14.12.2012 Views

Zilla Saksharata Samitis INTERVIEW GUIDELINES FOR ZSS ... - PRC

Zilla Saksharata Samitis INTERVIEW GUIDELINES FOR ZSS ... - PRC

Zilla Saksharata Samitis INTERVIEW GUIDELINES FOR ZSS ... - PRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

! "<br />

#<br />

$<br />

S. Rajaram<br />

R.V. Deshpande<br />

Report prepared for<br />

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi<br />

<strong>PRC</strong> Report No. 113<br />

February 2001<br />

DRAFT REPORT


%<br />

List of Tables<br />

Chapter 1 Introduction: Background and Study Design<br />

Background<br />

Objectives<br />

The Evaluation Design<br />

Questionnaires<br />

Training and fieldwork<br />

Sample coverage<br />

Chapter 2 RCH-IEC Activities: Proposed and Carried Out<br />

The Guidelines<br />

Preparation, Submission and Sanctioning of the Project Proposal<br />

Organization of RCH-IEC Activities<br />

RCH-IEC Activities<br />

Involvement of District Health Department in RCH-IEC Activities<br />

Fund Utilization and Account Keeping<br />

Chapter 3 Exposure to RCH-IEC Activities: Knowledge on Selected RCH<br />

Issues Among Village Communities<br />

Exposure to RCH-IEC Activities<br />

Knowledge on Selected RCH Issues<br />

Chapter 4 Summary and Conclusions<br />

Appendix A: Tables<br />

Appendix B: Questionnaires Used for Evaluation<br />

Appendix C: List of Persons Involved in Evaluation<br />

ii


& %<br />

Table 1: Summary of activities sanctioned and conducted under RCH-IEC<br />

scheme by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

Table 2: Number of street play and folksong performances planned and<br />

organized in the Talukas of Chitradurga District under the RCH-IEC<br />

Scheme<br />

Table 3: Number of orientation programmes planned and organized in the<br />

Talukas of Chitradurga District under the RCH-IEC Scheme<br />

Table 4: Summary of item-wise expenditure by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> under<br />

RCH-IEC scheme<br />

Table 5: Percentage of respondents who were exposed to RCH-IEC<br />

activities by background characteristics, Chitradurga District<br />

Table 6: Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed<br />

to various RCH-IEC activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />

iii


“…the person who has invested money in staging a play will receive many sponsors if<br />

the play is of good quality. If no one comes requesting for staging the play elsewhere,<br />

he will go inquiring how good was the play…”<br />

A respondent<br />

iv


The Background and Study Design<br />

'<br />

Chapter<br />

(<br />

The focus of the Indian family welfare programme has undergone a<br />

paradigm shift following the recommendations of the International<br />

Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) convened in Cairo in<br />

September 1994. The ICPD recommended that the family planning<br />

programme should respect the reproductive rights of individuals in general<br />

and women in particular, and should aim at narrowing the gender<br />

inequalities. It further advocated that the programme should aim at<br />

facilitating the couples to have their children as they desire in timing and<br />

number, help mothers to go through pregnancy and child birth safely so<br />

that the outcome of pregnancy is successful in terms of maternal and<br />

infant survival and well-being; and ensure that couples are able to have<br />

sexual relations free of fear of pregnancy and of contracting diseases. The<br />

current national Health and Family Welfare programme, renamed as<br />

Reproductive and Child Health (RCH) programme, is an unification of<br />

related programmes of Child Survival and Safe Motherhood (CSSM)<br />

initiated during 1992-93.<br />

Under this new approach, the programme intends to take into account the<br />

community's needs and thus aims at improving the quality of services<br />

instead of mere fulfilment of targets. As such, there are no targets for<br />

various services, the grass-root level workers are expected to assess the<br />

needs of the community, in consultation with the community, and based<br />

on this need assessment, formulate their own goals for health and family<br />

welfare activities in the community. This community need based<br />

programme includes various aspects of RCH services namely, family<br />

planning, child survival and safe motherhood, and RTI/STI and AIDS.<br />

Additionally, the approach intends to achieve increased levels of male<br />

participation.


2<br />

Reproductive and child health on the one hand and contraception on the<br />

other are both complementary mechanisms for achieving population<br />

stabilization. The former ensures good health of mother/children and<br />

creates assurance about the longevity of the mother and the child, which<br />

prompts couples to desire a smaller family. The latter, on the other hand,<br />

enables the couples to avoid unwanted pregnancies and to limit their<br />

family size. The national programme has been promoting these two<br />

aspects of population stabilization through the provision of reproductive<br />

and child health and family planning services at the grass-root level and<br />

generating demand for these services via a set of Information, Education<br />

and Communication (IEC) programme along with other measures related<br />

to socio-economic development and women's empowerment.<br />

Effectiveness of such persuasive effort with the people depends, to a large<br />

degree, on the educational status of the couple, particularly the wife. India<br />

being one of the least literate societies in the world, it is obviously<br />

important to design these IEC activities to make them relevant to the rural<br />

and illiterate masses. The IEC efforts under the national programme, so<br />

far, have been largely using the electronic and print media which have<br />

their inherent limitations of not being effective in reaching a large segment<br />

of our population – the rural, illiterate and poor. The IEC programmes, it<br />

is felt, which used to be designed centrally or at the state-level often do<br />

not register forcefully with the people in rural areas because of the<br />

difference in syntax and idiom. Further, the messages often do not reach<br />

the bottom 20-30% of the disadvantaged families who do not have access<br />

to such electronic or print media. However, their participation in RCH is<br />

crucial for the success of the programme. If local talent is mobilised for<br />

promoting IEC activities related to RCH, the effectiveness of<br />

communicating the messages would in all probability improve. It is<br />

expected that such effort would also lead to a greater involvement of<br />

people in population stabilization efforts.<br />

Since the educational/literacy status of families, particularly of women has<br />

a strong bearing on their response for RCH/population control, it is<br />

sensible to have a co-ordinated effort for IEC for both literacy and<br />

population control. Also in the past, co-ordination of this nature within the<br />

district has remained nominal. Although there is a post of a District Health<br />

Education Officer in most states, the co-ordination between the IEC<br />

activities of different departments to promote RCH has been quite nonexistent<br />

at the district level. Hence, the Government of India felt the need<br />

for an united effort for mass campaign and mobilization to achieve both<br />

literacy and population stabilization. Accordingly, in consultation with the<br />

Department of Education, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


3<br />

involved the <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong> (<strong>ZSS</strong>) for carrying out the IEC<br />

activities for Reproductive and Child Health/population control. It is felt<br />

that the <strong>ZSS</strong>s which have succeeded in mobilising the mass for literacy<br />

movement would also be able to successfully promote the cause of RCH<br />

and population stabilisation. It is envisaged that the <strong>ZSS</strong>s could utilise<br />

resource persons and institutions within the district who could design and<br />

deliver programmes in towns and villages of the district throughout the<br />

year using the syntax and idioms easily understandable to local<br />

population. The IEC materials which have the local images and<br />

vocabulary and the local modes of mass appeal would reach the rural mass<br />

more effectively.<br />

In 1998, the guidelines for project proposals were prepared by the<br />

Department of Family Welfare and sent to the respective District<br />

Collectors/Deputy Commissioners for preparing the project proposals in<br />

consultation with the respective District Health Officers and other medical<br />

specialists with <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong>. The project proposal received<br />

from each district was scrutinised by the Department of Family Welfare in<br />

consultation with the National Literacy Mission and sanctioned the<br />

projects to certain districts with suggested modifications. The scheme –<br />

Promotion of RCH-IEC Activities through <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong> – is in<br />

operation in 216 districts of the country, at various phases of<br />

implementation.<br />

After almost one year of sanctioning the scheme and funds to several<br />

districts, and before deciding to expand the scheme to other districts, the<br />

Department of Family Welfare decided to evaluate the progress made with<br />

respect to the efforts of the <strong>ZSS</strong> towards creating the awareness on various<br />

RCH issues. Since a substantial amount of material and manpower has<br />

been invested in the scheme, it is important to evaluate the organization<br />

and functioning of the scheme. An evaluation of the scheme in selected<br />

districts in 6 states – Assam, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka,<br />

Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh – has been commissioned to the<br />

Population Research Centres. The Population Research Centre, JSS<br />

Institute of Economic Research, Dharwad is assigned the evaluation of the<br />

scheme in five districts of Karnataka – Belgaum, Davangere, Chitradurga,<br />

Kolar, and Tumkur.<br />

This report presents the findings related to the evaluation of the scheme in<br />

Chitradurga district.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


4<br />

)%*<br />

The main objective of this evaluation is to ascertain the effectiveness of<br />

the implementation of the approved scheme in Chitradurga district and its<br />

impact on the target group. Specifically, the study includes an assessment<br />

of:<br />

1. Time gap between the sanction of funds by the Union Ministry of<br />

Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) and the receipt of the same by<br />

the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> and the actual launching of the scheme;<br />

2. Actual activities performed as against the approved activities under the<br />

scheme;<br />

3. The use of funds for various activities under the scheme as well as the<br />

manner in which accounts of expenditure have been maintained;<br />

4. Periodicity of meetings of various <strong>ZSS</strong> units for planning and<br />

monitoring the implementation of the scheme;<br />

5. The degree to which the scheme has been able to complement and coordinate<br />

with the efforts of IEC units within the District Health<br />

Education Unit;<br />

6. The extent to which the targeted population, particularly the<br />

Panchayati Raj Institutions and other village-level bodies have become<br />

aware of the new scheme and issues related to RCH/population<br />

stabilization;<br />

7. The extent to which the scheme has been able to influence the general<br />

population within the community in terms of their knowledge and<br />

attitude towards issues related to RCH/population stabilization; and<br />

8. The strengths and shortcomings of the functioning of the scheme and<br />

suggested corrective measures to improve the same.<br />

The evaluation design largely follows the guidelines given by the Ministry<br />

of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi for the same. Accordingly, the<br />

evaluation uses the information collected from various categories of the<br />

personnel involved in planning and implementation of the scheme at<br />

different levels (for example: <strong>ZSS</strong> functionaries at the District, Taluka and<br />

Village levels as well as health functionaries at these levels) as well as the<br />

beneficiaries at the community level. The study adopts both qualitative<br />

and quantitative methods of data collection such as in-depth interviews,<br />

structured interviews, and content analysis of selected IEC materials.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


5<br />

At the district level, in-depth interviews were conducted with two <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

functionaries (Deputy Commissioner and Secretary, <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong><br />

Samiti). The evaluation team could not meet any officials from the Office<br />

of the District Health and Family Welfare Officer, Chitradurga.<br />

From each of the six Talukas of Chitradurga district, two Taluka<br />

<strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti (TSS) functionaries (Taluka Co-ordinator and<br />

Tahasildar/Executive Officer of Taluka Panchayat) as well as the Taluka<br />

Medical Officer were interviewed.<br />

In order to get information from <strong>ZSS</strong> functionaries, health personnel and<br />

community members at the village level, a purposive sample of 12<br />

villages (two per Taluka) was selected in the district, including 10 villages<br />

where the activities under the scheme were conducted as per the<br />

information from the Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong> (six villages where street plays and<br />

folk songs were carried out and four villages where RCH orientation was<br />

organized), and two villages where no IEC activity under the scheme was<br />

carried out. Since the selection of villages within the Taluka was random,<br />

selected villages include those from remote areas.<br />

Within each selected village, interviews were conducted with two Village<br />

<strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti (VSS) functionaries (VSS Co-ordinator and Panchayat<br />

Chairman/Vice-Chairman), two persons from the local Primary Health<br />

Centre/Subcentre (Medical Officer/ANM/BHE/LHV), 5 opinion leaders<br />

and 10 other community members in the age group 15-34 1 .<br />

The following procedure was adopted for the selection of 10 community<br />

members: a list of all the major lanes/streets in the village are obtained<br />

from the villagers, five such lanes/streets are selected randomly. From the<br />

selected lane/street, one adult male and one adult female in the age group<br />

15-34 were selected. It was decided to interview only the usual residents<br />

of the household and not to interview both the male and female from the<br />

same household. Similarly, 5 opinion leaders were selected randomly<br />

from a list of Gram Panchayat members, including female members,<br />

religious leaders, school teacher, Anganwadi workers, political leaders,<br />

informal leaders, shop owners, social workers, local resource persons etc.<br />

The list was prepared by the study team in consultation with the Gram<br />

Panchayat officials/ or villagers.<br />

1 During the pre-testing we found that it is very difficult to get even 5 opinion leaders at village level. Hence, the<br />

number of opinion leaders to be interviewed was reduced to 5 as against 10 as per the Ministry's guidelines.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


6<br />

+<br />

In addition, the study reviewed the existing records (correspondence,<br />

activity reports and accounts) and the IEC materials developed under the<br />

scheme.<br />

Before finalising the study design, the study team undertook a pilot visit to<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong>, Belgaum on 25 August, 2000 to know about the organization,<br />

functioning and availability of various records related to the scheme in the<br />

District. The draft questionnaires for various functionaries as well as for<br />

the opinion leaders and community members were also discussed with the<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong> and health functionaries. Based on the discussion, the study design<br />

was finalised and appropriate modifications were made in the draft<br />

questionnaires. The questionnaires for the opinion leaders and community<br />

members were also pretested on 12 September, 2000 in a village in<br />

Davanagere district. These questionnaires were finalised following the<br />

results of the pretest.<br />

One questionnaire each for the different types of respondents mentioned<br />

above are used for the interviews. A brief description of the content of<br />

questionnaires that were used in the study is given below.<br />

Questionnaire for the <strong>ZSS</strong> functionary: This questionnaire collected<br />

information on specific activities carried out under the RCH/IEC scheme<br />

by the <strong>ZSS</strong>/TSS/VSS during the project period. The information collected<br />

include: the nature of activity, area of coverage, specific locations where<br />

the activity was conducted, the nature and number of beneficiaries, topics<br />

covered/discussed, amount spent, as well as the date/s of the activity. If<br />

an activity which was initially proposed under the scheme was not<br />

mentioned by the functionary, specific questions related to the omitted<br />

item was also asked. In addition, detailed information was collected on<br />

the organization and implementation of the scheme, co-ordination with the<br />

District Health officials, and utilization of funds, bottle-necks in the<br />

implementation of the scheme if any, and the suggested recommendations.<br />

Questionnaire for the Health staff: This questionnaire gathered<br />

information on the involvement of the district health and IEC officials in<br />

the planning and implementation of the scheme. The questionnaire also<br />

covered their perception regarding the role of <strong>ZSS</strong> in promoting the RCH<br />

activities, technical guidance provided, and the way in which the IEC<br />

activities carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong> are different from the routine IEC<br />

activities of the District Health and Family Welfare Office.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


7<br />

Questionnaire for the Opinion Leaders/Community members: The<br />

questionnaire collected information on exposure to and participation in<br />

any RCH/IEC activities, and for each activity, information on nature of<br />

activity, place, duration, topics covered, RCH messages received, and<br />

messages spread to others. In addition, a set of objective-type questions<br />

on the knowledge and attitude towards selected RCH issues were<br />

canvassed to the opinion leaders/community members.<br />

, $<br />

The training of the field staff was organised at Population Research<br />

Centre, Dharwad for two days on 16 and 18 September, 2000. The<br />

training was carried out by the Director of the Centre and Co-ordinators of<br />

the evaluation. Seven staff members of the <strong>PRC</strong> were trained and six were<br />

involved during the field work. Before carrying out the field work in<br />

Chitradurga district a review meeting was held on 8 October, 2000 for<br />

getting an insight from the experience of fieldwork in Davanagere district.<br />

Two co-ordinators of the evaluation study from the <strong>PRC</strong>, Dharwad,<br />

visited the office of the Secretary, <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti, Chitradurga on<br />

4 October, 2000 and held detailed discussions regarding the scheme.<br />

During this visit, various documents and materials related to the scheme<br />

were also photocopied for further analysis. The visit lasted for a day –<br />

about 7-8 hours of in-depth interview and discussions with the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

Secretary, and a brief discussion with the Deputy Commissioner of the<br />

district. The officials were very co-operative, and had rich insight into<br />

the scheme, its implementation and the goals of RCH programme in the<br />

country.<br />

The field work was carried out by two teams, each team consisting of<br />

three interviewers and one Co-ordinator. The Co-ordinators interviewed<br />

the Taluka-level <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti and health functionaries, one<br />

interviewer covered the village-level <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti and health<br />

functionaries, and the remaining two interviewers interviewed the selected<br />

community members and opinion leaders. The data collection was carried<br />

out during 10-15 October, 2000.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


8<br />

"<br />

The study covered, at the district level, two <strong>ZSS</strong> functionaries (Deputy<br />

Commissioner and, Secretary-<strong>ZSS</strong>). At the Taluka-level, 10 Taluka<br />

<strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti functionaries (Taluka co-ordinator and Tahasildar/<br />

Executive Officer of the Taluka Panchayat) and 6 Taluka Medical<br />

Officers were interviewed. At the village-level, 20 Village <strong>Saksharata</strong><br />

Samiti functionaries (co-ordinators and Gram Panchayat Chairman/Vice<br />

Chairman/Secretary) and 18 health functionaries (Medical Officers or<br />

BHE/LHV/ANM) were covered. In addition, 58 opinion leaders and 120<br />

community members were interviewed from the 12 selected villages.<br />

Although almost all the functionaries at all levels could be covered in this<br />

evaluation study, it is important to note the problems faced while<br />

interviewing them. For instance, the meeting with the higher officials in<br />

the District or Taluka was sometimes delayed because of their<br />

engagements despite obtaining an appointment in advance. In addition, the<br />

presence of others during the interview could not be avoided by the study<br />

team thus disturbing the flow of the interview as well as biasing the<br />

response of the concerned official. Similarly, many of the officials<br />

interviewed are only the nominal heads and some of them have joined<br />

only recently and hence could not give the required information about the<br />

scheme. Since these officials are under great pressure to attend to various<br />

other, sometimes more urgent, administrative work, it has been very<br />

difficult for them to spare longer time for the discussion related to <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

activities under the scheme.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


