04.09.2017 Views

St Mary Redcliffe Church Parish Magazine - September 2017

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e-united. There was a time when I thought I might see this in my lifetime,<br />

but sadly I think this will not happen. One of my ‘memorable moments’ of<br />

the past few years was a very happy meeting with the Roman Catholic Bishops<br />

in Birmingham.<br />

But what did the Reformation achieve? I think I can do no more than quote<br />

directly from an essay by Bishop J. C Ryle (1816–1900) on the subject of<br />

what we owe the Reformation:<br />

The Reformation found Englishmen steeped in ignorance and left them<br />

in possession of knowledge; found them without Bibles, and left them<br />

with a Bible in every parish; found them in darkness, and left them in<br />

comparative light; found them priest-ridden and left them enjoying<br />

the liberty which Christ bestows; found them strangers to the blood of<br />

atonement, to faith and grace and holiness and left them with the key<br />

to those things in their hands; found them blind, and left them seeing;<br />

found them slaves and set them free.<br />

.<br />

Some of the Reformers lost their lives to fight for these freedoms. So, in<br />

this 500th Anniversary year let us give thanks for the Reformation, but let us<br />

pray also that the <strong>Church</strong> Catholic might be re-united and that the principle<br />

of reform and renewal might be a continued process in the <strong>Church</strong> of God.<br />

By grace alone….<br />

Read Bishop Mike’s full article at www.bristol.anglican.org<br />

<br />

1517 REFORMATION SPECIAL <strong>2017</strong> <br />

Next month’s issue of the parish magazine<br />

is dedicated to the Reformation, and the<br />

publication of Martin Luther’s 95 articles<br />

in October 1517, which we celebrate with<br />

a feature interview with the Very Revd Dr<br />

David Hoyle, Dean of Bristol, historian of the<br />

Reformation, together with further articles<br />

<br />

<br />

church matters from the pcc<br />

REPORT ON PCC MEETINGS 3rd & 31st JULY <strong>2017</strong> AT THE MERCURE HOLLAND<br />

HOUSE HOTEL — CHAIR: REVD DAN TYNDALL<br />

PCC MEETING 3rd JULY: THE HOGARTH ALTARPIECE<br />

The PCC met to vote on the motion: “The PCC resolves<br />

that the Hogarth altarpiece is of such significance to our<br />

history and heritage and to the stories we wish to tell<br />

through our facilities development project that we continue<br />

to investigate the possibility of it being part of that project.”<br />

The meeting was convened to decide whether to continue including the<br />

Altarpiece in the church’s Development Project since the decision affects<br />

all future plans. Present were the Development Project Board (DPB) Chair,<br />

and three-quarters of the PCC membership. An appraisal was given of the<br />

advisory (brainstorming) sessions that had been arranged to inform the<br />

PCC about the potential relevance of the Altarpiece to SMR’s mission, and<br />

the feasibility of adopting it in its plans. These were: i) the Hogarth Options<br />

Appraisal Workshop (HOAW) in May convened for those with a professional<br />

interest in the Altarpiece and/or the Development Project, and; ii) the June<br />

DPB meeting convened to formulate a motion for the PCC to vote on, at<br />

which the formal HOAW findings were taken into account. Discussion ended<br />

in a last-minute amendment to the above motion, proposed and adopted in<br />

its stead in a 2–1 majority vote [figures here and below to be confirmed].<br />

The substitute motion “The PCC resolves to continue to explore the possibility<br />

of the Hogarth altarpiece being part of our facilities development project” was<br />

voted on, and carried with a 2–1 majority. The PCC did not rule out including<br />

the Altarpiece in its future Development plans, but the amendment and<br />

majority vote meant that as a body the Council feels that it does not at<br />

present have sufficient data, knowledge or understanding and, therefore,<br />

confidence to be able to judge the value of the work to the church’s mission.<br />

Discussion had ranged between considering the elements and histories<br />

of the work itself — art, aesthetic, social, theological, ecclesiastical, Bristol<br />

and parochial — and the practicalities of ‘adopting’ it. Though members<br />

had been asked to concentrate on the work’s attributes (as mentioned) in<br />

from Hogarth’s<br />

self-portrait ca. 1735

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!