18.09.2017 Views

NZDA H&W 198 WEB

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Four management units<br />

A mixture of sika subspecies were introduced to the<br />

central North Island from Britain in 1905, and now live<br />

throughout the Kaimanawa Forest Park Conservation Area<br />

(74,600 ha) and Kaweka Forest Park Conservation Area<br />

(59,000 ha) – total area 133,600 ha. The proposed Sika<br />

HOSI Management Area is broken into four management<br />

units under slightly different management to meet various<br />

conservation and hunting aims that are specific to identified<br />

habitat and place:<br />

»»<br />

Kaweka Mountain Beech Management Unit – 18,700<br />

ha: based on the current Kaweka Mountain Beech<br />

Project area, west of the main Kaweka Range, which<br />

has been intensively managed since 1998. The objective<br />

is to maintain the current gains that have been made,<br />

which have increased beech regeneration, improved<br />

meat quality and the hunting experience. There is a well<br />

established network of huts, tracks and helipads, and<br />

significant research data has been collected on both<br />

habitat and the deer.<br />

»»<br />

Other Mountain or Mountain/Silver Beech<br />

Management Unit – 18,300 ha: areas of mountain and<br />

silver beech habitat similar to the Kaweka Mountain Beech<br />

Management Unit. They include the Rangitikei Remote<br />

Experience Zone and the headwaters of the Oamaru River<br />

within the Kaimanawa Forest Park, both of which generally<br />

lack canopy regeneration after natural canopy collapse.<br />

There has been no effective deer impact management<br />

here for decades, there is limited historical data and<br />

hunting access is more difficult. Resident deer (hind)<br />

condition and performance and habitat quality continue to<br />

decline. The objective is to replicate the Kaweka Mountain<br />

Beech Management Unit outcomes at these sites.<br />

»»<br />

Enhanced Trophy Management Unit – 65,600 ha:<br />

these sites are identified as a 6-km buffer around the<br />

northern and eastern boundaries of Kaimanawa Forest<br />

Park, and the eastern and southern boundaries of Kaweka<br />

Forest Park, in an attempt to enhance the availability of<br />

high-quality sika trophies. Productive habitat on private<br />

lands adjoining these areas is where most trophy sika<br />

stags “grow out” during spring and summer. Stags then<br />

move during the rut into this strip of public conservation<br />

land and can be hunted by the public. These areas<br />

provide most of the high-quality sika trophies available<br />

on public land and are hunted the most, thanks to their<br />

accessibility. Mostly these areas are a mixture of red and<br />

silver beech forests or manuka shrublands. At current deer<br />

densities, retaining beech forest canopies, where they<br />

exist, appears achievable, as there has been widespread<br />

canopy recovery after historic damage. The objective is<br />

to maintain beech canopies and enhance both trophy<br />

and meat quality, and to enhance rut hunting experiences<br />

through higher contact rates with rutting stags.<br />

»»<br />

Enhanced Harvest Management Unit – 31,000 ha: the<br />

remaining public sika hunting land in the Kaimanawas<br />

and Kawekas has been combined into this management<br />

unit. These areas do not produce the best trophies, but<br />

nevertheless offer valuable hunting opportunities. The<br />

objective is to maintain beech canopies, enhance meat<br />

quality by having healthier animals, and improve rut<br />

hunting experiences.<br />

The four management units proposed for the sika Herd of Special Interest. The surrounding land is privately owned, including farms and<br />

Maori land. Owing to the wandering habits of sika stags, many of the trophy animals taken on public land have spent much of their time<br />

growing up on private lands outside the proposed HOSI boundaries, and this underpins the concept of an Enhanced Trophy Management<br />

Unit. It is possible that other management units may be identified in future on other areas of public land or adjoining private land, with<br />

specific conditions and management options to be considered at the time.<br />

NZ Hunting & Wildlife <strong>198</strong> - Spring 2017<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!