30.05.2017 Views

JEP mag

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thimerosal: A Safe Preservative<br />

Avariety of studies have been conducted<br />

that looked at the different<br />

effects thimerosal had, or were<br />

thought to have had on the body. A look<br />

at 9 of such studies ranging from early<br />

life exposure to thimerosal to ten years<br />

later. The first study looked at the effect<br />

that thimerosal exposure in early life had<br />

on brain functions, language, behavior,<br />

and coordination. It also looked at the<br />

nueropsychological outcomes 7 to 10<br />

years later, and it found that there were<br />

no associations with thimerosal and the<br />

general intellectual functioning, verbal<br />

memory, executive functioning, behavior<br />

regulation, fine motor coordination,<br />

and language in the children that were<br />

exposed to thimerosal. They did however,<br />

find that there was a small association<br />

between the thimerosal exposure and<br />

tics in boys. A second study looked at thimerosal<br />

exposure within the womb and<br />

in infancy. It compared children with and<br />

without autism, and looked at the exposure<br />

that they had to thimerosal from vaccines<br />

in infancy. It found that there was<br />

no difference in the exposure to thimerosal<br />

between the children that had autism<br />

and those that did not have autism. A<br />

third study, which was funded by the Center<br />

for Disease Control and Prevention,<br />

looked at the long term effect of thimerosal<br />

exposure, which compared the neuropsychological<br />

outcomes of the children<br />

they randomly selected to receive a form<br />

of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussive<br />

vaccine, or DTaP for short, within the first<br />

year of life. One of these contained thimerosal<br />

and the other did not, and ten<br />

years later they were tested for 24 neuropsychocological<br />

outcomes, and the results<br />

did not show that thimerosal in vaccines<br />

were harmful to children. A fourth<br />

study looked at thimerosal in vaccines in<br />

the United States, the United Kingdom,<br />

and Denmark. This was an analysis of<br />

data from “ the US health maintenace<br />

orgainzations, the UK General Practice<br />

Research Database, and the entire country<br />

of Denmark” ( CDC para 4). They all<br />

also failed to find a link between thimerosal<br />

in vaccines and causing autism. A fifth<br />

study looked at thimerosal within childrens<br />

flu shots. This study “measured the<br />

proportion of injection site reactions and<br />

the infections that were reported to the<br />

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System<br />

after testing three versions of an inactivated<br />

influenza vaccine in children that<br />

were under the age of 2” (CDC para 5).<br />

The three versions that they tested, which<br />

had thimerosal present within them and<br />

ones which did not contain any thimerosal,<br />

found that there was no difference<br />

between the proportion of ISR, rash or<br />

infections. A sixth study looked at whether<br />

or not thimerosal caused neurodevelopmental<br />

disorders with in children. This<br />

study only found “a few statistically significant<br />

associations between exposer<br />

from thimerosal and nueropsychological<br />

functioning” (CDC 6). The results showed<br />

no link between neurodevelopmental disorders<br />

within children and vaccinations<br />

that contained thimerosal.<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!