Booklet
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A<br />
Discover the impact of your HBDI® thinking style preferences.<br />
Overlay your profile transparency on the cover of this booklet.<br />
Review how your preferences relate to the Brain® model.<br />
“Is this profile ‘me’, or how I would like to see myself?”<br />
Generally, how people see themselves is accurate and<br />
informative: it captures a point of view which can be invisible<br />
Upper Lef<br />
A QUADRANT<br />
Logical<br />
Quantitative<br />
Analytical<br />
Technical<br />
Factual<br />
Realistic<br />
Sensible<br />
Sequential<br />
Controlled<br />
Detailed<br />
Cerebral<br />
– 1 –<br />
VERY STRONG<br />
– 1 –<br />
STRONG<br />
– 2 –<br />
INTERMEDIATE<br />
–3–<br />
LOW<br />
My HBDI® Profile<br />
Understanding<br />
the Herrmann<br />
Whole Brain®<br />
model<br />
to others. Our research has shown that having a third party<br />
filling out an HBDI® gives imprecise results. While you might<br />
tilt your answers towards an idealised view of yourself, the<br />
HBDI® questions are framed to minimise this. Also, it is<br />
likely you would think it self–defeating to provide inaccurate<br />
information about yourself.<br />
Upper Right<br />
D QUADRANT<br />
Metaphoric<br />
Integrative<br />
Visual<br />
Synthesising<br />
Conceptual<br />
Metaphoric<br />
Feeling–based<br />
Emotional<br />
Musical<br />
Humanistic<br />
The background of the<br />
Herrmann Whole<br />
I — Introduction<br />
The human brain is one of the wonders of the world. It<br />
weighs only 1.4 kg (3 lbs) yet contains over 100 billion neurons.<br />
Each neuron has the possibility of connecting with<br />
10,000 adjoining neurons. This means that the total number<br />
of possible combinations in the brain, if written out, would<br />
be 1 followed by over 10.5 million zeros.<br />
The potential of the human brain is unlimited.<br />
In the last 40 years, knowledge of the brain has progressed<br />
fur- ther than it had in the previous twenty centuries, thanks<br />
to new technologies which allow us to see the brain in<br />
action: electroencephalography (EEG), positron emission<br />
tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI and<br />
fMRI) and more.<br />
The Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument® (HBDI®) was<br />
developed from this knowledge. The HBDI® allows you to<br />
become aware of your thinking preferences in order to use<br />
them better in your personal and professional life.<br />
II — Right brain/Left brain<br />
In 1975, the brain research of Roger Sperry, began to<br />
reveal the dual specialisation of the brain. By observing<br />
patients who had their brain hemispheres separated by a<br />
procedure to sev- er the Corpus Callosum in an attempt to<br />
cure epilepsy, Sperry made a multitude of discoveries. For<br />
example, the left side of the brain, which controlled the right<br />
hand, appeared to have the function of logical, analytical,<br />
sequential and rational thinking.<br />
Conversely, the right hemisphere was shown to perceive<br />
the world and other people in a global mode, instantaneous,<br />
intu- itive, visual, synthesising, emotional and expressive. It<br />
finds solutions through sudden and spontaneous intuition,<br />
leaving to the left hemisphere the job of proving them in a<br />
logical, analytical and scientific manner.<br />
The research shows that the left hemisphere breaks everything<br />
down into different elements; the right hemisphere,<br />
on the other hand, considers the global whole and searches<br />
systematically for connections, analogies and similarities.<br />
This has been demonstrated and observed again and<br />
again in laboratory tests, as well as in healthy subjects and<br />
patients with lesions in one or the other hemisphere. For<br />
example, a victim of damage to the right hemisphere won’t<br />
recognise people or streets in his hometown. Someone<br />
with damage to the left hemisphere will not be able to<br />
express himself easily and may have to begin relying on<br />
such elements as word and sentence intonation to regain<br />
language ability.<br />
Ned Herrmann studied this research and also included other<br />
findings about the limbic system, also a dual structure,<br />
buried deep inside the brain. The principal location for<br />
emotion and memory, this system directs our affective<br />
and interpersonal processes. Ned Herrmann synthesised<br />
this body of research into the four quadrant Whole Brain®<br />
model, a metaphor for how we think.<br />
Organised<br />
Conservative<br />
Expressive<br />
Sensory<br />
B QUADRANT<br />
Lower Left<br />
Instinctive<br />
C QUADRANT<br />
Lower RIght<br />
When I filled out the HBDI®, I wasn’t feeling 100%. Will that affect my profile?<br />
Mood does have a bearing on the overall size of the profile, but it seems to have very little effect on the shape or orientation.<br />
If you were feeling especially positive or expansive when completing the assessment, then you may have answered some<br />
questions with higher values,<br />
thus expanding your higher preference scores. Your least preferred quadrant will typically not shift with your mood.<br />
Page - 2 Page - 3
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A<br />
Brain® model<br />
Those with more Left mode preferences would rather<br />
reason logically, study verified facts and adopt a systematic<br />
approach. They would tend to avoid fantasy, and resist<br />
going off on a tangent, preferring to remain focused,<br />
rational and rigorous.<br />
Right mode dominant people tend to enjoy new ideas<br />
and interpersonal involvement; they may communicate<br />
symbolically rather than by pure reason. They may think<br />
in pictures rather than words. Abstract concepts and<br />
hypothetical issues are interesting to the Right brain<br />
dominant person.<br />
By all evidence, these aspects of communication and<br />
perception are opposite, yet complimentary.<br />
Difference is the norm: the HBDI® profile data spans 81<br />
main preference codes or ‘families’ of profiles. The top<br />
10 profiles represent 78% of the population. Through the<br />
awareness achieved with the HBDI® profile data, you now<br />
can take into account how you can be more effective in<br />
a wide range of applications: communication, teams,<br />
problem solving, decision making, career development,<br />
management development, creativity, teaching and<br />
learning, and strategic planning.<br />
Upper Left Quadrant<br />
Logical, Analytical,<br />
Mathematical,<br />
Technical, Problem<br />
solving.<br />
Upper Right Quadrant<br />
Creative, Synthesising,<br />
Artistic, Holistic,<br />
Conceptual.<br />
Summary of key traits by quadrant<br />
Upper Left A<br />
Upper Right D<br />
SKILLS<br />
Analysis, Evaluation, Qualification, Technical, Financial, Feasibility studies, Critical<br />
assessment.<br />
SKILLS<br />
lnnovation, Vision, Lateral thinking, Synthesis, Holistic and Strategic thinking, Catalyst for<br />
change.<br />
STYLE<br />
Rational, Thorough, Precise, Logical, Authoritative.<br />
STYLE<br />
Exploring, Imaginative, Adventurous, Experimental, Artistic.<br />
Lower Left Quadrant<br />
Controlled, Detailed,<br />
Planning, Organisation,<br />
Administrative.<br />
Lower Right Quadrant<br />
Interpersonal,<br />
Emotional Musical,<br />
Spiritual, Expressive.<br />
Can appear<br />
Rigid, Ruthless, Cold and calculating,<br />
Short term, Limited by the need for proof/explanation.<br />
Can appear<br />
(Particularly from a diametrically opposed quadrant)<br />
Unfocussed, Impulsive, Rash, Oblivious of deadlines,<br />
Vague, Given to tangents.<br />
Each of us has access to all the above quadrants, but<br />
we clearly have preferences for some over others. Those<br />
preferences, based on the dominance of specialised<br />
thinking processes, form the basis of the Whole Brain®<br />
model, the foundation of the HBDI®.<br />
Applying Whole Brain® thinking through the HBDI® profile<br />
leads to a better understanding of the natural styles we<br />
use to process information. These styles impact our<br />
perception of the world as well as the way we approach<br />
problem solving, the effectiveness of our interaction with<br />
others and how we get things accomplished.<br />
Ongoing applications include leadership and management<br />
development programmes for global organisations that<br />
deliver results such as increased speed and effectiveness<br />
of com- munication, greater innovation, improved<br />
team processes and leveraging the possible return on<br />
intelligence of all con- tributors in the organisation.<br />
V — Taking different<br />
preferences into<br />
account<br />
The HBDI® allows participants to become conscious of<br />
