30 October - 5 November 2017-min
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2<br />
<strong>30</strong> <strong>October</strong> - 5 <strong>November</strong>, <strong>2017</strong><br />
U<br />
Editorial<br />
NEW DELHI TIMES<br />
Haley spells out US policy on India<br />
◆◆<br />
By NDT Special Bureau<br />
@NewDelhiTimes<br />
info@newdelhitimes.com<br />
S Ambassador to the United Nations<br />
Nikki Haley, in her address to the US-<br />
India Friendship Council in Washington<br />
on 17th <strong>October</strong>, said the United States<br />
was ‘really going to need’ greater support<br />
from major South Asian power India in<br />
stabilising Afghanistan and resolving the<br />
Afghan conflict. She sought India’s help not<br />
only with infrastructure and the aid towards<br />
rebuilding Afghanistan, but also to keep an<br />
eye on Pakistan.<br />
Haley said that America’s overriding interest<br />
in Afghanistan and South Asia was to<br />
eli<strong>min</strong>ate terrorist safe havens and keep<br />
nuclear weapons away from terrorists by<br />
using all its economic, diplomatic and military<br />
powers.<br />
After laying the groundwork for better US-<br />
Pakistan partnership the US intends to hold<br />
Pakistan accountable, hence needs India’s<br />
help to keep an eye on Pakistan. Recalling<br />
Trump’s ‘tougher approach’ to Pakistan<br />
for allegedly ‘harbouring terrorists’ Haley<br />
reiterated that Washington won’t tolerate<br />
any government offering safe havens on its<br />
soil to terrorists who target Americans.<br />
This new approach will require understanding<br />
and restraint from both Pakistan and India<br />
as the United States wanted to maintain<br />
separate relations with both nations. The<br />
United States recognises the important<br />
contributions India had made to the stability<br />
of Afghanistan and wanted New Delhi to<br />
continue doing so. Trump does not oppose<br />
the Indian nuclear programme as ‘India is<br />
a democracy that threatens no one’ but was<br />
deter<strong>min</strong>ed to stop Iran from acquiring any<br />
nuclear weapon.<br />
Halley said the objection by five permanent<br />
members to the proposed reform of the UN<br />
Security Council was less about expansion<br />
per se but ‘much more about veto’ power<br />
that allows Russia, China, Britain, US and<br />
France to veto a resolution.<br />
None of them want to give up veto power.<br />
Haley revealed how two of the five<br />
permanent members, Russia and China,<br />
opposed any changes in the current structure<br />
of the Security Council and could also keep<br />
India out if it sought veto powers. She<br />
advised India ‘not to touch’ the present veto<br />
arrangement at the UN Security Council<br />
if it wanted to join the world body as a<br />
permanent member. So, the key to getting<br />
India on the Security Council is not to touch<br />
the veto, Haley implored.<br />
While addressing think tank on policy<br />
statement Haley also spoke about close<br />
India- US cooperation to check China and<br />
Pakistan. Islamabad deprecates the US<br />
South Asia policy that makes India the new<br />
surrogate and China the clear target. There’s<br />
been a tilt in US policy towards India since<br />
Photo Credit : Shutterstock<br />
Bush era. Moreover, international relations<br />
are transactional and ever-changing. India<br />
is a democracy that values non-violence<br />
and don’t threaten any western country<br />
or interests, hence inspires Washington’s<br />
confidence. Pak still harbours the illusion<br />
of being sovereign equal to India and the<br />
guardian of Indus.<br />
Indians have kept an eye on Pakistan since<br />
independence with the other riveted on<br />
China. Pakistan and China eye India and<br />
America. The US wanted Pakistan to watch<br />
Afghanistan, and now desires India to<br />
keep an eye on Pakistan. India cannot rely<br />
on China which is out to contain India, so<br />
cannot but side with the US. Pakistan cannot<br />
fully align with China and at the same time<br />
expect proximity to Washington. Pakistan<br />
wanted both US and China to contain India.<br />
On growth trajectory now, India has neither<br />
time nor interest to keep eye on anyone, let<br />
alone interfere with other’s internal matters.<br />
China’s neighbours are too wary of its<br />
expansionist intentions. China and Russia’s<br />
involvement in Afghanistan is a major issue<br />
as both allow Taliban free movement in their<br />
countries.<br />
Afghanistan offers a good opportunity for<br />
India and Pakistan to fix bilateral relations<br />
by addressing common regional challenges.<br />
Good faith and trust can pre-empt efforts of<br />
weapon states to create instability to sell their<br />