9<br />

Chapter<br />

/<br />

-<br />

Proposed and Carried Out<br />

.<br />

In order to utilise <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong> which have succeeded in<br />

mobilising the mass for the literacy movement for promoting awareness<br />

and encourage the participation of the community in planning and<br />

implementation of various RCH programmes, the Secretary, Ministry of<br />

Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi wrote a<br />

letter on 25, May 1998 to the District Collectors/Deputy Commissioners<br />

seeking the involvement of <strong>ZSS</strong> and preparing project proposals for<br />

promoting IEC for various RCH issues.<br />

In reply to this letter, few project proposals were received by Department<br />

of Family Welfare which did not contain all the necessary details to enable<br />

them to sanction. Thus, the Department stipulated some guidelines for<br />

preparing the project proposals and referred them back to the District<br />

Collectors on 24 September 1998, stating that the revised/new proposals<br />

should reach the Department within the next few weeks so that the<br />

sanction can be made quickly and the implementation of the IEC activities<br />

in the district can begin within the next 2-3 months.<br />

The guidelines thus provided by the Department largely discussed three<br />

points for consideration while preparing the project proposals invited for<br />

two year periods from the year 1998: content, method and norms.<br />

The MOHFW suggested the following topics to be covered/addressed in<br />

the proposed IEC activities:<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


10<br />

0<br />

1<br />

1. Problems of having a large population in relation to education,<br />

nutrition, economic share, employment and quality of life for<br />

individual family members. And also what it means for environment,<br />

employment etc. in the community.<br />

2. Various methods of contraception and consequences of using or not<br />

using each. When to use spacing methods and when to use terminal<br />

methods.<br />

3. Nutritional status of children, adolescents and women. Its effect on<br />

mental development, body development and its consequences for<br />

pregnant women.<br />

4. Anaemia - its prevalence and consequences for children, adolescents<br />

and women.<br />

5. Diarrhoea control and role of Oral Rehydration Solution.<br />

6. Vaccine preventable diseases and vaccination. Importance of taking<br />

all doses.<br />

7. Vitamin-A and Iron and Folic Acid supplementation and their<br />

importance.<br />

8. Acute Respiratory Infection - its prevalence and consequences.<br />

9. Age at marriage.<br />

10. Birth weight of children - consequences for low birth weight babies.<br />

11. Importance of ante-natal check ups, tetanus immunization and postnatal<br />

check ups, anaemia treatment and information regarding<br />

complicated pregnancies.<br />

12. Maternal mortality situation - importance of institutional deliveries.<br />

How life of mother and children is more valuable.<br />

The guidelines suggested the <strong>ZSS</strong> to propose IEC activities covering the<br />

above themes in the form of Kalajatha, folk performances, posters and<br />

rallies in towns and villages and workshops for orienting and sensitising<br />

opinion leaders, literacy workers, social activists etc.<br />

The Department also stipulated the following norms that should be kept in<br />

mind while formulating the proposals:<br />

1. Training of Government staff and payment of honorarium to them<br />

should not be a part of the project.<br />

2. Surveys for determining status of family welfare indicators are not<br />

permitted. Routine activities such as advertisements in news papers,<br />

film shows and video making should be avoided.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


11<br />

3. Purchase of capital assets such as vehicles, VCR, TV, office furniture<br />

etc. will not be allowed.<br />

4. The expenditure on supervision etc. should not exceed 10% of the<br />

annual amount.<br />

! " % ! * ! "<br />

! "<br />

The discussions with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, Davanagere (during the<br />

evaluation of the scheme in Davanagere district) and the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary,<br />

Chitradurga revealed that the person who is presently the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary in<br />

Davanagere District was functioning as the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary in Chitradurga<br />

at the time of preparation of the project proposal and sanctioning of the<br />

project. One can see a lot of similarities between the RCH-IEC activities<br />

proposed under the scheme by the two districts.<br />

The <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga had not received any communication either from<br />

Government of Karnataka or from Government of India to submit the<br />

proposals on RCH-IEC activities. However, since the Secretary for both<br />

Davanagere and Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong>s were the same, proposals were<br />

submitted for both the districts on 8 January 1999.<br />

It is reported by the present <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary Chitradurga that the project<br />

proposal for Chitradurga was prepared based on the experience during a<br />

workshop organised by State Resource Centre (SRC), Mysore. The actual<br />

proposal was prepared with the help from the then Assistant Director,<br />

Women and Child Development and the District Health Education<br />

Officer, Chitradurga. The process of preparation of the project proposal<br />

took about two months.<br />

The project proposal submitted by the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> (which is very<br />

much similar to the project proposal submitted by the Davanagere <strong>ZSS</strong>)<br />

envisages the implementation of the RCH-IEC activities through the local<br />

teams consisting of Preraka/Anganwadi worker/ANM as Co-ordinators<br />

and the members of the local Mahila/Yuvak/Yuvati Mandals, elected<br />

representatives of Gram Panchayats and local school teachers and village<br />

contact persons as members.<br />

The IEC activities are proposed to be carried out mainly through posters,<br />

wall writings, street plays, folksongs, discussions/debates/essaywriting/quiz/seminar/workshop<br />

etc. involving various target groups at the<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


12<br />

village Panchayat level. The proposal also included a component of<br />

training of functionaries – local team implementing the scheme, folk<br />

artists/individuals/troupes, and officers and NGOs involved in the<br />

programme.<br />

More specifically, the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> proposed a total of 8 different<br />

activities, to be organized at the District, Taluka and village levels:<br />

1. Orientation workshops for officials/NGOs, 1 to be organized at the<br />

district level and 7 at the Taluka level<br />

2. Material Development Workshop, one each to develop posters, folksongs,<br />

and street plays, to be organized by the <strong>ZSS</strong> at the district level<br />

3. Street plays – 100 performances<br />

4. Folk songs – 100 performances<br />

5. Posters – about 10,000 posters to be printed and displayed<br />

6. Wall-writing – 500 in number<br />

7. Seminars/Workshops at Taluka, Panchayat and village levels – a total<br />

of 240 workshops to be organized – involving PRI representatives,<br />

literacy volunteers, women leaders, NGO and neo-literates.<br />

8. District-level workshops – a total of five – involving PRI<br />

representatives, literacy workers, women leaders, NGO and<br />

journalists.<br />

Both the guidelines and the proposal sanctioned for the <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga<br />

do not indicate, in detail, the operationalization of the proposed IEC<br />

activities. For instance, the guidelines for the preparation of the proposal<br />

provide, in detail, the various subject matter that should be included in the<br />

IEC activities but do not reveal how these contents should actually be<br />

incorporated in specific activities such as Kalajatha, folk songs etc.<br />

Similarly, the proposal did not mention specifically, with respect to the<br />

orientation and training programmes, the topics to be covered, the<br />

resource persons to be used and how the trained persons will be utilised<br />

subsequently in the scheme. The proposal was silent about the number of<br />

street plays and folk songs to be developed. It does not provide the details<br />

regarding the number of troupes and number of artists per troupe and the<br />

level at which these performances are to be organised.<br />

The proposal was sanctioned with some modification in the budget and<br />

this was communicated to the <strong>ZSS</strong> vide letter dated 31, March, 1999. An<br />

amount of Rs. 4,50,000 was released to Secretary (Family Welfare),<br />

Government of Karnataka vide letter dated 31 March, 1999 and the same<br />

was communicated to the Deputy Commission, Chitradurga District.<br />

However the fund for the scheme was released to the <strong>ZSS</strong> on 22<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


) 2<br />

13<br />

September 1999 and the amount was received on 1 January 2000. Thus,<br />

the time gap between the sanction of the fund from MOHFW and receipt<br />

of the same by the <strong>ZSS</strong> is about 9 months. The scheme was launched in<br />

district Chitradurga on 3 December, 1999 – before actually receiving the<br />

funds.<br />

As there was a delay in receiving the funds from the Secretary (Family<br />

Welfare), Government of Karnataka, the <strong>ZSS</strong> used Rs. 450,000 from<br />

funds it had received for the Post-Literacy Campaign, based on the<br />

decision of its Executive Committee which met on 30 June 1999. This<br />

amount drawn on 21 July 1999 was reimbursed to the PLC account on 1<br />

January 2000, after receiving the funds for RCH-IEC activities. Thus the<br />

Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> could start the RCH-IEC activities even before receiving<br />

the funds for the scheme.<br />

The organisational structure for the present scheme is almost the same as<br />

that for the Total Literacy Campaign (TLC) and Post-Literacy Campaign<br />

(PLC). The <strong>ZSS</strong>- Chitradurga is named as Aksharavani, whose literal<br />

meaning is to give literacy through voice. At the district level, the <strong>ZSS</strong> has<br />

an Executive Committee consisting of 35 members under the<br />

Chairmanship of the Deputy Commissioner. About 50 percent of<br />

members represent NGOs and women, while the remaining 50 percent are<br />

officials from various government departments. The <strong>ZSS</strong> also has a<br />

General Body at the district level consisting of 100 members from<br />

different spheres of life. The Executive Committee and General Body<br />

meet periodically at an interval of three months to review the progress and<br />

provide the required guidance.<br />

For the planning and implementation of the scheme, the <strong>ZSS</strong> has a<br />

Secretary and two Co-ordinators at the district level. The Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

prepares the action plan for activities to be conducted by the TSS and<br />

monitors the progress of these activities. The <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary told that since<br />

the Deputy Commissioner himself/herself is the Chairman of the <strong>ZSS</strong>, any<br />

activity carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong> receives its prominence and priority.<br />

Similarly, all the six Talukas of the district have Taluka Aksharavani<br />

Committees consisting of various governmental and non-governmental<br />

officials under the Chairmanship of Executive Officer of Taluka<br />

Panchayat/Tahasildar. The following are the six Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> in<br />

the district:<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


14<br />

1. Chitradurga Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />

2. Hiriyur Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />

3. Holalkere Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />

4. Challakere Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />

5. Hosadurga Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />

6. Molakalmuru Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />

In every Taluka, a person from the education department is deputed as the<br />

co-ordinator of the Samiti. It is the duty of the co-ordinator to organise<br />

and implement the IEC activities under the scheme in his/her respective<br />

Taluka/city according to the plan suggested by the <strong>ZSS</strong>. As per the<br />

discussion with <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, the district level review meeting is held on<br />

the third of every month, wherein the District and Taluka level<br />

Aksharavani functionaries report the progress of the activities assigned to<br />

them.<br />

The discussion with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary revealed that the Gram<br />

Panchayat/Village level committees which were constituted during the<br />

TLC and PLC, are not actually used for implementation of the present<br />

scheme. However, the help of the local co-ordinator of TLC/PLC is<br />

sought whenever any of the RCH-IEC activities is planned at the village<br />

level.<br />

The project proposal which was approved by MOHFW had a provision<br />

for Preraka/Anganwadi worker/ANM as co-ordinators and elected Gram<br />

Panchayat members and local school teacher as the members of the local<br />

team for the effective implementation of various IEC activities under the<br />

scheme. But during the evaluation, no such local team was identified in<br />

any of the villages covered for the evaluation.<br />

The Taluka <strong>Samitis</strong> are required to submit to the <strong>ZSS</strong> the monthly report<br />

of the progress of activities as well as the monthly expenditure incurred.<br />

The monthly reports thus received are compiled and incorporated in the<br />

report of the activities and expenditure of the <strong>ZSS</strong>, and are sent to<br />

MOHFW, with copies to Joint Director and RCH Project Director,<br />

Directorate of Health Services, Bangalore; Director, Directorate of Mass<br />

Education, Bangalore; Director, State Resource Centre, Mysore; DHO and<br />

RCH Officer, Chitradurga.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


15<br />

A statement showing the activities proposed and conducted in the district<br />

under the scheme at the time of the evaluation study is presented in Table<br />

1. The table indicates that the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> has made certain<br />

modifications in some of the activities sanctioned by MOHFW without<br />

informing the changes to the funding agency prior to implementation.<br />

Similarly, some of the activities for which funds are sanctioned are not<br />

carried out, and in some cases, the sanctioned funds are utilized for<br />

conducting activities other than those for which funds were sanctioned by<br />

the funding agency.<br />

) 3 " ) 41.)<br />

Under this activity, it was proposed and approved to carry out a two-day<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong> level workshop for Rs. 5,000 and 7 Taluka-level one-day workshops<br />

at the cost of Rs. 1,000 per workshop, for 25-30 participants each.<br />

At the time of this evaluation, the proposed <strong>ZSS</strong>-level workshop has not<br />

been organised. But the Taluka-level workshops were organised in all<br />

Talukas except Hiriyur. In Challakere, this workshop was organised<br />

exclusively for the Taluka-level officials. In other Talukas, however,<br />

journalists, elected members to various civic bodies, Gram Panchayat<br />

secretaries also participated along with the Taluka-level officials. In<br />

Holalkere Taluka, this workshop was organised only for half day. As per<br />

the information of various Taluka Co-ordinators the amount spent for this<br />

workshop ranges from Rs. 400 to Rs. 2350. The total amount spent for<br />

this activity is about Rs. 5,270. In total, 399 persons had participated in<br />

these workshops organised in the five Talukas, and the number ranges<br />

from 34 to 250 per workshop. It may be noted that in Hosadurga Taluka,<br />

250 persons had participated in the one-day workshop.<br />

The proposal, approved by MOHFW, does not indicate the types of<br />

persons who will be trained, the topics to be covered for the training, the<br />

resource persons, and the subsequent use of these trained persons in the<br />

scheme. It is important to note that only six Talukas are existing in the<br />

district but the sanctioned proposal provided budget for carrying out seven<br />

Taluka-level workshops.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


0 " 3 "<br />

16<br />

The proposed activities under material development include a two-day<br />

workshop on posters, two-day workshop on folk songs and a five-day<br />

workshop on street plays. The details about the themes to be covered,<br />

number of posters, street plays and folk songs to be developed and<br />

resource persons for this workshop were not mentioned in the approved<br />

proposal.<br />

As against the proposal, the <strong>ZSS</strong> organized (1) a three-day workshop to<br />

develop the scripts for 4 street plays, 12 folk songs and 1 Rupaka, (2) a<br />

three-day workshop for directors and artists for street plays and folksongs,<br />

and (3) another three-day workshop for the artists at Taluka level. Of the<br />

three workshops, two were conducted for Chitradurga and Davanagere<br />

districts combined. No workshop was conducted for the development of<br />

posters, and the workshops were not organized separately for the<br />

development of street plays and folksongs.<br />

Thus it is evident that the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> has taken very keen interest in<br />

developing the scripts for street plays and folk songs and also in directing<br />

and training 6 troupes each consisting of 12 performers, one troupe in<br />

each Taluka, for presentation of these street plays and folk songs.<br />

A three-day material development workshop for writers was organised in<br />

Chitradurga during 29-31, December, 1999. It was a combined workshop<br />

for both Chitradurga and Davanagere districts since the same person was<br />

officiating as Secretary for both the District <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong>. Several<br />

prominent artists and writers from both the districts attended the<br />

workshop. Scripts for 4 street plays, namely Betalana Kathe, Sandesha<br />

(meaning message), Harake (meaning offerings to God) and Udho Udho,<br />

were developed during the workshop. In addition, 12 songs and a short<br />

play named Sonku Rogagalu were also developed. The DHEO,<br />

Chitradurga and two health educators from State Resource Centre, Mysore<br />

participated as resource persons. About 35 persons attended this workshop<br />

(15 from the <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga). The expenditure incurred for this<br />

workshop is about Rs. 12,000. It is reported that <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga has<br />

paid an honorarium of Rs. 200 to persons from SRC and Rs. 100 to other<br />

participants.<br />

Although scripts for four street plays were developed in the workshop,<br />

only three were used by the <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga. The evaluation team<br />

obtained the scripts of 3 street plays and 12 folk songs from the <strong>ZSS</strong> and<br />

these materials are briefly described as under:<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


17<br />

1. Street play - Bethalana Kathe: Mainly provides messages on: the<br />

consequences of marrying at an early age; importance of consulting an<br />

Anganwadi worker, ANM or Doctor immediately after knowing that<br />

the woman is pregnant; ante-natal care check-ups; importance of<br />

conducting delivery by trained persons; five-cleans to be observed<br />

during delivery, post-natal care, signs of a healthy new-born baby,<br />

breastfeeding immediately after the birth and immunization of the<br />

child.<br />

2. Street play - Sandesha: Gives specific information about various<br />

family planning methods used for spacing and limiting births. The play<br />

also gives importance of use of Nirodh in avoiding AIDS.<br />

3. Street play – Harake: Highlights the blind-beliefs and superstitions<br />

existing among the villagers in the treatment of children. The specific<br />

messages spread through this street play are: symptoms and treatment<br />

of diarrhoea and pneumonia among children, importance of breast<br />

feeding, reasons and prevention of night-blindness among children,<br />

importance of child immunization and the importance of male<br />

participation in the utilization of various health services.<br />

4. Short play - Appa Nanna Hodiya Bedappa: It describes the gender<br />

discrimination and the ill-effects of alcoholism.<br />

5. The 12 folk songs also conveyed the above said messages in addition<br />

to infertility, use of safe drinking water, sanitation, and various modes<br />

of transmission and prevention of AIDS.<br />

During 14-16 February, 2000, a three-day workshop for Directors and<br />

Folk Singers from different Talukas was organised at Thirtharameshwar<br />

in Honnali Taluka of Davanagere district. The workshop was a combined<br />

activity for both Chitradurga and Davanagere districts. A total of 31<br />

participants from the two districts were present. The state resource persons<br />