their own mental preferences and thinking styles. This<br />
understanding allows individuals to be more at ease with<br />
themselves and more perceptive and effective with people<br />
who think differently.<br />
For example, Left mode dominant people may feel more<br />
at ease in a technical job, one that requires organisation,<br />
operational planning and administration.<br />
SKILLS<br />
Organisation, Implementation, Accuracy, Administration, Operational planning, Practical<br />
tasks, Completion.<br />
STYLE<br />
Careful, Methodical, Procedural, Reliable, Predictable, Disciplined, Detailed, ‘Doer’.<br />
VI — Two different ways to solve problems<br />
Everyone has their own particular way to face and solve<br />
every- day problems. Right mode dominant people<br />
proceed in a start and stop mode with periods of insight<br />
and incubation. They may take a step back and see the<br />
‘big picture’ with all the relationships between varying<br />
elements. They think and understand by metaphor or<br />
analogy by making connections between elements which<br />
at first glance seem remote and unrelated, things that<br />
would appear illogical to a Left brain dominant person.<br />
In contrast, the Left mode dominant person prefers a more<br />
methodical approach, step by step, beginning with detailed<br />
observation of the facts before continuing to form a judge-<br />
SKILLS<br />
Customer relations, Teaching/Training, Communication, Anticipating needs, Team<br />
awareness.<br />
STYLE<br />
Caring, Friendly, Sociable, Empathetic, Humanistic, Emotional.<br />
Can appear Can appear<br />
(Particularly from a diametrically opposed quadrant)<br />
Controlling, Nit picking, Bossy, Stuck in a rut, Boring. Overly sensitive, Un–businesslike, Sentimental, Too talkative.<br />
Lower Left B<br />
Lower Right C<br />
ment. This approach often appears sterile and boring to<br />
the Right mode dominant person who would have difficulty<br />
even playing along.<br />
The HBDI® can help individuals and teams understand<br />
how they prefer to approach problems. In a true–to–life<br />
way, their awareness is raised to demonstrate that their<br />
own way of thinking is not the only way, and that some<br />
approaches to problems require different types of thinking.<br />
Ned Herrmann insists, “Each person is unique; people<br />
interact spontaneously as a function of their thinking<br />
preferences.”<br />
Page - 4 Page - 5
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A<br />
Upper Left<br />
Key Descriptors<br />
Upper Right<br />
Upper Left<br />
Upper Right<br />
Performance<br />
Financial<br />
Rotational<br />
Fantasy<br />
Spontaneous<br />
Pleasure<br />
Facts<br />
Analytical<br />
Doctors<br />
Engineers<br />
Quantitative<br />
Intellectual<br />
Technical<br />
Lawyers<br />
Bankers<br />
Performance<br />
Efficiency<br />
Function<br />
Value<br />
Typical Professions<br />
Typical Types<br />
Special interests<br />
Exploration<br />
Strategy<br />
Concept<br />
Fun<br />
Artists<br />
Organisational Dev. Consultants<br />
Visionary<br />
Risk Taking<br />
Open<br />
Strategists<br />
Entrepreneurs<br />
Aesthetics<br />
Risk<br />
Finance:<br />
Transactor, Banker,<br />
Stock Exchange<br />
Trader<br />
Cartographer, Geographer,<br />
Surveyor<br />
Military<br />
Medicine:<br />
Veterinary, Surgeon,<br />
Doctor, Ophthalmologist,<br />
Physiotherapist,<br />
Radiologist, Dentist<br />
Law:<br />
Lawyer, Magistrate,<br />
Jurist, Notary,<br />
Auctioneer, Bailiff<br />
Engineering:<br />
Aeronautics,<br />
Electronics,<br />
Telecommunications,<br />
Old, Data Processing<br />
Aviation:<br />
Technical, Pilot,<br />
Air Traffic Controller<br />
Research:<br />
Biologist, Chemist,<br />
Botanist<br />
Analyses<br />
Is logical<br />
Is critical<br />
Is realistic<br />
Knows about money<br />
Knows how things work<br />
Quantifies/Likes numbers<br />
Sales:<br />
Selesperson,<br />
Departamental<br />
Supervisor,<br />
Real Estate Agent,<br />
Medical Rap<br />
Infers<br />
Takes risks<br />
Is impetuous<br />
Bracks rules<br />
Like surprises<br />
Advertising<br />
Building:<br />
Architect, Designer,<br />
Decorator,<br />
Webmaster<br />
Marketing:<br />
Research,<br />
Product Manager<br />
Film Making:<br />
Actor,<br />
Editor<br />
Creation:<br />
Script Writer,<br />
Fashion Designer<br />
Arts:<br />
Painter, Sculptor,<br />
Musician<br />
Quality<br />
Security<br />
Reliability<br />
Production<br />
Love<br />
People<br />
Charity<br />
Communication<br />
Insurance:<br />
Insurance Broker<br />
Takes preventive action<br />
Establishes procedures<br />
Gets Things done<br />
Plans/Organises<br />
Is Reliable<br />
Is Neat<br />
Timely<br />
Is sensitive to others<br />
Likes to teach<br />
Touches a lot<br />
Is supportive<br />
Is expressive<br />
Talks a lot<br />
Feels<br />
Journalism:<br />
Journalist,<br />
Copy Reader,<br />
Designer<br />
Teaching:<br />
Teacher,<br />
University Professor<br />
Form<br />
Reliability<br />
Planners<br />
Bookkeepers<br />
Control<br />
Quantitative<br />
Intellectual<br />
Technical<br />
Administrators<br />
Organized<br />
Safekeeping<br />
Supervisors<br />
Teachers/Trainers<br />
Sales People<br />
Emotional<br />
Spiritual<br />
Personable<br />
Musical<br />
Helpful<br />
Musicians<br />
Social Workers<br />
Feeling<br />
Satisfaction<br />
People<br />
Secretary,<br />
Personal Assistant<br />
Accountancy:<br />
Chartered Accountant,<br />
Book-Keeper,<br />
Organisational Manager,<br />
Economist<br />
Civil servant:<br />
Tax Inspector,<br />
Administrator,<br />
Factory Inspector<br />
Security:<br />
Fireman, Policeman,<br />
Inspector<br />
Tourism:<br />
Flight Attendant,<br />
Tourist Guide,<br />
Receptionist,<br />
Translator / Interpreter,<br />
Tourist Information<br />
Center Manager<br />
Person Responsible<br />
For Public Relations<br />
Medical:<br />
Pediatric Nurse, Dietician,<br />
Nurse, Midwife,<br />
Speech Therapist,<br />
Psychomotor Therapist<br />
Human Resources:<br />
Trainer,<br />
HR Manager<br />
Psychology:<br />
Psychologist,<br />
Career Counsellor<br />
Social Worker:<br />
Sociocultural Leader,<br />
Educator,<br />
Family Adviser<br />
Lower Left<br />
VII — Preferences and team effectiveness<br />
Lower Right<br />
Lower Left<br />
VIII — Improving communication<br />
Lower Right<br />
The distinctions between scientists and artists, engineers<br />
and sales people are as old as the human race. Statistical<br />
studies of HBDI® profiles have identified typical profiles<br />
for different careers, fields and job descriptions. A study of<br />
hospital personnel revealed preference differences among<br />
the varying jobs: Specialists (A quadrant); Administrators<br />
(B quadrant); Nurses (C quadrant); Psychiatrists (D<br />
quadrant). Is it any wonder that sometimes there might be<br />
tension in the hospital environment?<br />
HBDI® research has also demonstrated that directors and<br />
CEOs are most often multi–dominant — even with three<br />
or four dominant quadrants, as opposed to single or dual<br />
dominant specialists.<br />
An individual’s work approach can certainly be linked to<br />
their mental preferences. A team will work more effectively<br />
if the individual members appreciate the differences in<br />
their thinking styles. In fact, thinking diversity will also lead<br />
to more creative outcomes. Research using the HBDI®<br />
Team profile has shown that team effectiveness can be up<br />
to 66% greater in diverse teams.<br />
All of us communicate. Effective communicators who<br />
understand thinking styles will tailor their presentation<br />
to fit their audience while being sure to communicate key<br />
points in all four quadrants. For a group of engineers or<br />
technicians you might cite plenty of facts and figures, and<br />
emphasise logic and methodology showing the potential<br />
results of practical application. To a group of artists,<br />
teachers, or sales people, you would most likely emphasise<br />
innovative aspects and point out ways to improve<br />
communication and instruction. Which presentation<br />
appeals to you the most? Doesn’t your answer reflect your<br />
thinking style?<br />
Communication is easiest between people who have<br />
similar preferences. They ‘speak the same language’.<br />
Communication is quite easy when people share<br />
preferences in the same mode, Left (A and B) or Right (C<br />
and D).<br />
When people share preferences in the Upper (A and D) or<br />
Lower (B and C) mode, they may find common ground for<br />
communication. Most challenging may be communication<br />
between those who have preferences in diametrically<br />
opposing quadrants.<br />
Page - 6 Page - 7
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A<br />
