Zilla Saksharata Samitis INTERVIEW GUIDELINES FOR ZSS ... - PRC
Zilla Saksharata Samitis INTERVIEW GUIDELINES FOR ZSS ... - PRC
Zilla Saksharata Samitis INTERVIEW GUIDELINES FOR ZSS ... - PRC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
! "<br />
#<br />
$<br />
S. Rajaram<br />
R.V. Deshpande<br />
Report prepared for<br />
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi<br />
<strong>PRC</strong> Report No. 113<br />
February 2001<br />
DRAFT REPORT
%<br />
List of Tables<br />
Chapter 1 Introduction: Background and Study Design<br />
Background<br />
Objectives<br />
The Evaluation Design<br />
Questionnaires<br />
Training and fieldwork<br />
Sample coverage<br />
Chapter 2 RCH-IEC Activities: Proposed and Carried Out<br />
The Guidelines<br />
Preparation, Submission and Sanctioning of the Project Proposal<br />
Organization of RCH-IEC Activities<br />
RCH-IEC Activities<br />
Involvement of District Health Department in RCH-IEC Activities<br />
Fund Utilization and Account Keeping<br />
Chapter 3 Exposure to RCH-IEC Activities: Knowledge on Selected RCH<br />
Issues Among Village Communities<br />
Exposure to RCH-IEC Activities<br />
Knowledge on Selected RCH Issues<br />
Chapter 4 Summary and Conclusions<br />
Appendix A: Tables<br />
Appendix B: Questionnaires Used for Evaluation<br />
Appendix C: List of Persons Involved in Evaluation<br />
ii
& %<br />
Table 1: Summary of activities sanctioned and conducted under RCH-IEC<br />
scheme by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
Table 2: Number of street play and folksong performances planned and<br />
organized in the Talukas of Chitradurga District under the RCH-IEC<br />
Scheme<br />
Table 3: Number of orientation programmes planned and organized in the<br />
Talukas of Chitradurga District under the RCH-IEC Scheme<br />
Table 4: Summary of item-wise expenditure by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> under<br />
RCH-IEC scheme<br />
Table 5: Percentage of respondents who were exposed to RCH-IEC<br />
activities by background characteristics, Chitradurga District<br />
Table 6: Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed<br />
to various RCH-IEC activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />
iii
“…the person who has invested money in staging a play will receive many sponsors if<br />
the play is of good quality. If no one comes requesting for staging the play elsewhere,<br />
he will go inquiring how good was the play…”<br />
A respondent<br />
iv
The Background and Study Design<br />
'<br />
Chapter<br />
(<br />
The focus of the Indian family welfare programme has undergone a<br />
paradigm shift following the recommendations of the International<br />
Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) convened in Cairo in<br />
September 1994. The ICPD recommended that the family planning<br />
programme should respect the reproductive rights of individuals in general<br />
and women in particular, and should aim at narrowing the gender<br />
inequalities. It further advocated that the programme should aim at<br />
facilitating the couples to have their children as they desire in timing and<br />
number, help mothers to go through pregnancy and child birth safely so<br />
that the outcome of pregnancy is successful in terms of maternal and<br />
infant survival and well-being; and ensure that couples are able to have<br />
sexual relations free of fear of pregnancy and of contracting diseases. The<br />
current national Health and Family Welfare programme, renamed as<br />
Reproductive and Child Health (RCH) programme, is an unification of<br />
related programmes of Child Survival and Safe Motherhood (CSSM)<br />
initiated during 1992-93.<br />
Under this new approach, the programme intends to take into account the<br />
community's needs and thus aims at improving the quality of services<br />
instead of mere fulfilment of targets. As such, there are no targets for<br />
various services, the grass-root level workers are expected to assess the<br />
needs of the community, in consultation with the community, and based<br />
on this need assessment, formulate their own goals for health and family<br />
welfare activities in the community. This community need based<br />
programme includes various aspects of RCH services namely, family<br />
planning, child survival and safe motherhood, and RTI/STI and AIDS.<br />
Additionally, the approach intends to achieve increased levels of male<br />
participation.