– Mr. Police Patil and Mr. Sambashiva Dalwai conducted the workshop.<br />

During the workshop, the scripts of the street plays developed at<br />

Chitradurga workshop were reviewed and revised. While the directors<br />

were involved in directing the street plays, the singers were engaged in<br />

setting the tune for the songs. No money was spent on this workshop from<br />

the budget meant for Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />

Similarly, a three-day workshop for street play and folk song artists was<br />

organised in each Taluka in March, 2000. The resource persons for these<br />

workshops included a state resource person, district co-ordinator, Talukalevel<br />

street play director, Taluka Medical Officer and Taluka co-ordinator.<br />

A team consisting of about 12 artists – both male and female – were<br />

trained in these workshops. . The Taluka Co-ordinator was given the<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


18<br />

responsibility of selecting the 12 artists for this workshop. However, in<br />

Molakalmuru Taluka no female artisits was trained. The Taluka Medical<br />

Officer explained about the various technical issues and availability of<br />

health services. During this workshop the artists rehearsed the folk songs<br />

and street plays developed for the scheme. In some of the Talukas, the<br />

artists carried out pre-testing of street plays and folk songs in a village.<br />

Based on this field practice, appropriate modifications were made in the<br />

tuning as well as the script of folk songs and street plays. A sum of Rs.<br />

17,392 was spent for these workshops organised in the six Talukas of the<br />

district.<br />

! 5 ,<br />

The sanctioned proposal included a provision for conducting 100<br />

performances each of street plays and folk songs, separately, by involving<br />

local NGOs.<br />

The available records as well as the discussions with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary<br />

indicate that the same troupe performed both the street plays and<br />

folksongs at one occasion, and they were combined to make the campaign<br />

more effective. The total number of street-play and folk song<br />

performances also were more than the number proposed – a total of 351<br />

performances in rural areas.<br />

The street plays and folk songs in each Taluka were performed by a<br />

trained troupe of 12 members. In one of the Talukas a ‘technician’ from<br />

the Health Department accompanied the troupe throughout their<br />

performance.<br />

The actual planning and implementation of this activity was left to the<br />

Taluka Aksharavani Samiti in each Taluka while the <strong>ZSS</strong> monitored and<br />

supervised the street play and folk song performances. Various Taluka<br />

Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> were asked to stage between 40 and 75 street plays<br />

and between 40 and 51 folk song performances in selected villages and set<br />

a timetable for the same (between March and May, 2000, at the rate of a<br />

maximum of three performances a day). The TSS was asked to select the<br />

villages where the number of illiterates and neo-literates were more. The<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong> sanctioned a total amount of Rs. 73,500 for staging street plays (at<br />

the rate of Rs. 750 per day) and Rs. 39,200 for folk song performances (at<br />

the rate of Rs. 400 per day) to the six Taluka <strong>Samitis</strong>. The food and<br />

accommodation facilities for the troupe were to be arranged with the help<br />

of local people.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


19<br />

Although the <strong>ZSS</strong> sanctioned the amount separately for street plays and<br />

folk songs, the two programmes were actually combined, and the same<br />

troupe performed both the activities on one occasion.<br />

The number of performances planned and actually organised in selected<br />

villages of six Talukas of the Chitradurga district is given in Table-2.<br />

The Co-ordinator of the TSS took the complete responsibility of<br />

organizing the street plays and folksongs in selected villages according to<br />

schedule. Every Taluka Aksharavani Samiti printed handbills containing<br />

few RCH messages and the time-schedule of the performance of street<br />

plays and folk songs in the selected villages of the respective Taluka. The<br />

performances were well-publicized by giving these handbills to the<br />

concerned Gram Panchayat for distribution and also giving it in the local<br />

news paper, 3-4 days prior to the actual performance. The Taluka<br />

Aksharavani Samiti also made an appeal, well in advance, to all the<br />

elected representatives, government employees, teachers, Anganwadi<br />

workers, persons from the Health Department, Panchayat/Village Coordinators,<br />

and representatives of NGOs to welcome the troupe and<br />

participate in the program as per the schedule.<br />

Once the troupe reached the village, it walked through the village singing<br />

folk songs and inviting the residents to come and watch the street plays.<br />

Some of the TSSs maintained a register to record the attendance and<br />

views of the audience selected randomly.<br />

The arrangements for the transportation, accommodation and food for the<br />

troupe is organized with the assistance from Taluka Panchayat, GPS etc.<br />

In a day, a troupe performed street plays and folk songs in three villages –<br />

one in the morning, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. In most<br />

of the Talukas, the street plays and folk songs were organized in 2 or 3<br />

phases for a total period of 20 days covering 60 villages. The artists were<br />

generally given a rest for 1 or 2 weeks after completing the performance<br />

in each phase. In most villages, the performance was carried in front of the<br />

Gram Panchayat Office or in front of a Temple or in the school premises.<br />

Duration of each performance was about 2 hours.<br />

The selected 12 villages for the evaluation included 6 where both street<br />

plays and folk songs were carried out. Detailed discussions were held with<br />

the concerned Gram Panchayat officials/village co-ordinator as well as the<br />

health officials. During the interviews with the TSS co-ordinators as well<br />

and Taluka-level health functionaries, their remarks on street plays and<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


20<br />

folk songs were noted. Following are some of the remarks made on the<br />

street plays and folksongs, by the various <strong>ZSS</strong> and Health personnel<br />

interviewed:<br />

1. Of all the RCH-IEC activities, the street plays and folk songs are the<br />

most effective.<br />

2. The turnout of the audience is generally very good in villages where<br />

the performance was organized in the evenings, and turnout was very<br />

poor in villages where the performance was scheduled for the<br />

afternoons.<br />

3. The IEC activities on health issues through street plays and folk songs<br />

are needed since exposure to other mass media like posters,<br />

magazines, newspapers, pamphlets etc is very poor in rural areas.<br />

4. The street plays and folk songs are more effective because they use<br />

folk media and local artists. They give entertainment that is often<br />

absent in villages; attract huge crowd and also give messages through<br />

acting and jokes that can easily be understandable to the illiterate<br />

mass. Similarly, people's attention will be more on such activities.<br />

Since, the messages through street plays and folk songs were<br />

communicated using open stage, people do not have any hesitation to<br />

talk and discuss about various health issues. They also come forward<br />

to clear their doubts and misconceptions. Often the artists come from<br />

the audience themselves, and sometimes the artists themselves act as<br />

the audience reacting to the performance providing a total involvement<br />

of the audience and the artists. Through this activity mass awareness<br />

is created within a short duration of time and by spending less amount<br />

of money. Similarly during the time of staging and afterwards the<br />

villagers discuss on various issues covered through street plays and<br />

folk songs.<br />

5. In some of the villages, the people expressed that the things that<br />

happen in their villages are told through this street plays and<br />

folksongs.<br />

6. At the same time, it is also doubtful whether the people will just watch<br />

and have fun or they will be able to grasp the messages provided in<br />

these street plays and folksongs.<br />

7. It is not possible to provide detailed information on all the different<br />

issues related to RCH, within a short period.<br />

8. The rural people, who depend mainly on daily wages for their<br />

livelihood, will not come to see such performances if conducted during<br />

the daytime. Hence such activities should be organised in the evenings<br />

and during the months after the end of harvesting season.<br />

9. The street plays and folk songs were performed in some of the<br />

resistant villages in terms of utilisation of health services and after the<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


!<br />

21<br />

programme there has been some improvement in the attitude of the<br />

people in these villages.<br />

10. The frequency and duration of such programme is important for<br />

registering the messages in the minds of the people. It is necessary to<br />

repeat and continue such activities in order to make the villagers<br />

remember the messages for longer duration.<br />

11. Instead of performing these activities in selected villages, the street<br />

plays and folksongs should cover all the villages of a Taluka.<br />

12. There has been demand from villagers (where the programme was not<br />

organised) to organise the street plays and folk songs in their village to<br />

provide knowledge on various health issues.<br />

13. The street plays and folk songs were attended by all types of people<br />

such as young, old, males, females etc.<br />

14. The street plays and folksongs performed help in removing<br />

misconception/blind beliefs among the people, to know about various<br />

health issues and facilities available to them. It was informed that<br />

during the mass campaign in some of the villages mothers were<br />

realised that they are not treating their children well due to disbelieves.<br />

Similarly, one woman expressed that if she should have the knowledge<br />

regarding the care and treatment during pregnancy her child should not<br />

have became night-blind. It was reported that after the staging of street<br />

plays and folksongs in one of the village a person realised his mistake<br />

of sending his wife to her home for not delivering a male child and<br />

brought her back.<br />

15. People's faith on health department would improve through such<br />

programmes. It was reported by some of the grass-root level health<br />

workers that this type of programme made their work simple and easy.<br />

For example, after watching these street plays and folk songs, many<br />

mothers-in-law who were earlier opposing their daughters-in-law to<br />

utilise the health services such as ANC, hospital deliveries,<br />

immunisation, family planning etc. had changed.<br />

It was proposed to develop and print posters under the scheme. According<br />

to the sanctioned proposal, the <strong>ZSS</strong> Chitradurga has to print 10,000<br />

posters. The sanctioned proposal did not mention about the content, size<br />

and type of posters to be developed. It also did not give any idea about the<br />

subsequent utilisation of these posters in this scheme.<br />

The <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary reported that they printed one brochure and 4 posters.<br />

As discussed earlier, these posters and brochures were not developed in a<br />

workshop as it was proposed in the project plan. While the posters were<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


22<br />

designed and developed by the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary and a District Co-ordinator,<br />

the brochures were borrowed from the DHO, and printed in the name of<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga. In all 4,000 brochures and 6,000 posters (1,500 copies<br />

of each type) were printed. An amount of Rs. 44,750 has been spent for<br />

printing these materials. It is told that around 1,400 posters of each type<br />

was given to the six Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong>.<br />

Discussion with the six Taluka Aksharavani Samiti co-ordinators revealed<br />

that they received the posters and brochures from the <strong>ZSS</strong> but did not<br />

mention the exact number of copies. The brochures were mainly<br />

distributed to the participants who attended various orientation training<br />

programmes organised at Taluka and Gram Panchayat levels. The posters<br />

were distributed to the various Secretaries of Gram Panchayats to display<br />

them in prominent places. The evaluation team saw the posters displayed<br />

in few of the Gram panchayat Offices visited. Some of the participants of<br />

the orientation and training workshops who were interviewed reported that<br />

they received the brochure on RCH during the programme that they<br />

attended.<br />

However, the evaluation team found it difficult to assess the total number<br />

of posters and brochures distributed and the balance remaining with the<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />

A brief description of the four posters are as follows:<br />

1. Title - Reproductive and child health programme: The poster provides<br />

the information on the objectives of the RCH programme, and specific<br />

activities under maternal health, child health, and family planning.<br />

The poster also provides the child immunization schedule. However,<br />

the poster looks very crowded with too much of information, and the<br />

maps and figures provided in the poster do not convey any meaningful<br />

information. The poster has many editorial errors. Under family<br />

planning, the poster does not mention oral pill along with Nirodh and<br />

Copper-T to space births. There is also no mention of permanent<br />

methods of family planning in the poster.<br />

2. Title – Do you know about Child Health? Healthy child is nation’s<br />

asset: This two-coloured (red and green) poster contains few poorly<br />

worded messages on what care should be taken to promote child’s<br />

health. Early initiation of breastfeeding, immunization, clean<br />

surroundings and nutrition are the messages provided.<br />

3. Title – Do you know about pregnant woman? : The poster provides<br />

eight steps to be followed to achieve better maternal and child health –<br />

check-up from a trained doctor, provision of TT injections, IFA<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


3 3<br />

23<br />

tablets, delivery by health professionals, following the five principles<br />

of cleanliness during delivery, breastfeeding the new-born, bathing the<br />

child, and nutritious food to lactating mothers.<br />

4. Title – Activities under Continuing Education Programme: This<br />

poster, although printed under the RCH-IEC scheme, does not directly<br />

relate to the RCH issues that need to be addressed. The poster simply<br />

lists various activities under the CEP.<br />

The brochure gives a brief overview of the various components of the<br />

RCH programme and various services that are available under the<br />

programme.<br />

The sanctioned proposal suggested carrying out 500 wall-writings. The<br />

Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong> reported that 10 slogans on RCH have been prepared for<br />

writing on the walls. Stencils on the selected slogans are cut and 5 stencils<br />

were distributed to various Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> for writing the<br />

messages on the walls of various Gram Panchayats. The slogans are<br />

generally written on the walls of Government buildings such as Panchayat<br />

office, Anganwadi centre, schools, colleges, etc. At the time of evaluation<br />

study, the Secretary reported that this activity was initiated in all the<br />

Talukas except Chitradurga Taluka and was completed in Challakere and<br />

Hiriyur Talukas. But the TSS Co-ordinator of Molkalmuru Taluka<br />

reported that the wall-writings are not initiated in his Taluka also.<br />

However, the evaluation team could not determine the actual number of<br />

wall-writings. The evaluation team spotted a few wall-writings in some<br />

Government buildings located in the Taluka headquarters, and none in the<br />

selected villages. The following are the slogans prepared for the wall<br />

writing:<br />

1. Akshara Arogya (Literacy is health).<br />

2. Garbhini Mahilayennu Kudale Thapasane Nadesi (Pregnant woman<br />

should go for check-up immediately).<br />

3. Sadruda Mahile Maththu Magu Arogyavantha Samajada Bunadi<br />

(Healthy woman and child is a base for healthy society).<br />

4. Arogyavantha Magu Deshada Aasthi (Healthy child is country’s asset)<br />

5. Chikka Kutumba Sukhee Kutumba (Small family is happy family).<br />

6. Condom Balasi Lyngika Rogadinda Mukti Padeyiri (Use condom to<br />

prevent sexual diseases).<br />

7. Polio Tappisalu Lesike Hakisi (Take drops to avoid polio).<br />

8. Hennondu Kalithare Shaleyondu Theradanthe (Educating a woman is<br />

equivalent to opening a school).<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


24<br />

9. Magu Ondu Irali Mane Thumba Nagu Irali (Let there by one child and<br />

let the laughter fill the family).<br />

The Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong> reported that in addition to the wall writing they<br />

prepared 9 big hoardings carrying messages on RCH issues (selected from<br />

the wall-writings). Three hoarding were given to Chitradurga Aksharavani<br />

Samiti, two were given to Hiriyur Aksharavani Samiti and one each to the<br />

other four Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong>. These hoarding were erected<br />

mainly in the premises of DC office, Taluka Panchayat Office and<br />

National Highways. In some places the evaluation study team saw the<br />

hoarding.<br />

43 " 4! 5 46 &<br />

According to the sanctioned scheme, the <strong>ZSS</strong> had to organize 240<br />

seminars/workshops at Taluka/Gram Panchayat/Village levels for PRI<br />

representatives, literacy volunteers, women leaders, NGO and neoliterates.<br />

The proposal, however, does not indicate the number of<br />

participants, number of seminars/workshops to be organised at each level,<br />

the duration, topics to be covered, and the resource persons to be used.<br />

It was reported by the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary that a total of 35 workshops at<br />

Taluka/Gram Panchayat/Village level were organised in the district as a<br />

whole.<br />

Against the proposed 240 seminars/workshops to be organized at the<br />

Village/Panchayat level, the <strong>ZSS</strong> gave each Taluka Aksharavani Samiti an<br />

action plan to be implemented: (1) A one-day orientation programme for<br />

journalists at Taluka level, [a total of 6 orientation programmes, one in<br />

each Taluka]; and (2) Orientation programmes at the Gram Panchayat<br />

level for Anganwadi workers, teachers, literacy workers, health workers<br />

and neo-literates between July and August, 2000 [a total of 202<br />

workshops]. In addition, the TSSs were also instructed to carry out a oneday<br />

training on adolescent issues for science teachers of high schools at<br />

Taluka level [a total of 6 workshops, one per Taluka]. The number of<br />

orientation training programmes planned and organised at Village/Gram<br />

Panchayat levels in the six Talukas of the district, as reported by the<br />

respective TSS Co-ordinator, is given in Table-3. The Taluka level<br />

training programmes for the science teachers of high school were<br />

organized in all Talukas except Hiriyur and Holalkere.<br />

The <strong>ZSS</strong> directed the TSS to involve Medial Officer and Child<br />

Development Project Officer as resource persons for all these workshops.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


25<br />

However, the actual topics to be covered in these workshops are not<br />

mentioned.<br />

Although an action plan was distributed to the six Taluka Aksharavani<br />

<strong>Samitis</strong> for carrying out these activities, some of the <strong>Samitis</strong> did not<br />

follow the instructions completely. For example, in none of Talukas,<br />

workshops were organised exclusively for journalists. This workshop was<br />

combined with some other workshops at the Taluka-level. Similarly, the<br />

Hosadurga TSS combined all types of Taluka-level workshops into one –<br />

inviting various types of participants such as Taluka level officials, elected<br />

members, journalists, neo-literates, GP Secretaries etc for the same<br />

workshop. Thus the Taluka-level workshops were not organized<br />

uniformly, as per the action plan provided by the <strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />

