13.12.2012 Views

Julie Moore - final PhD submission.pdf - University of Hertfordshire ...

Julie Moore - final PhD submission.pdf - University of Hertfordshire ...

Julie Moore - final PhD submission.pdf - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eer was a very good thing. He brewed his own and liked it better than that nasty<br />

foreign wine’, is perhaps open to debate, but what he was doing was identifying<br />

himself in this division which was home to several breweries as one who would<br />

defend both the brewing and drinking <strong>of</strong> the staple <strong>of</strong> the working man’s diet. 165 One<br />

farmer in the Northern division claimed to have switched political allegiance because<br />

the Liberal attempt to increase the beer duty ‘was a tax on the barley grower equal<br />

to 4s an acre, while champagne only paid 2d a bottle’. 166 Conservative supporters<br />

were keen to exploit this potential for a class division, and on occasion their<br />

adventures into poetry could cause both rich and poor alike to wince:<br />

Let brandy and gin bring Revenue in<br />

Or luxuries, like Champagne, it is clear,<br />

When one’s income is large – it isn’t fair to charge<br />

A tax on malt or the poor man’s beer! 167<br />

As Lawrence identified, the highlighting by the Tories <strong>of</strong> the threat to the pint carried<br />

with it a wider appeal to an old England <strong>of</strong> simple pleasures within a paternalistic<br />

structure, and this appeal carried a particular resonance within <strong>Hertfordshire</strong>,<br />

reaching out to the understanding <strong>of</strong> those who were moving into the county. Ewen<br />

Green argued that the success <strong>of</strong> the Conservatives was their ability to relocate<br />

themselves as the party not simply <strong>of</strong> those who were owners <strong>of</strong> landed property,<br />

but rather as the party <strong>of</strong> those who owned property in general, those very villa<br />

owners <strong>of</strong> whose support Lord Salisbury had been pessimistic, convincing them that<br />

the Liberal party, infected with Radicalism, was a threat to all property owners, not<br />

just the large landowner. 168 Certainly, in <strong>Hertfordshire</strong> there was some evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

Conservatives playing on the suspicion <strong>of</strong> Radical intentions: H.G. Fordham was<br />

obliged to deny the claims <strong>of</strong> a Tory pamphlet circulating in the Northern division<br />

that the Liberals wanted to take people’s land for redistribution without<br />

compensation, and at a meeting in the St. Albans division, H.J. Gotto told a<br />

165 ‘Hoddesdon – Conservative Meeting’, HEO, 20 th June 1885 p.3, Whittaker, Brewers in<br />

<strong>Hertfordshire</strong>, Table 1.1 ‘Breweries in <strong>Hertfordshire</strong>’ pp.4-6 lists 12 breweries active in the<br />

Eastern division in the period 1885-1900.<br />

166 ‘Baron Dimsdale’s Candidature’, HEO, 4 th July 1885 p.3. Speech by C W Scruby. A<br />

correction appeared in the next edition, 11 th July 1885 p.2, confirming this should have read<br />

4s a quarter, not acre.<br />

167 ‘Correspondence’ from Thomas Garratt, HEO, 13 th June 1885 p.3.<br />

168 Green, The Crisis <strong>of</strong> Conservatism, see particularly Chapter 3 ‘Conservatism and the<br />

Propertied’.<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!