26.05.2017 Views

GSN_Apr_FINAL+links

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 1 of 12<br />

Cyber Threats & Solutions<br />

Report: Municipal governments lack funding to<br />

reach high level of cybersecurity<br />

WASHINGTON May 2, 2017 The<br />

inability to pay competitive salaries,<br />

insufficient cybersecurity staff, and<br />

a general lack of funds present serious<br />

barriers to local governments<br />

achieving the highest levels of cybersecurity,<br />

according to a survey of<br />

local government chief information<br />

officers conducted by ICMA, the International<br />

City/County<br />

Management Association,<br />

in partnership with<br />

the University of Maryland<br />

Baltimore County.<br />

The goal of the Cybersecurity<br />

2016 Survey was<br />

to better understand current<br />

local government<br />

cybersecurity practices and their related<br />

issues, including what capacities<br />

cities and counties possess, what<br />

kind of barriers they face, and what<br />

type of support they have to implement<br />

cybersecurity programs.<br />

Despite nearly a third (32 percent)<br />

of respondents reporting an increase<br />

in cyber attacks to their local<br />

government information during the<br />

past 12 months, 58 percent indicated<br />

that the inability to pay competitive<br />

salaries prohibited them from<br />

achieving high levels of cybersecurity.<br />

Fifty-three percent cited an insufficient<br />

number of cybersecurity<br />

staff as the primary obstacle, and 52<br />

percent said it was a general lack of<br />

funds.<br />

The public sector pays considerably<br />

less than the private sector<br />

“Because the costs to restore compromised<br />

data are staggering, local governments must<br />

understand what resources they need to<br />

achieve their cybersecurity objectives and<br />

ensure the safety of their data.”<br />

for cybersecurity expertise, which<br />

places further pressure on U.S. local<br />

governments to find ways to<br />

fund compensation in this explosive<br />

industry. Currently, this booming<br />

field has zero unemployment and<br />

one million unfilled jobs, and experts<br />

estimate that the shortfall will<br />

reach 1.5 million by 2019.<br />

When asked to rank the top three<br />

things most needed to ensure the<br />

highest level of cybersecurity for<br />

their local government, respondents<br />

cited greater funding as number<br />

one, better cybersecurity policies as<br />

number two, and greater cybersecurity<br />

awareness among local government<br />

employees as number three in<br />

importance.<br />

“As local governments become<br />

increasingly reliant on technology<br />

and the Internet, they must<br />

also become increasingly<br />

diligent about the security<br />

they provide for the data<br />

and information they collect<br />

and manage,” said ICMA<br />

Executive Director Marc<br />

Ott. “Because the costs to restore<br />

compromised data are<br />

staggering, local governments must<br />

understand what resources they<br />

need to achieve their cybersecurity<br />

objectives and ensure the safety of<br />

their data. The results of the ICMA-<br />

UMBC Cybersecurity 2016 Survey<br />

can help local leaders identify and<br />

evaluate critical resource shortages.”<br />

Other highlights of the ICMA/<br />

UMBC cybersecurity survey results<br />

include:<br />

Only 1 percent of responding lo-<br />

cal governments<br />

have a stand-alone<br />

cybersecurity department<br />

or unit.<br />

Primary responsibility<br />

for cybersecurity is most<br />

often located within the IT department.<br />

Roughly 62 percent of responding<br />

jurisdictions have developed a<br />

formal policy governing the use of<br />

personally-owned devices by governmental<br />

officials and employees.<br />

Nearly 70 percent of responding<br />

local governments have not developed<br />

a formal, written cybersecurity<br />

risk management plan, but nearly<br />

41 percent conduct an annual risk<br />

assessment and an additional 16<br />

percent take stock of their risk at<br />

least every two years.<br />

The Cybersecurity 2016 Survey<br />

was mailed (with an online option)<br />

to the chief information officers of<br />

3,423 U.S. municipalities and counties<br />

with populations of 25,000 or<br />

greater. Responses were received<br />

from 411 local governments for a<br />

response rate of 12 percent.<br />