2<br />
Reproductive and child health on the one hand and contraception on the<br />
other are both complementary mechanisms for achieving population<br />
stabilization. The former ensures good health of mother/children and<br />
creates assurance about the longevity of the mother and the child, which<br />
prompts couples to desire a smaller family. The latter, on the other hand,<br />
enables the couples to avoid unwanted pregnancies and to limit their<br />
family size. The national programme has been promoting these two<br />
aspects of population stabilization through the provision of reproductive<br />
and child health and family planning services at the grass-root level and<br />
generating demand for these services via a set of Information, Education<br />
and Communication (IEC) programme along with other measures related<br />
to socio-economic development and women's empowerment.<br />
Effectiveness of such persuasive effort with the people depends, to a large<br />
degree, on the educational status of the couple, particularly the wife. India<br />
being one of the least literate societies in the world, it is obviously<br />
important to design these IEC activities to make them relevant to the rural<br />
and illiterate masses. The IEC efforts under the national programme, so<br />
far, have been largely using the electronic and print media which have<br />
their inherent limitations of not being effective in reaching a large segment<br />
of our population – the rural, illiterate and poor. The IEC programmes, it<br />
is felt, which used to be designed centrally or at the state-level often do<br />
not register forcefully with the people in rural areas because of the<br />
difference in syntax and idiom. Further, the messages often do not reach<br />
the bottom 20-30% of the disadvantaged families who do not have access<br />
to such electronic or print media. However, their participation in RCH is<br />
crucial for the success of the programme. If local talent is mobilised for<br />
promoting IEC activities related to RCH, the effectiveness of<br />
communicating the messages would in all probability improve. It is<br />
expected that such effort would also lead to a greater involvement of<br />
people in population stabilization efforts.<br />
Since the educational/literacy status of families, particularly of women has<br />
a strong bearing on their response for RCH/population control, it is<br />
sensible to have a co-ordinated effort for IEC for both literacy and<br />
population control. Also in the past, co-ordination of this nature within the<br />
district has remained nominal. Although there is a post of a District Health<br />
Education Officer in most states, the co-ordination between the IEC<br />
activities of different departments to promote RCH has been quite nonexistent<br />
at the district level. Hence, the Government of India felt the need<br />
for an united effort for mass campaign and mobilization to achieve both<br />
literacy and population stabilization. Accordingly, in consultation with the<br />
Department of Education, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
3<br />
involved the <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong> (<strong>ZSS</strong>) for carrying out the IEC<br />
activities for Reproductive and Child Health/population control. It is felt<br />
that the <strong>ZSS</strong>s which have succeeded in mobilising the mass for literacy<br />
movement would also be able to successfully promote the cause of RCH<br />
and population stabilisation. It is envisaged that the <strong>ZSS</strong>s could utilise<br />
resource persons and institutions within the district who could design and<br />
deliver programmes in towns and villages of the district throughout the<br />
year using the syntax and idioms easily understandable to local<br />
population. The IEC materials which have the local images and<br />
vocabulary and the local modes of mass appeal would reach the rural mass<br />
more effectively.<br />
In 1998, the guidelines for project proposals were prepared by the<br />
Department of Family Welfare and sent to the respective District<br />
Collectors/Deputy Commissioners for preparing the project proposals in<br />
consultation with the respective District Health Officers and other medical<br />
specialists with <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong>. The project proposal received<br />
from each district was scrutinised by the Department of Family Welfare in<br />
consultation with the National Literacy Mission and sanctioned the<br />
projects to certain districts with suggested modifications. The scheme –<br />
Promotion of RCH-IEC Activities through <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong> – is in<br />
operation in 216 districts of the country, at various phases of<br />
implementation.<br />
After almost one year of sanctioning the scheme and funds to several<br />
districts, and before deciding to expand the scheme to other districts, the<br />
Department of Family Welfare decided to evaluate the progress made with<br />
respect to the efforts of the <strong>ZSS</strong> towards creating the awareness on various<br />
RCH issues. Since a substantial amount of material and manpower has<br />
been invested in the scheme, it is important to evaluate the organization<br />
and functioning of the scheme. An evaluation of the scheme in selected<br />