With regard to the Gram Panchayat level workshops, the actual number of<br />

workshops organized varies among the Talukas – ranging from a high of<br />

11 in Chitradurga Taluka to a low of 1 in Molkalmuru Taluka. The Gram<br />

Panchayat-level orientation programmes were generally organized at<br />

Hobli place, covering several Gram Panchayats, instead of carrying out<br />

workshops/seminars separately for each Gram Panchayat.<br />

These workshops were generally organized with the involvement and cooperation<br />

of several officers at different levels. In many Talukas, the<br />

elected members of the <strong>Zilla</strong> Panchayat and Taluka Panchayats were<br />

informed in advance by the Executive Officer of the Taluka Panchayat.<br />

Similarly, the Gram Panchayat Secretaries informed the President, Vicepresident<br />

and other members of the Gram Panchayat regarding the<br />

orientation training programme 2 or 3 days in advance. The<br />

headmasters/headmistress of primary schools and science teachers were<br />

instructed by the respective Block Education Officers to depute few<br />

teachers from his/her school for the orientation programme. The<br />

Anganwadi workers were informed about the orientation programme<br />

through the Child Development Project Officer (CDPO). The Taluka<br />

Medical officer informed the medical officers of various PHCs to depute<br />

ANM/BHW for the training programme at Gram Panchayat level. The<br />

Taluka co-ordinator informed other categories of people to participate in<br />

the orientation training programme.<br />

As reported by the various Taluka-level officials, the average duration of<br />

the training programme was about five hours. The number of participants<br />

for these orientation programmes ranged from 40 to 60 for the Talukalevel<br />

orientation programmes and between 60 and 160 for the Gram<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


26<br />

Panchayat level programmes. Only a few TSS Co-ordinators maintained a<br />

detailed report regarding these orientation training programmes.<br />

The topics discussed during these orientation programmes included:<br />

population control, cleanliness during menstruation, age at marriage,<br />

antenatal and postnatal care, breastfeeding, child immunization, Oral<br />

Rehydration Salt, spacing of births and RTI/STD/AIDS. The Taluka<br />

Medical Officers and Medical Officers from the Taluka hospital were the<br />

resource persons for the Taluka-level orientation programmes. For the<br />

Gram Panchayat-level orientation programmes, the Medical Officers and<br />

BHEs from the concerned PHC and Head Masters/Assistant Teachers<br />

participated as resource persons.<br />

In most of the Talukas, folk songs were also staged along with the<br />

orientation programmes.<br />

The views of the several <strong>ZSS</strong> and health personnel interviewed during this<br />

evaluation on the orientation programmes are summarized as under:<br />

1. Such orientation programmes are required because the grass-root level<br />

health workers and health educators have not been carrying out the<br />

routine health education due to various factors such as heavy work<br />

load and an absence of concrete action plan. Also the number of<br />

health facilities and health workers is less. This type of activity is<br />

required to control population and to increase the voluntary acceptance<br />

of various health services by the community members. There is a<br />

tendency among community members to neglect the information<br />

provided by the grass root-level health workers.<br />

2. It is useful to give training to Anganwadi workers and<br />

headmasters/teachers because these people are available in almost all<br />

the villages and people have faith in them. Anganwadi workers and<br />

headmasters will propagate the messages to the community.<br />

3. In recent period, more illiterates and backward class people are<br />

becoming Chairman/Vice-chairman of Grama Panchayats. Such<br />

training programmes will help them to know about various health<br />

issues.<br />

4. The orientation training programme for the elected members was not<br />

very successful, mainly because, most of the elected members did not<br />

show any interest in it. However, the Anganwadi workers and<br />

headmasters/teachers took the training very seriously and got their<br />

doubts clarified.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


27<br />

5. The training programmes were more helpful to teachers and<br />

Anganwadi workers rather than the health department persons, for<br />

whom it was only a refresher course.<br />

6. The training helped them to know about first-aid in case of emergency<br />

and people are coming forward voluntarily to accept various health<br />

services.<br />

Most of the Gram Panchayat Presidents/Vice-presidents interviewed told<br />

that they did not know about the purpose of training, content of the<br />

training etc before attending the programme. Some of them informed that<br />

they could not participate in the programme due to several reasons.<br />

However, almost all Gram Panchayats extended full co-operation and<br />

arranged tea, snacks and meals for the participants.<br />

Majority of the village level <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti functionaries interviewed<br />

appreciated the orientation programme and opined that such programmes<br />

help: (1) them to know about various health issues; (2) in reducing the<br />

superstitions prevailing among the villagers; and (3) such programmes<br />

should be organised once a month so that people will remember the<br />

messages.<br />

& 3 " &<br />

It was proposed to organise five district-level workshops for<br />

representatives of Panchayati Raj Institutions, NGOs, women leaders,<br />

journalists and literacy workers. However, as is the case with regard to<br />

other orientation programmes planned and approved, the proposal did not<br />

mention the number of participants, topics to be discussed, resource<br />

persons to be used, the purpose, and the subsequent utilisation of these<br />

trainees in the scheme. It is very surprising to note that almost the same<br />

type of target group as in the Taluka/Panchayat/Village level workshops<br />

was mentioned for the district-level workshop too.<br />

During the discussion, the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary reported that the district-level<br />

workshop originally proposed has been changed into Taluka-level<br />

workshop for elected members, and members of the Yuvak and Yuvati<br />

mandals.<br />

At the time of the evaluation study, these Taluka-level workshops were<br />

organised only in three Talukas namely Chitradurga, Challakere and<br />

Molkalmuru. As per the information from the Taluka Co-ordinators an<br />

amount of Rs. 1,850 was spent for these three workshops.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


,0 !<br />

28<br />

- " "<br />

The <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga had organised two RCH-IEC activities other than<br />

the ones sanctioned under the scheme – airing RCH messages through FM<br />

radio (Chitradurga, AIR) and a debate competition for Pre-university and<br />

High school students. Both these activities were not proposed at all in the<br />

proposal sanctioned by the MOHFW.<br />

This programme was organised as a part of the tenth anniversary of<br />

Chitradurga AIR. Under this programme, messages on RCH were aired<br />

for 13 weeks on every Friday between 6.00 to 6.20 PM. This programme<br />

was mainly based on the street plays and folk songs developed by the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

under this scheme.<br />

Before the programme was aired through the FM channel, an appeal was<br />

made to the public to register their names with AIR for a competition<br />

testing their knowledge on RCH, which will be conducted after the<br />

programme was aired. About 120 persons registered their names with the<br />

AIR and 63 participated in the competition held at the district<br />

headquarters. The <strong>ZSS</strong> and AIR together prepared a set of 25 objective<br />

type questions related to the messages spread through this programme. A<br />

certificate and a FM radio worth Rs. 500 were given to the first 20<br />

winners.<br />

An amount of Rs. 4000/- was spent for the travel from this scheme and the<br />

<strong>Zilla</strong> panchayat, Chitradurga, met the expenditure for the purchase of 20<br />

FM radios.<br />

% " ! - 5<br />

The <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga instructed all the Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> to<br />

organise a debate competition for Pre-university and High school students.<br />

The topic for the debate competition was left to the TSS. An amount of<br />

Rs. 2000 from this scheme was allotted to each TSS for carrying out this<br />

activity.<br />

This activity was conducted only in two Talukas viz. Chitradurga and<br />

Challakere. The competition was organized at two levels – college level<br />

and Taluka level. In the first stage, principals of all the Junior Colleges in<br />

each Taluka were asked to organise a debate competition for the students<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


29<br />

in their college and send the list of first 3 winners to TSS. The following<br />

topics were provided by the TSS for the competition:<br />

1. Hadi Hareyeda Shikshana Aadhunika Samajada Anivarya<br />

(Adolescent education is required for modern society).<br />

2. Hadi Harayedavarge Lyngika Shikshana Needuvalli Sarkarada Mattu<br />

Poshakara Patra (Role of Government and parents in providing sex<br />

education to adolescents).<br />

3. Hadi Harayedavarge Lyngika Shikshana Needuvalli Yeduraguva<br />

Savalugalu (Facing of challenges in providing sex education to<br />

adolescents).<br />

In the second stage debate competition was again organised at the Taluka<br />

level for those students who won the competition at the college level. The<br />

number of participants varied from 12 in Challakere to 16 in Chitradurga<br />

Taluka. In Chitradurga the first three winners were given prize money of<br />

Rs. 200, Rs. 150 and Rs. 100 and the remaining participants were given a<br />

small dictionary. However, in Challakere the first three students were<br />

given trophies. The TSS reimbursed the travel expenses for the<br />

participants and one accompanied person.<br />

" -<br />

One of the objectives of the evaluation study is to examine the coordination<br />

and co-operation of various officials from the department of<br />

health and family welfare in the scheme of RCH-IEC activities though<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong>, at various stages. It was expected that the District health personnel<br />

be involved at every stage of the implementation of the scheme including<br />

the preparation of the project proposal, development of campaign<br />

materials, organizing training and orientation programmes, etc. The<br />

discussion with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, selected Taluka Medical Officers,<br />

Medical Officers of the PHCs, and BHEs/LHVs/ANMs of selected<br />

Subcentres revealed that the officers of department of health and family<br />

welfare in the district was involved in various capacities in all the<br />

activities of the scheme, mostly as resource persons in various orientation<br />

programmes. The District Health Education Officer is reported to have<br />

been involved in the preparation of the project proposal.<br />

The development of scripts for the street plays and folk songs was<br />

organised in the Chitradurga and the DHO, Chitradurga had participated<br />

in this. However, the DHO, Davanagere attended the workshop organised<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


30<br />

in Kondajji for directors and artists and appreciated the efforts of <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

after knowing the contents of street plays and folk songs.<br />

Taluka medical officers were involved in various Taluka-level orientation<br />

programmes as resource persons and some of them attended the<br />

inauguration function of the street plays and folk songs. Some of the<br />

Medical Officers from the Taluka Hospitals are also reported to have<br />

participated in the orientation training programme as resource persons.<br />

Similarly, there is a strict instruction from the Taluka Medical Officer to<br />

all the Medical and Paramedical staffs of various PHCs to attend and<br />

assist in various activities of the <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti. As mentioned earlier,<br />

the Medical Officers and BHEs from various PHCs were involved in the<br />

Gram Panchayat-level orientation programmes as resource persons.<br />

In almost all the villages, the grass-root level workers were present during<br />

the street plays and folk songs. It was reported that in most Talukas, after<br />

the completion of street plays and folk songs, some of the health<br />

functionaries explained to the gathered public, the information provided in<br />

these plays and songs. In Hosadurga Taluka, the Kalajatha team was<br />

accompanied by a technician from the Health Department throughout the<br />

campaign.<br />

Most Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> reported that the health department<br />

supplied Copper-T, Condoms, Mala-D tablets, IFA tablets, and ORS<br />

packets to be used in mass campaigns as well as in orientation<br />

programmes. Similarly, the health department gave some<br />

posters/brochures/flip charts on AIDS, immunisation, family planning<br />

methods, care during pregnancy and delivery, elements and objective of<br />

RCH etc. These materials were used both in the training programmes and<br />

in street plays and folk songs. Some of the posters were supplied to Gram<br />

Panchayat Secretaries or Co-ordinators for display in important spots<br />

within the village.<br />

As mentioned earlier, the <strong>ZSS</strong> used some of the IEC materials and the<br />

assistance from the health department in developing the posters and the<br />

brochure.<br />

The Taluka Medical Officers told that sometimes they provided vehicle<br />

during the performance of street plays and folk songs in various villages<br />

of the Taluka.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


31<br />

Thus, as per the information from the health and <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti<br />

functionaries, there is a total involvement of the health personnel at every<br />

type of the RCH-IEC activities through <strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />

, 7 2 "<br />

As discussed earlier, the Department of Family Welfare, Ministry of<br />

Health and Family Welfare released an amount of Rs. 450,000 to<br />

Secretary (Family Welfare), Government of Karnataka for carrying out<br />

RCH-IEC activities in Chitradurga District through the <strong>ZSS</strong>. There seems<br />

to be a mistake in totalling the cost of the project in the letter from<br />

MOHFW, New Delhi, bearing the sanctioning of the project. While the<br />

actual amount to be sanctioned to the project as per the letter sums up to<br />

Rs. 460,000, the total printed on the sanctioned proposal is Rs. 450,000.<br />

The fund for the project is deposited in a separate bank account opened in<br />

the joint names of President (District Deputy Commissioner) and<br />

Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong> in the Chitradurga Grameen Bank, Chitradurga. The<br />

expenditure incurred in the scheme is entered in a separate account book<br />

with vouchers and is maintained by the Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong>. The Secretary gets<br />

prior permission from the President for spending on various activities<br />

under the scheme.<br />

The expenditure incurred in the scheme at the time of evaluation study,<br />

i.e, as on September, 2000 was prepared after verifying the account books<br />

and the monthly account statements that were submitted to the MOHFW,<br />

New Delhi and is provided in Table-4. The Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> has so far<br />

spent an amount of Rs. 369,561 against Rs. 450,000 sanctioned for<br />

carrying out various RCH-IEC activities in the district.<br />

Comparing the discussion with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary as well as the Taluka<br />

Co-ordinators, the Quarterly reports of activities and expenditure<br />

submitted to MOHFW, the following points need further clarifications:<br />

a) According to the Quarterly progress report submitted by Chitradurga<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong> to MOHFW, New Delhi, an expenditure of Rs. 6,635 is spent<br />

against 10 Orientation Workshops for Officials/NGOs. However, only<br />

five such orientation training programmes were reported to the<br />

evaluation team by the Taluka Co-ordinators and the total expenditure<br />

reported for this activity is Rs.5,270.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


32<br />

b) Under the item – wall writing – it is reported that the <strong>ZSS</strong> has spent an<br />

amount of Rs. 24,900 in the month of July, 2000. But at the time of the<br />

evaluation, this activity was in progress only in four of the six Talukas.<br />

c) The <strong>ZSS</strong> has reported a total of 217 seminars/workshops at<br />

Taluka/GP/Village levels for an expenditure of Rs. 116,836.<br />

However, the Taluka Co-ordinators reported only 47 such<br />

seminars/workshops (8 Taluka-level and 39 Gram Panchayat level<br />

workshops covering 190 Gram Panchayats).<br />

d) An expenditure of Rs. 6,950 was shown against five district-level<br />

workshops. As discussed earlier this activity was changed to<br />

Workshop exclusively for PRI representatives at the Taluka level. At<br />

the time of evaluation study, i.e. on October, 2000, only three such<br />

workshops were reported to be organised exclusively for the PRI<br />

representatives at Taluka level and the total amount spent for these<br />

three workshops was Rs. 1,850.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


33<br />

Chapter<br />

9<br />

8" -<br />

Knowledge on Selected RCH Issues Among Village Communities<br />

One of the main objectives of the scheme of RCH-IEC through <strong>ZSS</strong> has<br />

been to create mass awareness and to facilitate the individuals and<br />

families in their decision-making in the direction desired for achieving the<br />

goal of the RCH programme. As presented in the previous section, various<br />

IEC activities on RCH issues have been planned and implemented by<br />

Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> under the scheme. This evaluation tried to assess the<br />

reach-effectiveness of these IEC activities, and to some extent, measure<br />

and compare the knowledge and awareness of community members who<br />

were exposed to these activities and those who were not.<br />

As mentioned earlier, 120 community members and 58 opinion leaders<br />

were randomly selected from the 12 study villages, who were asked<br />

several questions on their exposure to various IEC activities on health and<br />

family welfare, as well as on their knowledge about various health and<br />

family welfare issues. The responses to these questions are analysed and<br />

discussed in this chapter.<br />

8" -<br />

The following question was asked to all the selected opinion leaders and<br />

community members to assess their exposure to RCH-IEC activities:<br />

“During the last one year, did you see/participate in any kind of activity<br />

where people were given information on health and family welfare?” A list<br />

of all the activities seen/participated was prepared for those who answered<br />

positively to the question. Table-5 presents the percentage of respondents<br />

who reported exposure to any IEC activity, to street-plays, to folk songs,<br />

and to orientation training programmes, according to their selected<br />

background characteristics.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


34<br />

A large majority of the respondents (84 percent) reported an exposure to at<br />

least one IEC activity on health and family welfare during the year<br />

preceding the interview. The specific activities seen/participated, as<br />

reported by the respondents are: posters/hoarding/handbill – 68 percent;<br />

advertisement on television – 38 percent; street plays – 32 percent;<br />

folksongs – 26 percent; Orientation/training – 11 percent; Jatha – 11<br />

percent; and other activity – 4 percent.<br />

Among these specific activities seen/participated by the respondents, the<br />

three activities – orientation/training, street plays and folksongs – are the<br />

most important ones aimed at the direct participation of the community<br />

members.<br />

Although street plays and folksongs were the major RCH-IEC activities<br />

carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong>, only 32 and 26 percent, of the respondents,<br />

respectively, have seen these programmes. Even in villages where these<br />

activities are conducted (Out of the 12 villages selected for the study, 6<br />

were the villages where the <strong>ZSS</strong> had organized street plays and folk<br />

songs), only 46 and 32 percent have reported seeing street play and<br />

folksong performances, respectively. The orientation and training<br />

workshops, which were organized in 4 of the 12 villages selected, are<br />

attended by 11 percent of the respondents, overall, and only 9 percent of<br />

the respondents from villages where this activity was performed.<br />

The street plays and folksongs are less likely to be seen by women,<br />

members of community who are not opinion leaders, and of course by the<br />

respondents from villages where the <strong>ZSS</strong> has not organized these<br />

programmes. On the other hand, orientation/training programmes are<br />

attended more by women, persons above age 25, persons who have<br />

studied beyond middle school, married persons, and opinion leaders. In<br />

fact, the orientation/training activity at the Gram Panchayat level catered<br />

mostly to the local Anganwadi teachers and female teachers of local<br />

school.<br />

Although the scheme aimed at exposing the poor and the illiterate persons<br />

to RCH messages, it is important to note that their exposure is limited to<br />

street plays and folk songs.<br />

Orientation training programmes are considered as the most important<br />

interpersonal communication media in disseminating various RCH issues.<br />

These channels involve face to face message transfer between a source<br />

and a receiver. As mentioned earlier, only 11 percent of the respondents<br />

were exposed to this medium of communication. In order to obtain a<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


