30.05.2017 Views

JEP mag

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table of Contents<br />

Meet the Author……………………………………….2<br />

Autism Speaks………………………………………….5<br />

Timeline……………………………….……………….7-8<br />

Wakefield Fraud………………………………….9-10<br />

Wakefield Interview…………………………..11-12<br />

A Look Inside………………………………………...13<br />

Myths and Facts………………………………..15-16<br />

Thimerosal in Vaccines…………………………..15<br />

Trump Administration……………………………..17<br />

From the Mailroom………………………………...18<br />

Annotations………………………………………….19+<br />

2 TIME May 31, 2017<br />

Fig 2. Staff, Seattle Times. “Editorial: It’s Time to End All Debate on Vaccines.” The Seattle<br />

Times. The Seattle Times Company, 12 Feb. 2015. Web. 29 May 2017.


Letter From The Editor<br />

Hi and welcome to Time <strong>mag</strong>azine.<br />

Our goal here is to provide you with<br />

the best information possible so you<br />

can make the right choice when it<br />

comes to the important health decisions.<br />

You may be asking yourself<br />

“what makes a Time <strong>mag</strong>azine editor<br />

qualified to be giving out medical advice.”<br />

After ten years as the CEO of<br />

the Center for Disease Control, I know<br />

my way around the health industry,<br />

and will put my knowledge that I have<br />

acquired in that time to work for you.<br />

I have dedicated my life to the wellbeing<br />

of others and holds true especially<br />

when it comes to the carefully chosen<br />

content of this special edition of Time<br />

<strong>mag</strong>azine. I was raised in a small,<br />

medical orented family with both parents<br />

and my brother working in the<br />

medical field, they were what sparked<br />

my interest for the topic and eventually<br />

backed my pursuit to attending Harvard<br />

University, where I earned my<br />

MD. Back in 2001 I was lucky enough<br />

to further my career with the help of<br />

Time <strong>mag</strong>azine. After years of working<br />

with the team I was able to reach<br />

my current position of editor. I have<br />

picked up a few tricks over the years<br />

and have built up . They work tirelessly<br />

to provide vast knowledge to you, the<br />

reader, with what you need to know<br />

going forward in the ever changing<br />

medical field. When taking on new<br />

staff, each candidate is carefully assessed<br />

1 and goes through a trial period<br />

where they get to show how well<br />

Fig 3. “Michael Elliott: TIME International Editor Dies at 65.” Time. Time, n.d. Web. 29 May 2017.<br />

they can work with our team. We do<br />

this so we hire the best of the best. All<br />

the information in our issues is handpicked<br />

by our team of staff, all experts<br />

in their rightful areas. The team’s diversity<br />

allows us to create content that<br />

is accurate and un bias across a vast<br />

array of medical topics so you get the<br />

most for your read here. In order to<br />

not adumbrate 2 any of the information<br />

in this special issue of the <strong>mag</strong>azine,<br />

covering vaccinations and autism, I<br />

have taken it upon myself to call in numerous<br />

experts on the topic throughout<br />

our writing. Such experts include<br />

Bob and Suzanne Wright founders of<br />

Autism Speaks, representatives from<br />

the Center for Diseas Control and Prevention,<br />

as well as represetatives from<br />

the US Food and Drug Administration.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Michael Elliot<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 3


Autism Speaks: A Look Inside<br />

Written By: Ben Goldberger<br />

A<br />

utism Speaks, founded by the<br />

vice chairman of General<br />

Electric Bob and his wife Suzanne<br />

Wright is an autism advocacy<br />

organization within the United States<br />

that sponsors autism research and<br />

conducts awareness and outreach<br />

activities aimed at families, governments,<br />

and the public. This organization<br />

was founded in 2005 a year<br />

after their grandson was diagnosed<br />

with autism. Ever since then, they<br />

have done great things, as they “are<br />

dedicated to funding global biomedical<br />

research into the causes, prevention,<br />

treatments and a possible cure<br />

for autism. Although some people<br />

may attack Autism Speaks as a hate<br />

group, or believe that people with<br />

autism do not support the organization,<br />

or that they cater to the parents<br />

of autistic children rather than autistic<br />

children themselves. Some people<br />

even believe they are bad for wanting<br />

to find a cure for autism, but all these<br />

ludicrous claims do not tarnish their<br />

goal. Visiting their website greets you<br />

with the sight of their logo which is a<br />

puzzle piece, although it is controversial.<br />

The origins of the puzzle piece,<br />

trace all the way back to 1963. It was<br />

created by Gerald Gasson, a parent<br />

and board member for the National<br />

Autistic Society, which was formerly<br />

The Society for Autistic Children,<br />

in London. The board believed autistic<br />

people suffered from a ‘puzzling’<br />

condition, hence their decision to take<br />

up a puzzle piece as a logo. They adopted<br />

the logo because it didn’t look<br />

like any other i<strong>mag</strong>e used for charitable<br />

or commercial use. Included<br />

with the puzzle piece was an i<strong>mag</strong>e<br />

of a weeping child. The weeping child<br />

was used as a reminder that Autistic<br />

people suffer from their condition.<br />

If you visit their website at www.autismspeaks.org,<br />

you will find information<br />

about the signs to see if your child<br />

has autism spectrum disorder, what<br />

do do if you have recently received<br />

a diagnosis for autism, information on<br />

local fundraiser walks, events, corporate<br />

sponsors you can support, and<br />

most importantly an advocate in your<br />

state. According to the website, “The<br />

2 TIME May 31, 2017 Fig 4: “Autism.” Pinterest. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 May 2017.


Autism Response Team (ART) is specially<br />

trained to connect people with<br />

autism, their families, and caregivers<br />

to information, tools, and resources.”<br />

This is helpful to those who may have<br />

difficulty fitting into society, as they<br />

may be able to help. “Autism Speaks<br />

is enhancing lives today and accelerating<br />

a spectrum of solutions for tomorrow.”<br />

Building upon the legacy of<br />

three leading autism organizations,<br />

Autism Coalition for Research and Education<br />

(ACRE), the National Alliance<br />

for Autism Research (NAAR) and Cure<br />

Autism Now (CAN), who merged with<br />

the organization, Autism Speaks has<br />

made extraordinary advancements<br />

in the autism community, and has<br />

drawn the support of many prominent<br />

individuals throughout its creation.<br />

Fig 5:“Pequot Library’s Annual Meeting Features Guest Speaker Bob Wright.”<br />

Fairfield Sun. N.p., 19 Oct. 2016. Web. 29 May 2017.<br />

Fig 6: Twittikat. “ALL about Max Restaurant Group.” Champs Et Frites. N.p., 02 Apr.<br />

