Spacex Falcon 9 Block 5 targets 24 hour turnaround, no refurbishment reuse and relaunch a dozen times _ NextBigFuture
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FACEBOOK TWITTER REDDIT GOOGLE+ RSS<br />
<br />
Home Space <strong>Spacex</strong> <strong>Falcon</strong> 9 <strong>Block</strong> 5 <strong>targets</strong> <strong>24</strong> <strong>hour</strong> <strong>turnaround</strong>, <strong>no</strong><br />
<strong>refurbishment</strong> <strong>reuse</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>relaunch</strong> a <strong>dozen</strong> <strong>times</strong><br />
SUPPORT US TODAY!<br />
<strong>Spacex</strong> <strong>Falcon</strong> 9 <strong>Block</strong> 5 <strong>targets</strong> <strong>24</strong><br />
<strong>hour</strong> <strong>turnaround</strong>, <strong>no</strong><br />
<strong>refurbishment</strong> <strong>reuse</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>relaunch</strong><br />
a <strong>dozen</strong> <strong>times</strong><br />
brian wang | August 29, 2017 | 67 comments<br />
NEXTBIGFUTURE IS ON<br />
PATREON NOW!<br />
Unlock exclusive content <strong>and</strong><br />
join our community.<br />
No ads on Nextbigfuture<br />
Access to our special<br />
member newsletter<br />
See additional content<br />
Join us today! Thank you!<br />
— Brian Wang<br />
SUBSCRIBE TO BLOG VIA<br />
EMAIL<br />
Tweet Like Share Pin it<br />
<strong>Spacex</strong> Chief tech officer Tom Mueller discussed the next-gen<br />
<strong>Falcon</strong> 9, called the “<strong>Block</strong> 5,” which will have a reusable<br />
thermal protection that won’t burn up the heat shielding. It will<br />
also have retractable legs that will only come out during<br />
l<strong>and</strong>ing. The <strong>Falcon</strong> 9 <strong>Block</strong> 5 will have a <strong>24</strong>-<strong>hour</strong> <strong>turnaround</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> be much cheaper <strong>and</strong> is expected to be flying by the end of<br />
2017.<br />
Enter your email address to<br />
subscribe to this blog <strong>and</strong><br />
receive <strong>no</strong>tifications of new<br />
posts by email.<br />
Email Address<br />
Subscribe
With a cheaper design comes a few tradeoffs. The <strong>Block</strong> 5 has<br />
a single Merlin engine on it, although it’s a fairly sophisticated<br />
version of the engine. It uses some of the same tech — like the<br />
guidance computer — from the <strong>Falcon</strong> 9 (which has 9 Merlin<br />
engines), though. Mueller says the <strong>Block</strong> 5 has a significantly<br />
lower cost but the performance is “marginal.”<br />
After subscribing, you can adjust<br />
email frequency here.<br />
FACEBOOK GROUP<br />
The <strong>Falcon</strong> 9 <strong>Block</strong> 5 is expected to be far more reusable than<br />
the <strong>Block</strong> 3. Shotwell said a <strong>Block</strong> 5 booster could <strong>relaunch</strong> “ a<br />
<strong>dozen</strong> or so <strong>times</strong>.” The <strong>Block</strong> 3, by comparison, has an<br />
estimated life of two or three missions.<br />
Shotwell said the <strong>Block</strong> 5 version of the <strong>Falcon</strong> 9 won’t need<br />
refurbishing, but will mainly undergo inspections prior to<br />
launch, streamlining the process compared to the first <strong>reuse</strong>d<br />
boosters.<br />
<strong>Block</strong> 5 will feature:<br />
For increased payload:<br />
* 7–8% more thrust by upgrading the engines,<br />
* an improved flight control system for an optimized angle of<br />
attack on descent, lowering l<strong>and</strong>ing fuel requirements.<br />
For rapid reusability:<br />
* Forged, more temperature-resistant titanium grid fins,<br />
* a thermal protection coating on the first stage to limit reentry<br />
heating damage,<br />
* a set of retractable l<strong>and</strong>ing legs for rapid recovery <strong>and</strong><br />
shipping,<br />
* a reusable heat shield protecting the engines <strong>and</strong> plumbing at<br />
the base of the rocket.<br />
COMMUNITY<br />
People Recent Popular<br />
Fully reusable <strong>Spacex</strong> Rockets would be lower<br />
cost than Skylon spaceplanes |<br />
<strong>NextBigFuture</strong>.com<br />
(http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/fullyreusable-spacex-rockets-would-be-lower-costthan-skylon-spaceplanes.html)<br />