35<br />

concrete idea about the effectiveness of this medium, people who attended<br />

this programme were asked to indicate the duration, method, topics<br />

covered, and major messages received. Due to small number of persons<br />

who reported to have participated in these training/orientation<br />

programmes, the results are not shown in tabular form.<br />

Majority of those who attended orientation programmes, did so only once.<br />

About half of them reported that Aksharavani Samiti had organised these<br />

orientation programmes. More than half of them reported that they<br />

received the communication 2 or more days in advance.<br />

The average reported duration of the orientation workshop is 5 hours. All<br />

the participants informed that lecture was the method of training; and<br />

mostly the local Medical Officer was the resource person. The different<br />

topics reported as included in these training programmes are: child care<br />

(47 percent), family planning (37 percent), maternal care (31 percent),<br />

environmental protection (26 percent), literacy (11 percent) and AIDS (11<br />

percent). The most important messages received from these training<br />

programmes were - “women should take nutritious food and go for health<br />

check-up during pregnancy”, “safe sex to avoid AIDS” and “small family<br />

is happy family”. The next most frequently reported message was -<br />

“immunisation should be provided to avoid polio attack, blind belief<br />

should not be followed and nutritious food to children for faster growth”.<br />

Folk media is another channel used in the RCH-IEC strategies of <strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />

This is considered to be more effective medium in sensitising various<br />

health issues among the illiterate rural mass, who are not exposed much to<br />

the modernizing influences. As mentioned earlier, street-plays and folksongs<br />

were the folk media used under this scheme in Chitradurga district.<br />

Some particulars regarding the street-plays and folk songs were asked to<br />

the respondents who were exposed to them, in order to ascertain the reach<br />

effectiveness of these media.<br />

As discussed earlier, around one-third each of the respondents reported<br />

that they have seen street plays and 26 percent of the respondents have<br />

heard folk-songs. Majority of those who had heard folksongs (89 percent)<br />

said that the folksongs were part of the street plays. Most (81 percent) of<br />

them reported that they have seen the street-play only once during the last<br />

one year. With regard to the place of staging, a substantial proportion (60<br />

percent) informed that the street-play was conducted in the premises of the<br />

school ground. Around two-fifth of the respondents correctly knew that<br />

the street plays were organized by the Aksharavani Samiti and one-fourth<br />

thought that the street plays were organized by Gram Panchayat. The<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


36<br />

average duration of the street play performance as reported by the<br />

audience was about 2 hours.<br />

Almost all the respondents who have seen a street play said that it was<br />

organised on no special occasion, but on usual day. When asked regarding<br />

the advance publicity about the street-plays, more than three-fifths of<br />

those who had seen a street play had received notification about it<br />

adequately in advance. It is surprising to note that more than three-fourths<br />

(79 percent) of those who had seen the street play could not recall the<br />

name of at least one street play.<br />

Each respondent who had seen a street play was asked about the themes<br />

covered in the street-play that they saw last. The different themes reported<br />

by those who have seen street plays in the order of frequency of reporting<br />

are: literacy (37 percent), environmental protection (30 percent), AIDS<br />

(26 percent), maternal care (21 percent), child care (19 percent), blind<br />

beliefs on health care practices (16 percent), and family planning (16<br />

percent). The street play performance was satisfactory according to the<br />

majority (83 percent) of the respondents.<br />

The reported themes covered in folksongs, in the order of frequency are:<br />

child care (35 percent), AIDS (22 percent), environmental protection (20<br />

percent), literacy (13 percent), blind beliefs on health care practices (11<br />

percent), maternal care (6 percent) and family planning (4 percent).<br />

According to the respondents who had seen a street play, the most<br />

important message conveyed through these street plays are:<br />

a. Safe sex to avoid AIDS (12 percent)<br />

b. Environmental protection/ sanitation to avoid diseases (12 percent)<br />

c. Blind beliefs should not be followed for health care practices (7<br />

percent)<br />

d. Small family is happy family (7 percent)<br />

e. When child is sick he/she should be taken to hospital (5 percent)<br />

f. Pregnant woman should take nutritious food (5 percent)<br />

g. Children should go to school not for work (5 percent)<br />

The important messages received through the folk-songs, as reported by<br />

those who were exposed to folk-songs are:<br />

a. Safe sex to avoid AIDS (13 percent)<br />

b. Immunisation should be provided to avoid polio attack (11 percent)<br />

c. Habitual alcohol consumption leads to increase the family size (7<br />

percent)<br />

d. Children should go to school not for work ( 7 percent)<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


37<br />

$<br />

e. Marriage age for girls is 18 and for boys it is 21 years (4 percent)<br />

f. Blind beliefs should not be followed for health care practices (4<br />

percent)<br />

g. When child is sick he/she should be taken to hospital (4 percent)<br />

In order to assess the knowledge generated on various RCH issues<br />

through this scheme, structured questions were asked to the randomly<br />

selected opinion leaders and community members in the 12 selected<br />

villages of the District. The questions asked related mainly to the topics or<br />

themes included in the various RCH-IEC activities of <strong>ZSS</strong>. It is very<br />

difficult to determine whether the knowledge and awareness of the<br />

community member measured in this evaluation is due to the specific<br />

scheme under evaluation or due to other similar influences prevailing on<br />

the community. In order to overcome this problem to some extent,<br />

knowledge on various RCH issues are analysed separately for respondents<br />

who were exposed to any RCH-IEC activity of <strong>ZSS</strong> (either street play, or<br />

folksongs or orientation/training programme) and those who were not<br />

exposed to these activities. The two groups are referred in the discussion<br />

as ‘exposed’ and ‘not-exposed’ groups, respectively.<br />

Table-6 presents the distribution of exposed and non-exposed respondents<br />

according to their responses to questions on selected health and family<br />

welfare issues. The results are discussed separately by themes covered in<br />

the awareness questionnaire.<br />

Age at marriage is an important issue discussed and included in the<br />

various RCH-IEC activities of <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga. The knowledge<br />

generated regarding this aspect was examined by the legal minimum age<br />

at marriage for boys and girls reported by those who were exposed to the<br />

RCH-IEC activities of <strong>ZSS</strong> and those were not. A larger proportion of the<br />

exposed and non-exposed group reported correctly the legal minimum age<br />

at marriage for girls (73 and 75 percent respectively) compared to the<br />

legal minimum age at marriage for boys (36 and 40 percent respectively).<br />

This indicates that more respondents know about the minimum legal age<br />

at marriage for girls than boys.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


38<br />

Under the theme three questions on breastfeeding, three questions on<br />

management of diarrhoea and four questions on childhood vaccinations<br />

were asked to each respondent. The questions on breastfeeding are: how<br />

soon after childbirth should the child be put to breast for the first time,<br />

whether the first breast milk should be given to the new-born or not, and<br />

the age till which a child should be breastfed. Under the theme of<br />

management of childhood diarrhoea, the questions asked are: the danger<br />

signs of diarrhoea, treatment of and feeding during diarrhoea. With regard<br />

to childhood vaccinations, questions were included on names of<br />

vaccinations against specific diseases, and the timing of measles<br />

vaccination.<br />

While 53 percent of persons who were exposed reported that a child<br />

should be initiated to breastfeeding immediately after childbirth, this<br />

proportion for not exposed group is only 34 percent. A greater percentage<br />

of respondents who were not exposed mentioned that the breastfeeding<br />

should be initiated only a day after childbirth. The difference between<br />

those exposed and not exposed categories are found to be statistically<br />

significant with more persons from the exposed group giving correct<br />

answer.<br />

With regard to feeding colostrum to the new-born, 60 and 33 percent of<br />

exposed group and non-exposed group, respectively, are of the opinion<br />

that the first breast milk should be given to the child, without discarding it.<br />

Similarly, more persons who were not exposed to the IEC-RCH activities<br />

of <strong>ZSS</strong> reported that they don't know the ideal duration of breastfeeding.<br />

More than one-third of the persons exposed reported that repeated watery<br />

stools (43 percent), repeated vomiting (35 percent) and fever (35 percent)<br />

are the symptoms of diarrhoea which would tell that the child should be<br />

taken to a health facility. The corresponding proportions for non-exposed<br />

category are 47, 36 and 39, respectively. Other danger signs of diarrhoea<br />

mentioned by a substantial proportion of respondents are: any vomiting<br />

(28 percent for exposed and 31 percent for non-exposed), not getting<br />

better (28 percent for exposed and 23 percent for non-exposed), and any<br />

watery stools (27 percent for exposed and 16 percent for non-exposed).<br />

The persons who were exposed to the IEC activities of <strong>ZSS</strong> seem to have<br />

better knowledge of ORS and increased fluid intake during diarrhoea,<br />

which are emphasised in the Indian programme on diarrhoea<br />

management, compared to persons who were not exposed. To a question<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


0<br />

39<br />

on what should one do if a child suffers from diarrhoea, 65 percent of the<br />

exposed group reported that the child should be taken to a doctor, 48<br />

percent reported that the child should be given ORS, and 24 percent<br />

reported that the child should be given more liquids. The corresponding<br />

proportions among non-exposed category are: 65, 32 and 8 percent<br />

respectively.<br />

A higher proportion of respondents who were exposed, compared to those<br />

who were not exposed, reported that the child with diarrhoea should be<br />

given more to drink (64 percent and 46 percent).<br />

Significant difference is observed in the knowledge of the exposed and the<br />

non-exposed groups regarding BCG as the vaccination given to children<br />

against TB. A higher proportion of the non-exposed group doesn't know<br />

the name of the vaccination given to children against TB. DPT is known<br />

as the vaccination given to the children against diphtheria, whooping<br />

cough and tetanus to only one-third of exposed group and a quarter of<br />

non-exposed group. Both the exposed and non-exposed respondents are<br />

most familiar with the vaccination against poliomyelitis. While 28 percent<br />

of the exposed group reported 9 months as the age at which a child should<br />

be given measles vaccines, this percentage for non-exposed groups is 20.<br />

Maternal care is one of the important aspects of RCH programme. A<br />

substantial proportion of respondents who were exposed to the IEC<br />

activities of <strong>ZSS</strong> reported that maternal care was one of the major topics<br />

covered by these programmes. Various indicators of maternal care such as<br />

the month of first antenatal check-up, minimum number of antenatal<br />

check-ups that are recommended for pregnant women, the recommended<br />

number of doses of tetanus toxoid injections, important tests that a<br />

pregnant woman should undergo during pregnancy, types of pregnancies<br />

that may be categorised as risk pregnancies, and the common health<br />

problems experienced during pregnancy were asked to each respondent.<br />

With regard to the month of first antenatal check-up, majority of both<br />

those who were exposed and those who were not (75 percent and 71<br />

percent, respectively) reported that during the first trimester itself,<br />

antenatal check-up should be received. Similarly, a comparatively higher<br />

proportion of persons (35 percent) who were exposed reported six or more<br />

number of antenatal check-ups as the minimum that a pregnant woman<br />

should receive. To a question on the number of tetanus toxoid injections a<br />

pregnant woman should receive, more respondents from the exposed<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


, 5"<br />

40<br />

group reported two doses than non-exposed group (25 percent and 19<br />

percent).<br />

A relatively higher proportion of exposed group mentioned abdominal<br />

check-up (45 percent), urine test (36 percent) and blood test (35 percent)<br />

as the important tests that a woman should undergo during pregnancy.<br />

About half of the non-exposed category do not know about the important<br />

tests that a woman should undergo during pregnancy.<br />

To a question on what type of pregnancy is called risk pregnancy, 25<br />

percent of respondents who were exposed and only 4 percent of those who<br />

were not exposed reported that pregnancy under age 20 is a risk<br />

pregnancy, the difference being statistically significant. Too short a birth<br />

interval is considered as risk pregnancy by 12 and 3 percent of those who<br />

were exposed and who were not. A significantly higher proportion of<br />

those who were not exposed did not know about the type of pregnancy<br />

that is considered as risk pregnancy (82 percent against 55 percent).<br />

The reported major health problems that some women may experience<br />

during pregnancy are: swelling of hands and feet (17 percent of the<br />

exposed and 10 percent of the non-exposed), weakness or tiredness (17<br />

percent of the exposed and 17 percent of the non-exposed), bleeding (9<br />

percent of the exposed and 5 percent of the non-exposed) and abnormal<br />

presentation (12 percent of the exposed and 7 percent of the non-exposed).<br />

A relatively greater proportion of the exposed group mentioned delivery<br />

by trained professionals and sterile blade as precautionary measures that<br />

need to be taken during delivery.<br />

To a question on the family planning methods that couples can use if they<br />

want to space births, more than half of the persons exposed as well as nonexposed<br />

reported IUD. The results indicate that the two groups do not<br />

differ much with regard to the knowledge of oral pill as a spacing method.<br />

However, a relatively higher proportion of the exposed group reported<br />

condom as a spacing method (49 percent against 42 percent).<br />

In order to compare the awareness on AIDS between exposed and nonexposed<br />

groups, each respondent was first asked if she/he had ever heard<br />

of an illness called AIDS. Respondents who reported the knowledge of<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


41<br />

AIDS were asked further questions on the mechanisms of HIV<br />

transmission and the precautions a person can take to avoid AIDS.<br />

A greater proportion of exposed category and non-exposed category have<br />

heard of an illness called AIDS (89 percent and 87 percent). The correct<br />

knowledge of transmission of AIDS is also more among exposed category<br />

than non-exposed category. Majority of exposed persons who have heard<br />

of the disease (66 percent) reported sexual intercourse as a mode of<br />

transmission of AIDS followed by needles/blades/skin punctures (48<br />

percent), transfusion of infected blood (36 percent) and heterosexual<br />

intercourse (24 percent). The corresponding proportions for non-exposed<br />

category are: 53 percent, 38 percent, 28 percent and 22 percent. The<br />

proportion who did not know about the modes of transmission of AIDS is<br />

almost twice among the non-exposed than among the exposed (19 percent<br />

versus 8 percent).<br />

In order to understand the misconceptions among exposed persons and<br />

non-exposed persons about the disease, the respondents were asked if they<br />

thought that one could get AIDS from various commonly occurring social<br />

situations such as shaking hands with someone who has AIDS, sharing<br />

clothes or eating utensils with someone who has AIDS, or stepping on<br />

urine or stools of a person who has AIDS. Respondents were also asked<br />

whether they thought they could get AIDS from mosquito, flea or bedbugs<br />

bites. Medical professionals believe that these situations pose an<br />

extremely low risk of transmission of AIDS.<br />

Respondents who heard of AIDS have a number of misconceptions about<br />

the disease and not much difference was observed between these two<br />

groups in this regard. The most common misconception is that AIDS can<br />

be transmitted through mosquito/flea/bedbug bites (58 percent nonexposed<br />

and 63 percent exposed). About half of the exposed and nonexposed<br />

group believe that AIDS can be transmitted through stepping on<br />

urine.<br />

A greater proportion of exposed group than non-exposed group mentioned<br />

specific modes of prevention. ‘Safe sex’ and ‘sterilising needles and<br />

syringes’ are mentioned by 70 and 40 percent of exposed group and the<br />

corresponding percentages among non-exposed group are 68 and 27.<br />

Similarly, the proportion who did not know about the methods of<br />

prevention of AIDS is greater among the non-exposed (21 percent)<br />

compared with the exposed group (16 percent).<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


42<br />

To a specific question on whether a woman who has AIDS virus can give<br />

birth to a child with AIDS virus, 84 percent of the exposed category and<br />

79 percent of the non-exposed category answered in the affirmative. Onefifth<br />

of the non-exposed group do not know that whether it is possible for<br />

a woman who has AIDS virus to give birth to a child with AIDS virus.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


43<br />

Chapter<br />

:<br />

5<br />

At the instance of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW),<br />

Government of India, the Population Research Centre, JSS Institute of<br />

Economic Research, Dharwad undertook an evaluation of the scheme<br />

‘RCH-IEC Activities through <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong> (<strong>ZSS</strong>)’ in District<br />

Chitradurga, Karnataka. The Scheme itself aimed at (1) promoting the<br />

participation of <strong>ZSS</strong>s in organizing IEC activities in the area of reproductive<br />

and child health, who had ample experience in carrying out mass literacy<br />

campaigns throughout the country, and (2) development and dissemination<br />

of IEC materials for RCH in the local language in the acceptable folk<br />

media, incorporating local images and idioms, themes and talents, so that<br />

the substantial proportion of the rural population who are not exposed to the<br />

regular IEC activities of the Department of Health and Family Welfare are<br />

reached.<br />

The MOHFW, in consultation with the Department of Education, Ministry<br />

of Human Resource Development, Government of India, invited the<br />

proposals from various Deputy Commissioners/<strong>ZSS</strong>s for carrying out IEC<br />

activities for reproductive and child health. The guidelines for the project<br />

proposal were also sent to the Deputy Commissioners/<strong>ZSS</strong>s in 1998. The<br />

project proposals received from the <strong>ZSS</strong>s were scrutinized at MOHFW, and<br />

were sanctioned after due modifications, to 216 <strong>ZSS</strong>s. After the lapse of<br />

one year following the sanctioning of the scheme, the performance of the<br />

scheme is being evaluated with the main objectives of (1) assessing whether<br />

the activities have been carried out according to the proposal, (2) the<br />

utilization of funds for specific approved activities, (3) coordination with<br />

the local health personnel, (4) the probable impact of the scheme on<br />

knowledge and awareness of the target population and (5) the perceived<br />

strengths and the weaknesses of the scheme as per the <strong>ZSS</strong> and health<br />

personnel at various levels as well as the beneficiaries.<br />

The evaluation was conducted involving detailed discussions with the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

and health functionaries at the district, Taluka and village levels. In<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