2017. Web. 30 May 2017.<br />

SUPPORT THE CAUSE TODAY!<br />

EVERY BIT COUNTS AS WE FIGHT<br />

TO RAISE AWARNESS FOR<br />

AUTISM SPEAKS<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 3


DO YOU KNOW THE<br />

CONSEQUENCES<br />

OF NOT GETTING<br />

VACCINATED?<br />

For more information regarding vaccinations,<br />

please visit www.CDC.gov or call 800-CDC-INFO


Fig 7: “I<strong>mag</strong>es by Klinikadiva.” Klinik Pratama Adiva. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 May 2017.


Andrew Wakefield: Fraud<br />

Written By: Jonathan Woods<br />

Andrew Wakefield, now known as<br />

a fraud in the medical field by<br />

many and those who choose to<br />

believe it, and it is for a good reason.<br />

Afterall, he caused a massive spike of<br />

fear within parents throughout the world<br />

in the late 90s about vaccine safety, by<br />

publishing a study that had a “link” between<br />

autism and vaccines. His study was<br />

published in 1998, and has since been<br />

retracted, as many scientists proved that<br />

his data was wrong. 11 out of 12 of the<br />

people that worked with Wakefield on<br />

this study voted to retract the information.<br />

Wakefield got himself into a lot of<br />

legal trouble with his study. The courts of<br />

UK got involved and caused the study to<br />

be retracted and for Wakefield to lose<br />

his medical liscence in the UK. He was<br />

found to have ties with a competing vaccination<br />

company that looked to profit<br />

from the chaos that it created. The problem<br />

with his study was that his sample<br />

size was very small, so the data taken<br />

is not a good representation, especially<br />

when you then try to apply the data that<br />

they found to millions of people. “The<br />

study had an uncontrolled experiment<br />

design, so others who may be looking<br />

to recreate the study would struggle.<br />

Speculative conclusions were also made<br />

by the group, further adding for the decision<br />

to withdraw from the Lancet” (Rao<br />

para 7). Court decisions found Wakefield<br />

guilty of skewing results, on the<br />

grounds of taking money from certain individuals.<br />

They also suspended his medical<br />

license. His study gained so much<br />

attention because parents had fears because<br />

the cause of autism was, and still<br />

remains unknown, and then a study is<br />

Fig 8:“Andrew Wakefield.” Health Impact News. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 May 2017.<br />

10 TIME May 31, 2017


Fig 9: “Vaccines and Diseases.” Vaccines and Disease An Investigative Report. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 May 2017.<br />

released revealing a link between the<br />

measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine<br />

and autism, naturally parents reacted.<br />

Vaccination rates took a major hit as a<br />

result, and that caused an outbreak of<br />

measles, mumps and rubella. This remains<br />

a concern today because the<br />

same thing would happen if a large number<br />

of people refused to get a certain<br />

vaccination, or if vaccination companies<br />

were not allowed to give vaccinations<br />

anymore because of regulations. If that<br />

were to happen, the results would be catastrophic<br />

and felt worldwide. “Despite<br />

all this, and to no benefit of the public,<br />

he has returned to the spotlight by meeting<br />

with President Donald Trump” (Garrett<br />

para 6), and with his 2016 movie<br />

Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe,<br />

which is an investigation in the Center<br />

for Disease Control and Prevention’s<br />

destruction of a study linking autism to<br />

the MMR vaccine. He is still a vaccine<br />

critic, and continues to push his agenda.<br />

His meeting with Trump at his inaugural<br />

ball raises questions, as he talks<br />

about his call for a overhaul of the Center<br />

for Disease Control and Prevention.<br />

He walked around the ball talking about<br />

looking for important individuals who<br />

he could “prevail upon them to make a<br />

world a better place for children with autism,<br />

a safer place for children” (Garrett<br />

para 2). His return may be problematic<br />

for the vaccine industry, and more importantly,<br />

parents and children. Like the<br />

first time he published a study, an outbreak<br />

of measles, mumps, and rubella<br />

may occur if they were to overhaul the<br />

Center for Disease Control and Prevention,<br />

like he said. The Trump administration<br />

is a cause for concern throughout<br />

the scientific community because of these<br />

meetings that have been held with these<br />

anti-vaccination people such as Andrew<br />

Wakefield and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 11


The Spread of Preventable Disea<br />

2 TIME May 31, 2017<br />

Fig Doucleff, Michaeleen. “How Vaccine Fears Fueled The Resurgence Of Preventable Diseases.” NPR. NPR, 25 Jan. 2014. Web. 29 May 2017.


ses Caused By Vaccination Fears<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 3


Fig Handley, Jr. J.B. “’Vaccine Safety Commission’: 50 Studies the AAP Failed to Send President Trump.” Medium. N.p., 14 Feb.<br />

