27.10.2017 Views

30 October - 5 November 2017-min

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>October</strong> - 5 <strong>November</strong>, <strong>2017</strong><br />

U<br />

Editorial<br />

NEW DELHI TIMES<br />

Haley spells out US policy on India<br />

◆◆<br />

By NDT Special Bureau<br />

@NewDelhiTimes<br />

info@newdelhitimes.com<br />

S Ambassador to the United Nations<br />

Nikki Haley, in her address to the US-<br />

India Friendship Council in Washington<br />

on 17th <strong>October</strong>, said the United States<br />

was ‘really going to need’ greater support<br />

from major South Asian power India in<br />

stabilising Afghanistan and resolving the<br />

Afghan conflict. She sought India’s help not<br />

only with infrastructure and the aid towards<br />

rebuilding Afghanistan, but also to keep an<br />

eye on Pakistan.<br />

Haley said that America’s overriding interest<br />

in Afghanistan and South Asia was to<br />

eli<strong>min</strong>ate terrorist safe havens and keep<br />

nuclear weapons away from terrorists by<br />

using all its economic, diplomatic and military<br />

powers.<br />

After laying the groundwork for better US-<br />

Pakistan partnership the US intends to hold<br />

Pakistan accountable, hence needs India’s<br />

help to keep an eye on Pakistan. Recalling<br />

Trump’s ‘tougher approach’ to Pakistan<br />

for allegedly ‘harbouring terrorists’ Haley<br />

reiterated that Washington won’t tolerate<br />

any government offering safe havens on its<br />

soil to terrorists who target Americans.<br />

This new approach will require understanding<br />

and restraint from both Pakistan and India<br />

as the United States wanted to maintain<br />

separate relations with both nations. The<br />

United States recognises the important<br />

contributions India had made to the stability<br />

of Afghanistan and wanted New Delhi to<br />

continue doing so. Trump does not oppose<br />

the Indian nuclear programme as ‘India is<br />

a democracy that threatens no one’ but was<br />

deter<strong>min</strong>ed to stop Iran from acquiring any<br />

nuclear weapon.<br />

Halley said the objection by five permanent<br />

members to the proposed reform of the UN<br />

Security Council was less about expansion<br />

per se but ‘much more about veto’ power<br />

that allows Russia, China, Britain, US and<br />

France to veto a resolution.<br />

None of them want to give up veto power.<br />

Haley revealed how two of the five<br />

permanent members, Russia and China,<br />

opposed any changes in the current structure<br />

of the Security Council and could also keep<br />

India out if it sought veto powers. She<br />

advised India ‘not to touch’ the present veto<br />

arrangement at the UN Security Council<br />

if it wanted to join the world body as a<br />

permanent member. So, the key to getting<br />

India on the Security Council is not to touch<br />

the veto, Haley implored.<br />

While addressing think tank on policy<br />

statement Haley also spoke about close<br />

India- US cooperation to check China and<br />

Pakistan. Islamabad deprecates the US<br />

South Asia policy that makes India the new<br />

surrogate and China the clear target. There’s<br />

been a tilt in US policy towards India since<br />

Photo Credit : Shutterstock<br />

Bush era. Moreover, international relations<br />

are transactional and ever-changing. India<br />

is a democracy that values non-violence<br />

and don’t threaten any western country<br />

or interests, hence inspires Washington’s<br />

confidence. Pak still harbours the illusion<br />

of being sovereign equal to India and the<br />

guardian of Indus.<br />

Indians have kept an eye on Pakistan since<br />

independence with the other riveted on<br />

China. Pakistan and China eye India and<br />

America. The US wanted Pakistan to watch<br />

Afghanistan, and now desires India to<br />

keep an eye on Pakistan. India cannot rely<br />

on China which is out to contain India, so<br />

cannot but side with the US. Pakistan cannot<br />

fully align with China and at the same time<br />

expect proximity to Washington. Pakistan<br />

wanted both US and China to contain India.<br />

On growth trajectory now, India has neither<br />

time nor interest to keep eye on anyone, let<br />

alone interfere with other’s internal matters.<br />

China’s neighbours are too wary of its<br />

expansionist intentions. China and Russia’s<br />

involvement in Afghanistan is a major issue<br />

as both allow Taliban free movement in their<br />

countries.<br />

Afghanistan offers a good opportunity for<br />

India and Pakistan to fix bilateral relations<br />

by addressing common regional challenges.<br />

Good faith and trust can pre-empt efforts of<br />

weapon states to create instability to sell their<br />

weapons. USA doing dual diplomacy; Vice<br />