IX — Inside each of the four quadrants<br />
B Quadrant: Organise<br />
The following model and paragraphs explain the<br />
characteristics of each quadrant, shown as clusters of<br />
preferred tasks, and style of functioning within each<br />
quadrant. A preference for a quadrant indicates an<br />
inclination for some or many of the clusters of tasks in that<br />
mode. This helps explain how two<br />
Upper<br />
Left<br />
A<br />
Intellectual<br />
Thinking<br />
Logical<br />
Analytical<br />
Problem solving<br />
Test & prove<br />
Knows how<br />
Things work<br />
Factual<br />
Critical<br />
Rational<br />
Realistic<br />
Rigorous thinking<br />
Knows the basis of<br />
things<br />
people with similar preferences can be different in the<br />
specifics of that preference. Keep in mind that you may<br />
only A prefer one cluster in a quadrant while another<br />
individual with a preference for that quadrant may prefer a<br />
different cluster or clusters.<br />
Original<br />
Imaginative<br />
Innovative<br />
Creative<br />
Curious<br />
Artistic<br />
Artistic<br />
Spatial<br />
Visual<br />
Integrating<br />
Synthesising<br />
Holistic<br />
Intuitive<br />
(solutions)<br />
Playful<br />
Breaks rules<br />
Risk taking<br />
Original<br />
Upper<br />
Right<br />
D<br />
This quadrant likes structure in a practical and procedural<br />
sense. A primary preference here would suggest you<br />
have a natural inclination towards organisation, reliability,<br />
efficiency, order, and/or discipline. Tasks might frequently<br />
be prioritised; you would tackle them in a systematic<br />
and sequential manner and complete them; time is often<br />
managed effectively. This quadrant is mindful of logistical<br />
constraints and is methodical and attentive to detail. Skills<br />
of this quadrant include operational planning and the<br />
implementation of projects.<br />
Equally, administration and maintenance are smoothly<br />
handled. B quadrant preferences may suggest you<br />
dislike chaos and confusion and have considerable skill<br />
and satisfaction in making order out of such a situation.<br />
Characteristics are caution, control, and conservatism.<br />
The degree to which ‘B’ quadrant tendencies are apparent<br />
will be affected by the ‘D’ quadrant score; a low primary<br />
or high secondary preference in ‘D’ would tend to have a<br />
balancing influence. Clusters in this quadrant may include<br />
safekeeping for one individual vs. timelines for another.<br />
Which clusters best describe you?<br />
Technical<br />
Financial<br />
Numerical<br />
Quantitative<br />
Mathematical<br />
Knows about<br />
Money<br />
Simultaneous<br />
Impetuous<br />
Like surprises<br />
Conceptual<br />
Metaphorical<br />
Intuitive<br />
(Solutions)<br />
Strategic<br />
Future oriented<br />
Imaginative<br />
C Quadrant: Personalise<br />
B<br />
Lower<br />
Left<br />
Conservative<br />
Traditional<br />
Controlled<br />
Dominant<br />
Safekeeping<br />
On time<br />
Organized<br />
Reliable<br />
Detailed<br />
Speaker<br />
Reader<br />
Linear<br />
Sequential<br />
Step by step<br />
Procedural<br />
Implementation<br />
Gets things done<br />
Organized<br />
Planning<br />
Administrative<br />
Preventive<br />
Neat<br />
Interpersonal<br />
Friendly<br />
Intuitive (people)<br />
Sensitive to others<br />
People oriented<br />
Supportive<br />
Empathetic<br />
Emotional<br />
Feeling<br />
Symbolic<br />
Intuitive<br />
(people)<br />
Spiritual<br />
Talker<br />
Teaching/Training<br />
Communicator<br />
Expressing<br />
Musical<br />
Writer<br />
Reader<br />
C<br />
Lower<br />
Right<br />
A primary preference in this quadrant would suggest you are<br />
naturally in tune with and sensitive to other’s needs, mood,<br />
attitudes, atmosphere, or energy level. There is usually an<br />
attraction to people–related tasks plus an ability to relate<br />
to others and express yourself easily. Characteristics may<br />
include good interpersonal skills with an awareness of<br />
the feelings of others, ease of communication, and often<br />
skills in teaching/training facilitation or group leadership.<br />
‘Sensory intuition’, in the form of gut feelings or hunches,<br />
D Quadrant: Strategise<br />
may be given credence. Spiritual awareness and musical<br />
interest are largely ‘C’ quadrant features.<br />
People with preferences in this quadrant may be emotional<br />
and highly sensitive. For some, spiritual aspects represent<br />
a significant ‘cluster’ for this quadrant. For others,<br />
interpersonal aspects play a key role. Which clusters<br />
represent your preferences in this quadrant?<br />
A Quadrant: Analyse<br />
This quadrant prefers a cognitive and rational approach.<br />
When using this thinking style, you would be likely to<br />
approach problem solving in a logical manner and to take<br />
account of facts, figures, statistics, and other tangibles.<br />
You would prefer conclusions that are backed up by<br />
supporting data or by examples of precedent. You would<br />
like approaches that reduce the complex to the simple,<br />
the unclear to clear, and the cumbersome to the efficient.<br />
Your critical evaluation of ideas occurs in this quadrant;<br />
decisions or judgments are explained and justified by A<br />
quadrant thinking.<br />
This style is logical, analytical and rational; it is engaged in<br />
feasibility studies, critical assessments, and any task that<br />
requires rigorous and focused research. Financial, mathematical,<br />
and technical matters are included in this mode.<br />
One individual may prefer rational, logical approaches,<br />
while another may be mathematical and quantitative.<br />
Which clusters do you prefer?<br />
With a D quadrant preference you can usually handle several<br />
mental inputs simultaneously, make rapid connections<br />
and feel comfortable with abstract concepts.<br />
An initially holistic approach to problem solving may be<br />
preferred; various facets are assessed simultaneously,<br />
‘mental jigsaws’ are made and conclusions are reached<br />
in a spontaneous rather than a studied manner. Such<br />
operating could be called intuitive in an intellectual sense.<br />
Lateral thinking takes place in this mode and inspires<br />
imaginative, innovative and original ideas.<br />
This quadrant could be described as the catalyst for the<br />
creative process. Strategic thinking is an activity that<br />
draws heavily on D quadrant thinking. In this mode you<br />
welcome positive change (particularly when occurring<br />
with a considerably lower ‘B’ score) and may have an<br />
inclination towards adventure, experimentation, and risk.<br />
This quadrant often thrives on the excitement of new ideas,<br />
variety, incongruities, and possibilities. The risk–taking<br />
aspects of this mode may be in contrast to or balanced<br />
by the B quadrant safe–keeping modes. Some prefer the<br />
‘artistic’ cluster while others might select ‘metaphorical’.<br />
Which clusters represent your D quadrant thinking?<br />
Page - 8 Page - 9
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model B Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model B<br />
Reading your<br />
HBDI® profile<br />
step by step<br />
Preference code<br />
This consists of four numbers placed in order<br />
of the quadrants: ABCD. The terms ‘Primary,<br />
Secondary, and Tertiary’ are used to designate<br />
the 1 (prefer), 2 (use), 3 (use least) zones of the<br />
profile grid. Please refer to chapter C to read<br />
more about your code.<br />
Reading your HBDI® profile step by step<br />
You have just received your HBDI® profile.<br />
You now want to understand the significance of<br />
the results. You want to learn how to apply the<br />
results.<br />
This chapter was created to get you started.<br />
Profile Scores and Preferences Codes<br />
> 1 or Primary (score of 67 or above): In a given quadrant,<br />
a primary indicates a dis- tinct preference for the type of<br />
activities relevant to that quadrant. Every profile will have at<br />
least one primary score, but could have as many as four.<br />
A result above 100 represents a very strong preference, often<br />
easily recognised by other people. Scores may go above 133,<br />
outside the boundary of the grid, and represent very strong<br />
preferences.<br />
> 2 or Secondary (score of 34–66 inclusive): A secondary in<br />
your profile indicates thinking modes that are comfortable<br />
and available as necessary with relative ease. It is still<br />
A QUADRANT<br />
TO UNDERSTAND<br />
‘WHAT?’<br />
My learning<br />
profile<br />
a preference, but clearly secondary to your primary (or<br />
primaries).<br />
> 3 or Tertiary (scores less than 34): A tertiary preference<br />
indicates a lack of interest in that mode of thinking and<br />