44<br />

addition, a randomly selected sample of 58 opinion leaders and 120<br />

community members were interviewed with the help of a semi-structured<br />

questionnaire on exposure to different IEC activities related to health and<br />

family welfare as well as their knowledge on the selected RCH themes.<br />

The important observations made during the evaluation are summarized<br />

below:<br />

1. It is reported by the present <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary Chitradurga that the project<br />

proposal for the district was prepared based on the experience during a<br />

workshop organised by State Resource Centre (SRC), Mysore. The<br />

actual proposal was prepared with the help of the then Assistant<br />

Director, Women and Child Development and the District Health<br />

Education Officer, Chitradurga.<br />

2. The <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga submitted its project proposal to the Ministry on<br />

8 January, 1999 – almost 7 months after the first call for proposals and 3<br />

months after the second communication regarding the guidelines.<br />

3. The proposal submitted by the <strong>ZSS</strong> was approved with little<br />

modification and an amount of Rs. 4,50,000 was released to Secretary<br />

(Family Welfare), Government of Karnataka vide letter dated 31,<br />

March, 1999 and the same was communicated to the District<br />

Collector. However the funds for the scheme was released to the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

on 22 September, 1999 and the amount was received only on 1<br />

January, 2000. Thus, the time gap between the sanction of the fund at<br />

the central level and receipt of the same by the <strong>ZSS</strong> is about 9 months.<br />

The scheme was actually launched in Chitradurga district on 3<br />

December, 1999 – before receiving the funds.<br />

4. The proposal submitted to and approved by the MOHFW did not<br />

include any district-specific content or activity, although the guidelines<br />

for the scheme suggested the same.<br />

5. Both the guidelines and the proposal sanctioned do not indicate, in<br />

detail, the operationalization of the proposed IEC activities. For<br />

instance, the guidelines for the preparation of the proposal provide, in<br />

detail, the various subject matter that should be included in the IEC<br />

activities but do not reveal how these contents should actually be<br />

incorporated in specific activities such as Kalajatha, folk songs etc.<br />

Similarly, the proposal did not mention specifically, with respect to the<br />

orientation and training programmes, the topics to be covered, the<br />

resource persons to be used and how the trained persons will be<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


45<br />

utilised subsequently in the scheme. The proposal was silent about the<br />

number of street plays and folk songs to be developed. It does not<br />

provide the details regarding the number of troupes and number of<br />

artists per troupe and the level at which these performances are to be<br />

organised.<br />

6. The project proposal which was approved by MOHFW had a<br />

provision for Preraka/Anganwadi worker/ANM as co-ordinators and<br />

elected Gram Panchayat members and local school teacher as the<br />

members of the local team for the effective implementation of various<br />

IEC activities under the scheme. But during the evaluation, no such<br />

local team was identified in any of the villages covered for the<br />

evaluation.<br />

7. The following activities - to be organized at the District, Taluka and<br />

village levels – were sanctioned under the scheme to Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong>:<br />

a. Orientation workshops for officials/NGOs, 1 to be organized at the<br />

district level and 7 at the Taluka level<br />

b. Material Development Workshop, one each to develop posters,<br />

folk-songs, and street plays, to be organized by the <strong>ZSS</strong> at the<br />

district level<br />

c. Street plays – 100 performances<br />

d. Folk songs – 100 performances<br />

e. Posters – about 10,000 posters to be displayed<br />

f. Wall-writing – 500 in number<br />

g. Seminars/Workshops at Taluka, Panchayat and village levels – a<br />

total of 240 workshops to be organized<br />

h. District-level workshops – a total of five – involving elected<br />

representatives, representatives of the NGOs, women leaders,<br />

journalists and literacy workers.<br />

8. Each TSS was given an action plan according to which various Taluka<br />

and Gram Panchayat/village level activities under the scheme were<br />

implemented. The <strong>ZSS</strong> sanctioned the related funds to the TSS.<br />

9. Under orientation workshops for the officials/NGOs, it was proposed<br />

and approved to carry out a two-day <strong>ZSS</strong> level workshop for Rs. 5,000<br />

and 7 Taluka-level workshops (there are only 6 Talukas in Chitradurga<br />

district) at the cost of Rs. 1,000 per workshop, for 25-30 participants<br />

each. However, the two-day <strong>ZSS</strong>-level workshop has not been<br />

organized so far. Five Taluka-level orientation programmes for<br />

officials of various Government departments have been organized.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


46<br />

However, in some Talukas, this workshop was combined with some<br />

other Taluka-level workshops.<br />

10. The proposed activities under material development includes a twoday<br />

workshop on posters, two-day workshop on folk songs and a fiveday<br />

workshop on street plays. As against the proposal, the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

organized :<br />

a. a three-day workshop to develop the scripts for 4 street plays,12<br />

folk songs and 1 Rupaka,<br />

b. a three-day workshop for directors and artists for street plays and<br />

folksongs, and<br />

c. another three-day workshop for the artists at the Taluka level.<br />

Of the three workshops, two were conducted together for Davanagere<br />

and Chitradurga districts. No workshop was conducted for the<br />

development of posters, and the workshops were not organized<br />

separately for the development of street plays and folksongs.<br />

It is evident that the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> has taken very keen interest in<br />

developing the scripts for street plays and folk songs and also in<br />

directing and training 6 troupes each consisting of 12 performers, one<br />

troupe in each Taluka, for presentation of these street plays and folk<br />

songs.<br />

11. The sanctioned proposal included a provision for conducting 100<br />

performances each of street plays and folk songs, separately, by involving<br />

the local NGOs. However, the same troupe performed both the street<br />

plays and folksongs at one occasion, and they were combined to make the<br />

campaign more effective. The total number of street-play and folk song<br />

performances also were more than the number proposed – a total of 351<br />

performances.<br />

12. It was proposed to develop and print 10,000 posters under the scheme.<br />

The Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> printed 6,000 posters and 4,000 brochures showing<br />

important messages on RCH issues. However, these posters and<br />

brochures do not follow the principles of designing such communication<br />

materials, and suffer from several editorial errors.<br />

13. The proposed wall-writing activity has been initiated in four Talukas of<br />

the district. The messages are generally written on the walls of Gram<br />

Panchayats and other government buildings in villages and Government<br />

buildings located in Taluka head quarters.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


47<br />

14. In addition to these wall-writings, 9 hoardings were also erected at<br />

prominent places conveying messages on reproductive and child health.<br />

However, this activity was neither proposed nor sanctioned under the<br />

scheme.<br />

15. According to the sanctioned scheme, the <strong>ZSS</strong> had to organize 240<br />

seminars/workshops at Taluka/Gram Panchayat/Village levels for PRI<br />

representatives, literacy volunteers, women leaders, NGOs and neoliterates.<br />

However, a total of 8 Taluka-level workshops and 39 Gram<br />

Panchayat/Village level workshops covering 190 Gram Panchayats are<br />

reported to have been organized.<br />

16. It was proposed to organise five district-level workshops for<br />

representatives of Panchayati Raj Institutions and NGOs, women leaders,<br />

journalists and literacy workers. Instead, the <strong>ZSS</strong> instructed the six TSSs<br />

to carry out Taluka-level workshops exclusively for PRI representatives,<br />

and such workshops were organised in three Talukas.<br />

17. The <strong>ZSS</strong> and the DHO’s office together co-ordinated in almost all the<br />

activities under the scheme. The involvement was greater at the Taluka<br />

and Village-level activities – as the TMOs and MOs along various<br />

paramedical staff participated in the activities under the scheme. The<br />

contribution was in terms of resource persons, IEC materials, supply of<br />

ORS and contraceptives for demonstration purposes and transportation.<br />

18. Comparing the discussion with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary as well as the Taluka<br />

Co-ordinators, the Quarterly reports of activities and expenditure<br />

submitted to MOHFW, the following points need further clarifications:<br />

a) According to the Quarterly progress report submitted by<br />

Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> to MOHFW, New Delhi, an expenditure of Rs.<br />

6,635 is spent against 10 Orientation Workshops for<br />

Officials/NGOs. However, only five such orientation training<br />

programmes were reported to the evaluation team by the Taluka<br />

Co-ordinators and the total expenditure reported for this activity<br />

is Rs.5,270.<br />

b) Under the item – wall writing – it is reported that the <strong>ZSS</strong> has<br />

spent an amount of Rs. 24,900 in the month of July, 2000. But at<br />

the time of the evaluation, this activity was in progress only in<br />

four of the six Talukas.<br />

c) The <strong>ZSS</strong> has reported a total of 217 seminars/workshops at<br />

Taluka/GP/Village levels for an expenditure of Rs. 116,836.<br />

However, the Taluka Co-ordinators reported only 47 such<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


48<br />

seminars/workshops (8 Taluka-level and 39 Gram Panchayat<br />

level workshops covering 190 Gram Panchayats).<br />

d) An expenditure of Rs. 6,950 was shown against five district-level<br />

workshops. As discussed earlier this activity was changed to<br />

Workshop exclusively for PRI representatives at the Taluka<br />

level. At the time of evaluation study, i.e. on October, 2000, only<br />

three such workshops were reported to be organised exclusively<br />

for the PRI representatives at Taluka level and the total amount<br />

spent for these three workshops was Rs. 1,850.<br />

19. A large majority of the respondents (84 percent) reported an exposure to at<br />

least one IEC activity on health and family welfare during the year<br />

preceding the interview. The specific activities seen/participated, as<br />

reported by the respondents are: posters/hoarding/handbill – 68 percent;<br />

advertisement on television – 38 percent; street plays – 32 percent;<br />

folksongs – 26 percent; Orientation/training – 11 percent; Jatha – 11<br />

percent; and other activity – 4 percent. The exposure to any of the three<br />

activities carried out by <strong>ZSS</strong> (street plays, folksongs, and<br />

training/orientation programme) is to the extent of 42 percent of the<br />

respondents.<br />

20. Although street plays and folksongs were the major RCH-IEC activities<br />

carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong>, only around one-third of the respondents have<br />

seen these programmes. Even in villages where these activities are<br />

conducted (Out of the 12 villages selected for the study, 6 were the<br />

villages where the <strong>ZSS</strong> had organized street plays and folk songs), only 46<br />

and 32 percent have reported seeing street play and folksong<br />

performances, respectively. The orientation and training workshops,<br />

which were organized in 4 of the 12 villages selected, are attended by 11<br />

percent of the respondents, overall, and only 9 percent of the respondents<br />

from villages where this activity was performed.<br />

21. The street plays and folksongs are less likely to be seen by women,<br />

members of community who are not opinion leaders, and of course by the<br />

respondents from villages where the <strong>ZSS</strong> has not organized these<br />

programmes. On the other hand, orientation/training programmes are<br />

attended more by women, persons above age 25, persons who have<br />

studied beyond middle school, married persons, and opinion leaders. In<br />

fact, the orientation/training activity at the Gram Panchayat level catered<br />

mostly to the local Anganwadi teachers and female teachers of local<br />

school. Although the scheme aimed at exposing the poor and the illiterate<br />

persons to RCH messages, it is important to note that their exposure is<br />

limited to street plays and folk songs.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


49<br />

22. In general, the awareness on the measured RCH issues seems to be better<br />

among those who were exposed to either street play or folksong or<br />

orientation/training programme organized by <strong>ZSS</strong> compared to those who<br />

were not exposed to these activities.<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


50<br />

APPENDIX A<br />

TABLES<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


51<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


Table 1: Summary of activities sanctioned and conducted under RCH-IEC scheme by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

Activity Proposed/Sanctioned Status Date Place Resource persons Participants Specific activity<br />

Seven Taluka Level Workshops 5 organised April and Various DHEO, THO’s, MO’s Taluka Lecture on<br />

for 25-30 participants<br />

August, 2000 Taluka Head from General Hospital and Officials, various RCH<br />

Quarters One member from <strong>ZSS</strong>, Journalists, PRI issues<br />

Chitradurga<br />

representatives<br />

GP Secretaries<br />

Two-day workshop on folksongs 3 workshops were 28-30/12/99 Chitradurga DHO, Chitradurga; two 34 (District and 12 folksongs, 4<br />

held together for<br />

Health Educators from Taluka level streetplays and 1<br />

the development<br />

State Resource Centre, directors of both Rupaka on RCH<br />

of folksongs and<br />

Mysore; prominent script districts) messages were<br />

street plays<br />

writers of both Davanagere<br />

developed<br />

and Chitradurga districts<br />

Six-day workshop for street plays<br />

14-16/2/00 Thirtharam- Two resource persons from 31 (7 play Direction of the<br />

and folk songs<br />

eshwara, State Resource Centre, directors and 7 play and music<br />

Davanagere Mysore<br />

folk singers) for folksongs<br />

finalized<br />

3 days in Taluka level THO’s, State Resource 90 (in each 6 Troupes were<br />

March, 2000<br />

person, District Director, Taluka 15 artists trained in staging<br />

One member from <strong>ZSS</strong> were trained ) street plays and<br />

folksongs<br />

100 performances of street play Combined as one March- 351 villages Trained troupes Local leaders, Street plays and<br />

100 performances of folksongs activity; same July/2000 were covered<br />

Panchayat folksongs<br />

troupe performed<br />

members, local covering various<br />

both<br />

health personnel RCH issues<br />

and the public<br />

Two-day <strong>ZSS</strong> Level workshop Not conducted<br />

for 25-30 participants<br />

Two-day workshop on posters Not conducted


Table 1 (Contd): Summary of activities sanctioned and conducted under RCH-IEC scheme by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

Activity Proposed/Sanctioned Status Date Place Resource persons Participants Specific activity<br />

10,000 Posters<br />

6,000 posters were June, 2000 Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, District General Public About 1400<br />

printed (1500<br />

Co-ordinator, <strong>ZSS</strong> and<br />

posters were<br />

posters of 4<br />

DHEO<br />

distributed for<br />

different types)<br />

display in various<br />

GP’s<br />

4,000 brochures June, 2000 Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, District Distributed to Used in various<br />

were printed<br />

Co-ordinator, <strong>ZSS</strong> and participants of orientation<br />

DHEO<br />

various programmes<br />

orientation<br />

programmes<br />

500 Wall writings In progress September, Taluka’s and <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, District General Public Slogans on RCH<br />

2000 GP’s Co-ordinator, <strong>ZSS</strong> and<br />

were written in 10<br />

DHEO<br />

to 20 GP’s of 3<br />

Talukas<br />

240 Seminars/Workshops at 47 organised June- Various Local Medical Officers PRI<br />

Lectures on RCH<br />

Taluka/Panchayat/Village levels<br />

September, Taluka and and CDPOs<br />

representatives, issues<br />

2000 Hobli places<br />

literacy<br />

volunteers,<br />

women leaders,<br />

NGOs, neoliterates,<br />

Anganwadi<br />

workers and<br />

Lectures on RCH<br />

issues<br />

school teacher s<br />

PRI<br />

representatives<br />

Medical Officer and<br />

Lecturer in District<br />

Nursing School<br />

Taluka head<br />

quarters<br />

May-<br />

September,<br />

2000<br />

Changed to Taluka<br />

level workshops<br />

exclusively for<br />

elected<br />

represetatives and<br />

3 were orgnised<br />

Five District-level workshops for<br />

PRI representatives, NGOs,<br />

women leaders, Journalists and<br />

literacy workers<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />

2


Table 2: The number of street-play performances planned and organized in the Talukas of<br />

Chitradurga district under the RCH-IEC scheme.<br />

Date of<br />

inauguration of the<br />

Taluka Performances planned Performances organized programmes<br />

Chitradurga<br />

75<br />

72<br />

27 April, 2000<br />

Challakere<br />

60<br />

60<br />

10 April, 2000<br />

Hiriyur<br />

60<br />

57<br />

20 March, 2000<br />

Hosadurga<br />

60<br />

60<br />

21 April, 2000<br />

Holalkere<br />

60<br />

60<br />

22 April, 2000<br />

Molkalmuru<br />

40<br />

42<br />

10 April, 2000<br />

TOTAL<br />

Taluka<br />

Chitradurga<br />

Challakere<br />

Hiriyur<br />

Hosadurga<br />

Holalkere<br />

Molkalmuru<br />

TOTAL<br />

355<br />

351<br />

Table 3: The number of orientation programmes planned and organized by Talukas of Chitradurga<br />

District under RCH-IEC scheme.<br />

Taluka-level workshop GP-level workshop<br />

PlannOrga- Date Plan-ned Orga- GPs covered Date<br />

ednizednized 2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

12<br />

2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

8<br />

Apr/Sep., 2000<br />

June, 2000<br />

April, 2000<br />

Sep., 2000<br />

April, 2000<br />

July, 2000<br />

42<br />

33<br />

33<br />

33<br />

33<br />

33<br />

202<br />

11<br />

6<br />

4<br />

9<br />

8<br />

1<br />

39<br />

36<br />

39<br />

31<br />

33<br />

29<br />

16<br />

190<br />

July/Aug. 2000<br />

July, 2000<br />

Sept., 2000<br />

July, 2000<br />

August, 2000<br />

July, 2000


2<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


Total<br />

6,635<br />

12,000<br />

90,491<br />

37,242<br />

44,750<br />

24,900<br />

September<br />

2000<br />

700<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

August<br />

2000<br />

1,000<br />

-<br />

7,601<br />

490<br />

-<br />

-<br />

July<br />

2000<br />

-<br />

-<br />

6,000<br />

1,400<br />

-<br />

24,900<br />

June<br />

2000<br />

650<br />

-<br />

26,960<br />

13,960<br />

44,750<br />

-<br />

1,16,836<br />

6,950<br />

21,201<br />

8,556<br />

20,250<br />

5,100<br />

-<br />

1,050<br />

30,600<br />

18,50<br />

-<br />

1,127<br />

31,259<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

650<br />

-<br />

-<br />

6,379<br />

Table 4: Summary of the item-wise expenditure by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> under RCH-IEC Scheme<br />

