28.04.2018 Views

MEM55

marine engineers messenger vol 3 issue 55

marine engineers messenger vol 3 issue 55

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

elieve in a cleaner, healthier<br />

future,” said Peter Selway, Marine<br />

Segment Marketing Manager at<br />

Schneider Electric.<br />

While road transport pollution<br />

garners public prominence because<br />

it is so visible in our everyday lives,<br />

the company says the impact of<br />

portside emissions on the<br />

environment should not be under<br />

estimated.<br />

Emissions from all vessels’<br />

auxiliary engines at berth in UK<br />

ports in 2016 was estimated to be<br />

equivalent to 2.6% of the total<br />

transport sector emissions of<br />

nitrogen oxides in the UK.<br />

Selway said that the shipping<br />

industry generally has been<br />

receptive to turning of its marine<br />

engines in port and plug into shore<br />

power (Schneider Elctric’ produces<br />

such systems) which can achieve<br />

95% reduction in a vessel’s<br />

alongside emissions and cut fuel<br />

costs substantially. Danish ferry<br />

group Scandlines, for example has<br />

seen an overall energy saving of<br />

between 10-14 per cent in its<br />

equipped vessels.<br />

“It is time now to adopt a new<br />

way of thinking and embrace, as an<br />

industry, the benefits that shore<br />

connections and portside electricity<br />

can bring quickly and costeffectively.<br />

We are fortunate enough<br />

to have the technology at hand and<br />

we must put it to good use,” Selway<br />

said.<br />

FUELS & LUBES<br />

HIGH-SULPHUR FUEL BAN TO HAVE A MATERIAL AND TECHNICAL<br />

IMPACT ON SHIPOWNERS<br />

Finland-based exhaust gas<br />

cleaning pioneer Langh Tech has<br />

explained how last week’s<br />

decision to prohibit the carriage<br />

of non-compliant fuel oil will<br />

have a material and technical<br />

impact on commercial ship<br />

operations.<br />

In a special panel session<br />

during the Sulphur Cap 2020<br />

conference in Amsterdam today,<br />

Langh Tech Managing Director<br />

Laura Langh-Lagerlof (pictured)<br />

told delegates: “If such measures<br />

are adopted, any shipowner,<br />

operator, master mariner or chief<br />

engineer found guilty of<br />

transporting non-compliant fuels<br />

intended for burning in marine<br />

engines could face stringent<br />

financial penalties and possible<br />

imprisonment.”<br />

Amongst the measures to<br />

reduce shipping’s carbon<br />

footprint adopted at the 72nd<br />

session of the IMO’s Marine<br />

Environment Protection<br />

Committee, which met last week<br />

in London, the MEPC approved<br />

proposals to ban the carriage of<br />

high sulphur fuels, submitting<br />

draft amendments to MARPOL<br />

Annex VI for approval and<br />

adoption at MEPC 73.<br />

Should the amendment be<br />

adopted, any a ship without an<br />

approved scrubber or equivalent<br />

arrangement would be banned<br />

from carrying and using bunker<br />

with a sulphur content exceeding<br />

0.50%.<br />

“While we completely support<br />

initiatives to reduce Greenhouse<br />

Gas Emissions and shipping’s<br />

impact on the marine<br />

environment, the MEPC 72<br />

decision makes clear that<br />

technical solutions are now<br />

required if shipowners are to<br />

comply with the sulphur limit<br />

requirements,” she said.<br />

Langh-Lagerlof went on to<br />

emphasise that of all the possible<br />

fuelling options, the use of Heavy<br />

Fuel Oil with a scrubber remains<br />

the “sensible option”.<br />

“Given the continued concern<br />

surrounding methane slip, LNG<br />

fuel could potentially be more<br />

environmentally hazardous than<br />

the current arrangement, while<br />

the direct and indirect costs<br />

associated with burning low<br />

sulphur fuels would have a<br />

considerable impact on the<br />

shipowners P+L.<br />

“The low viscosity, low<br />

lubricity, acidity, flashpoint and<br />

cylinder oil compatibility of these<br />

expensive fuels could also result<br />

in corrosion issues and other<br />

engine problems. With a<br />

scrubber, at least there’s a return<br />

on the investment,” she said.<br />

Referring to the practical,<br />

operational experience of the<br />

Langh Tech scrubber installations<br />

aboard Langh Ship’s fleet of five<br />

containerships, Langh-Lagerlof<br />

explained why the technology is<br />

the only viable option in meeting<br />

the regulatory requirement.<br />

One of the key take-aways<br />

from the conference was how<br />

Langh Tech’s closed loop<br />

scrubber removes oxides of<br />

sulphur from the HFO exhaust<br />

emissions without resulting in a<br />

corrosive wash water typical of<br />

other exhaust gas cleaning<br />

systems.<br />

“With increasing concern<br />

about the corrosive properties of<br />

wash water corroding pipework,<br />

our lightweight, compact<br />

scrubber technology manages to<br />

extract almost all the water from<br />

the scrubber sludge, with the end<br />

result being simply a dry black<br />

waste that can be effortlessly and<br />

cost-effectively disposed off,” she<br />

said<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!