2017. Web. 29 May 2017.


Common Vaccination Myths<br />

Written By: Dan Hirschhorn<br />

Myth #1- Vaccines are a cause of autism.<br />

This false myth is widely circulated<br />

throughout the world over many years,<br />

and “is the cause of a major drop in vaccination<br />

rates, which in turn caused many<br />

virus outbreaks, some more deadly than<br />

others. This myth is widely believed because<br />

of the 1997 study by the notorious<br />

Andrew Wakefield was published in The<br />

Lancet, a prestigious medical journal,<br />

and this study suggested that the measles,<br />

mumps, and rubella vaccine was<br />

the cause of autism” (Abraham para 1).<br />

This led widespread concern from parents<br />

all over the world, causing many to<br />

go unvaccinated. This study was actually<br />

retracted from The Lancet years later,<br />

and among those who voted in favor<br />

of the retraction were 10 of the 12 who<br />

worked on the case. The retraction came<br />

after reputable scientific evidence was<br />

found after that disproved the information<br />

within the study. With the events that<br />

transpired, Andrew Wakefield had his<br />

study removed, and his career ruined.<br />

The many court cases that followed left<br />

Wakefield unable to practice medicine<br />

(legally) once his medical license was<br />

revoked. The courts found him guilty of<br />

committing fraud. We still may not know<br />

what causes autism, but many large scientific<br />

studies have disproved this myth.<br />

Myth #2- Infant immune systems can’t<br />

handle so many vaccines as they are currently<br />

being given.<br />

This myth is also false. A common concern,<br />

and for good reason, is around infants<br />

and whether or not they can handle<br />

so many vaccines. We understand that<br />

as parents it is your responsibility for<br />

the wellbeing of your children. Although<br />

many believe this myth to be true, it is not,<br />

and infants immune systems are stronger<br />

than many believe them to be. “Through<br />

many tests, scientists have found that,<br />

because of the large amount of antibodies<br />

present within the blood of an infant,<br />

they are able to respond to 10,000 vaccines<br />

at one given time (theoretically).<br />

If 14 vaccines were given at once, they<br />

would only use up about 0.1% of the baby’s<br />

immune system” (Abraham para 2).<br />

The amount of vaccines given can never<br />

overwhelm a child’s immune system because<br />

they are constantly replenishing<br />

cells within the immune system, so the<br />

vaccines only benefit them. Vaccinations,<br />

although increased in the number give,<br />

are far more effective at doing their jobs<br />

than they once were. Vaccinations are<br />

carefully crafted and tested by scientists<br />

in order to create a final product that<br />

does not negatively react with humans<br />

and their immune system. The goal of<br />

vaccinations has and always will be to<br />

prevent the acquiration of harmful and<br />

deadly diseases and viruses. This is no<br />

different when it comes to infants. They<br />

to come into contact with harmful bacteria<br />

daily, and the results are just as dead-<br />

6 TIME May 31, 2017<br />

Fig Raptor, The Original Skeptical. “The End of the Vaccines Cause Autism Myth.” Skeptical Raptor. N.p., 17 Apr. 2016. Web. 29 May 2017.


ly, if not worse than the same in an adult.<br />

It is imperative that all infants around the<br />

world receive vaccinations, as there are<br />

benefits to the masses receiving them that<br />

one does not get if they are the only one<br />

with the vaccination. It takes the crowd<br />

to prevent deadly viruses. Most infants<br />

have a really strong and healthy immune<br />

systems that can take the ingredients that<br />

are in vaccines, and come out on top of<br />

the virus strain within the vaccine.<br />

Myth #3- Natural Immunity is better than<br />

vaccine acquired immunity.<br />

Sometimes natural immunity to a disease<br />

results in stronger immunity than vaccines,<br />

but it also produces many dangers. “For<br />

a disease such as measles, natural acquisition<br />

would result in a 1 in 500 chance<br />

of death from the symptoms that would<br />

follow compared to the 1 in a million<br />

chance of having a reaction to the disease”<br />

(Abraham para 3). Vaccines are<br />

specifically designed to build up immunity<br />

within the body against certain bacteria<br />

and viruses making this myth false<br />

in most cases. The vaccines can come in<br />

a variety of ways, but all have a much<br />

greater chance of the immune system<br />

learning to fight it than if it were to encounter<br />

the same bacteria or virus naturally,<br />

where there is a greater chance for<br />

sickness to occur. Natural immunity is in<br />

no way controlled, so there is no way to<br />

tell how the body will react to it, and if it<br />

will be able to fight it off.<br />

Fig “Immunity (medical).” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 27 May 2017. Web. 29 May 2017.<br />

Myth #4- Vaccines contain unsafe toxins.<br />

Concerns of the safety have been about<br />

the use of aluminum, mercury, or formaldehyde<br />

within vaccines. Although it is<br />

true that these substance are toxic to the<br />

human body in high levels of concentration,<br />

vaccines approved by the FDA only<br />

contain trace amounts of these substances”<br />

(Abraham para 4), making this myth<br />

false. According to the CDC and the<br />

FDA, our body actually produces formaldehyde<br />

in rates higher than the vaccine<br />

introduces. No scientific evidence has<br />

proven that low levels of mercury or aluminum<br />

within vaccines is harmful or toxic<br />

to the body. Vaccines follow specific<br />

safety procedures to ensure that nothing<br />

within them will be harmful to someone<br />

who receives it.<br />

Myth #5- Better hygiene and sanitation<br />

are actually responsible for decreased<br />

infections, not vaccines.<br />

Although better hygiene and sanitation<br />

does decrease infections, it is not solely<br />

responsible for doing so and cannot be<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 7