101 comments<br />
Seoul Plan for Pre-emptive Strike as part of<br />
Full-Fledged War with North Korea |<br />
<strong>NextBigFuture</strong>.com<br />
(http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/seoulplan-for-pre-emptive-strike-as-part-of-fullfledged-war-with-<strong>no</strong>rth-korea.html)<br />
39 comments<br />
Auto<strong>no</strong>mous rocket tracking | <strong>NextBigFuture</strong>.com<br />
(http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/auto<strong>no</strong>m<br />
rocket-tracking.html)<br />
17 comments<br />
Top fifteen cryptocurrencies <strong>and</strong> twelve have<br />
billion dollar market cap | <strong>NextBigFuture</strong>.com<br />
ARCHIVES<br />
Archives<br />
Select Month
A recent analysis posted on reddit of <strong>Spacex</strong> costs with ten<br />
<strong>reuse</strong>s suggests a maintained profit margin with costs that are<br />
about 40-50% of a <strong>no</strong>n-usable <strong>Spacex</strong> flight.<br />
SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell told the Space<br />
Symposium conference that the cost of refurbishing the <strong>Falcon</strong><br />
9 rocket that originally flew the CRS-8 Space Station resupply<br />
mission last year for SES-10 was “substantially less than half”<br />
what it would have cost to build a br<strong>and</strong> new one. That’s<br />
despite doing a lot to bring the recovered rocket back to<br />
operational condition. The new <strong>Block</strong> 5 rocket that would <strong>no</strong>t<br />
need <strong>refurbishment</strong> could deliver on the speed <strong>and</strong> cost saving<br />
for reusable rockets.<br />
Arabsat will be the first customer for the <strong>Falcon</strong> Heavy when it<br />
begins commercial service in 2018, following a demonstration<br />
mission later this year.<br />
<strong>Falcon</strong> Raptor<br />
Shotwell has hinted at the possibility of a future version of<br />
<strong>Spacex</strong> rockets that could use the Raptor engines designed for<br />
transportation to Mars. Shotwell said Raptor, a liquid methane<br />
<strong>and</strong> oxygen engine for SpaceX’s interplanetary spaceship, has<br />
undergone “many <strong>dozen</strong>s of tests” <strong>and</strong> is progressing well.<br />
“The original idea for those engines were to serve as a
propulsion system for the big Mars system, but we are looking<br />
at the utility of it on the <strong>Falcon</strong> program,” she said.<br />
ABOUT THE AUTHOR<br />
brian wang<br />
More From This Author <br />
Tags: space, spacex<br />
Latest threads<br />
Fully reusable <strong>Spacex</strong> Rockets would be lower<br />
cost than Skylon spaceplanes |<br />
<strong>NextBigFuture</strong>.com<br />
(http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/fullyreusable-spacex-rockets-would-be-lower-costthan-skylon-spaceplanes.html)<br />
101 comments<br />
Make sure your comment is heard!<br />
Sort by newest<br />
All Comments Community Help<br />
Subscribe<br />
5G <strong>and</strong> Internet of Things are ramping up <strong>and</strong><br />
Intel is ready to make them work efficiently |<br />
<strong>NextBigFuture</strong>.com<br />
(http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/5g-<br />
<strong>and</strong>-internet-of-things-are-ramping-up-<strong>and</strong>-<br />
Enrique More<strong>no</strong> 1 day(s) ago<br />
(https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/spacex-falcon-9-block-5-<br />
<strong>targets</strong>-<strong>24</strong>-<strong>hour</strong>-<strong>turnaround</strong>-<strong>no</strong>-<strong>refurbishment</strong>-<strong>reuse</strong>-<strong>and</strong>-<strong>relaunch</strong>-<br />
I read the source <strong>and</strong> it is very strange. They sayd that the block<br />
5 will have only one merlin engine instead of 9 (would be that<br />
Mueller was talking about the second stage?), they said also that<br />
the mars rocket is the falcon heavy...<br />
0 ▲ 0 ▼ Reply Actions<br />
<br />
a-<strong>dozen</strong>-<br />
<strong>times</strong>.html#sot_aab19f73ee47e256bf3b8e8efdc818bdb541b495)<br />
Steven in reply to Enrique More<strong>no</strong><br />
f I read the source <strong>and</strong> it is ve... more »<br />
20 <strong>hour</strong>(s) ago<br />
(https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/spacex-falcon-<br />