Expenditure/Month<br />

Amount<br />

Activity<br />

Sanctioned March1 April May<br />

2000 2000 2000<br />

1. Orientation workshop for Officials/NGOs 12,000 - 4,285 -<br />

2. Material Development Workshop<br />

25,000 12,000 - -<br />

3. Street play<br />

1,00,000 5,250 35,980 8,700<br />

4. Folk songs<br />

50,000 2800 17,392 1,200<br />

5. Posters<br />

50,000 - - -<br />

6. Wall-writings<br />

25,000 - - -<br />

7. Seminars/Workshops at Taluka/GP/Village<br />

level<br />

1,20,000 31,077 3,000 -<br />

8. Five District-level Workshops<br />

9,000 - - -<br />

9. Miscellaneous programme expenses 23,000 8917 11,424 860<br />

10. Administrative expenses<br />

46,000 - - -<br />

Total 4,60,000 60,044 72,081 10,760 93,349 63,559 42,668 27,100 3,69,561


Table 5: Percentage distribution of respondents exposed to RCH-IEC activities by background characteristics, Chitradurga district<br />

Background characteristic Any IEC activity Exposed to RCH-IEC activity of <strong>ZSS</strong> Number<br />

Street play Folksong Orientation Any<br />

91<br />

87<br />

44.0<br />

40.2<br />

6.6<br />

14.9<br />

26.4<br />

25.3<br />

36.3<br />

27.6<br />

89.0<br />

78.2<br />

Sex<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

64<br />

114<br />

32.8<br />

47.4<br />

3.1<br />

14.1<br />

15.6<br />

31.6<br />

28.1<br />

34.2<br />

81.3<br />

85.1<br />

Age<br />


EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />

3


Table 6: Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to various RCH-IEC<br />

Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />

Exposed to IEC activity of<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong><br />

Item Yes No Total<br />

Age at marriage<br />

Legal minimum age at marriage for girls<br />

18 years<br />

Other<br />

Legal minimum age at marriage for boys<br />

21 years<br />

Other<br />

Child Care<br />

Till what age should a child be breastfed?<br />


2<br />

Table 6 (Contd.): Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to<br />

various RCH-IEC Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />

Exposed to IEC activity of<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong><br />

Item Yes No Total<br />

When a child is sick with diarrhoea, what signs of illness would tell that<br />

he/she should be taken to a health facility or health worker? 1<br />

Repeated watery stools<br />

Any watery stools<br />

Repeated vomiting<br />

Any vomiting<br />

Blood in stools<br />

Fever<br />

Marked thirst<br />

Not eating/not drinking well<br />

Getting sicker/very sick<br />

Not getting better<br />

Other<br />

Don’t know<br />

What is the vaccination given to children against TB?<br />

BCG<br />

Other<br />

Don’t know<br />

What is the vaccination given to children against diptheria, whooping<br />

cough and tetanus?<br />

DPT<br />

Other<br />

Don’t know<br />

What is the vaccination for polio?<br />

Polio<br />

Other<br />

Don’t know<br />

At what age should the child be given measles vaccine?<br />

9 months<br />

Other<br />

Total percent<br />

Number<br />

42.7<br />

26.7<br />

34.7<br />

28.0<br />

10.7<br />

34.7<br />

14.7<br />

17.3<br />

25.3<br />

28.0<br />

24.0<br />

2.7<br />

41.3<br />

10.7<br />

48.0<br />

33.3<br />

10.7<br />

56.0<br />

80.0<br />

4.0<br />

16.0<br />

28.0<br />

72.0<br />

100.0<br />

75<br />

46.6<br />

16.5<br />

35.9<br />

31.1<br />

4.9<br />

38.8<br />

14.6<br />

9.7<br />

12.6<br />

23.3<br />

18.5<br />

2.9<br />

31.2<br />

7.8<br />

61.2<br />

26.2<br />

8.7<br />

65.1<br />

78.6<br />

5.8<br />

15.5<br />

20.4<br />

79.6<br />

100.0<br />

103<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />

44.9<br />

20.8<br />

35.4<br />

29.8<br />

7.3<br />

37.1<br />

14.6<br />

12.9<br />

15.0<br />

25.3<br />

20.8<br />

2.8<br />

35.3<br />

9.0<br />

55.6<br />

29.2<br />

9.6<br />

61.2<br />

79.2<br />

5.1<br />

15.7<br />

23.6<br />

76.4<br />

100.0<br />

178


3<br />

Table 6 (Contd.): Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to<br />

various RCH-IEC Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />

Exposed to IEC activity of<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong><br />

Item Yes No Total<br />

Maternal care<br />

At what month of pregnancy should a pregnant mother receive her first<br />

antenatal checkup?<br />

1 st trimester<br />

2 nd trimester<br />

3 rd trimester<br />

Don’t Know<br />

What is the minimum number of antenatal checkups that are<br />

recommended for a pregnant woman?<br />


4<br />

Table 6 (Contd.): Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to<br />

various RCH-IEC Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />

Exposed to IEC activity of<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong><br />

Item Yes No Total<br />

What are the health problems that some women may experience during<br />

pregnancy which are dangerous to the health and life of the mother as<br />

well as the child? 1<br />

Swelling of hands and feet<br />

Paleness<br />

Weakness or tiredness<br />

Dizziness<br />

Visual disturbances<br />

Bleeding<br />

Convulsion<br />

Weak or no movement of foetus<br />

Abnormal presentation<br />

Other<br />

Don’t know<br />

What are different precautions that need to be taken during delivery? 1<br />

Use of DDK<br />

Hospital delivery<br />

Delivery by trained person<br />

Delivery in a clean place<br />

Use of sterile blade<br />

Use of sterile thread<br />

Other<br />

Don’t know<br />

Family Planning<br />

What are the family planning methods that couples can use if they want<br />

to space births? 1<br />

IUD<br />

Oral pill<br />

Condom<br />

Rhythm/periodic abstinence<br />

Other<br />

Don’t know<br />

AIDS<br />

Have you heard of an illness called AIDS?<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Total percent<br />

Number<br />

17.3<br />

0.0<br />

17.3<br />

5.3<br />

1.3<br />

9.3<br />

2.7<br />

9.3<br />

12.0<br />

24.0<br />

49.3<br />

2.6<br />

66.7<br />

33.3<br />

0.0<br />

8.0<br />

2.7<br />

2.7<br />

30.6<br />

54.7<br />

49.3<br />

49.3<br />

4.0<br />

8.0<br />

25.3<br />

89.3<br />

10.7<br />

100.0<br />

75<br />

10.4<br />

1.9<br />

16.5<br />

11.7<br />

1.9<br />

4.9<br />

1.0<br />

6.8<br />

6.8<br />

9.7<br />

58.3<br />

0.0<br />

67.0<br />

29.1<br />

0.0<br />

3.9<br />

4.9<br />

4.9<br />

24.3<br />

54.4<br />

50.5<br />

41.7<br />

2.9<br />

11.7<br />

21.3<br />

87.4<br />

12.6<br />

100.0<br />

103<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />

13.4<br />

1.1<br />

16.9<br />

9.0<br />

1.7<br />

6.7<br />

1.7<br />

7.9<br />

9.0<br />

15.7<br />

54.5<br />

1.1<br />

66.8<br />

30.9<br />

0.0<br />

5.6<br />

3.9<br />

2.8<br />

27.0<br />

54.5<br />

50.0<br />

44.9<br />

3.4<br />

10.1<br />

23.0<br />

88.2<br />

11.8<br />

100.0<br />

178


5<br />

Table 6 (Contd.): Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to<br />

various RCH-IEC Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />

Exposed to IEC activities<br />

of <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

Item Yes No Total<br />

AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE HEARD OF AIDS:<br />

How is AIDS transmitted? 1<br />

Sexual intercourse<br />

Homosexual intercourse<br />

Heterosexual intercourse<br />

Needles/blades/skin puncture<br />

Mother to child<br />

Transfusion of infected blood<br />

Other<br />

Don’t know<br />

Do you think that one can get AIDS from:<br />

Shaking hands<br />

Hugging<br />

Kissing<br />

Sharing clothes<br />

Sharing eating utensils<br />

Stepping on urine/stool<br />

Mosquito/flea/bedbug bites<br />

How do you think one can avoid AIDS? 1<br />

Using condom during intercourse<br />

Safe sex<br />

Checking blood prior to blood transfusion<br />

Sterilizing needles and syringes<br />

Avoiding pregnancy when having AIDS<br />

Other<br />

Don’t know<br />

Is it possible for a woman who has the AIDS virus to give birth to a child<br />

with AIDS virus?<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Don’t know<br />

Total percent<br />

Number who have heard of AIDS<br />

1<br />

The total does not add to 100.0 because multiple responses were allowed<br />

65.7<br />

0.0<br />

23.8<br />

47.8<br />

10.5<br />

35.8<br />

5.9<br />

7.5<br />

25.4<br />

32.8<br />

46.3<br />

37.3<br />

38.8<br />

49.2<br />

58.2<br />

20.9<br />

70.2<br />

14.9<br />

40.3<br />

1.5<br />

17.9<br />

16.4<br />

83.6<br />

3.0<br />

13.4<br />

100.0<br />

67<br />

53.3<br />

1.1<br />

22.2<br />

37.8<br />

8.9<br />

27.8<br />

4.4<br />

18.9<br />

25.6<br />

33.3<br />

44.4<br />

44.2<br />

46.7<br />

50.0<br />

63.3<br />

18.9<br />

67.8<br />

12.2<br />

26.7<br />

4.4<br />

16.7<br />

21.1<br />

78.9<br />

1.1<br />

20.0<br />

100.0<br />

90<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />

58.6<br />

0.6<br />

22.9<br />

42.0<br />

9.5<br />

31.2<br />

5.2<br />

14.1<br />

25.5<br />

33.1<br />

45.2<br />

40.1<br />

43.3<br />

49.7<br />

61.1<br />

19.8<br />

68.8<br />

13.4<br />

32.5<br />

3.2<br />

17.2<br />

19.1<br />

80.9<br />

1.9<br />

17.2<br />

100.0<br />

157


6<br />

APPENDIX B<br />

QUESTIONNAIRES<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


! " #<br />

6 5 $ ; $ $ " * " " " " ?<br />

3. Who are the persons/ agencies consulted during the project proposal<br />

preparation?<br />

4. How much time was taken to prepare and finalize the proposal?<br />

5. When was the project proposal submitted? RECORD DATE<br />

6. When did you receive the sanctioning letter from MOHFW? RECORD<br />

DATE<br />

7. Was the proposal accepted by MOHFW in total or were there<br />

modification suggested?<br />

8. IF MODIFIED: What were the specific modifications done to the<br />

proposal?<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


8<br />

9. When did you receive the funds for the project? RECORD DATE<br />

10. When did you actually launch the project? RECORD DATE<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


9<br />

11. IF THE TIME GAP BETWEEN RECEIVING FUNDS AND<br />

LAUNCHING OF THE PROGRAM IS GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS,<br />

ASK <strong>FOR</strong> THE REASONS:<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

1. Orientation workshops/awareness camps/seminars:<br />

12. Was there any orientation workshop/awareness camp conducted as<br />

a part of this project?<br />

13. IF NO RECORD REASONS:<br />

14. IF YES: How many?<br />

15. IF THE NUMBER OF WORKSHOPS/CAMPS REPORTED IS<br />

DIFFERENT FROM THE PROPOSED NUMBER, PROBE AND<br />

RECORD EXPLANATIONS<br />

16. <strong>FOR</strong> EACH WORKSHOP/CAMP RECORD:<br />

Date (From and To):<br />

Place (village/town):<br />

Target group (For whom was this orientation workshop/camp<br />

organized?):<br />

Level at which organized (District/Taluka/GP/Village):<br />

List of participants by name, affiliation and designation (OBTAIN FROM<br />

THE <strong>ZSS</strong>):<br />

Programmes (OBTAIN A COPY OF THE PROGRAM SHEET):<br />

Topics covered:<br />

Resource persons – Name, affiliation and designation:<br />

Was there any report prepared on this workshop/camp/seminar? IF YES,<br />

OBTAIN A COPY<br />

The total amount spent on the workshop/camp/seminar:<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


2. IEC Materials developed:<br />

9>0 9>0 "<br />

"<br />

10<br />

17. Was any IEC material developed under this project?<br />

If No: Why?<br />

18. IF NO, RECORD REASONS<br />

19. IF YES: What are the different types of materials developed?<br />

(RECORD IN TERMS OF POSTERS, FOLK SONGS, STREET PLAYS,<br />

HOARDINGS, PAMPHLETS HANDBILL ETC.)<br />

20. <strong>FOR</strong> EACH TYPE OF MATERIAL, RECORD THE FOLLOWING:<br />

The method of development of the material (through workshop, contract):<br />

Resource persons involved in material development:<br />

Artists involved in material development:<br />

Topics covered:<br />

Time taken to develop the material:<br />

Target Group:<br />

Number produced:<br />

Number in stock:<br />

Number distributed:<br />

Method of distribution (channels of distribution):<br />

GP’s covered for the distribution:<br />

Whether the material reflects local culture, theme, medium, health<br />

problems, etc?<br />

IF YES: Examples of inclusion of such local culture, theme, medium,<br />

health problems, etc.<br />

Total cost for this activity:<br />

OBTAIN A SAMPLE OF THE MATERIAL DEVELOPED:<br />

Under the project did the <strong>ZSS</strong> conduct any mass campaign? (eg., Jatha,<br />

hoardings, wall-writings, street play, folk songs, concention/public<br />

meetings/counselling, competitions, handbill distribution,)<br />

IF NO RECORD REASONS:<br />

IF YES: What are the different types of campaigns carried out?<br />

<strong>FOR</strong> EACH TYPE OF CAMPAIGH, RECORD THE FOLLOWING AS<br />

APPROPRIATE:<br />

Total number of times the campaign was organized:<br />

On which occasion/s?<br />

Date/s:<br />

Place/s (OBTAIN THE LIST OF PLACES):<br />

Who organized? (<strong>ZSS</strong>, TSS, VSS)<br />

Resource persons/arists?<br />

Target groups:<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


'<br />

11<br />

Content/s:<br />

Coverage (number of persons reached)<br />

Total cost for this activity:<br />

COMPARE THE ACTIVITIES REPORTED WITH THE ACTIVITIES<br />

PROPOSED. IF DIFFERENT, PROBE AND RECORD<br />

EXPLANATION.<br />

OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE<br />

What is the budget sanctioned for this scheme?<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


12<br />

) ' ' 7! 7! ), ),<br />

0 0 ,) ,) 3 3<br />

0 0 )1 )1 @<br />

@<br />

1 1 )1<br />

)1<br />

0 5 "<br />

0 5<br />

, , 0 0 )71 )71 ! ! 1 1<br />

,, ,, , , )0 )0 0 0 ) )71 ) 71<br />

1 1 )1 )1 ! ! )' )' 1 1<br />

) ) A!& A!& 1 1 )1<br />

)1<br />

)' )' 1 1 ,7&& ,7&& ) ) 70 7<br />

0 1 1 & & ) ) )71<br />

)71<br />

0 0 1 1 1 1 '@ '@ 1 1<br />

,) ,) ,)&& ,)&&)3 ,)&& )3 1.B 1.B<br />

1.B<br />

Whether quotations have been called?<br />

Yes for all occasions<br />

Yes for few occasions<br />

No<br />

Whether payments are supported by stamped receipts?<br />

Yes for all occasions<br />

Yes for few occasions<br />

No<br />

3 3 % % ?<br />

?<br />

) ) C<br />

C<br />

What was the involvement of DHO/other IEC officers in FW department/<br />

other district health and family welfare officers in the planning and<br />

implementation of the project?<br />

PROBE <strong>FOR</strong>:<br />

The persons involved: Name, affiliation, designation<br />

In what capacity was he/she involved:<br />

At what stage (planning, implementation, review, training/orientation,<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


0<br />

13<br />

monitoring)<br />

Problems of coordination, if any:<br />

Are you using any of the IEC materials that are used in the routine IEC<br />

activities of the DHO?<br />

How is the scheme implementation monitored by the <strong>ZSS</strong>?<br />

Was there any evaluation study conducted by <strong>ZSS</strong>?<br />

RECORD DETAILS<br />

What is the reporting mechanism of the programme from GP-TSS-<strong>ZSS</strong>?<br />

How many review meetings were conducted?<br />

At what levels?<br />

How often it is conducted?<br />

What is reviewed?<br />

When was the last meeting held?<br />

What is the follow-up action taken?<br />

What is your perception of the impact of the scheme?<br />

If you are asked to submit a new project proposal, which of the activities<br />

that you have already carried out will be included and which activities will<br />

be excluded?<br />

RECORD REASONS:<br />

Would you like to include some new items to this proposal?<br />

IF YES: Which activities will be included?<br />

How do you think the IEC activities that you are carrying out under the<br />

scheme is different from the regular IEC activities conducted by the<br />

Department of Family Welfare?<br />

In your opinion, the IEC activities proposed/conducted through the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

are more effective, less effective or of the same effectiveness compared<br />

to the regular IEC activities carried out by the Department of Family<br />

Welfare?<br />

RECORD REASONS<br />

What are the difficulties/bottlenecks that you experienced in<br />

implementing the project in the following aspects?<br />

Finance:<br />

Organization:<br />

Implementation:<br />

Coordination:<br />

Monitoring:<br />

What are your suggestions for overcoming these problems/for improving<br />

the scheme?<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


14<br />

QUESTIONNAIRE <strong>FOR</strong> HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE<br />

FUNCTIONARIES<br />

Name:<br />

Designation:<br />

Were you/your Department involved in the preparation of the project plan<br />

by the <strong>ZSS</strong>? [DHO and DMO]<br />

, @ B $ $ 5 5 45 " %<br />

" " " * " ?<br />

Did you/anyone from your Department participate in any of the activities<br />

carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong> under the scheme?<br />