depended on every single time, thus making<br />

this myth false. Measles in 1963 is<br />

an example of this, with nearly 400,000<br />

infected, it dropped to about 25,000 infected<br />

in 1970 because of vaccines. It is<br />

important to mention that hygiene and<br />

sanitation habits did not change much<br />

over this time period. “Similarly, with the<br />

Hib disease, rates went from 20,000 in<br />

1990 to around 1,500 in 1993 after the<br />

introduction of the vaccine” (Abraham<br />

para 5). If we were to cease giving vaccinations<br />

while keeping good hygiene,<br />

you would see an increase in infections.<br />

That is because vaccines are specially<br />

designed to combat a majority of infections,<br />

many of which are fatal to humans<br />

if they were to get them.<br />

at work is the MMR vaccination. The<br />

Andrew Wakefield case sparked fear in<br />

the people, and that lead to a greatly<br />

reduced amount of the MMR vaccination<br />

being received, and that lead to a measles,<br />

mumps and rubella outbreak within<br />

the United States and the United Kingdom.<br />

Those outbreaks could have easily<br />

been prevented if the people continued<br />

to vaccinate their children. No credible<br />

sources are available today that prove<br />

that vaccinations cause harm to the body,<br />

and are not worth the risk of getting. This<br />

is because the vaccinations are carefully<br />

crafted so that this is avoided.<br />

Myth #6- Vaccines aren’t worth the risk.<br />

Many parents think that vaccines are<br />

not worth the risk, but children have<br />

been vaccinated safely for decades, and<br />

no credible study has linked long term<br />

health conditions to vaccines. “The incidence<br />

of death is so rare from vaccines,<br />

it is about one per every 2 million injections”<br />

(Abraham para 6), making this<br />

myth false. Vaccinations when given to<br />

large populations are effective in preventing<br />

diseases from taking hold and<br />

ravaging the population. Previous strains<br />

of bacteria that killed off or left others<br />

disabled can now be prevented by vaccinations.<br />

An example of vaccinations<br />

Myth #7- Vaccines are something that<br />

can infect children with the disease that<br />

the vaccination is trying to prevent.<br />

In very rare cases, those who are vaccinated<br />

may get the symptoms of the<br />

disease that was trying to be prevented.<br />

“In fact, of the less than one in one million<br />

cases where someone does have the<br />

symptoms, they simply are experiencing<br />

a body’s immune system responding to<br />

the vaccine, not the actual disease itself.<br />

There has only been one recorded instance<br />

where a vaccine was proven to<br />

have caused a disease, and this was with<br />

the Oral Polio Vaccine, a vaccine that is<br />

no longer used today” (Abraham para<br />

7). Vaccinations within the United States<br />

are under the regulation of the Food<br />

and Drug Adminstration.<br />

2 TIME May 31, 2017<br />

Fig :“Handwashing: Clean Hands Save Lives.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,<br />

27 Jan. 2016. Web. 30 May 2017.


Fig : Plait, Phil. “Antivaxxers Take Their Dangerous Message to the Streets.” Slate Magazine. N.p., 15 Mar. 2013. Web. 30 May 2017.<br />

Myth #8- There is no need to get vaccinations because infection rates in the United States<br />

are currently so low.<br />

This is false because infection rates in the United States being so low is caused by the<br />

amount of vaccinations being received. “The more people that receive a vaccination, the<br />

greater the chances are of protecting those who do not get the immunization, through<br />

something called herd immunity” (Abraham para 8). When more and more people opt<br />

out of getting vaccinated, whether it be for them or their children, a collective danger<br />

is created and the opportunity for viruses and bacteria to spread. “With the wide availabilty<br />

and ease of international travel, diseases that may not be a threat within your<br />

area may become one if the disease is carried abroad from an unvaccinated individual”<br />

(Abraham para 8).<br />

Fig :“Vaccinate with Confidence.” Refutation to Anti-Vaccine. N.p., 08 July 2013. Web. 30 May 2017.<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 3