districts in 6 states – Assam, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka,<br />
Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh – has been commissioned to the<br />
Population Research Centres. The Population Research Centre, JSS<br />
Institute of Economic Research, Dharwad is assigned the evaluation of the<br />
scheme in five districts of Karnataka – Belgaum, Davangere, Chitradurga,<br />
Kolar, and Tumkur.<br />
This report presents the findings related to the evaluation of the scheme in<br />
Chitradurga district.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
4<br />
)%*<br />
The main objective of this evaluation is to ascertain the effectiveness of<br />
the implementation of the approved scheme in Chitradurga district and its<br />
impact on the target group. Specifically, the study includes an assessment<br />
of:<br />
1. Time gap between the sanction of funds by the Union Ministry of<br />
Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) and the receipt of the same by<br />
the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> and the actual launching of the scheme;<br />
2. Actual activities performed as against the approved activities under the<br />
scheme;<br />
3. The use of funds for various activities under the scheme as well as the<br />
manner in which accounts of expenditure have been maintained;<br />
4. Periodicity of meetings of various <strong>ZSS</strong> units for planning and<br />
monitoring the implementation of the scheme;<br />
5. The degree to which the scheme has been able to complement and coordinate<br />
with the efforts of IEC units within the District Health<br />
Education Unit;<br />
6. The extent to which the targeted population, particularly the<br />
Panchayati Raj Institutions and other village-level bodies have become<br />
aware of the new scheme and issues related to RCH/population<br />
stabilization;<br />
7. The extent to which the scheme has been able to influence the general<br />
population within the community in terms of their knowledge and<br />
attitude towards issues related to RCH/population stabilization; and<br />
8. The strengths and shortcomings of the functioning of the scheme and<br />
suggested corrective measures to improve the same.<br />
The evaluation design largely follows the guidelines given by the Ministry<br />
of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi for the same. Accordingly, the<br />
evaluation uses the information collected from various categories of the<br />
personnel involved in planning and implementation of the scheme at<br />
different levels (for example: <strong>ZSS</strong> functionaries at the District, Taluka and<br />
Village levels as well as health functionaries at these levels) as well as the<br />
beneficiaries at the community level. The study adopts both qualitative<br />
and quantitative methods of data collection such as in-depth interviews,<br />
structured interviews, and content analysis of selected IEC materials.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
5<br />
At the district level, in-depth interviews were conducted with two <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
functionaries (Deputy Commissioner and Secretary, <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong><br />
Samiti). The evaluation team could not meet any officials from the Office<br />
of the District Health and Family Welfare Officer, Chitradurga.<br />
From each of the six Talukas of Chitradurga district, two Taluka<br />
<strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti (TSS) functionaries (Taluka Co-ordinator and<br />
Tahasildar/Executive Officer of Taluka Panchayat) as well as the Taluka<br />
Medical Officer were interviewed.<br />
In order to get information from <strong>ZSS</strong> functionaries, health personnel and<br />
community members at the village level, a purposive sample of 12<br />
villages (two per Taluka) was selected in the district, including 10 villages<br />
where the activities under the scheme were conducted as per the<br />
information from the Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong> (six villages where street plays and<br />
folk songs were carried out and four villages where RCH orientation was<br />
organized), and two villages where no IEC activity under the scheme was<br />
carried out. Since the selection of villages within the Taluka was random,<br />
selected villages include those from remote areas.<br />
Within each selected village, interviews were conducted with two Village<br />
<strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti (VSS) functionaries (VSS Co-ordinator and Panchayat<br />
Chairman/Vice-Chairman), two persons from the local Primary Health<br />
Centre/Subcentre (Medical Officer/ANM/BHE/LHV), 5 opinion leaders<br />
and 10 other community members in the age group 15-34 1 .<br />
The following procedure was adopted for the selection of 10 community<br />
members: a list of all the major lanes/streets in the village are obtained<br />
from the villagers, five such lanes/streets are selected randomly. From the<br />
selected lane/street, one adult male and one adult female in the age group<br />
15-34 were selected. It was decided to interview only the usual residents<br />
of the household and not to interview both the male and female from the<br />