for some people even an avoidance. This means that the<br />
modes of a tertiary quadrant will, although available to<br />
you, be those you will least likely use or with which you are<br />
least comfortable. A tertiary will reinforce (by the absence<br />
of preference) the other strong preferences in the profile,<br />
especially when a primary preference is situated diagonally<br />
opposite it (A–C or B–D).<br />
D QUADRANT<br />
TO DISCOVER<br />
‘WHY?’<br />
Different ways to look<br />
at your HBDI® profile<br />
results<br />
The Visual Profile found on your<br />
transparency is a good place to start.<br />
It is a graphic displaying 4 diagonal<br />
axes, where the data plots of your<br />
four profile scores have been placed,<br />
based on your responses to the<br />
HBDI® Survey Form. It is a visual<br />
representation which synthesises<br />
your responses into a global Visual<br />
Profile. At the top of your Visual<br />
Profile, you will find your preference<br />
code, adjective pairs and profile<br />
scores for your easy reference.<br />
Another way to look at your data is the<br />
Data Summary sheet which shows<br />
how your pro- file score for each<br />
quadrant is determined. The purpose<br />
of this sheet is to remind you of your<br />
responses to many of the questions on<br />
the HBDI® Survey Form and to clarify<br />
which elements in each quadrant<br />
you prefer. It is a representation of<br />
your profile using a sequential, linear,<br />
detailed and quantified mode format.<br />
TO APPLY<br />
‘HOW?’<br />
B QUADRANT<br />
TO LIVE AND<br />
FEEL ‘WHO?’<br />
C QUADRANT<br />
Dotted line profile: It indicates where your thinking shifts in pressured situations.<br />
It is the result of the forced choice pairings on the HBDI® survey where you were asked to select one of two adjectives most<br />
like you.<br />
Page - 10 Page - 11
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model B Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model B<br />
a detailed guide to the results<br />
I — The Visual Profile<br />
To create the graphic representation of your profile, we<br />
used the profile scores which appear on the first line of the<br />
Data Summary sheet. These values are placed along the<br />
diagonal axes. The four totals are read in the order ABCD,<br />
starting in the upper Left and going counter-clockwise.<br />
This order is also used to describe a group or family of<br />
Preference Codes which can be found in the C booklet.<br />
The four different modes<br />
II — The Data Summary sheet and<br />
Explanation page<br />
Your package includes a Data Summary sheet and<br />
explanation page. The explanation page describes, in<br />
descending order of preference, your selections in each<br />
quadrant. The Data Summary shows how your profile scores<br />
for each quadrant are deter- mined. This sheet consists of<br />
a table of four colour columns sorting your responses into<br />
the four quadrants and a set of self- placement scales in<br />
black and white. The purpose of this sheet is to remind you<br />
of your responses to many of the questions on the<br />
Profile scores: the basis of your profile<br />
HBDI® Survey Form and to clarify which specific element<br />
selected in each quadrant you prefer. This is particularly<br />
useful should you wish to compare or contrast your data to<br />
that of others. The four columns represent the quadrants<br />
from left to right ABCD:<br />
> The A (blue) and B (green) columns correspond to the<br />
Left brain mode.<br />
> The C (red) and D (yellow) columns correspond to the<br />
Right brain mode.<br />
SAMPLE<br />
SAMPLE<br />
The Visual Profile graphic<br />
Your thinking preferences are<br />
measured not only by the four<br />
quadrants, but also by four modes<br />
combining the mental processes of 2<br />
adjoining quadrants; Left (A+B), Right<br />
(C+D), Upper (A+D) and Lower (B+C).<br />
100% is split between Upper and<br />
Lower to show the degree of tilt toward<br />
that mode. The Left and Right modes<br />
also have 100% representatively split<br />
between them.<br />
> The Upper Mode, combining<br />
quadrants A and D, is more cognitive<br />
and intellectual, preferring thinking<br />
in abstract, conceptual modes.<br />
Compare to the Lower mode.<br />
> The Left Mode, combining the A and<br />
B quadrants prefers concise, efficient<br />
processes with realistic, disciplined<br />
and orderly approaches. Compare to<br />
the Right mode.<br />
> The Right Mode, combining the<br />
C and D quadrants, includes key<br />
mental processes such as intuitive<br />
and perceptive thinking, as well<br />
as idealistic, expressive and open<br />
approaches. Compare to the Left<br />
mode.<br />
> The Lower Mode, combining the<br />
B and C quadrants is grounded and<br />
emotional in nature. This mode often<br />
prefers visceral, ‘gut’ and concrete<br />
approaches. Compare to the Upper<br />
mode.<br />
This line shows the total score for each quadrant A, B, C and D. These figures are used to plot the graphic on the profile<br />
overlay.<br />
Adjective pairs<br />
The adjective pair data comes from the forced choice<br />
pairings section on the HBDI®. By forcing you to choose<br />
between two different terms, this section typically reveals<br />
the thinking style distribution that is most instinctive for<br />
you. This distribution may or may not be the same as your<br />
overall preferences. Your adjective pair data helps indicate<br />
your inner or ‘back up’ style of preferred thinking. The<br />
highest score typically reveals the thinking styles favored<br />
in ‘pressured’ situations, which may vary from your ‘day<br />
Key descriptors: a general view of self<br />
This section is a simple transcription of the choices you<br />
made in the Key Descriptors section of the HBDI® Survey<br />
Form (questions 26–50). An X appears next to your<br />
selections in the columns relating to the quadrant to which<br />
they belong.<br />
The asterisk (*) denotes the key word you chose as being<br />
SAMPLE<br />
to day’ preferences. Differences between adjective pairs<br />
and your overall profile sometimes indicate that you are<br />
undergoing a change in preferences in part of your life.<br />
Preferences suggested by the adjective pairs may be<br />
more visible to others than your overall profile and under<br />
pressure situations you may react more in keeping with the<br />
adjective pair indications. There are 24 pairs, and therefore,<br />
24 points distributed between the four quadrants.<br />
SAMPLE<br />
the most descriptive of the 8 you selected from the 25<br />
provided. Look over the distribution of your selections. Do<br />
they cluster in certain quadrants or are they distributed<br />
across all four? Is the distribution consistent with your<br />
overall profile scores?<br />
Page - 12 Page - 13
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model B Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model B<br />
Work Elements: your work self<br />
Energy Level and Motion Sickness<br />
SAMPLE<br />
SAMPLE<br />
When completing this section of the HBDI® Survey Form<br />
(questions 10–25) you were asked to rank order the Work<br />
Elements from 1 (work you do least well) to 5 (work you<br />
do best). Your rankings are shown, sorted into the four<br />
quadrant display. Your work preferences show thinking<br />
styles that are most accessed in a work environment.<br />
This is often influenced by the training, assignments,<br />
opportunities and challenges your work experiences have<br />
provided.<br />
Note your selections. Where do the higher rankings (4’s and<br />
5’s) appear? Check for clusters of preferences in certain<br />
quadrants and lack of preferences in others. Now compare<br />
this section with your Key Descriptors section. Are they<br />
similar or different? Your data may reveal situational<br />
work preferences which have developed that are perhaps<br />
somewhat different from your overall more general Key<br />
Descriptor preferences.<br />
Adolescent education, educational focus, occupation and hobbies: other<br />
aspects of self<br />
SAMPLE<br />
This information corresponds to the questions about day/<br />
night time energy and about motion sickness (questions<br />
73–75). Energy Level: In very general terms, people who<br />
are Left mode dominant are frequently more morning or<br />
day oriented and people who are Right mode dominant<br />
are frequently more night oriented. However this can be<br />
greatly influenced by life circumstances. This information<br />
can give a clue to preference by observation and is<br />
useful in deciding when to schedule meetings, tasks and<br />
group activities. From your own perspec- tive, an idea of<br />