Importance of Vaccinations<br />

Written By: Dan Hirschhorn<br />

Vaccinations play a very important<br />

role in protecting us, the people<br />

of the world, no matter what your<br />

ethnic, religious, or economic background<br />

is. There are benefits of the masses<br />

getting vaccines, one such benefit is<br />

that even the people that do not receive<br />

immunizations are less likely to contract<br />

it. This is important to keep in mind, as<br />

those who are unable to receive vaccinations<br />

for various reasons such as elderly,<br />

those who are pregnant, and people<br />

with severe allergies are still kept safe<br />

with every other person that is vaccinated.<br />

Gambia was able to get rid of their<br />

Hib disease problem entirely when just<br />

70 percent of their overall population<br />

was vaccinated. The opposite can be<br />

achieved if people decided they did not<br />

need vaccines any more, for whatever<br />

reason they may have. If a large number<br />

of people stop receiving vaccinations,<br />

then the chances of a disease outbreak<br />

increase greatly. “The Andrew Wakefield<br />

study did just that, greatly reducing<br />

the amount of people that got vaccines<br />

by instilling fear in the people, a fear<br />

of autism. His study effectively caused<br />

a measles, mumps, and rubella disease<br />

outbreak, which could have easily been<br />

prevented if they kept on receiving the<br />

proper vaccinations for the disease”<br />

(Rao para 13). The number of people<br />

affected by MMR was just several dozen<br />

in 1997, but that number quickly skyrocketed<br />

to over 2,000 cases in 2011.<br />

Outbreaks of the whooping cough in the<br />

United States have been linked to low<br />

vaccination rates. There are many types<br />

of vaccines that someone can receive,<br />

and each type has certain advantages<br />

and disadvantages that go along with<br />

them. The first type of vaccination that<br />

you can receive is a live attenuated vaccine,<br />

where a weak asymptotic form of<br />

a virus is introduced into the body. This<br />

form will not cause sickness, instead it<br />

will allow the body, specifically the immune<br />

system, to recognize the antigens<br />

that the virus has, and be able to fight<br />

it in the future, if you were ever to encounter<br />

it again. This is good for giving<br />

someone lifelong immunity to a virus, as<br />

it is live and allows the body to adapt<br />

to it. However, this form of vaccination<br />

is not used on people with weakened immune<br />

systems, as that could lead to the<br />

virus causing sickness. Refrigeration is required<br />

to keep the pathogens alive long<br />

enough to be used. Common vaccines<br />

used in this life style are the measles,<br />

mumps, rubella vaccine, the chickenpox<br />

vaccine, influenza vaccine, and the rotavirus<br />

vaccine. Inactivated vaccines are<br />

those where the bacteria or viruses are<br />

killed off with chemicals or heat to accomplish<br />

a similar effect as the live virus<br />

when introduced into the body. The immune<br />

system is still able to learn from the<br />

dead cells, and is able to fight live versions<br />

of the virus or bacteria if it were to<br />

encounter them in the future. This style is<br />

much safer to give, as there is no risk of<br />

the virus or bacteria mutating back into<br />

its disease causing form, and it is able<br />

to be easily stored as there is no risk of<br />

killing the pathogens. Seeing as you are<br />

administering dead versions of the virus<br />

into your body, it takes more doses of<br />

6 TIME May 31, 2017


the vaccine so that the body has a better<br />

chance of later defending against it.<br />

Vaccine that are typically introduced into<br />

the body in this way are the polio vaccine,<br />

the rabies vaccine, and hepatitis A<br />

vaccine. Subunit vaccines are those that<br />

scientists can isolate specific proteins that<br />

when introduced into the body, train the<br />

immune system to react with it, without<br />

provoking sickness. This way has a much<br />

lower chance of a reaction within the patient<br />

happening because scientists only<br />

inject part of the pathogen into the body.<br />

Only certain vaccines can be produced<br />

in this style because it is not always possible<br />

to identify the best antigens in pathogens<br />

that would train the immune system.<br />

Vaccines that are introduced in this style<br />

are pneumococcal, Human papillomavirus,<br />

haemophilus influenza type b, influenza,<br />

hepatitis b, meningococcal, and<br />

pertussis. Another way that vaccines can<br />

be used are toxoid vaccines, where scientists<br />

are able to deactivate some toxins<br />

that bacterial diseases secrete. This<br />

is done with a mixture of formaldehyde<br />

and water. Vaccines used in this way are<br />

tetanus and diphtheria. A conjugate vaccine<br />

is one where scientists link an antigen<br />

from another recognizable pathogen to<br />

a sugary coating of a camouflaged bacteria,<br />

and the immune system is able to<br />

recognize the camouflaged bacteria as<br />

harmful, so it attacks it and the carrier<br />

when it enters the body. Haemophilus Influenzae<br />

Type B, or Hib, is a vaccine used<br />

in this style. DNA vaccines are emerging<br />

more and more today, but they are still<br />

not perfected. This style would potentially<br />

get rid of the need for bacteria or<br />

viruses, instead having an injection of<br />

a few parts of a pathogen’s DNA, and<br />

they would instruct the immune system to<br />

Fig :“Vaccination - PRRS Control.” Vaccination - PRRS.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 May 2017.<br />

produce the antigens for combating the<br />

pathogens. As an added benefit, they<br />

are easy and also cheap to create. Vaccines<br />

for this style are for herpes and<br />

influenza, but they are currently being<br />

tested on humans, and not given to large<br />

amounts of people yet. Another type of<br />

vaccines that is similar to DNA vaccines<br />

is recombinant vector vaccines. The experimental<br />

vaccines introduce DNA from<br />

a harmful pathogen into the body, and<br />

this triggers the immune system to produce<br />

the antigens, and also train itself on<br />

how to identify and combat the disease.<br />

They use a weakened virus or bacteria<br />

that rides DNA, essentially taking harmless<br />

pathogens disguised with the DNA<br />

of a more dangerous disease, and training<br />

the body to recognize it. This style of<br />

vaccines are currently being developed<br />

for HIV, rabies, and measles. Each vaccination<br />

type has its own set of benefits<br />

that come along with, as well as disadvantages.<br />

With that said, they all serve<br />

their own purpose in protecting the masses<br />

from disease outbreaks.<br />

Protect Society. Get Vaccinated.<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 7


Fig .“HPV Vaccine Is Cancer Prevention.” City of Chicago :: HPV Vaccine Is Cancer Prevention. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 May 2017.


Autism: The Debate Continues<br />

Written By: Belinda Luscombe<br />

T<br />

he autism debate continues<br />

throughout 2017. Sites such as<br />

Focus for Health are in renunciation<br />

of the majority opinion that is backed by<br />

a myriad of scientific evidence. They state<br />

that “many families insist that their child<br />

developed normally, but then regressed<br />

into autism after receiving routine immunizations”<br />

(Mulvihill para 2) but give no<br />

information on how they collected this information.<br />

The scope of the demographics<br />

is not shown by this statement, and<br />

this allows us to come to the conclusion<br />

that the information is not credible. They<br />

base their argument off of the United<br />

States Vaccine Injury Compensation Program<br />

“awarding financial compensation<br />

to parents of autistic children” (Mulvihill<br />

para 3). The USVIC program was created<br />

as a no fault alternative to going<br />

through traditional courts for resolving<br />

disputes against vaccine companies. This<br />

program was created when vaccination<br />

rates were at a low and the vaccination<br />

companies were struggling to survive because<br />

of all the lawsuits that amassed on<br />

them. The program allowed for the companies<br />

to produce vaccinations and not<br />

deal with lawsuits against them. In a rare<br />

case that something were to happen as a<br />

result from the vaccine, such as a severe<br />

allergic reaction, this program allows for<br />

parents to file a petition with the Court of<br />

Federal Claims to start off the process.<br />

From there the petition is reviewed to<br />

see if it meets the proper medical criteria<br />

for compensation from the program,<br />

and they make a preliminary reccomendation.<br />

The U.S. Department of Justice<br />

receives it next and there they develop<br />

it further with medical reccomendations<br />

and the legal analysis, which they go on<br />

to submit to the Court. A special master<br />

appointed by the court then reviews the<br />

petition and decides whether or not there<br />

should be compensation, and if there is<br />

going to be they also decide how much<br />

and how the compensation will come.<br />

This step also often offers a hearing<br />

where both parties in the case can show<br />

their evidence. The final step in the process<br />

is the Court ordering the U.S. Department<br />

of Health and Human Services<br />

to award compensation to the victim,<br />

and that is if they decided that it should<br />

be awarded. If they do not come to the<br />

decision, it is also possible for the courts<br />

to order the Department to cover the attorneys’<br />

cost. “In efforts to save vaccine<br />

companies Congress passed a law that<br />

made those harmed or negatively affected<br />

by a vaccine could no longer sue the<br />

vaccine producers” (Mulvihill para 5).<br />

They think that this takes all the pressure<br />

off of the vaccine companies, allowing<br />

them to create vaccines that are less safe<br />

than before, as the companies no longer<br />

have to worry about getting sued if<br />

the product does something it should not<br />

to a user. They state that through 1940-<br />

1980, autism rates remained stable, but<br />

after 1980 is when we saw an increase<br />

in autism because the vaccine schedule<br />

expanded. Not taken into consideration<br />

here is the fact that more parents came<br />

forward to doctors, and the definition for<br />

autism expanded, encompassing more<br />

people that would have been considered<br />

autism free before this time. That, and<br />

6 TIME May 31, 2017<br />

Fig Raptor, The Original Skeptical. “The End of the Vaccines Cause Autism Myth.” Skeptical Raptor. N.p., 17 Apr. 2016. Web. 29 May 2017.