same household. Similarly, 5 opinion leaders were selected randomly<br />
from a list of Gram Panchayat members, including female members,<br />
religious leaders, school teacher, Anganwadi workers, political leaders,<br />
informal leaders, shop owners, social workers, local resource persons etc.<br />
The list was prepared by the study team in consultation with the Gram<br />
Panchayat officials/ or villagers.<br />
1 During the pre-testing we found that it is very difficult to get even 5 opinion leaders at village level. Hence, the<br />
number of opinion leaders to be interviewed was reduced to 5 as against 10 as per the Ministry's guidelines.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
6<br />
+<br />
In addition, the study reviewed the existing records (correspondence,<br />
activity reports and accounts) and the IEC materials developed under the<br />
scheme.<br />
Before finalising the study design, the study team undertook a pilot visit to<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong>, Belgaum on 25 August, 2000 to know about the organization,<br />
functioning and availability of various records related to the scheme in the<br />
District. The draft questionnaires for various functionaries as well as for<br />
the opinion leaders and community members were also discussed with the<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong> and health functionaries. Based on the discussion, the study design<br />
was finalised and appropriate modifications were made in the draft<br />
questionnaires. The questionnaires for the opinion leaders and community<br />
members were also pretested on 12 September, 2000 in a village in<br />
Davanagere district. These questionnaires were finalised following the<br />
results of the pretest.<br />
One questionnaire each for the different types of respondents mentioned<br />
above are used for the interviews. A brief description of the content of<br />
questionnaires that were used in the study is given below.<br />
Questionnaire for the <strong>ZSS</strong> functionary: This questionnaire collected<br />
information on specific activities carried out under the RCH/IEC scheme<br />
by the <strong>ZSS</strong>/TSS/VSS during the project period. The information collected<br />
include: the nature of activity, area of coverage, specific locations where<br />
the activity was conducted, the nature and number of beneficiaries, topics<br />
covered/discussed, amount spent, as well as the date/s of the activity. If<br />
an activity which was initially proposed under the scheme was not<br />
mentioned by the functionary, specific questions related to the omitted<br />
item was also asked. In addition, detailed information was collected on<br />
the organization and implementation of the scheme, co-ordination with the<br />
District Health officials, and utilization of funds, bottle-necks in the<br />
implementation of the scheme if any, and the suggested recommendations.<br />
Questionnaire for the Health staff: This questionnaire gathered<br />
information on the involvement of the district health and IEC officials in<br />
the planning and implementation of the scheme. The questionnaire also<br />
covered their perception regarding the role of <strong>ZSS</strong> in promoting the RCH<br />
activities, technical guidance provided, and the way in which the IEC<br />
activities carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong> are different from the routine IEC<br />
activities of the District Health and Family Welfare Office.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
7<br />
Questionnaire for the Opinion Leaders/Community members: The<br />
questionnaire collected information on exposure to and participation in<br />
any RCH/IEC activities, and for each activity, information on nature of<br />
activity, place, duration, topics covered, RCH messages received, and<br />
messages spread to others. In addition, a set of objective-type questions<br />
on the knowledge and attitude towards selected RCH issues were<br />
canvassed to the opinion leaders/community members.<br />
, $<br />
The training of the field staff was organised at Population Research<br />
Centre, Dharwad for two days on 16 and 18 September, 2000. The<br />
training was carried out by the Director of the Centre and Co-ordinators of<br />
the evaluation. Seven staff members of the <strong>PRC</strong> were trained and six were<br />
involved during the field work. Before carrying out the field work in<br />
Chitradurga district a review meeting was held on 8 October, 2000 for<br />
getting an insight from the experience of fieldwork in Davanagere district.<br />
Two co-ordinators of the evaluation study from the <strong>PRC</strong>, Dharwad,<br />
visited the office of the Secretary, <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti, Chitradurga on<br />
4 October, 2000 and held detailed discussions regarding the scheme.<br />
During this visit, various documents and materials related to the scheme<br />
were also photocopied for further analysis. The visit lasted for a day –<br />
about 7-8 hours of in-depth interview and discussions with the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
Secretary, and a brief discussion with the Deputy Commissioner of the<br />
district. The officials were very co-operative, and had rich insight into<br />
the scheme, its implementation and the goals of RCH programme in the<br />