Review the complete results of<br />

the survey at: http://icma.org/cybersecurity2016surveyresults.<br />

About ICMA<br />

ICMA, the International City/<br />

County Management Association,<br />

advances professional local government<br />

worldwide through leadership,<br />

management, innovation, and ethics.<br />

ICMA is second only to the federal<br />

government in the collection,<br />

analysis, and dissemination of data<br />

focused on issues related to local<br />

government management. Through<br />

expansive partnerships with local<br />

governments, federal agencies, nonprofits,<br />

and philanthropic funders,<br />

the organization gathers information<br />

on topics such as sustainability,<br />

health care, aging communities,<br />

38 39<br />

Introduction<br />

In 2016, the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), in partnership with the University of Maryland,<br />

Baltimore County (UMBC), conducted a survey to be ter understand local government cybersecurity practices. The<br />

results of this survey provide insights into the cybersecurity issues faced by U.S. local governments, including wha their<br />

capacities are, what kind of ba riers they face, and wha type of suppor they have to implement cybersecurity programs.<br />

Methodology<br />

The survey was sent on paper via postal mail to the chief information o ficers of 3,423 U.S. local governments with<br />

populations of 25,000 or greater. An online submission option was also made available to survey recipients.<br />

Responses were received from 411 of the governments surveyed, yielding a response rate of 12%. Cities were<br />

ove represented among respondents while counties were underrepresented. Similarly, higher percentage of responses<br />

received from larger communities compared to sma ler communities. Further, jurisdictions in the Mountain region of the<br />

U.S. were ove represented, while jurisdictions in the Mid-Atlantic and East South-Central regions were<br />

unde represented. The following report reflects trends among the unweighted survey responses, and should only be<br />

considered to be representative of the responding governments. Weighting should be applied to achieve representation<br />

of the broader survey population.<br />

Cybersecurity 2016 Survey<br />

Summary Report of Survey Results<br />

Cybersecurity 2016 Survey<br />

Number Surveyed Number Responding Response Rate<br />

Total 3423 411 12.0%<br />

Population Size<br />

Over 1,000,000 42 11 26.2%<br />

500,000 - 1,000,000 98 20 20.4%<br />

250,000 - 499,999 168 26 15.5%<br />

100,000 - 249,999 532 63 11.8%<br />

50,000 - 99,999 939 108 11.5%<br />

25,000 - 49,999 1644 183 11.1%<br />

Geographic Division<br />

New England 183 23 12.6%<br />

Mid-Atlantic 391 23 5.9%<br />

East North-Central 782 94 12.0%<br />

West North-Central 266 26 9.8%<br />

South Atlantic 541 79 14.6%<br />

East South-Central 253 20 7.9%<br />

West South-Central 354 41 11.6%<br />

Mountain 220 48 21.8%<br />

Pacific Coast 433 57 13.2%<br />

Type of Government<br />

Municipalities 1893 267 14.1%<br />

Counties 1530 144 9.4%<br />

economic development, homeland<br />

security, alternative service delivery,<br />

as well as performance measurement<br />

and management data on a<br />

variety of local government services—all<br />

of which support related<br />

training, education, and technical<br />

assistance.<br />

About the University of Maryland<br />

Baltimore County<br />

UMBC is a dynamic public research<br />

university integrating teaching, research,<br />

and service to benefit the<br />

citizens of Maryland. As an Honors<br />

University, the campus offers academically<br />

talented students a strong<br />

undergraduate liberal arts foundation<br />

that prepares them for graduate<br />

and professional study, entry into<br />

the workforce, and community service<br />

and leadership. UMBC emphasizes<br />

science, engineering, information<br />

technology, human services<br />

and public policy at the graduate<br />

level. UMBC contributes to the economic<br />

development of the State and<br />

the region through entrepreneurial<br />

initiatives, workforce training, K-16<br />

partnerships, and technology commercialization<br />

in collaboration with<br />

public agencies and the corporate<br />

community. UMBC is dedicated to<br />

cultural and ethnic diversity, social<br />

responsibility and lifelong learning.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!