not the use of the preservative thimerosal<br />

in measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine,<br />

is the reason for the increase in autism<br />

rates. They also mention that the “Center<br />

for Disease Control and Prevention<br />

denies the link between the ingredients<br />

within vaccines, thimerosal more specifically,<br />

is a causing factor of autism, and<br />

the Hannah Poling case is evidence of<br />

this” (Mulvihill para 8).<br />

Fig : “Hannah Poling.” AGE OF AUTISM. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 May 2017.<br />

The Hannah Poling case came to trial in<br />

2007, five years after her parents filed<br />

an autism claim in the federal vaccine<br />

court. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation<br />

Program awarded the family<br />

1.5 million dollars for the measles,<br />

mumps and rubella vaccines role in her<br />

autism diagnosis. Hannah is no ordinary<br />

case, as she had an unknow mitochondrial<br />

disorder that was triggered when<br />

she received vaccines for nine diseases,<br />

including measles, mumps and rubella.<br />

The court came to the decision to award<br />

the family money because of this medical<br />

disorder, and made no statement which<br />

would indicate that vaccines cause autisms,<br />

as some believe. This case is a rare<br />

instance where vaccines might be at fault<br />

for causing something such as autism,<br />

and that is only because there were other<br />

medical problems lying under the surface<br />

that reacted with the vaccines. On a<br />

different note, they link the first diagnosis<br />

of autism to vaccinations in the 1930s<br />

that just started to contain the preservative<br />

thimerosal. Again, this is not backed<br />

up by scientific evidence and is just speculation.<br />

It is just a coincidence that both<br />

showed up around the same time, and<br />

are not connected whatsoever. The Environmental<br />

Protection Agency makes<br />

many reccomendations when it comes to<br />

certain substances in the medical field.<br />

They say that “Despite reccomendations<br />

from the Institute of Medicine back in<br />

1999, infants today are still receiving<br />

mercury from multidose vial flu shots”<br />

(Mulvihill para 13). When consulting the<br />

Environmental Protection Agency website<br />

for thimerosal within vaccines, we<br />

are linked to the U.S. Food and Drug<br />

Administration website with information<br />

about the use of it in vaccines. There,<br />

they state that “all vaccines routinely reccommended<br />

for children 6 years of age<br />

and younger in the U.S. do not contain<br />

the preservative thimerosal” (FDA para<br />

1). In the past, the preservative was used<br />

to prevent the growth of micribes within<br />

the vaccine, and the use of thimerosal<br />

has decreased because of reformulation<br />

of vaccines, new preservatives becoming<br />

available, and also with the development<br />

of new vaccines that are single<br />

use. Single dose vaccnes do not require<br />

a preservative, while a preservative is required<br />

in a multidose vial of vaccinations.<br />

Organizations such as Focus for Health<br />

bring evidence that is not supported by<br />

facts, scientific evidence, or major organizations<br />

such as the Center for Disease<br />

Control and Prevention, the Environmental<br />

Protection Agency, or the U.S. Food<br />

and Drug Administration.<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 7


Hi, I am Dawn Guzmann, and I grew up<br />

in a time where autism was the new medical<br />

condition to worry about, as more<br />

and more people were being diagnosed<br />

with autism than ever before. I have always<br />

believed in vaccinations, and I<br />

have always gotten them, as I know the<br />

value that they have for me and even<br />

other people. I received the vaccinations<br />

that contained everything from thimerosal<br />

to iron, even as an infant, and I am<br />

healther now because of it. People in my<br />

community were also receiving vacccinations,<br />

so the effect that they had on<br />

curbing the spreading of diseases were<br />

great. Without the communitys shared<br />

belief in the health benefits that come<br />

from vaccinations viruses and diseases<br />

would be wreaking havoc on the people,<br />

making everyone sick. Vaccinations<br />

work best when everyone gets them,<br />

and I also experienced this firsthand,<br />

as a town about 20 minutes out from<br />

ours were not firm believers in the power<br />

of vaccines, and instead were scared<br />

that they would only urt them and do no<br />

good whatsoever to us. There was about<br />

a handful of people who did receive<br />

vaccinations, and even they they did not<br />

work for most of them. This is because<br />

the community does indeed play a role<br />

in whether or not someone is going to<br />

get a disease. They were not able to gain<br />

immmunity as there was an outbreak of<br />

the disease within the community. This is<br />

excactly the reason as to who I believe in<br />

vaccinations and explain the very same<br />

6 TIME May 31, 2017<br />

A Viewers Story<br />

thing to my friends who do not believe in<br />

vaccinations. The information throughout<br />

this <strong>mag</strong>azine has helped me even further<br />

expand my knowledge that I had<br />

obtained from other sources before this,<br />

and solidified other information as truth<br />

by repeating it.<br />

My name is Kelly Conniff, and I am someone<br />

that whishes that this <strong>mag</strong>azine were<br />

to have come out years ago, because I<br />

feel that it could have caused me to go<br />

through a lot less pain and suffereing.<br />

As I grew up, I was not lucky enough to<br />

have parents that were educated enough<br />

in vaccination areas, and nor could they<br />

afford them at times. If they knew what<br />

information I have now, I know that many<br />

of the diseases that I suffered through as<br />

a child would not have been because of<br />

vaccinations. My parents thought that<br />

they were bad for us so they stayed<br />

away from them at all costs. Because of<br />

this <strong>mag</strong>azine, I am spreading the word<br />

of the benefits of vaccines, and am vaccinating<br />

my children whenever a new one<br />

comes out. I would do anything for my<br />

children, and giving them these vaccinations<br />

allows for them to live a much happier<br />

and healthier life that is almost 100%<br />

disease free. I am now aware of the time<br />

and effort that goes into perfecting the<br />

design of each vaccine so that they are<br />

the most effective that they can be and<br />

so that they do not cause the person who<br />

is receiving the vaccine to become sick.