country.<br />
The field work was carried out by two teams, each team consisting of<br />
three interviewers and one Co-ordinator. The Co-ordinators interviewed<br />
the Taluka-level <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti and health functionaries, one<br />
interviewer covered the village-level <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti and health<br />
functionaries, and the remaining two interviewers interviewed the selected<br />
community members and opinion leaders. The data collection was carried<br />
out during 10-15 October, 2000.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
8<br />
"<br />
The study covered, at the district level, two <strong>ZSS</strong> functionaries (Deputy<br />
Commissioner and, Secretary-<strong>ZSS</strong>). At the Taluka-level, 10 Taluka<br />
<strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti functionaries (Taluka co-ordinator and Tahasildar/<br />
Executive Officer of the Taluka Panchayat) and 6 Taluka Medical<br />
Officers were interviewed. At the village-level, 20 Village <strong>Saksharata</strong><br />
Samiti functionaries (co-ordinators and Gram Panchayat Chairman/Vice<br />
Chairman/Secretary) and 18 health functionaries (Medical Officers or<br />
BHE/LHV/ANM) were covered. In addition, 58 opinion leaders and 120<br />
community members were interviewed from the 12 selected villages.<br />
Although almost all the functionaries at all levels could be covered in this<br />
evaluation study, it is important to note the problems faced while<br />
interviewing them. For instance, the meeting with the higher officials in<br />
the District or Taluka was sometimes delayed because of their<br />
engagements despite obtaining an appointment in advance. In addition, the<br />
presence of others during the interview could not be avoided by the study<br />
team thus disturbing the flow of the interview as well as biasing the<br />
response of the concerned official. Similarly, many of the officials<br />
interviewed are only the nominal heads and some of them have joined<br />
only recently and hence could not give the required information about the<br />
scheme. Since these officials are under great pressure to attend to various<br />
other, sometimes more urgent, administrative work, it has been very<br />
difficult for them to spare longer time for the discussion related to <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
activities under the scheme.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
9<br />
Chapter<br />
/<br />
-<br />
Proposed and Carried Out<br />
.<br />
In order to utilise <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong> which have succeeded in<br />
mobilising the mass for the literacy movement for promoting awareness<br />
and encourage the participation of the community in planning and<br />
implementation of various RCH programmes, the Secretary, Ministry of<br />
Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi wrote a<br />
letter on 25, May 1998 to the District Collectors/Deputy Commissioners<br />
seeking the involvement of <strong>ZSS</strong> and preparing project proposals for<br />
promoting IEC for various RCH issues.<br />
In reply to this letter, few project proposals were received by Department<br />
of Family Welfare which did not contain all the necessary details to enable<br />
them to sanction. Thus, the Department stipulated some guidelines for<br />
preparing the project proposals and referred them back to the District<br />
Collectors on 24 September 1998, stating that the revised/new proposals<br />
should reach the Department within the next few weeks so that the<br />
sanction can be made quickly and the implementation of the IEC activities<br />
in the district can begin within the next 2-3 months.<br />
The guidelines thus provided by the Department largely discussed three<br />
points for consideration while preparing the project proposals invited for<br />
two year periods from the year 1998: content, method and norms.<br />
The MOHFW suggested the following topics to be covered/addressed in<br />
the proposed IEC activities:<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
10<br />
0<br />
1<br />
1. Problems of having a large population in relation to education,<br />
nutrition, economic share, employment and quality of life for<br />
individual family members. And also what it means for environment,<br />
employment etc. in the community.<br />
2. Various methods of contraception and consequences of using or not<br />
using each. When to use spacing methods and when to use terminal<br />
methods.<br />
3. Nutritional status of children, adolescents and women. Its effect on<br />
mental development, body development and its consequences for<br />
pregnant women.<br />
4. Anaemia - its prevalence and consequences for children, adolescents<br />
and women.<br />
5. Diarrhoea control and role of Oral Rehydration Solution.<br />
6. Vaccine preventable diseases and vaccination. Importance of taking<br />
all doses.<br />
7. Vitamin-A and Iron and Folic Acid supplementation and their<br />
importance.<br />
8. Acute Respiratory Infection - its prevalence and consequences.<br />
9. Age at marriage.<br />
10. Birth weight of children - consequences for low birth weight babies.<br />
11. Importance of ante-natal check ups, tetanus immunization and postnatal<br />