when you are likely to be most mentally alert shows the<br />
optimum time of day to pursue activities which are most<br />
mentally challenging. Motion Sickness: An area of ongoing<br />
Introvert/Extrovert<br />
research, a person’s sense of balance is maintained with<br />
information from two biological sources, the eye and the<br />
inner ear. Motion sickness occurs when input from these<br />
two sources conflict. Left mode people often have the<br />
ability to deal with facts and information sequentially and<br />
thus may have the inner control to make an ‘executive<br />
decision’ to either go with the information from the eye or<br />
the ear but not both at once. Right mode people often have<br />
a large tolerance for ambiguity and tend to take note of<br />
both inputs and may end up nauseous as a result. However,<br />
the above is a tendency and there are many exceptions to<br />
the trend.<br />
SAMPLE<br />
An indicator of an earlier, often influential time of your life,<br />
ranking school subjects can indicate an early orientation<br />
toward maths, foreign language or native language, and<br />
through that orientation a possible inclination toward associated<br />
thinking styles. Additional clues are provided about<br />
the tilt of your mental preferences through understanding<br />
preferred subjects in school, education and occupational<br />
choices and how you spend your leisure time. The data<br />
Hand Dominance<br />
has been consolidated, sorted into quadrants and grouped<br />
together B for comparative purposes. A bar chart indicates<br />
the distribu- tion of preferences for each of the above<br />
categories. The longer the bar, the greater the preference<br />
for that quadrant. If no bar appears in a quadrant, there<br />
was no significant data in that quadrant in response to<br />
your selections.v<br />
SAMPLE<br />
Your self–placement in the introvert/extrovert scale on<br />
the assessment is replicated on the report. In very general<br />
terms, introverts tend to be more Left mode oriented and<br />
A Quadrant<br />
Introvert: Quiet, serious, very focused<br />
Extrovert: Debater, often funny, driven<br />
B Quadrant<br />
Introvert: Controlled, always ‘doing,’ often keeps to self<br />
Extrovert: Dominant, organiser of events and people<br />
extroverts more Right mode oriented. However, each<br />
quadrant may have its own continuum of introvert to<br />
extrovert, and thus its own interpretation and impact.<br />
D Quadrant<br />
Introvert: Off in ‘own world’, does own thing, loner<br />
Extrovert: Constant flow of ideas, loves to experiment<br />
with others, have fun<br />
C Quadrant<br />
Introvert: Expressive through writing or<br />
non–verbals, caring in a quiet way<br />
Extrovert: Talkative, interested in bringing<br />
people together, sharing<br />
Preference does not equal competency<br />
Hand dominance is readily recognised. Most of us<br />
consider ourselves either left or right handed. Handedness<br />
provides a simple example of the body’s tendency towards<br />
dominance in paired structures. Analysis of our data<br />
indicates a slight con- nection between left handedness<br />
and Right brain dominance and between right handedness<br />
and Left brain dominance. Therefore we are continuing to<br />
gather data for further research. You were asked (questions<br />
5 and 6) to choose the diagram which corresponded most<br />
closely to the way you hold your pen and this provides<br />
another interesting research opportunity. Handwriting has<br />
a connection to language processing — a powerful mental<br />
process.<br />
Remember that your profile is not ‘good’ or ‘bad’, ‘right’ or<br />
‘wrong’. It is just a representation of your preferred thinking<br />
approach. The concept of dominance is often evident with<br />
any paired structures in the human body. In most cases<br />
we naturally choose to use a certain hand, foot, or eye<br />
in preference to the other and then reinforce this with<br />
continued and habitual use. This does not, of course, reflect<br />
less potential for effective use of the other. The same<br />
pattern frequently emerges with a dominant thinking style.<br />
A preference or dominance does not indicate competence.<br />
Although there is a link — the two terms represent two<br />
distinct ideas. We often have competencies in areas of<br />
lesser preference. Our preferences present those thinking<br />
styles that provide the greatest satisfaction, those that<br />
make our ‘heart sing’. Our competencies are skills that<br />
allow us to perform and get things done.<br />
Page - 14 Page - 15
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model B Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model B<br />
III — Making sense of your personal HBDI®<br />
profile: FAQs<br />
1. Is there an ideal profile?<br />
Yes. Yours! One of the most appreciated aspects of the<br />
HBDI® is that it shows us you can be ‘great’ whatever your<br />
profile. People often think that being ‘Whole Brained’ would<br />
be ideal but, like any profile, this may be felt to have its<br />
disadvantages as well as its advantages. The HBDI® is a<br />
tool provided to encourage us to understand our strengths<br />
and blind spots, preferences and avoidances. We can<br />
then, if desired, find strategies to learn competencies<br />
in those areas of lesser prefe- rences. By doing this we<br />
widen our scope for using different approaches without<br />
compromising our preferences.<br />
4. ‘This person is highly ‘competent’ in Left brain activities.’<br />
Profiles indicate preferences not competencies. The two<br />
must be kept distinct. A person may very well have skills<br />
in a given quadrant and yet still only be doing a type<br />
of work out of necessity rather than by choice. Some<br />
people would love to sing but are unable to carry a tune.<br />
To prefer something is to be drawn to it, to have a taste<br />
for it. Competency has to do with acquired knowledge<br />
and professional experience. Just because, for example,<br />
a person has Left brain preferences doesn’t automatically<br />
mean they are going to be a master accountant, especially<br />
if they have never studied or trained in the profession!<br />
motivation, preferences are unlikely to change quickly.<br />
However if you do indeed wish to develop new preferences,<br />
Herrmann’s advice is to start the process in your private<br />
life first rather than in the workplace, for example in free<br />
time activities or other hobbies. This private approach<br />
always entails fewer risks of consequences for mistakes<br />
made, and generally allows more freedom of choice. For<br />
example if you want to develop approaches that are more<br />
C quadrant oriented, you might decide to purchase season<br />
tickets to a concert series, or take yoga classes. Conversely,<br />
if you want to develop greater comfort with the<br />
A quadrant you might enroll in a course on how to invest<br />
in the stock market, or get more interested in computers.<br />
In the ‘Activities and Hobbies’ table located in the D<br />
chapter, you will find a wide range of activities you might<br />
consider when seeking to become more comfortable with<br />
a particular preference. Pick one, stick with it and you are<br />
bound to succeed.<br />
2. ‘My profile is good, his profile is bad...’<br />
Absolutely not. Profiles are never good or bad. Your profile<br />
is just a static representation of your thinking preferences<br />
at a specific point in time, which always have to be<br />
viewed within your current context in order to be properly<br />
understood. There is no such thing as a good or bad<br />
preference, there are only preferences that are more or less<br />
suited to your situation, profession and activities. If your<br />
preferences match well with the work you are doing and<br />
hope to do, then it is likely that you are feeling good and<br />
succeeding. On the other hand, if your preferences seem<br />
disconnected or unrelated to your current activities, you<br />
may not feel at ease and could have a hard time devoting<br />
3. ‘I have Right brain tendencies, I am very<br />
Right brained, etc’.<br />
These expressions are not helpful because they tend to be<br />
misleading. Preferences are not something we possess<br />
like things. A preference is not something that determines<br />
every aspect of who we are and which is not subject to<br />
change. In fact it is more correct to say for example “I prefer<br />
to function using my Right brain preferences”, because<br />
preferences are about modes of mental functioning, ways<br />
of grasping or perceiving the world, of reacting to it through<br />
specific behaviours.may not feel at ease and could have a<br />
hard time devoting<br />