Thimerosal: A Safe Preservative<br />

Avariety of studies have been conducted<br />

that looked at the different<br />

effects thimerosal had, or were<br />

thought to have had on the body. A look<br />

at 9 of such studies ranging from early<br />

life exposure to thimerosal to ten years<br />

later. The first study looked at the effect<br />

that thimerosal exposure in early life had<br />

on brain functions, language, behavior,<br />

and coordination. It also looked at the<br />

nueropsychological outcomes 7 to 10<br />

years later, and it found that there were<br />

no associations with thimerosal and the<br />

general intellectual functioning, verbal<br />

memory, executive functioning, behavior<br />

regulation, fine motor coordination,<br />

and language in the children that were<br />

exposed to thimerosal. They did however,<br />

find that there was a small association<br />

between the thimerosal exposure and<br />

tics in boys. A second study looked at thimerosal<br />

exposure within the womb and<br />

in infancy. It compared children with and<br />

without autism, and looked at the exposure<br />

that they had to thimerosal from vaccines<br />

in infancy. It found that there was<br />

no difference in the exposure to thimerosal<br />

between the children that had autism<br />

and those that did not have autism. A<br />

third study, which was funded by the Center<br />

for Disease Control and Prevention,<br />

looked at the long term effect of thimerosal<br />

exposure, which compared the neuropsychological<br />

outcomes of the children<br />

they randomly selected to receive a form<br />

of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussive<br />

vaccine, or DTaP for short, within the first<br />

year of life. One of these contained thimerosal<br />

and the other did not, and ten<br />

years later they were tested for 24 neuropsychocological<br />

outcomes, and the results<br />

did not show that thimerosal in vaccines<br />

were harmful to children. A fourth<br />

study looked at thimerosal in vaccines in<br />

the United States, the United Kingdom,<br />

and Denmark. This was an analysis of<br />

data from “ the US health maintenace<br />

orgainzations, the UK General Practice<br />

Research Database, and the entire country<br />

of Denmark” ( CDC para 4). They all<br />

also failed to find a link between thimerosal<br />

in vaccines and causing autism. A fifth<br />

study looked at thimerosal within childrens<br />

flu shots. This study “measured the<br />

proportion of injection site reactions and<br />

the infections that were reported to the<br />

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System<br />

after testing three versions of an inactivated<br />

influenza vaccine in children that<br />

were under the age of 2” (CDC para 5).<br />

The three versions that they tested, which<br />

had thimerosal present within them and<br />

ones which did not contain any thimerosal,<br />

found that there was no difference<br />

between the proportion of ISR, rash or<br />

infections. A sixth study looked at whether<br />

or not thimerosal caused neurodevelopmental<br />

disorders with in children. This<br />

study only found “a few statistically significant<br />

associations between exposer<br />

from thimerosal and nueropsychological<br />

functioning” (CDC 6). The results showed<br />

no link between neurodevelopmental disorders<br />

within children and vaccinations<br />

that contained thimerosal.<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 7


A History Of Vaccinations<br />

Prior to 15th Century- there is archealogical evidence that the people of this time were<br />

able to see the connection between exposure to diseases and immunity to those diseases.<br />

For example, the Chinese are thought to have mashed up the scabs from people with the<br />

smallpox disease and rubbing that onto the skin of others to get immunity to smallpox.<br />

17th Century- Christopher Columbus and the rest of the people<br />

that came to America with him also brought smallpox, the<br />

whooping cough, measles, the bubonic plague, and typhus,<br />

which effectively wiped out 80 to 95% of the native population,<br />

as they had not had any interaction with these diseases before<br />

hand, so they had no immunity to it.<br />

1908: The word autism is used to describe a subset of schizophrenic<br />

patients who were especially withdrawn and self-absorbed.<br />

16th century- People of this time had to deal<br />

with things such as the whooping cough,<br />

smallpox and measles which would quickly<br />

spread through the crowded conditions that<br />

took place living in the cities. It is estimated<br />

that almost 30% of the children at this time<br />

died before turning 15 from things such as<br />

the whooping cough, smallpox, pneumonia,<br />

dysentry, or the scarlet fever.<br />

2 TIME May 31, 2017<br />

Fig Doucleff, Michaeleen. “How Vaccine Fears Fueled The Resurgence Of Preventable Diseases.” NPR. NPR, 25 Jan. 2014. Web. 29 May 2017.


Fifteenth Century-Today<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 3


Q: What are some other materials that<br />

have cause worry throughout the public<br />

about their safety?<br />

A: Materials such as aluminum and iron<br />

have also caused much worry throughout<br />

the public as they voiced their concerns<br />

about the health problems some<br />

think they cause. With that said, trenchant<br />

scientific evidence has shown that<br />

they are indeed healthy in vaccines and<br />

do not cause an health problems. They<br />

are within the vaccines for your safety,<br />

and occur naturally in the human body.<br />

Some people often require iron supplements<br />

if their body lacks amounts of it.<br />

They can be harmful to the body in extremely<br />

large amounts, but no vaccination<br />

gets anywhere close to a level that<br />

would cause problems.<br />

Q: Why was thimerosal removed from<br />

vaccines if it was not the cause of autism?<br />

A: Thimerosal amounts were reduced or<br />

completely removed from vaccines because<br />

we are able to create other preservatives<br />

that can do the same job. This<br />

stemmed from a public movement to take<br />

action against the amount of thimerosal<br />

being used, and we listened, but also,<br />

and most importantly, still kept the vaccines<br />

functioning. As far as the autism<br />

claim goes, there is a wealth of scientific<br />

evidence available to anyone who wishes<br />

to see it, and it all proves that there is<br />

no link between vaccines and autism. The<br />

cause of autism is still very much unclear<br />

to us. Thimerosal was used in the first<br />

6 TIME May 31, 2017<br />

From The Mailroom<br />

place to preserve multi dose vaccines so<br />

they were able to be used. Children are<br />

exposed to thimerosal everyday, and it<br />

is within their body, so the amounts within<br />

vaccines such as MMR posed no real<br />

threat to the child, except in rare circumstances<br />

when other factors are in play<br />

within the child.<br />

Q: What makes a vaccination work effectively?<br />

A: In order for a vaccination to work effectively,<br />

multiple things need to occur. First<br />

off, there needs to be a good preservative<br />

so that no bacteria grows within and<br />

ruins the vaccine. Then, it is all about administering<br />

the vaccine worldwide so that<br />

it greatly reduces the chances of what it is<br />

trying to prevent from coming up. Vaccinations<br />

only work in a community effort,<br />

because there is strength in numbers. In<br />

terms of vaccinations themselves, they<br />

are worked on by many scientists who<br />

strive to perfect them through trial and<br />

error to end up with a vaccine that does<br />

not harm the person, just stirring enough<br />

in the body so that the immune system<br />

reacts to the vaccination, and then gaining<br />

immunity to the specific disease it was<br />

designed for. Multi dose vaccinations require<br />

preservatives, such as thimerosal,<br />

to prevent microbial growth that would<br />

render the vaccination useless. Since the<br />

introduction of thimerosal in vaccines in<br />

the 1930s, there have been advancements<br />

in medicine that allow for different<br />

preservatives to be used, ones which do<br />

not use mercury.