check ups, anaemia treatment and information regarding<br />
complicated pregnancies.<br />
12. Maternal mortality situation - importance of institutional deliveries.<br />
How life of mother and children is more valuable.<br />
The guidelines suggested the <strong>ZSS</strong> to propose IEC activities covering the<br />
above themes in the form of Kalajatha, folk performances, posters and<br />
rallies in towns and villages and workshops for orienting and sensitising<br />
opinion leaders, literacy workers, social activists etc.<br />
The Department also stipulated the following norms that should be kept in<br />
mind while formulating the proposals:<br />
1. Training of Government staff and payment of honorarium to them<br />
should not be a part of the project.<br />
2. Surveys for determining status of family welfare indicators are not<br />
permitted. Routine activities such as advertisements in news papers,<br />
film shows and video making should be avoided.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
11<br />
3. Purchase of capital assets such as vehicles, VCR, TV, office furniture<br />
etc. will not be allowed.<br />
4. The expenditure on supervision etc. should not exceed 10% of the<br />
annual amount.<br />
! " % ! * ! "<br />
! "<br />
The discussions with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, Davanagere (during the<br />
evaluation of the scheme in Davanagere district) and the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary,<br />
Chitradurga revealed that the person who is presently the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary in<br />
Davanagere District was functioning as the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary in Chitradurga<br />
at the time of preparation of the project proposal and sanctioning of the<br />
project. One can see a lot of similarities between the RCH-IEC activities<br />
proposed under the scheme by the two districts.<br />
The <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga had not received any communication either from<br />
Government of Karnataka or from Government of India to submit the<br />
proposals on RCH-IEC activities. However, since the Secretary for both<br />
Davanagere and Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong>s were the same, proposals were<br />
submitted for both the districts on 8 January 1999.<br />
It is reported by the present <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary Chitradurga that the project<br />
proposal for Chitradurga was prepared based on the experience during a<br />
workshop organised by State Resource Centre (SRC), Mysore. The actual<br />
proposal was prepared with the help from the then Assistant Director,<br />
Women and Child Development and the District Health Education<br />
Officer, Chitradurga. The process of preparation of the project proposal<br />
took about two months.<br />
The project proposal submitted by the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> (which is very<br />
much similar to the project proposal submitted by the Davanagere <strong>ZSS</strong>)<br />
envisages the implementation of the RCH-IEC activities through the local<br />
teams consisting of Preraka/Anganwadi worker/ANM as Co-ordinators<br />
and the members of the local Mahila/Yuvak/Yuvati Mandals, elected<br />
representatives of Gram Panchayats and local school teachers and village<br />
contact persons as members.<br />
The IEC activities are proposed to be carried out mainly through posters,<br />
wall writings, street plays, folksongs, discussions/debates/essaywriting/quiz/seminar/workshop<br />
etc. involving various target groups at the<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
12<br />
village Panchayat level. The proposal also included a component of<br />
training of functionaries – local team implementing the scheme, folk<br />
artists/individuals/troupes, and officers and NGOs involved in the<br />
programme.<br />
More specifically, the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> proposed a total of 8 different<br />
activities, to be organized at the District, Taluka and village levels:<br />
1. Orientation workshops for officials/NGOs, 1 to be organized at the<br />
district level and 7 at the Taluka level<br />
2. Material Development Workshop, one each to develop posters, folksongs,<br />
and street plays, to be organized by the <strong>ZSS</strong> at the district level<br />
3. Street plays – 100 performances<br />
4. Folk songs – 100 performances<br />
5. Posters – about 10,000 posters to be printed and displayed<br />
6. Wall-writing – 500 in number<br />
7. Seminars/Workshops at Taluka, Panchayat and village levels – a total<br />
of 240 workshops to be organized – involving PRI representatives,<br />
literacy volunteers, women leaders, NGO and neo-literates.<br />
8. District-level workshops – a total of five – involving PRI<br />
representatives, literacy workers, women leaders, NGO and<br />
journalists.<br />
Both the guidelines and the proposal sanctioned for the <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga<br />
do not indicate, in detail, the operationalization of the proposed IEC<br />
activities. For instance, the guidelines for the preparation of the proposal<br />
provide, in detail, the various subject matter that should be included in the<br />
