which seem to have become one.<br />

They cannot exist without each-other. The<br />

visitors feel the closeness and seem to be<br />

very touched by Moriyama’s character. It is<br />

interesting to be able to get to know a man’s<br />

character based on his home. The film features<br />

shots of small collectable sculptures,<br />

that are also displayed in the exhibition<br />

which only intensifies the feeling of familiarity.<br />

This is why, it can be said that Moriyama<br />

House is not a building. It is an immaterial<br />

and material portrait of the man and his<br />

spirit coming together in perfect balance<br />

with the surroundings that make this building<br />

Moriyama’s home, and an absolute architectural<br />

masterpiece.<br />

23


Issue 1<br />

May 2017<br />

24


Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

25


#1<br />

Who let my Fish Loose<br />

23/ 05/2017<br />

In this edition, you can find a range of topics including popular<br />

and current:<br />

Trump and rise of Narcissism and newly created edible water<br />

bottles,<br />

Cultural theory looking at the sense of urgency of life by Boris<br />

Groys<br />

Current exhibitions in London: Japanese House and why everyone<br />

should see it.<br />

for digital access and more visit<br />

www.wholetmyfishloose.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!