Q: Do you think that people like Andrew<br />

Wakefield or Robert Kennedy<br />

will be able to follow through with<br />

their goal of eliminating vaccines?<br />

A: It is very unlikely that Andrew Wakefield<br />

or Robert Kennedy will be able to<br />

cause a stir like the first time his study was<br />

published. At President Trump’s inaugural<br />

ball, Wakefield called for things that<br />

won’t happen, because they would be<br />

devastating to the public if it did. Meetings<br />

between Trump and Kennedy took<br />

place and have stirred up the questions<br />

within the public, but those concerns will<br />

most likely not amount to anything at all,<br />

as the majority of the public still knows<br />

the benefit of vaccinations. There is not<br />

much Wakefield can do as he still lacks a<br />

medical license, so there will not be another<br />

study out from him anytime soon<br />

to stir up controversy as before, so the<br />

only way he would be able to influence<br />

vaccines would be by making powerful<br />

friends to do his bidding for him. That<br />

also seems like a long shot. If these two<br />

individuals were to achieve their goal of<br />

getting rid of vaccinations, the science<br />

community would come together again<br />

to disprove the information.<br />

A: He hopes that he can influence as many<br />

people as he can with the work, and<br />

feels that it’s necessary to get his message<br />

across. In a statemnt to us, he said<br />

that “The longer that we delay in making<br />

changes on our vaccines, the worse that<br />

it will be. The Center for Disease Control<br />

and Prevention is a program that is corrupt<br />

and is all about making money, they<br />

constantly put your health in the backseat<br />

to this. I do not think that my study will<br />

have that much of an impact on others<br />

because of the legal surroundings of it<br />

and the outcome for me. If there was no<br />

legal involvement within, the study could<br />

have had the driving force in preventing<br />

autism that I intended it to have. My<br />

study was a step in the right direction as<br />

it caused many to question vaccinations<br />

and not receive them. The major companies<br />

that control the vaccinations, of<br />

course would not allow for something to<br />

get in the way of them making money, so<br />

they were quickly able to put me under<br />

wraps. I still think is important to get my<br />

message across to the people, as not receiving<br />

the MMR vaccine is the only way<br />

that we will be able to stop autism. The<br />

link that I found between the MMR vaccine<br />

and autism is important and should<br />

be kept in mind by everyone.<br />

Q: Do you think that Andrew’s research<br />

will affect how others will conduct<br />

their research in the future?<br />

Fig :UmHomemZangado. “As Incríveis Fotografias a Bebés De Evan Kafka.” Um Homem Zangado. N.p., 19 Jan. 2017. Web. 30 May<br />

2017.<br />

KNOW WHAT YOU ARE<br />

PROTECTING<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 7


Prior to 15th Century- there is archealogical evidence that the people of this time were able to see the connection between e<br />

from people with the smallpox disease and rubbing that onto the skin of others to get immunity to smallpox.<br />

16th century- People of this time had to deal with things such as the whooping cough, smallpox and measles which would qu<br />

dren at this time died before turning 15 from things such as the whooping cough, smallpox, pneumonia, dysentry, or the scar<br />

17th Century- Christopher Columbus and the rest of the people that came to America with him also brought smallpox, the wh<br />

as they had not had any interaction with these diseases before hand, so they had no immunity to it.<br />

18th Century-<br />

1908: The word autism is used to describe a subset of schizophrenic patients who were especially withdrawn and self-absorb<br />

1967: Psychologist Bruno Bettelheim popularizes the theory that “refrigerator mothers,” as he termed them, caused autism by<br />

searchers looked solely at the impact of life experiences,” explains Parents advisor Fred Volkmar, M.D., director of the Child<br />

“They didn’t consider the role of biology or genetics, which we now understand to be the main cause.” Autism is also classifie<br />

scientists now know there is no link between the conditions.<br />

1991: The federal government makes autism a special education category. Public schools are now beginning to identify child<br />

1998: A study published in The Lancet by Andrew Wakefield suggests that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine causes<br />

2000: Vaccine manufacturers remove thimerosal (a mercury-based preservative) from all routinely given childhood vaccines<br />

2010: The Lancet completely retracts Andrew Wakefield’s paper, admitting several elements of the paper were incorrect.<br />

2013: The DSM-5 folds all subcategories of the condition into one umbrella diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Asp<br />

repetitive behaviors. 2) Impaired social communication and/or interaction.<br />

2 TIME May 31, 2017<br />

Fig Doucleff, Michaeleen. “How Vaccine Fears Fueled The Resurgence Of Preventable Diseases.” NPR. NPR, 25 Jan. 2014. Web. 29 May 2017.


xposure to diseases and immunity to those diseases. For example, the Chinese are thought to have mashed up the scabs<br />

ickly spread through the crowded conditions that took place living in the cities. It is estimated that almost 30% of the chillet<br />

fever.<br />

ooping cough, measles, the bubonic plague, and typhus, which effectively wiped out 80 to 95% of the native population,<br />

ed.<br />

not loving their children enough. “Post-World War II, there was a lot of psychoanalytic work done on autism where re-<br />

Study Center at Yale University School of Medicine and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders.<br />

d under schizophrenia in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, although<br />

ren on the spectrum and offering them special services.<br />

autism. This finding was quickly debunked.<br />

due to public fears about its role in autism--even though, again, the vaccine-autism link has been debunked.<br />

erger’s Syndrome is no longer considered a separate condition. ASD is defined by two categories: 1) Restricted and/or<br />

May 31, 2017 TIME 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!