9-block-5-<strong>targets</strong>-<strong>24</strong>-<strong>hour</strong>-<strong>turnaround</strong>-<strong>no</strong>-<strong>refurbishment</strong>-<br />
<strong>reuse</strong>-<strong>and</strong>-<strong>relaunch</strong>-a-<strong>dozen</strong>-
4a3ccd)<br />
The first stage still has 9 engines <strong>and</strong> the second still<br />
has one. The only difference is the engines have been<br />
improved <strong>and</strong> uprated for a bit more thrust. The heavy<br />
version has 27 first stage engines (9 on each booster<br />
<strong>and</strong> 9 on the cor stage). Then in the table for the falcon<br />
9 they list 13.5 engines. I think the the aditional 4.5 is<br />
referring to the additionally thrust the engines produce.<br />
The table also list 2 second stage engines but everything<br />
I have heard is one with a larger more efficient vacuum<br />
<strong>no</strong>zzle.<br />
0 ▲ 0 ▼ Reply Actions<br />
<br />
Alwin Barni<br />
in reply to<br />
Enrique More<strong>no</strong><br />
f I read the source <strong>and</strong> it is ve... more »<br />
21 <strong>hour</strong>(s) ago<br />
<strong>reuse</strong>-<strong>and</strong>-<strong>relaunch</strong>-a-<strong>dozen</strong><strong>times</strong>.html#sot_0c4465a7170d432844a902c027dfb09c97<br />
(https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/spacex-falcon-<br />
9-block-5-<strong>targets</strong>-<strong>24</strong>-<strong>hour</strong>-<strong>turnaround</strong>-<strong>no</strong>-<strong>refurbishment</strong>-<br />
06cdbc)<br />
Exactly. This 'one Merlin engine' makes me question the<br />
quality of this article entirely (<strong>and</strong> unfortunately others<br />
as well). It does <strong>no</strong>t seem possible to have e<strong>no</strong>ugh<br />
thrust with one engine, <strong>and</strong> as for the second stage - it<br />
does have only one. If it was Raptor, then maybe, but<br />
still it would be entirely different rocket.<br />
Seriously Mr Wang, what are you talking about?<br />
0 ▲ 0 ▼ Reply Actions<br />
<br />
Kerry Chivers in reply to Enrique More<strong>no</strong><br />
f I read the source <strong>and</strong> it is ve... more »<br />
1 day(s) ago<br />
<strong>reuse</strong>-<strong>and</strong>-<strong>relaunch</strong>-a-<strong>dozen</strong>-<br />
<strong>times</strong>.html#sot_fdd26f00256815b00680807c622a2a56c8<br />
(https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/spacex-falcon-<br />
9-block-5-<strong>targets</strong>-<strong>24</strong>-<strong>hour</strong>-<strong>turnaround</strong>-<strong>no</strong>-<strong>refurbishment</strong>-<br />
41759f)<br />
Same here - quite confusing. If it has one engine then it<br />
can't be a <strong>Falcon</strong> 9 as the number de<strong>no</strong>tes the number<br />
of engines. Except that <strong>Falcon</strong> Heavy won't be called<br />
<strong>Falcon</strong> 27, for rather obvious reasons.<br />
0 ▲ 0 ▼ Reply Actions<br />
<br />
<strong>reuse</strong>-<strong>and</strong>-<strong>relaunch</strong>-a-<strong>dozen</strong>-<br />
<strong>times</strong>.html#sot_e8d2089517d12111f4ece670352db54988<br />
vl hc 1 day(s) ago<br />
(https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/spacex-falcon-9-block-5-<br />
<strong>targets</strong>-<strong>24</strong>-<strong>hour</strong>-<strong>turnaround</strong>-<strong>no</strong>-<strong>refurbishment</strong>-<strong>reuse</strong>-<strong>and</strong>-<strong>relaunch</strong>-<br />
a-<strong>dozen</strong>-<br />
<strong>times</strong>.html#sot_a46853bfdef31b18eea41833b075b195aa2fe420)<br />
The great thing about <strong>no</strong>t going public is you don't have to<br />
release your finances, gives fans a lot more room to fantasize<br />
about profit. Just imagine how much more "profit" Tesla would<br />
be making, at least according to fans, if they can also keep<br />
financial data a secret.
financial data a secret.<br />
Unfortunately for customers they have to pay the list price, <strong>no</strong>t<br />
<strong>NextBigFuture</strong>.com<br />
ABOUT CONTACT FORUM<br />
PRIVACY POLICY<br />
TERMS AND CONDITIONS<br />
Copyright © 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 New big future Inc. All rights reserved.<br />
Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service <strong>and</strong> Privacy Policy.<br />
About Us Contact<br />
ABOUT CONTACT FORUM PRIVACY POLICY TERMS AND CONDITIONS