09.04.2018 Views

Lec4_Piled Raft

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20-Oct-15<br />

Drawbacks of Current Practice:<br />

‣ In a plate load test, dimensions of the plate are much<br />

smaller than actual raft size.<br />

‣ Hence k value obtained from plate load test does not<br />

take into account settlement contribution of<br />

all the soil layers upto 1.5 times width of the raft.<br />

‣ This may lead to over estimation of subgrade modulus<br />

leading to under-design of the raft (unsafe).<br />

‣ For eg. for a raft size 30 x 60 m, thickness = 2.5 m,<br />

analysis was done for 2 cases with k = 1 kg/cm 3 and<br />

k = 0.5 kg/cm 3 . In the 2 nd case, moments were higher by 20%,<br />

resulting in 20% higher reinforcement steel or 10% thicker raft.<br />

Prof. V.S.Raju Consultants<br />

17<br />

Predicting the Settlements on cohesionless soils<br />

S = Settlement<br />

S = H ∆σ z<br />

Es<br />

H = Thickness of the layer<br />

∆σ z = Pressure increase @ middle of the layer (obtained<br />

Es = Soil Modulus<br />

from stress distribution curves)<br />

Es is determined by correlating<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

With SPT N value<br />

Static cone penetration value<br />

Footing / Plate load test (at shallow depth only)<br />

Prof. V.S.Raju Consultants 18<br />

V.S.Raju Consultants 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!