yourself and being as successful as you desire to be.<br />
It is up to you to work on aligning your preferences with<br />
your activities, studies, career and life (see paragraph 7).<br />
Necessity may be the mother of professional competency,<br />
but true mastery in a specific domain can only be achieved<br />
in those areas that converge with our preferences as well.<br />
Thus in practice, there arises a certain correlation between<br />
prefer- ences and competencies, but only because people<br />
tend to succeed the most when doing what they love the<br />
most. Having a taste for something tends to make us more<br />
motivated to become skilled at it, which then reinforces our<br />
taste for it, and so on, in a positive feedback loop that is<br />
generated whenever a person truly acquires a new skill.<br />
5. ‘This person has pronounced Right brain preference,<br />
therefore he must be creative’.<br />
Wrong! Never reduce a quadrant to just one of its component<br />
parts: each quadrant has several characteristics. Always<br />
double- check in the Data Summary sheet whether a<br />
specific attribute is truly preferred, rather than assuming<br />
it is, when only looking at the overall view. A person may<br />
be dominant in A quadrant and yet still be weak in maths,<br />
simply because they lacked the opportunity to pursue<br />
their studies in this domain. Indeed it is highly likely they<br />
would succeed in it if they decided to truly put the time in,<br />
precisely because these kinds of studies suit their thinking<br />
preferences.<br />
6. ‘Can my profile change?’<br />
Yes. Longitudinal studies of thousands of HBDI®<br />
participants indicate that change can take place if there<br />
is a reason for it. Change seems to take place over a long<br />
period of time with an individual’s desire and willingness<br />
to change, or with a change in their life’s circumstances,<br />
or as a result of a significant emotional event. However, if<br />
nothing has happened to the individual and they continue<br />
to do the same things in the same way, then the profile will<br />
remain stable.<br />
7. ‘How do we actually develop new preferences<br />
in practice?’<br />
The object of the HBDI® profile is not to change preferences,<br />
but rather to be more effective, accept the consequences<br />
of our preferences and not become their ‘prisoner’. Our<br />
prefer- ences can’t be changed just because it might seem<br />
like a nice idea. Situational change is preferable in order to<br />
achieve new personal or professional objectives, when we<br />
have begun to view our current preferences as incoherent<br />
with our activities or life-goals. Without this kind of<br />
8. ‘Is the 1111 profile the most desirable profile to have?’<br />
Definitely not for everyone. The most ‘desirable profile’<br />
is the profile that truly matches your goals in life and the<br />
professional activities you are pursuing (see the answer to<br />
Question 1).<br />
9. ‘Are there any 2222 or 3333 profiles?’<br />
No, everyone has at least one primary (1) in their profile.<br />
10. ‘I am very strong in one quadrant, but not all<br />
of the descriptors describe me. Why?’<br />
Each quadrant is made up of ‘clusters’ of specialised<br />
thinking. You may prefer one set of clusters over another,<br />
and having a preference for a quadrant does not mean you<br />
will prefer all of the clusters in that quadrant.<br />
Page - 16 Page - 17
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model C Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model C<br />
Important : Competence and preference are two different<br />
things. The HBDI® measures your preferences. Knowledge<br />
of your preferred thinking styles illuminates what degree<br />
of satisfaction or comfort you may have on the job when<br />
you encounter: a work challenge, a learning situation, a<br />
challenging interpersonal or communication situation.<br />
Superimpose your HBDI® profile overlay on this page and<br />
compare its orientation with different groups of professions.<br />
Technical<br />
Scientific<br />
Troubleshooting<br />
How does<br />
your HBDI®<br />
profile impact<br />
your work and<br />
compare to<br />
others?<br />
Consider your interests and successes in your professional<br />
and personal life. Where would you place your co–workers and<br />
family? How are their preferences similar or different from<br />
yours?<br />
Our statistics have shown a strong correlation between job<br />
satisfaction and how well a job matches one’s profile. We<br />
have a tendency to orient ourselves toward professions which<br />
attract us and bring us satisfaction.<br />
Artistic<br />
Developmental<br />
How does your profile compare to others?<br />
Principal profile groupings<br />
General profile information<br />
One of the best ways to understand the uniqueness of your<br />
profile is through understanding the general attributes<br />
of your profile group or ‘family’ and comparing it with<br />
others. This chapter contains descriptions of the 40 most<br />
frequently occurring profiles.<br />
Each profile consists of four numbers: a four-digit<br />
preference code, identified using the following order: A, B,<br />
C, D. For example 1 2 2 1.<br />
Remember within each quadrant:<br />
1. Corresponds to a strong preference (a score of 67 or above).<br />
2. Corresponds to an intermediate preference or thinking that<br />
is comfortable and available as needed (a score of 34–66).<br />
3. Indicates a low preference or a lack of interest and for some<br />
even an avoidance (a score of 33 or below).<br />
Example: 2 3 1 1 indicates an intermediate preference<br />
(use) in the A quadrant, a low preference (use least) in the B<br />
quadrant and a strong preference<br />
(prefer) in the C and D quadrants.<br />
Frequency of typical profiles<br />
Two facts are clear from the studies of over one million profiles<br />
studied across the world in the Herrmann International<br />
database.<br />
1. The aggregate total of all profiles results in a 1 1 1 1 profile.<br />
This will be true of most groups of at least 100 profiles. This<br />
means that the world is a composite ‘Whole Brain’.<br />
2. When you compare averages of a given profession, to an<br />
individual in that profession, you see strong correlation.<br />
Although this is generally true, exceptions do occur.<br />
The chart below shows the percentage of profiles that have<br />
single, double, triple or quadruple dominance:<br />
Triple dominance: 34 %<br />
Quadruple dominance: 3 %<br />
Single dominance: 5%<br />
Financial<br />
Entrepreneurial<br />
Double dominance: 58 %<br />
Legal<br />
Accounting<br />
Supervisory<br />
Preferences<br />
at work<br />
Strategic<br />
Expressive<br />
Educational<br />
These numbers alone can answer the question: “Is my<br />
profile rare or common?”<br />
This section provides brief general descriptions of<br />
profile groups or families with typical problem solving,<br />
communica- tion and decision making approaches for<br />
each.<br />
Administrative<br />
Implementing<br />
Social/Helping<br />
Supportive<br />
They are grouped as above:<br />
> single dominant profile: page 19 (one 1)<br />
> double dominant profile: page 23 (two 1’s)<br />
> triple dominant profile: page 31 (three 1’s)<br />
> quadruple dominant profile: page 34 (four 1’s)<br />
Customer service<br />
Page - 18 Page - 19
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model C Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model C<br />
I — Single Dominant Profiles<br />
This group of profiles has only one primary and represents<br />
only 5% of the population surveyed. Instances of primary<br />
preferences occur across all of the four quadrants.<br />
One advantage of having a single dominant profile is that<br />
there is relatively little internal conflict. Perceptions and<br />
deci- sion making tend to be predictable, coherent and<br />
comfort- able. The single dominant person tends to see the<br />
world through a consistent set of lenses.<br />
II — Double Dominant Profiles<br />
1. Left or Right<br />
A<br />
B<br />
Double dominant Left or Right profiles experience an<br />
internal integrated coherence between the two primary<br />
quadrants. In both Left and Right double dominant profiles,<br />
the two quadrants tend to reinforce each other. The logical,<br />
rational processes of the A quadrant reinforce the structural<br />
and pro- cedural qualities of the B quadrant. Likewise,<br />
the visual imaginative approaches of the D quadrant are<br />
supported by the expressive, sensory elements of the<br />
C quadrant. As opposing modes, double dominant Left<br />
This group of profiles has only one primary and represents<br />
only 5% of the population surveyed. Instances of primary<br />
