Newcastle News Oct 2017
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Editorial<br />
In the President’s column in the<br />
last edition of <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>News</strong>,<br />
Lewis Pearson spoke of the<br />
“extended working hours” pilot<br />
scheme that was due to<br />
commence in September. It is fair<br />
to say that this pilot was not<br />
universally accepted with judges,<br />
barristers, solicitors and probation<br />
staff airing their views, but<br />
perhaps the most vociferous were<br />
the court staff, especially the<br />
ushers. The view was that this was<br />
a step too far, with the proposal<br />
meaning that those who lived any<br />
appreciable distance from the<br />
court would be returning home at<br />
a late hour and from the lawyers’<br />
point of view there was the little<br />
question of remuneration. Many of<br />
the solicitors or trainees or<br />
paralegals who spend time at the<br />
Crown Court are employees and<br />
as such would quite properly<br />
expect to be paid for their time<br />
and given the wafer thin profit<br />
margins that most criminal<br />
practices operate under, that<br />
would be an unwelcome<br />
additional expense. However, an<br />
announcement this week that the<br />
scheme had been suspended was<br />
both unexpected and very<br />
welcome. Criminal practitioners<br />
will be pleased to note that<br />
HMCTS has listened to the<br />
profession and the planned pilot<br />
of flexible operating hours has<br />
been placed on hold, pending retendering<br />
for an independent<br />
organisation to lead the<br />
evaluation work. Further<br />
information will be made<br />
available. There will be further<br />
consultation with the profession<br />
and the pilots will now begin in<br />
February. Now I am as sceptical as<br />
the next lawyer of consultations<br />
between the profession and the<br />
rule-makers, but I see this as a<br />
positive move and it may just be<br />
that someone is prepared to listen<br />
to those at the “coal face” for a<br />
change. Over to you HMCTS!<br />
As someone who is admittedly<br />
technologically challenged, I have<br />
been encouraged/cajoled into<br />
embracing the technology that<br />
Contents...<br />
had flooded the courts. I never<br />
thought that I would see the day<br />
when my vocabulary would<br />
consist of words such as “upload”,<br />
“download” and “attachment” but I<br />
speak this language, albeit<br />
falteringly, and marvel at the fact<br />
that it only seems months since I<br />
was content to master the<br />
calculator! The court service is very<br />
keen to push technology and<br />
criminal lawyers have quickly<br />
become used to the “DCS” (Digital<br />
Court System) whereby all<br />
prosecution papers are sent online<br />
(see another computer word!)<br />
Gone are the days when the<br />
courier arrives at the office with a<br />
couple of boxes of papers which<br />
we all struggled to carry, as<br />
everything can now be read on<br />
the laptop (yes I also have one of<br />
those, which is useful when I<br />
remember how to switch it on).<br />
On the same theme, the TV link<br />
was introduced some years ago<br />
and whilst there was initial<br />
suspicion that the remanded<br />
defendant would be at a<br />
disadvantage appearing on screen<br />
rather than live in court, we have<br />
become used to it. So common<br />
sense seemed to dictate that<br />
when I had a case in Oxford Crown<br />
Court that was going to be<br />
adjourned and where the<br />
defendant was appearing by TV<br />
link himself, the court would agree<br />
to counsel (who was from<br />
<strong>Newcastle</strong>) also using the link<br />
facilities. Sadly the judge would<br />
have none of it and at the 11th<br />
hour arrangements had to be<br />
made for counsel to attend for a<br />
brief hearing. I find our local<br />
courts very accommodating in this<br />
regard and was disappointed at<br />
the judge’s view in this case as it is<br />
about saving costs and<br />
demonstrating efficiency, which<br />
was lacking on this occasion.<br />
I read a survey which placed<br />
<strong>Newcastle</strong> as the 21st best place<br />
to live in England. So who was<br />
first, London, Stratford-upon-<br />
Avon, Oxford or Cambridge? No, I<br />
give you Slough, yes Slough, as<br />
the winner. I have never been to<br />
Slough (or not that I can<br />
remember) but it is not a place<br />
that would immediately come to<br />
mind if I had participated in that<br />
survey. Above <strong>Newcastle</strong> was a<br />
place I have visited, twice in the<br />
past month, Milton Keynes. All I<br />
knew about that town was that it<br />
had lots of roundabouts and at<br />
one time it had concrete cows. I<br />
looked for a Grey Street, a river<br />
flanked by wonderful bridges and<br />
a vibrant centre, but simply found<br />
underpasses, tall concrete<br />
buildings and very little history or<br />
tradition. So with due apologies<br />
to the residents of Slough and<br />
Milton Keynes, I vote the Toon<br />
ahead of you every time.<br />
Last month I had the sad task of<br />
attending the funeral of Ken<br />
Weldon, a former partner at<br />
Lambert Taylor & Gregory and<br />
father of current partner, Andrew.<br />
I never worked with Ken, but I met<br />
him on a number of occasions<br />
after I joined the firm and he was<br />
very welcoming to me. He was<br />
not a criminal lawyer, but showed<br />
great interest in and<br />
encouragement for our fight with<br />
the Ministry of Justice and<br />
appeared bewildered at the<br />
current treatment of the<br />
profession. His funeral, whilst sad,<br />
was uplifting as we learned a little<br />
of his life away from the<br />
profession and not least his skill in<br />
playing the Northumberland<br />
pipes. He will be remembered by<br />
all who had the pleasure of<br />
knowing him and sadly missed.<br />
Paul Hanratty<br />
Ediitor<br />
Editorial<br />
Diary Dates<br />
Standing Committee<br />
Dates for <strong>2017</strong><br />
Monday 4th December <strong>2017</strong><br />
Monday 15th January 2018<br />
Date for the Annual<br />
Dinner<br />
10th November <strong>2017</strong><br />
If you have any matters you<br />
would like to bring before the<br />
committee please e mail us<br />
on<br />
mail@newcastlelawsociety.co.uk<br />
Contact us at:<br />
<strong>Newcastle</strong> Upon Tyne Law Society<br />
College House<br />
Northumberland Road<br />
<strong>Newcastle</strong> Upon Tyne<br />
NE1 8SF<br />
DX 61024 <strong>Newcastle</strong> upon Tyne<br />
Tel: 0191 232 5654<br />
Fax: 0191 222 0313<br />
Email:<br />
mail@newcastlelawsociety.co.uk<br />
Website:<br />
www.newcastlelawsociety.co.uk<br />
Those wishing to attend CPD<br />
courses must ensure that first they<br />
fill in the appropriate booking form<br />
to reserve a place and return to this<br />
office.<br />
Published by<br />
Baskerville Publications Ltd<br />
Apartment 327<br />
Holden Mill<br />
Blackburn Road<br />
Bolton<br />
BL1 7PN<br />
Tel: 01204 303323<br />
Email:<br />
j.baskerville@jbaskerville.co.uk<br />
Advertising Enquiries<br />
Julia on 01204 303323<br />
The views and opinions expressed<br />
in the <strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>News</strong> are those of<br />
the individual contributors. No<br />
responsibility for any loss of<br />
consequential loss occasioned to<br />
any person acting as a result of any<br />
views and opinions expressed or<br />
any information in the <strong>Newcastle</strong><br />
<strong>News</strong> can be accepted by any<br />
contributor, the Publisher or the<br />
editorial board of the <strong>Newcastle</strong><br />
Law Society.<br />
President’s Column...4 Annual Dinner <strong>2017</strong>...5<br />
Client Care in Dickens...6 Local <strong>News</strong>...8