, @ B 3 5 4" 5<br />

" $ ?<br />

Training/Orientation?<br />

Material Development?<br />

Mass campaign?<br />

Any other activities?<br />

Did you supply the <strong>ZSS</strong> (for use in the scheme) any of the IEC materials<br />

generally used by your Department?<br />

In your opinion, what was the need for involving <strong>ZSS</strong> in the RCH IEC<br />

efforts?<br />

What is your perception of the impact of the scheme?<br />

In what way, according to you, the IEC activities that are being carried<br />

out by <strong>ZSS</strong> under the scheme is different from the regular IEC activities<br />

conducted by your Department?<br />

In your opinion, the IEC activities proposed/conducted through the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />

are more effective, less effective or of the same effectiveness compared<br />

to the regular IEC activities carried out by your Department?<br />

RECORD REASONS<br />

Do you think that the <strong>ZSS</strong> should continue to be involved in this way in<br />

the RCH-IEC activities?<br />

RECORD REASONS:<br />

What are the IEC needs of the District that are satisfied through this<br />

scheme of the <strong>ZSS</strong>?<br />

What are the other activities that you suggest should be included by the<br />

<strong>ZSS</strong> if they are asked to prepare a fresh proposal?<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


! " #<br />

6 5 $ ;


(> (> B<br />

B<br />

/> /> /> BB<br />

B B<br />

9>. 9>. ! ! 5 5 B<br />

B<br />

:>6 :>6 :>6 B<br />

B<br />

;>1 ;>1 ;>1 " " " B<br />

B<br />

16<br />

1. Opinion Leader<br />

2. Community member ⇐ 7<br />

D> D> 5" 5" "B<br />

"B<br />

E>1 E>1 " " B<br />

$ $ B<br />

B<br />

F>1 F>1 $ $ $ B<br />

B<br />

'<br />

10. Sex of the respondent:<br />

1. Male<br />

2. Female<br />

11. How old were you at your last birth day? (RECORD AGE IN<br />

!<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


17<br />

COMPLETED YEARS):<br />

12. What is your current marital status?<br />

1. Currently married<br />

2. Separated<br />

3. Widowed<br />

4. Divorced<br />

5. Never married<br />

13. Have you ever attended any literacy classes?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


18<br />

14. Can you read and write?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No<br />

15.What is the highest grade you have completed? (RECORD GRADE)<br />

16. To which religion do you belong?<br />

1. Hindu<br />

2. Muslim<br />

3. Christian<br />

4. Jain<br />

5. Other<br />

17. To which caste do you belong? (RECORD NAME OF THE CASTE)<br />

8" 4! "<br />

18. During the last one year, did you see/ participate in any kind of<br />

activity where people were given information on health and family<br />

welfare?<br />

1.Yes<br />

2. No ⇐20<br />

19. What are the different activities did you see/participate? (RECORD<br />

ALL ACTIVITIES MENTIONED)<br />

20. During the last one year, did you attend any orientation<br />

workshop/seminar/awareness camp on health and family welfare<br />

aspects?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No ⇐31<br />

21. How many such workshops/seminars/camps did you attend during<br />

the last one year?<br />

22. [Now I would like to ask some more details about the<br />

workshop/seminar/camp that you last attended.] Who had organized this<br />

orientation workshop/seminar/awareness camp?<br />

23. Who had asked you to participate in this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


19<br />

24. Where was this workshop/seminar/camp organized?<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


20<br />

25. How many days in advance did you come to know about this<br />

programme?<br />

26. What was the duration of this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />

27. Through which method was this orientation/training given? RECORD ALL<br />

MODES<br />

1. Lecture<br />

2. Question-answer<br />

3. Demonstration<br />

4. Exhibition<br />

5. Posters/pamphlets<br />

6. Other<br />

28. Who were the resource persons in this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />

29. What were the different topics covered in this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />

30. In your opinion, what is the most important message that you have received<br />

during this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />

31. During the last one year, did you see any street play carrying messages on<br />

health and family welfare aspects?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No⇐ 43<br />

9/> $ 5 " 5 5 5 ?<br />

33. [Now I would like to ask you some more details about the street play that you<br />

saw the last time]. Where was this street play organized?<br />

34. Who had organized this street play?<br />

35. On what occasion was this street play organized?<br />

36. For how long was this street play staged?<br />

37. Was there any publicity about the street play before it was staged?<br />

38. What was the name/s of the street play that you saw last?<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


21<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


39. What are the different themes covered by each of the street plays? RECORD<br />

THE THEME BY TITLE<br />

40. How do you rate the street play? Do you think the street play was satisfactory or<br />

not satisfactory?<br />

41. What is the most important message that you received from this street play?<br />

22<br />

42. What suggestions would you give to make these street plays more<br />

effective?<br />

43. During the last one year, did you listen to any folk song carrying messages on<br />

health and family welfare aspects?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No⇐53<br />

44. Is this folk song performed separately?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No<br />

45. How many times, during the last one year, did you listen to these folksongs?<br />

46. Through what medium did you listen to these folk songs?<br />

1. Stage performance<br />

2. Street performance<br />

3. Radio<br />

4. Television<br />

5. Cassette<br />

6. Printed material<br />

7. Any other (Specify)<br />

47. Who had organized these folk songs?<br />

48. Where was this organized?<br />

49. On which occasion was folk songs programme organized?<br />

50. What was the duration of this folk songs programme?<br />

51. What are the different topics covered by these folk songs?<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


52. What is the most important message that you received through these folk<br />

songs?<br />

53. During the last one year, did you see (show some poster/hand bills) any<br />

posters/wall writings/hand bills/hoarding carrying messages on health and<br />

family welfare aspects?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No⇐59<br />

54. Which one did you see, posters, handbills or wall-writings? RECORD ALL<br />

1. Posters<br />

2. Wall-writings<br />

3. Handbills<br />

4. Hoardings<br />

5. Others (Specify)<br />

55. How many such items in total did you see during the last one year?<br />

56. Where did you see them?<br />

57. What are the different topics that were covered by these posters/handbills/wallwritings?<br />

58. What is the most important message that you received from these<br />

posters/handbills/wall-writings?<br />

59. During the last one year, did you see any advertisement on TV carrying<br />

messages<br />

on health and family welfare aspects?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No⇐63<br />

60. How many advertisements did you see on TV?<br />

23<br />

61. On what topic/s was the advertisement?<br />

62. What is the most important message that you received from this advertisement?<br />

63. During the last one year, did you see/participate in any jatha/rallies<br />

displaying/carrying messages on health and family welfare aspects?<br />

1. Yes<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


2. No⇐71<br />

64. How many such jathas/rallies did you see/participate?<br />

24<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


65. [Now I would like to ask you some more details on the jatha/rally that you<br />

attended the last time.] Who had organized this jatha/rally?<br />

66. Where was this programme organized?<br />

67. On what occasion was this programme organized?<br />

68. Who else had participated in this programme?<br />

69. What was/were the theme/s covered by this jatha/rally?<br />

70. What is the most important message that you received from this jatha/rally?<br />

25<br />

71. During the last one year, did you participate in any essay<br />

competition/debate in your area on health and family welfare issues?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No⇐78<br />

72. How many such competitions did you participate during the last one<br />

year?<br />

73. Who had organized this competition?<br />

74. Where was this organized?<br />

75. Who were the participants in this competition?<br />

76. On what topic/s the competition was organized?<br />

77. What is the most important message that you received through this competition?<br />

78. CHECK QUESTION 18 AND MARK:<br />

1. Has seen/participated in any IEC activity<br />

2. Has not seen/partcipated in any IEC activity ⇐80<br />

79. Did you share the knowledge that you received through these programmes with<br />

any other person?<br />

1. Yes<br />

2. No<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


Knowledge on health and family welfare issues<br />

80 What is the legal minimum age at marriage for the girls<br />

in India?<br />

81 What is the legal minimum age at marriage for the boys<br />

in India?<br />

82 Till what age should a child be breastfed?<br />

83 How soon after childbirth should the child be put to<br />

breast, for the first time?<br />

84 In you opinion, should the first breastmilk be given to<br />

the child or should it be discarded?<br />

85 What should one do if a child suffers from diarrhoea?<br />

26<br />

RECORD ALL MENTIONED<br />

86 When a child has diarrhoea, should he/she be given less<br />

to drink than usual, about the same amount, or more than<br />

usual?<br />

87 When a child is sick with diarrhoea, what signs of<br />

illness would tell you that he or she should be taken to<br />

a health facility or health worker?<br />

88 What is the vaccination given to children against<br />

tuberculosis?<br />

89 At what age should the child be given BCG vaccination?<br />

RECORD ‘7’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘7 AND ABOVE’<br />

AGE IN YEARS……………………………………………………….<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />

AGE IN YEARS……………………………………………………….<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />

AGE IN MONTHS……………………………………………………….<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />

IMMEDIATELY……………………………………………………….……00<br />

HOURS…………………………………………………………….…….1<br />

DAYS……………………………………………………………..………2<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />

SHOULD BE GIVEN……………………………………….……….1<br />

SHOULD BE DISCARDED………………………………..….2<br />

TAKE TO DOCTOR………………………………………………..……A<br />

GIVE ORS……………………………………………………………..………B<br />

GIVE MORE LIQUIDS………………………………………….……C<br />

GIVE MEDICINES………………………………………………..….D<br />

OTHER K<br />

(SPECIFY)<br />

DK………………………………………………………………………………..……X<br />

LESS TO DRINK……………………………………………………...1<br />

ABOUT SAME AMOUNT TO DRINK…………………...2<br />

MORE TO DRINK………………………………………………..…..3<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />

REPEATED WATERY STOOLS………………………..…..A<br />

ANY WATERY STOOLS………………………………………....B<br />

REPEATED VOMITING…………………………………………..…C<br />

ANY VOTMITTING……………………………………………..…..D<br />

BLOOD IN STOOLS……………………………………………..….E<br />

FEVER…………………………………………………………………………..…F<br />

MARKED THIRST……………………………………………………...G<br />

NOT EATING/NOT DRINKING WELL……………..…H<br />

GETTING SICKER/VERY SICK……………………..……I<br />

NOT GETTING BETTER……………………………………....J<br />

OTHER K<br />

(SPECIFY)<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..…….X<br />

BCG………………………………………..…………………………………...1<br />

OTHER…………………………………………………..…………………...2<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />

AGE IN MONTHS………………………………………………...……<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


NO. QUESTIONS CODING CATEGORIES<br />

90 What is the vaccination given to children against<br />

diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus?<br />

91 In total, how many doses of DPT should be given?<br />

RECORD ‘8’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘DON’T KNOW’<br />

92 What is the vaccination given to children against polio?<br />

93 In total, how many doses of polio vaccine should be<br />

given? RECORD ‘8’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘DON’T KNOW’<br />

94 At what age should the child be given measles<br />

vaccination?<br />

95 At what month of pregnancy should a pregnant mother<br />

receive her first antenatal checkup?<br />

RECORD ‘7’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘7 AND ABOVE’<br />

96 What is the minimum number of antenatal check ups that<br />

are recommended for a pregnant woman?<br />

RECORD ‘7’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘7 AND ABOVE’<br />

97 How many doses of tetanus toxoid injections are<br />

recommended during pregnancy?<br />

98 What are the important tests that a woman should undergo<br />

during pregnancy?<br />

27<br />

RECORD ALL MENTIONED<br />

99 What type of pregnancy is considered as risk pregnancy?<br />

RECORD ALL MENTIONED<br />

DPT………………………………………..…………………………………...1<br />

OTHER…………………………………………………..…………………...2<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />

NUMBER OF DPT DOSES……………………………..……..<br />

POLIO…………………………………..…………………………………...1<br />

OTHER…………………………………………………..…………………...2<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />

NUMBER OF POLIO DOSES……………………………..……..<br />

AGE IN MONTHS……………………………………………….<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />

MONTHS……………………………………………………..………………..<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />

NUMBER OF ANC CHECKUPS……………………..……..<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />

NUMBER OF TT INJECTIONS…………………..……..<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />

HEIGHT……………………………………………………………………….………A<br />

WEIGHT……………………………………………………………………..…….B<br />

ABDOMINAL CHECKUP…………………………………………..….C<br />

INTERNAL EXAMINATION……………………………………...D<br />

BLOOD TEST……………………………………………………………..….E<br />

URINE TEST…………………………………………………………..…..F<br />

BLOOD PRESSURE TEST…………………………………..…..G<br />

X-RAY………………………………………………………………………..…..H<br />

SONOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………..…..I<br />

AMNIOSYNTESIS…………………………………………………..…..J<br />

OTHER K<br />

(SPECIFY)<br />

DK……………………………………………………………………………..……….X<br />

FIRST PREGNANCY……………………………………………………..A<br />

SHORT STATURED MOTHER……………………………….………B<br />

PREGNANCY UNDER 20……………………………………..…….C<br />

PREGNANCY AFTER 30………………………………………..….D<br />

THIRD OR HIGHER ORDER BIRTHS………………...E<br />

PREVIOUS INTERVAL TOO SHORT………………..….F<br />

OTHER K<br />

(SPECIFY)<br />

DK………………………………………………………………………………..…….X<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


NO. QUESTIONS CODING CATEGORIES<br />

100 What are the health problems that some women may<br />

experience during pregnancy, which are dangerous to the<br />

health and life of the mother as well as the child?<br />

101 What are the different precautions that need to be taken<br />

during delivery?<br />

102 What are the five important ‘cleanliness measures’ that<br />

one should follow during delivery?<br />

103 What are the family planning methods that the couple can<br />

use if they want to space births?<br />

104 Have you heard of an illness called AIDS?<br />

105 How is AIDS transmitted?<br />

28<br />

SWELLING OF HANDS AND FEET………………….………A<br />

PALENESS……………………..……………………………………..…….B<br />

WEAKNESS OR TIREDNESS………………………………..….C<br />

DIZZINESS……………………………………………..………………...D<br />

VIUSAL DISTURBANCES…………………………..……..….E<br />

BLEEDING………………………………………………………………..…….F<br />

CONVULSIONS………………………………………………………..…..G<br />

WEAK OR NO MOVEMENT OF FOETUS…………..……H<br />

ABNORMAL PRESENTATION………………………………....I<br />

OTHER K<br />

(SPECIFY)<br />

DK………………………………………………………………………………..…….X<br />

USE OF DDK……………………..………………………………………..A<br />

HOSPITAL DELIVERY………………………………………………..B<br />

DELIVERY BY TRAINED PERSON………………………..C<br />

DELIVERY IN A CLEAN PLACE.…………………....D<br />

USE OF STERILE BLADES……………………………………..E<br />

USE OF STERILE THREAD………………………………....F<br />

OTHER K<br />

(SPECIFY)<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X<br />

CLEAN PLACE……………………..……………………………………..A<br />

CLEAN HANDS.………………..………………………………………..B<br />

CLEAN THREAD…………………………………..……………………..C<br />

CLEAN BLADE……..………………………..…………………....D<br />

CLEAN UMBELICAL CORD.……………………………………..E<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X<br />

IUD/LOOP/COPPER-T………………………………………………..A<br />

ORAL PILL……………………………………………………………………..B<br />

CONDOM……………………………………………………………………………..C<br />

RHYTHM/PERIODIC ABSTINENCE…………………....D<br />

WITHDRAWAL…………………………………………………………………..E<br />

OTHER K<br />

(SPECIFY)<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X<br />

YES…………………………………………………………………………………………1<br />

NO……………………………………………………………………………………...2<br />

SEXUAL INTERCOURSE…………………………………………...A<br />

HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE……………………………....B<br />

HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE………………………….….C<br />

NEEDLES/BLADES/SKIN PUNCTURE……………..….D<br />

MOTHER TO CHILD………………………………………………....E<br />

TRANSFUSION OF INFECTED BLOOD…………..….F<br />

OTHER K<br />

(SPECIFY)<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA


NO. QUESTIONS CODING CATEGORIES<br />

106 Is it possible for a woman who has the AIDS virus to<br />

give birth to a child with AIDS virus?<br />

107 Do you think that one can get AIDS from:<br />

29<br />

Shaking hands with someone who has AIDS?<br />

Hugging someone who has AIDS?<br />

Kissing someone who has AIDS?<br />

Wearing the clothes of someone who has AIDS?<br />

Sharing eating utensils with someone who has AIDS?<br />

Stepping on the urine or stool of someone with AIDS?<br />

Mosquito, flea or bedbug bites?<br />

YES…………………………………………………………………………………...1<br />

NO……………………………………………………………………………………..…2<br />

DK………………………………………………………………………………………..8<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />

YES NO DK<br />

HAND SHAKING………………………………………..1 2 8<br />

HUGGING……………..…………………………………..1 2 8<br />

KISSING……….…………………………………………..1 2 8<br />

SHARING CLOTHES………………………………..1 2 8<br />

SHARING EATING UTENSILS…………..1 2 8<br />

STEPPING ON URINE/STOOL…………….1 2 8<br />

MOSQUITO/FLEA/BEDBUG BITES…….1 2 8<br />

108 How do you think one can avoid AIDS? USING CONDOMS DURING EACH<br />

SEXUAL INTERCOURSE…………………………………………….A<br />

SAFE SEX……………………………………………………………………..…B<br />

CHECKING BLOOD PRIOR TO<br />

TRANSFUSION………………………………………………………....C<br />

STERILIZING NEEDLES AND<br />

SYRINGES <strong>FOR</strong> INJECTION…………………………….….D<br />

AVOIDING PREGNANCY WHEN<br />

HAVING AIDS VIRUS………………………………………..….E<br />

OTHER K<br />

(SPECIFY)<br />

DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X


APPENDIX C<br />

List of persons involved in the evaluation<br />

Principal Investigators<br />

Dr. B.M. Ramesh<br />

Dr. S. Rajaram<br />

Mr. R.V. Deshpande<br />

Field Investigators<br />

Mr. G.C. Jadar<br />

Mr. A.S. Kulkarni<br />

Mrs. A.S. Joshi<br />

Mrs. H.W. Hombal<br />

Mr. K.E.T. Rajarama<br />

Mrs. M.N. Korkoppa<br />

30<br />

EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!