preferences occur across all of the four quadrants.<br />
One advantage of having a single dominant profile is that<br />
there is relatively little internal conflict. Perceptions and<br />
deci- sion making tend to be predictable, coherent and<br />
comfort- able. The single dominant person tends to see the<br />
world through a consistent set of lenses.<br />
D<br />
C<br />
might perceive their Right counterpart as unrealistic and<br />
unfocused. The double dominant Right might see their Left<br />
counterpart as controlling and pedestrian. In both cases,<br />
these individuals will benefit from a greater appreciation<br />
of their mental opposites, not only to improve their<br />
communication and relationships, but also to appreciate<br />
mental processes very different than their own, allowing<br />
them to more effectively ‘cross the bridge’ between these<br />
very different styles.<br />
2. Double Dominant Profiles — Upper and Lower<br />
Both the Upper and Lower dominant families of profiles<br />
unite distinct thinking processes in a synergistic<br />
interchange. The Upper mode, A + D may, for example,<br />
be as comfortable with facts, data and theory (A) as with<br />
conceptual frameworks and intuitive insights (D). This<br />
results in a cognitive, intellectual approach. The Lower<br />
mode, B + C, brings together a strong sense of detail and<br />
structure (B) with a sensitive, emotional awareness of<br />
3. Double dominant profiles — Diagonal<br />
This diamond shaped family of profiles cross the diagonals<br />
from either B to D or A to C. There is an inherent internal<br />
con- trast of preferences within these profiles. The<br />
contrast is both Left vs Right and Upper vs Lower. This<br />
can translate into a sense of conflict, both internally and<br />
when interacting with others. For example: Ideas (D) vs.<br />
Action (B), Safekeeping (B) vs. Risk taking (D), Facts (A)<br />
vs. Feelings (C), People consid- erations (C) vs. Financial<br />
considerations (A).<br />
This contrast is often described by these individuals as a<br />
pull between two very different, sometimes contradicting<br />
thinking processes. Ideally, they are able to integrate and<br />
balance out these two different perspectives as they make<br />
decisions. How- ever under less ideal circumstances there<br />
may be a tendency to vacillate, or at worst, feel paralysed<br />
between both.<br />
It is worth noting that no direct connection exists in the<br />
brain to link the Upper Left mode with the Lower Right<br />
III — Triple Dominant Profiles<br />
The triple dominant profile represents 34% of the database.<br />
Within that total, 2111, 1121 and 1112 are the most frequent,<br />
representing 81% of the triple dominant profiles.<br />
This group has access to a certain thinking flexibility that<br />
comes from the multi-dominant nature of their thinking<br />
process. This allows the individuals to move through their<br />
three dominant modes somewhat seamlessly, looking at<br />
all of the perspectives before making a decision. Such<br />
multiple preferences also facilitate interaction with others.<br />
Due to the triple nature of their preferences, they are likely<br />
to share at least one preference with those with whom they<br />
interact.<br />
IV — Quadruple Dominant Profile<br />
The 1 1 1 1 profile expresses primary level preferences for<br />
every one of the four quadrants and is sometimes referred<br />
to as ‘whole brained’.<br />
Perhaps surprisingly to some, these profiles occur less<br />
than 3% of the time. They offer an enormous potential for<br />
a highly integrated, varied thinking processes. This can<br />
translate into an ability to move seamlessly from quadrant<br />
to quadrant and mode to mode as the situation requires.<br />
Often able to under- stand all the thinking perspectives,<br />
these individuals have the potential to function quite<br />
effectively in group situations<br />
feelings and people (C). This results in a visceral, grounded<br />
approach. On the other hand, both Upper and Lower<br />
modes can experi- ence a sense of two distinct mental<br />
perspectives as they look at the world. These individuals<br />
have an opportunity to learn when to apply particular<br />
thinking processes appropriately to different situations,<br />
allowing them to maximise the effective- ness of their<br />
mental processes.<br />
mode or the Upper Right mode with the Lower Left mode.<br />
In both the model and the actual brain, all iteration between<br />
these two modes must go through another brain structure<br />
or quadrant first.<br />
A good way to integrate diagonally opposed preferences<br />
is to enhance abilities in one of the other two quadrants.<br />
These quadrants can play the role of relay station to<br />
facilitate thinking processes.<br />
On the plus side, the person who learns to integrate his<br />
func- tioning has an enormously powerful combination of<br />
abilities. An entrepreneur, for example with a 2 1 2 1 profile,<br />
can envision the business as it can be and do the detailed<br />
work required to get it there. A financial person with a 1<br />
2 1 2 profile has not only the A quadrant necessary for<br />
determining the best financial arrangements, but also the<br />
C quadrant which gives him the interpersonal ability to<br />
package and present his services effectively on a face–<br />
to–face basis.<br />
On the other hand, this multiplicity of preference can<br />
slow down the decision-making process due to the need<br />
to really check out all the alternatives available. Another<br />
potential challenge may be the multitude of options these<br />
preferences provide, as career decisions or education<br />
choices need to be made. Identifying the strongest<br />
preference among the three comes with time and a<br />
willingness to go with a lead quadrant long enough to<br />
be able to evaluate the experience effectively. Often the<br />
opportunities that present themselves first are the ones<br />
pursued.<br />
which require situational flexibility such as management<br />
or mediation (with appropriate training). They will interact<br />
easily with many different types of profiles. Like other<br />
profile families that display multiple preferences, these<br />
individuals are faced with certain challenges associated<br />
with the multiplicity of their preferences. Internal conflicts<br />
can occur, as well as a sense of indecisiveness or unclear<br />
focus. As with triple dominant profiles, establishing a lead<br />
quadrant helps provide direction. The overall tilt of their<br />
thinking preferences will be influenced by their highest<br />
profile quadrant or quadrants.<br />
Page - 20 Page - 21
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model D Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model D<br />
The coalition of our different thinking processes<br />
Remember that you use each of the four quadrants at different<br />
times and in different ways.<br />
The most preferred styles seem natural and accessible to you,<br />
but they never<br />
Exploring your<br />
HBDI® profile<br />
Ideas and<br />
exercises<br />
function independently of the others. Secondary preferences<br />
are ‘comfort zones’, more ‘operational’, and tertiary<br />
preferences often require more effort. Keep in mind that all<br />
thinking preferences function as an integrated system, all part<br />
of your complex mental processes.<br />
Exploring implications<br />
You have just become aware of your HBDI® profile. Your curiosity<br />
is now satisfied.<br />
This next step is the most important.<br />
The real objective of the HBDI® profile is to help you achieve<br />
better results by exploring how you<br />
can be most effective and what development options you might<br />
wish to pursue to get there.<br />
The following exercises were designed to help you reach that<br />
objective. Take a few moments to relax<br />
and work through the following exercises. It represents an<br />
essential application step and will be time well spent.<br />
A voyage through your profile<br />
At this point, you should have reviewed your Visual Profile,<br />
Data Summary, explanation page and read the description<br />
of your ‘profile’ in chapter C (red) ‘How does your HBDI®<br />
profile compare to others?’, giving you a general description<br />
of your preference code and how it impacts your problem<br />
solving, decision making and communication approaches.<br />
The next step is to synthesise and personalise all of the<br />
infor- mation you have received. This will help you become<br />
more self aware and decide on actions you can take to<br />
broaden and expand the range of your thinking approaches.<br />
Note: these exercises are only guides; feel free to make<br />
