20.09.2017 Views

TIL_22 Septimber 2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16<br />

Photos: Johan Persson<br />

FOLLIES<br />

Olivier Theatre<br />

Ever since Follies opened at the Winter<br />

Garden in 1971 it has been labelled a<br />

‘problem’ musical. Dyed-in-the-wool<br />

Sondheim-ites consider it a masterpiece<br />

yet it has always failed to resonate with<br />

the general public and open-ended runs<br />

never turn a profit, including Hal Prince’s<br />

stunning original production. The reason<br />

has generally been attributed to the fact<br />

that there is no one in James Goldman’s<br />

patchy and plotless book to root for.<br />

As any Follies aficionado knows, the<br />

setting is a derelict Broadway theatre<br />

where, between the wars, its legendary<br />

owner, Dimitri Weismann (Gary Raymond)<br />

annually presented his lavish Follies. The<br />

theatre is about to face the wrecking ball<br />

for an office block and, as a last hurrah,<br />

Weismann has invited several ex-Follies<br />

girls and their spouses to a nostalgic<br />

reunion.<br />

Of the eleven women who show up,<br />

Goldman’s book focuses on just two: Sally<br />

(Imelda Staunton) and Phyllis (Janie Dee),<br />

both of whose marriages are in trouble.<br />

Though Sally is married to Buddy (Peter<br />

Forbes), a philandering salesman from<br />

Phoenix, she has always carried a torch<br />

for Ben (Philip Quast) Phyllis’s wealthy,<br />

ex-politician husband; while for the<br />

bilious Phyllis, who once shared digs with<br />

Sally, there is no love lost for either Sally<br />

or Ben.<br />

Augmented by some of the finest<br />

songs Sondheim has ever written, and<br />

further enhanced by the<br />

ghost-like appearances<br />

of their younger selves,<br />

this quartet of unhappy<br />

souls, with their<br />

unrealised dreams,<br />

frustrations and the<br />

inevitable compromises<br />

life demands, cry out<br />

for your sympathy and<br />

understanding. But<br />

because the sketchy<br />

book is no match for<br />

the brilliance of<br />

Sondheim’s classic<br />

score, it is hard to get<br />

involved with these<br />

tiresome people and<br />

their unfulfilled lives.<br />

In the first twenty minutes or so during<br />

which all the characters are introduced,<br />

there is so much activity in director<br />

Dominic Cooke’s staging and in Vicki<br />

Mortimer’s atmospheric but constantly<br />

revolving set, it’s hard to get a handle on<br />

any of them and their back stories.<br />

However, as the show progresses the four<br />

protagonists (though not their younger<br />

counterparts) become more clearly<br />

defined but not more endearing.<br />

The best performance of the evening is<br />

Staunton’s. Though physically miscast as<br />

an erstwhile Follies chorine, this<br />

diminutive powerhouse with a singing<br />

voice to match, comes close to breaking<br />

your heart as the unrequited Sally. Her<br />

interpretation of the show’s best-known<br />

song, Losing My Mind, is the most<br />

forceful I’ve heard. If only Goldman’s book<br />

were as adept as Arthur Laurents’ for<br />

Gypsy, Follies would undoubtedly qualify<br />

as one of the greatest of all Broadway<br />

musicals. But it isn’t and it doesn’t.<br />

Given the number of starry, highoctane<br />

revivals this show has had since<br />

1971, its stellar combination of both<br />

Imelda Staunton as Sally Durant Plummer<br />

t h i s i s l o n d o n m a g a z i n e • t h i s i s l o n d o n o n l i n e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!