24.05.2017 Views

Complete Whole Notebook

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This would be a generic base:<br />

152<br />

XOH ---> X + + OH¯<br />

When acids and bases react according to this theory, they neutralize each other, forming water and a<br />

salt:<br />

HA + XOH ---> H2O + XA<br />

Keeping in mind that the acid, the base and the salt all ionize, we can write this:<br />

Finally, we can drop all spectator ions, to get this:<br />

H + + A¯ + X + + OH¯ ---> H2O + X + + A¯<br />

H + + OH¯ ---> H2O<br />

These ideas covered all of the known acids at the time (the usual suspects like hydrochloric acid,<br />

acetic acid, and so on) and most of the bases (sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium<br />

hydroxide and so on). HOWEVER, and it is a big however, the theory did not explain why ammonia<br />

(NH3) was a base. There are other problems with the theory also.<br />

III. Problems with Arrhenius' Theory<br />

1. The solvent has no role to play in Arrhenius' theory. An acid is expected to be an acid in any<br />

solvent. This was found to not be the case. For example, HCl is an acid in water, behaving in<br />

the manner Arrhenius expected. However, if HCl is dissolved in benzene, there is no<br />

dissociation, the HCl remaining as un-dissociated molecules. The nature of the solvent plays a<br />

critical role in acid-base properties of substances.<br />

2. All salts in Arrhenius' theory should produce solutions that are neither acidic or basic. This is<br />

not the case. If equal amounts of HCl and ammonia react, the solution is slightly acidic. If equal<br />

amounts of acetic acid and sodium hydroxide are reacted, the resulting solution is basic.<br />

Arrhenius had no explanation for this.<br />

3. The need for hydroxide as the base led Arrhenius to propose the formula NH4OH as the<br />

formula for ammonia in water. This led to the misconception that NH4OH is the actual base,<br />

not NH3.<br />

In fact, by 1896, several years before Arrhenius announced his theory, it had been recognized that<br />

characteristic base properties where just as evident in such solvents as aniline, where no hydroxide<br />

ions were possible.<br />

4. H + , a bare proton, does not exist for very long in water. The proton affinity of H2O is about 799<br />

kJ/mol. Consequently, this reaction:<br />

H2O + H + ---> H3O +<br />

happens to a very great degree. The "concentration" of free protons in water has been estimated to<br />

be 10¯130 M. A rather preposterous value, indeed.<br />

The Arrhenius theory of acids and bases will be fully supplanted by the theory proposed<br />

independently by Johannes and Thomas Lowry in 1923.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!