You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LakeForestLeader.com NEws<br />
the lake forest leader | August 17, 2017 | 3<br />
Documents: City Manager aware of holding track four years ago<br />
Robert Kiely:<br />
‘No recollection’<br />
of attending or<br />
speaking during<br />
2012 webinar<br />
Alyssa Groh, Editor<br />
Lake Forest residents<br />
were surprised to learn in<br />
October 2016 there was a<br />
proposal to build a freight<br />
train holding track in Lake<br />
Forest, and the City only<br />
had a month to react to<br />
it.<br />
It appears now, after The<br />
Lake Forest Leader reviewed<br />
public documents,<br />
that despite its claims, the<br />
City had known for years<br />
about the plans.<br />
According to a log from<br />
a 2012 webinar by The<br />
Wisconsin Department of<br />
Transportation, not only<br />
did Lake Forest City Manager<br />
Robert Kiely participate<br />
in the session on the<br />
holding track, he posed a<br />
question to WisDot.<br />
At a City Council meeting<br />
in Nov. 7, 2016, Kiely<br />
repeatedly stated that he<br />
had no prior knowledge of<br />
the holding track.<br />
“(At that meeting) I had<br />
no recollection of participating<br />
in the [webinar],”<br />
Kiely told The Leader on<br />
Monday, Aug. 14. “That<br />
meeting took place three<br />
years ago, and I had no<br />
recollection of participating<br />
in the webinar.”<br />
Lake Forest residents<br />
first learned about the<br />
Hiawatha Expansion<br />
project, which included<br />
plans to build a milelong<br />
freight train holding<br />
track in Lake Forest, on<br />
Oct. 12, 2016, and began<br />
asking questions during<br />
the City’s Annual Town<br />
Hall meeting on Nov. 1,<br />
2016.<br />
Discussion about the<br />
holding track continued<br />
during the City Council<br />
meeting on Nov. 7, 2016,<br />
when residents and council<br />
members alike expressed<br />
their frustration<br />
with the proposal and the<br />
minimal time they had<br />
to react to it. The open<br />
comment session of the<br />
track’s environmental assessment<br />
ended Nov. 15,<br />
2016, giving the City just<br />
over a month to express<br />
concerns.<br />
During the City Council<br />
meeting on Nov. 7,<br />
2016, residents learned<br />
the project’s environmental<br />
assessment had been<br />
ongoing since 2012 and<br />
questioned why the council<br />
was just reporting the<br />
information.<br />
Kiely admitting that<br />
he received emailed invitations<br />
to a webinar<br />
but told residents that the<br />
city did not participate in<br />
them.<br />
“There was a webinar in<br />
2012 and I think a webinar<br />
in 2014,” Kiely said during<br />
the Nov. 7 City Council<br />
meeting. “...There is no<br />
record that we did participate,”<br />
he continued.<br />
An email obtained from<br />
a Freedom of Information<br />
Act show that Kiely was<br />
personally thanked for<br />
“participating in the Chicago-Milwaukee<br />
agency<br />
coordination webinar on<br />
Dec. 2.”<br />
At the webinar, according<br />
to the log, Kiely asked<br />
IDOT a question. This is<br />
what is noted: “Bob Kiely<br />
of Lake Forest said that he<br />
is aware that the stop in<br />
“I think we would disagree with the residents<br />
that we haven’t been transparent. We have given<br />
information out when it is available.”<br />
-Robert Kiely — Lake Forest City Manager told The Leader on Monday,<br />
Aug. 14 referring to a letter from residents addressing his involvement in<br />
Hiawatha Expansion project in 2012.<br />
Lake Forest is not included<br />
within the Chicago-Milwaukee<br />
[environmental<br />
assessment] and that the<br />
project is not precluded<br />
by the [environmental assessment]<br />
work, but will<br />
the proposed improvement<br />
projects help Lake Forests’s<br />
chance of getting a<br />
stop?”<br />
Following the webinar,<br />
Kiely sent out a memo,<br />
which he asked to be kept<br />
“confidential,” to Metra<br />
and WisDot officials asking<br />
for comments on his<br />
draft resolution, which<br />
endorsed the freight train<br />
holding track as “reasonable<br />
and acceptable to the<br />
community.”<br />
“I would prefer that you<br />
keep this document confidential<br />
as it has not been<br />
circulated in Lake Forest,”<br />
Kiely wrote in the memo.<br />
Kiley told The Leader<br />
Monday he wanted it confidential<br />
because the City<br />