your own inspired reflections.<br />
Exercise 1: HBDI® profile<br />
Describe a typical daily behaviour that illustrates each one of your four quadrants.<br />
1. It may be helpful to also look at the relative scores between the Upper and Lower modes and the Left and Right modes.<br />
2. Functioning in Upper mode (A+D) means that you would be considering things and people in an intellectual manner, somewhat<br />
abstractly, with a certain distance, without committing yourself, and thinking before acting.<br />
3. The opposite functioning, in the Lower mode (B+C) means considering things and people in a reactive manner, being emotional,<br />
getting involved right away, because of gut feelings or by need for structure, detail or getting things done.<br />
4. Functioning in Left mode (A+B) means considering things and people realistically, logically, factually, analytically (broken down into<br />
essential elements). It means thinking sequentially (one step at a time), liking precision, having control, measuring, numbers. > The<br />
opposite functioning, in Right mode (C+D) means considering things and people in an intuitive manner, seeing the ideal (rather than<br />
the reality), synthesising, imagining, looking at things holistically, being sensitive and aesthetic.<br />
5. With the above in mind, imagine the effect of your dominances and preferences in everyday activities both in and out of work for<br />
instance.<br />
Page - 22 Page - 23
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model D Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model D<br />
Ideas and exercises<br />
Exercise 2: Draw your own profile<br />
under stress<br />
A<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
D<br />
Look up your profile code in chapter C ’How does your profile compare to others?’ and read its description carefully.<br />
1. The exercise consists in personalising the text describing your preference code. Copy the text and replace the general<br />
terms by your profile’s own terms (coming from the 2 upper sections of your Data Summary sheet).<br />
1 — Take a look at your profile overlay<br />
and refer to the dotted line which<br />
represents your profile under stress.<br />
Draw your own profile under stress on<br />
the grid to the right.<br />
Compare to your profile (represented<br />
by the solid line): What do you notice?<br />
What are the positive and negative<br />
points of your profile under stress?<br />
B<br />
90<br />
80<br />
50<br />
70<br />
60<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
C<br />
2. Advantages and disadvantages of your profile in the current situation. To write it down, you will get inspiration from the<br />
text which describes your profile, in the Chapter ‘How does your profile compare to others?’<br />
Advantages:<br />
Disadvantages:<br />
Thoughts regarding the future:<br />
2 — Now, please take a look at the Data Summary sheet. In each quadrant (A, then B, then C, then D) copy the ‘X’s which<br />
appear in the Key Descriptor section. Underline the key words you have chosen. Circle the ‘key’ word marked with an<br />
asterisk (*).<br />
Exercise 4: Choice of a new sport or leisure activity (as an amateur)<br />
Upper Left<br />
Upper Right<br />
Describe a daily behaviour corresponding to each one of the key words you have selected. How is it positive and with<br />
whom? How does it create difficulties and with whom?<br />
Amateur radio<br />
Billiards<br />
Car repair<br />
Computers<br />
Do–it–yourself projects<br />
Electronic games<br />
Golf<br />
Body building<br />
Bowling<br />
Cards<br />
Collecting<br />
(organisation)<br />
Fishing<br />
Gardening<br />
Model building<br />
Restoring cars<br />
Strategy games<br />
Woodworking<br />
Hunting<br />
Jogging<br />
Rowing<br />
Spectator sports<br />
Team handball<br />
Tennis<br />
Weight lifting<br />
Distributed:<br />
Aviation<br />
Basketball<br />
Camping<br />
Caring for pets<br />
Chess<br />
Family outings<br />
Sailing<br />
Swimming<br />
Aerobics/Dance<br />
Applied arts<br />
Creative writing<br />
Cycling<br />
Exploring<br />
Extreme sports<br />
Collecting (passion for)<br />
Conversation<br />
Cooking<br />
Fashion<br />
Listening to music<br />
People watching<br />
Playing with children<br />
Nature watching<br />
Photography<br />
Playing music<br />
Skiing<br />
Video games<br />
Wine tasting<br />
Pleasure reading<br />
(Fiction)<br />
Singing<br />
Theatre<br />
Travel<br />
Volunteering<br />
Walking<br />
Lower Left<br />
Lower Right<br />
Exercise 3: Your personal profile<br />
Your profile code is<br />
Your profile is<br />
mono dominant<br />
double dominant<br />
(The term dominant corresponds to number ‘1’s’ in the profile code).<br />
triple dominant<br />
multi dominant<br />
Page - 24 Page - 25
Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A Understanding the Herrmann Whole Brain® model A<br />
Exercise 6: Review your HBDI® profile, using all of the pages provided,<br />
especially the Visual Profile and Data Summary sheet.<br />
Exercice 6 : How do I move from one quadrant or mode to another?...<br />
1. In thinking about your career<br />
development needs, identify a quadrant<br />
which you would like to ‘work on’ or<br />
develop.<br />
2. For the quadrant you selected above,<br />
identify in the Work Elements section<br />
on your Data Summary sheet the items<br />
that you ranked lowest, 1 or 2 (do less<br />
well or least well). Which one of these<br />
represents an area that would be useful<br />
to better develop or ‘work on’ as you<br />
think about your current work situation?<br />
3. Now think back to real situations<br />
from your professional or personal<br />
life in which the non–preferred<br />
activity identified above created a real<br />
challenge or problem for you.<br />
4. What is a concrete example that<br />
describes why this type of activity can<br />
be a challenge for you?<br />
My quadrant to be developed is:<br />
The work activity that is most critically important to my work, and occasionally<br />
represents a challenge for me is:<br />
Real life examples of a challenge with a non–preferred activity:<br />
My challenge with is because<br />
To move<br />
from Upper Left A<br />
to Lower Right C:<br />
Relax on need<br />
for proof by facts<br />
and value feelings.<br />
To move<br />
from Left Mode AB<br />
to Right Mode CD:<br />
Respect intuition<br />
and value instinctive,<br />
experimental, humanistic<br />
approaches.<br />
To move<br />
from Lower Left B<br />
to Upper Right D:<br />
Relax on tightness<br />
of form and structure<br />
and value spontaneity.<br />
To move<br />
from Upper Mode AD<br />
to Lower Mode BC:<br />
Respect gut feelings, value<br />
body response<br />
and relax on<br />
intellectual modes.<br />
To move<br />
from Lower Mode BC<br />
to Upper Mode AD:<br />
Respect cognitive<br />
processes and value<br />
the balance of rational<br />
and intuitive thinking.<br />
To move<br />
from Upper Right D<br />
to Lower Left B:<br />
Relax on need for<br />
absolute freedom<br />
and value form<br />
and structure.<br />
To move<br />
from Right Mode CD<br />
to Left Mode AB:<br />
Respect logic and value<br />
planned, organised,<br />
rational approaches.<br />
To move<br />
from Lower Right C<br />
to Upper Left A:<br />
Relax on intensity<br />
of feelings and<br />
value facts.<br />
5. Restate your problem in “how–to”<br />
format by beginning your sentence with<br />
‘how do I’ and completing the sentence<br />
with a second phrase ‘in order to’.<br />
Example: “my problem is that I do not<br />
organise my files” will now read “how<br />
do I better organise my files in order to<br />
save time and frustration at work?”<br />
How do I<br />
in order to<br />
Now that you discovered your profile, what did you learn?<br />
What are your strong points?<br />
6. Next, seek out a person in your<br />
personal or professional network<br />
who has a style that is different from<br />
yours, complementary to your profile,<br />
to discuss your challenge and uncover<br />
some new ideas. Explore options and<br />
helpful tips by asking: ”In this situation,<br />
how do you approach it for the best<br />
results?”<br />
People I can seek out to discuss my challenge:<br />
What are the potential blind spots and areas for development?<br />
Based on what you discovered about your preferences:<br />
What are you going to stop doing?<br />
What are you going to start doing differently?<br />
7. Develop an action plan using the<br />
advice and tips provided. Be sure it<br />
includes specific and realistic action<br />
items you can start as early as the next<br />
day.<br />
My action plan, starting tomorrow morning, will be:<br />
What are you going to continue to do and reinforce?<br />
Page - 26 Page - 27