President appreciating Pakistan’s efforts<br />

while Haley balancing by encouraging India.<br />

India is chosen as new emerging power but<br />

must learn from history not to take the bait.<br />

Pakistan’s experience proves that playing<br />

surrogate for US has short shelf life. India<br />

should honestly try to solve problems with<br />

neighbours Pakistan and China by developing<br />

business like USA-Canada-Europe. India<br />

must pursue its own interests regardless of<br />

what USA or Pakistan wants. After all war<br />

in Afghanistan is not against terrorism but<br />

for resources - trillion dollars of lithium that<br />

could be the future source of energy!<br />

Trump’s one statement ‘India do more in<br />

Afghanistan’ proved to be the Trump card<br />

producing more action from Pakistan than<br />

any other threat over the last <strong>30</strong> years!<br />

Burkas, niqabs pose public safety risk<br />

T<br />

◆◆<br />

By Tarek Fatah<br />

Author & Columnist, Canada<br />

@TarekFatah<br />

tarek.fatah@gmail.com<br />

he slur of “racism” has been hurled at<br />

Muslims who support Quebec’s Bill 62<br />

— the new law banning face coverings, for<br />

example the burka and niqab, when giving<br />

or receiving government services.<br />

Photo Credit : Shutterstock<br />

From Ontario Liberal Premier Kathleen<br />

Wynne to Ontario Progressive Conservative<br />

Leader Patrick Brown, many white politicians<br />

and liberal media commentators have been<br />

quick to label any support of Bill 62 racist.<br />

Since I, a Muslim, support Bill 62, I guess<br />

that makes me a racist.<br />

Indeed, it’s not uncommon to hear whispers<br />

suggesting Muslims like me who support the<br />

burka and niqab ban are “sell-outs” within<br />

the Muslim community.<br />

And that white politicians who oppose Bill<br />

62 are trying to salvage the reputation of our<br />

community, despite our supposed betrayal.<br />

After all, what do these politicians have to<br />

lose?<br />

The political race to the bottom to curry<br />

favour with the so-called “Muslim vote<br />

bank” in Canada, as they see it, has worked<br />

well for both Conservatives and Liberals.<br />

Charmed as they are by many secondgeneration<br />

radical Muslims who were born<br />

in Canada, some of whom hate western<br />

civilization more than their parents do.<br />

But none of the attacks on Quebec’s burka/<br />

niqab ban was more disingenuous than one<br />

told by a well-coiffed hijabi on Canadian<br />

television recently, dismissing the public<br />

safety aspect of people wearing facemasks.<br />

This young Muslim woman claimed there<br />

has not been a single incident where someone<br />

wearing a burka committed a crime.<br />

To set the record straight, here are just a few<br />

examples of cri<strong>min</strong>al activities committed<br />

by men and women wearing burkas and<br />

other face coverings in Canada:<br />

Two months ago, on Aug. 17, <strong>2017</strong>, an<br />

armed robbery took place at a Scotia Bank<br />

branch in Milton, Ontario.<br />

Police said one of the two suspects was<br />

wearing a balaclava.<br />

On Sept. 9, 2015, two burka-wearing male<br />

teens charged into a Toronto bank in the<br />

Yonge Street and Highway 401 area. Both<br />

were later arrested in Ajax.<br />

On Oct. 14, 2014, two men wearing burkas<br />

robbed a Toronto jewellery store in the York<br />

Mills and Leslie Street area, and walked<br />

away with $500,000 worth of gold and<br />

precious stones.<br />

On Aug. 18, 2010 an armed robbery by two<br />

masked men took place at a Scotiabank<br />

branch in Vaughan, north of Toronto.<br />

Ottawa police have in the past cited a handful<br />

of robberies in that city involving male<br />

suspects using Muslim women’s religious<br />

garments as disguises.<br />

Some of us will never forget how a young<br />

Toronto Muslim woman, Bano Shahdady,<br />

threw off her burka as she was divorcing her<br />

husband, only to be stalked by him disguised<br />

in a burka.<br />

He entered her apartment building and killed<br />

her in July, 2011.<br />

It was a story few media were willing to<br />

delve into, but because I knew the family,<br />

one journalist did report about this burkarelated<br />

murder that almost went unreported.<br />

Around the world, numerous cri<strong>min</strong>als have<br />

fled arrest wearing burkas, everywhere from<br />

London’s Heathrow airport to the infamous<br />

Lal Masjid armed revolt by jihadis in<br />

Islamabad.<br />

My plea to vote-grabbing Canadian politicians<br />

of all political stripes in English-speaking<br />

Canada is, for once, be honest.<br />

Put the racist card aside and recognize<br />

burkas and niqabs pose a serious public<br />

safety risk.<br />

www.NewDelhiTimes.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!