kce

one soon believes that they did see something! But is that good enough for
us? Did they see all that they now report, or is it just prefabricated
illusions, created in influenced minds; or hallucination? We really don’t
know. The evidence is a mixture of physical and verbal data, somewhat
disjointed and always elusive. Yet to the UFO researcher it is real and
needs our attention.
The first hurdle we face in all such subjects is the question of health.
When we have been presented with mental or emotional problems beyond
the range of our mandate, we always assign the case to professional
medical practitioners. Our research policy is a policy of investigation!
There is no substitute for good medical and psychological assistance. When
we are satisfied that there is no problem, we are then presented with the
witness’s supposition that ‘We are not alone!’
Academics from all levels of research and discipline are confident
that the universe is full of life. There are, statistically, 1,000,000,000,000,000
stars in the visible universe that are orbited by planets that could support
life. The only limiting factors that scientists employ to literally ‘crash’ the
UFO theory are the vast distances in the universe and a lack of a futuretechnology
paradigm to traverse them.
Each researcher finds that one of the biggest problems in his or her
research is the problem of what has been called ‘hidden data’. Only about
one in seven (14 per cent) of those persons who witness UFOs ever make a
report. This percentage falls away dramatically to about six in 500 (1.2 per
cent) when the encounter involves an entity. Obviously, from a scientific
point of view, the test sample is just too small.
So what happens? Why do we lose this hidden data? From our
research in Australia, the answers are wide and varied: fear of social
ridicule, fear of losing one’s standing in the community or at work and the
fear of losing one’s job are some of the reasons why so many cases go
unreported.
Often this hidden data is written off as lost knowledge. However, no
matter how unusual, bizarre or strange it may seem to the orthodox
thinker, it is data that needs to be made available to the public.
I am the first to admit that such data is a labyrinth of paradoxical
accounts, but with an open mind and an effort to listen, one soon realises
that this is data worthy of belief. If not, then at least it warrants
examination.