does not make preliminary<br />
drafts public.<br />
“When the email was<br />
sent to the people at Wis-<br />
Dot and IDOT it was in the<br />
draft stages of the resolution,”<br />
he said. “We never<br />
make preliminary drafts<br />
public drafts while they<br />
are being prepared. So it<br />
was made public before<br />
the City Council, and the<br />
City Council chose not to<br />
act on it but that was during<br />
that phase or stage in<br />
which that resolution was<br />
still being drafted.”<br />
Mayor: Prior knowledge<br />
‘would not have had an<br />
impact’<br />
Residents of Academy<br />
Woods neighborhood,<br />
Pine Oaks condo association<br />
and others posted a<br />
letter to Facebook Aug.<br />
2 that they claimed was<br />
sent to Lake Forest Mayor<br />
Robert T.E. Lansing and<br />
the members of the City<br />
Council. Lansing, however,<br />
said the letter has not<br />
been sent to him but he has<br />
seen the letter.<br />
In the letter, the residents<br />
not only spoke about<br />
discovering Kiely’s prior<br />
knowledge of the project,<br />
but also expressed how<br />
they felt about the lack of<br />
communication.<br />
“We write to notify you<br />
of egregious violations<br />
of the principles of honesty<br />
and truthfulness in the<br />
Lake Forest City Manager’s<br />
office that threaten to<br />
undermine the credibility<br />
of City Hall and destroy<br />
the trust of City residents<br />
in their leadership,” the<br />
letter says.<br />
Despite their claims,<br />
Kiely disagrees, saying<br />
the City does not want to<br />
make information public<br />
prematurely.<br />
“I think we would disagree<br />
with the residents<br />
that we haven’t been transparent,”<br />
Kiely said. “We<br />
have given information<br />
out when it is available.<br />
There are times when we<br />
are pushing WisDot to do<br />
additional testing and until<br />
we had confirmation that<br />
the testing was underway<br />
we are not going to be out<br />
there saying anything.”<br />
Despite never directly<br />
receiving the letter from<br />
the residents who wrote it,<br />
Lansing wrote a response<br />
letter to them.<br />
“There may have been<br />
conversations in 2012 and<br />
2014 that our City Manager<br />
does not specifically<br />
recollect, however, that<br />
does not justify the statements<br />
and the offensive<br />
assertion that somehow<br />
the City is not promoting<br />
a community spirit of<br />
trust, respect, and citizen<br />
involvement,” he said in<br />
the letter.<br />
He also stated that<br />
whether a City staff member<br />
was aware of the<br />
proposal years ago and<br />
may have participated in<br />
a meeting where it was<br />
discussed, it “would not<br />
have had an impact on the<br />
issue.”<br />
Lansing also spoke<br />
visit us online at www.LAKEFORESTLEADER.com<br />
about the issue of the holding<br />
track and the process it<br />
has gone through.<br />
“All Lake Forest residents<br />
should also know<br />
[the] City Council has<br />
fully evaluated the proposed<br />
project from many<br />
perspectives and, at present,<br />
finds no basis under<br />
which the City should take<br />
any formal legal action at<br />
this time,” he wrote in the<br />
letter.<br />
He also commented<br />
on the City’s support of<br />
the expansion long before<br />
the proposal became<br />
public.<br />
“The City Council and<br />
I are always mindful of<br />
our duties to balance the<br />
local interests of those<br />
living in proximity to<br />
the Milwaukee District<br />
North line with Lake Forest’s<br />
overall, long-term<br />
best interests,” the letter<br />
reads. “Long before the<br />
proposed rail infrastructure<br />
project and the draft<br />
[environmental assessment]<br />
became public, our<br />
community has supported<br />
the improvement and expansion<br />
of commuter rail<br />
service throughout Lake<br />
Forest. We have worked<br />
consistently with state<br />
and federal legislators to<br />
accomplish this goal. Regardless<br />
of the outcome<br />
of the [environmental assessment],<br />
we are committed<br />
to pursuing safer,<br />
expanded and more convenient<br />
commuter rail<br />
service. We believe this is<br />
in the best long-term interests<br />
of all Lake Forest<br />
homeowners.”<br />
The Leader attempted<br />
to contact the resident<br />
who sent in the letter<br />
and never received a<br />
reply.