weapons. USA doing dual diplomacy; Vice<br />
President appreciating Pakistan’s efforts<br />
while Haley balancing by encouraging India.<br />
India is chosen as new emerging power but<br />
must learn from history not to take the bait.<br />
Pakistan’s experience proves that playing<br />
surrogate for US has short shelf life. India<br />
should honestly try to solve problems with<br />
neighbours Pakistan and China by developing<br />
business like USA-Canada-Europe. India<br />
must pursue its own interests regardless of<br />
what USA or Pakistan wants. After all war<br />
in Afghanistan is not against terrorism but<br />
for resources - trillion dollars of lithium that<br />
could be the future source of energy!<br />
Trump’s one statement ‘India do more in<br />
Afghanistan’ proved to be the Trump card<br />
producing more action from Pakistan than<br />
any other threat over the last <strong>30</strong> years!<br />
Burkas, niqabs pose public safety risk<br />
T<br />
◆◆<br />
By Tarek Fatah<br />
Author & Columnist, Canada<br />
@TarekFatah<br />
tarek.fatah@gmail.com<br />
he slur of “racism” has been hurled at<br />
Muslims who support Quebec’s Bill 62<br />
— the new law banning face coverings, for<br />
example the burka and niqab, when giving<br />
or receiving government services.<br />
Photo Credit : Shutterstock<br />
From Ontario Liberal Premier Kathleen<br />
Wynne to Ontario Progressive Conservative<br />
Leader Patrick Brown, many white politicians<br />
and liberal media commentators have been<br />
quick to label any support of Bill 62 racist.<br />
Since I, a Muslim, support Bill 62, I guess<br />
that makes me a racist.<br />
Indeed, it’s not uncommon to hear whispers<br />
suggesting Muslims like me who support the<br />
burka and niqab ban are “sell-outs” within<br />
the Muslim community.<br />
And that white politicians who oppose Bill<br />
62 are trying to salvage the reputation of our<br />
community, despite our supposed betrayal.<br />
After all, what do these politicians have to<br />
lose?<br />
The political race to the bottom to curry<br />
favour with the so-called “Muslim vote<br />
bank” in Canada, as they see it, has worked<br />
well for both Conservatives and Liberals.<br />
Charmed as they are by many secondgeneration<br />
radical Muslims who were born<br />
in Canada, some of whom hate western<br />
civilization more than their parents do.<br />
But none of the attacks on Quebec’s burka/<br />
niqab ban was more disingenuous than one<br />
told by a well-coiffed hijabi on Canadian<br />
television recently, dismissing the public<br />
safety aspect of people wearing facemasks.<br />
This young Muslim woman claimed there<br />
has not been a single incident where someone<br />
wearing a burka committed a crime.<br />
To set the record straight, here are just a few<br />
examples of cri<strong>min</strong>al activities committed<br />
by men and women wearing burkas and<br />
other face coverings in Canada:<br />
Two months ago, on Aug. 17, <strong>2017</strong>, an<br />
armed robbery took place at a Scotia Bank<br />
branch in Milton, Ontario.<br />
Police said one of the two suspects was<br />
wearing a balaclava.<br />
On Sept. 9, 2015, two burka-wearing male<br />
teens charged into a Toronto bank in the<br />
Yonge Street and Highway 401 area. Both<br />
were later arrested in Ajax.<br />
On Oct. 14, 2014, two men wearing burkas<br />
robbed a Toronto jewellery store in the York<br />
Mills and Leslie Street area, and walked<br />
away with $500,000 worth of gold and<br />
precious stones.<br />
On Aug. 18, 2010 an armed robbery by two<br />
masked men took place at a Scotiabank<br />
branch in Vaughan, north of Toronto.<br />
Ottawa police have in the past cited a handful<br />
of robberies in that city involving male<br />
suspects using Muslim women’s religious<br />
garments as disguises.<br />
Some of us will never forget how a young<br />
Toronto Muslim woman, Bano Shahdady,<br />
threw off her burka as she was divorcing her<br />
husband, only to be stalked by him disguised<br />
in a burka.<br />
He entered her apartment building and killed<br />
her in July, 2011.<br />
It was a story few media were willing to<br />
delve into, but because I knew the family,<br />
one journalist did report about this burkarelated<br />
murder that almost went unreported.<br />
Around the world, numerous cri<strong>min</strong>als have<br />
fled arrest wearing burkas, everywhere from<br />
London’s Heathrow airport to the infamous<br />
Lal Masjid armed revolt by jihadis in<br />
Islamabad.<br />
My plea to vote-grabbing Canadian politicians<br />
of all political stripes in English-speaking<br />
Canada is, for once, be honest.<br />
Put the racist card aside and recognize<br />
burkas and niqabs pose a serious public<br />
safety risk.<br />
www.NewDelhiTimes.com