IEC activities but do not reveal how these contents should actually be<br />
incorporated in specific activities such as Kalajatha, folk songs etc.<br />
Similarly, the proposal did not mention specifically, with respect to the<br />
orientation and training programmes, the topics to be covered, the<br />
resource persons to be used and how the trained persons will be utilised<br />
subsequently in the scheme. The proposal was silent about the number of<br />
street plays and folk songs to be developed. It does not provide the details<br />
regarding the number of troupes and number of artists per troupe and the<br />
level at which these performances are to be organised.<br />
The proposal was sanctioned with some modification in the budget and<br />
this was communicated to the <strong>ZSS</strong> vide letter dated 31, March, 1999. An<br />
amount of Rs. 4,50,000 was released to Secretary (Family Welfare),<br />
Government of Karnataka vide letter dated 31 March, 1999 and the same<br />
was communicated to the Deputy Commission, Chitradurga District.<br />
However the fund for the scheme was released to the <strong>ZSS</strong> on 22<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
) 2<br />
13<br />
September 1999 and the amount was received on 1 January 2000. Thus,<br />
the time gap between the sanction of the fund from MOHFW and receipt<br />
of the same by the <strong>ZSS</strong> is about 9 months. The scheme was launched in<br />
district Chitradurga on 3 December, 1999 – before actually receiving the<br />
funds.<br />
As there was a delay in receiving the funds from the Secretary (Family<br />
Welfare), Government of Karnataka, the <strong>ZSS</strong> used Rs. 450,000 from<br />
funds it had received for the Post-Literacy Campaign, based on the<br />
decision of its Executive Committee which met on 30 June 1999. This<br />
amount drawn on 21 July 1999 was reimbursed to the PLC account on 1<br />
January 2000, after receiving the funds for RCH-IEC activities. Thus the<br />
Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> could start the RCH-IEC activities even before receiving<br />
the funds for the scheme.<br />
The organisational structure for the present scheme is almost the same as<br />
that for the Total Literacy Campaign (TLC) and Post-Literacy Campaign<br />
(PLC). The <strong>ZSS</strong>- Chitradurga is named as Aksharavani, whose literal<br />
meaning is to give literacy through voice. At the district level, the <strong>ZSS</strong> has<br />
an Executive Committee consisting of 35 members under the<br />
Chairmanship of the Deputy Commissioner. About 50 percent of<br />
members represent NGOs and women, while the remaining 50 percent are<br />
officials from various government departments. The <strong>ZSS</strong> also has a<br />
General Body at the district level consisting of 100 members from<br />
different spheres of life. The Executive Committee and General Body<br />
meet periodically at an interval of three months to review the progress and<br />
provide the required guidance.<br />
For the planning and implementation of the scheme, the <strong>ZSS</strong> has a<br />
Secretary and two Co-ordinators at the district level. The Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
prepares the action plan for activities to be conducted by the TSS and<br />
monitors the progress of these activities. The <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary told that since<br />
the Deputy Commissioner himself/herself is the Chairman of the <strong>ZSS</strong>, any<br />
activity carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong> receives its prominence and priority.<br />
Similarly, all the six Talukas of the district have Taluka Aksharavani<br />
Committees consisting of various governmental and non-governmental<br />
officials under the Chairmanship of Executive Officer of Taluka<br />
Panchayat/Tahasildar. The following are the six Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> in<br />
the district:<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
14<br />
1. Chitradurga Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />
2. Hiriyur Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />
3. Holalkere Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />
4. Challakere Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />
5. Hosadurga Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />
6. Molakalmuru Taluka Aksharavani Samiti<br />
In every Taluka, a person from the education department is deputed as the<br />
co-ordinator of the Samiti. It is the duty of the co-ordinator to organise<br />
and implement the IEC activities under the scheme in his/her respective<br />
Taluka/city according to the plan suggested by the <strong>ZSS</strong>. As per the<br />
discussion with <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, the district level review meeting is held on<br />
the third of every month, wherein the District and Taluka level<br />
Aksharavani functionaries report the progress of the activities assigned to<br />
them.<br />
The discussion with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary revealed that the Gram<br />
Panchayat/Village level committees which were constituted during the<br />
TLC and PLC, are not actually used for implementation of the present<br />
scheme. However, the help of the local co-ordinator of TLC/PLC is<br />
sought whenever any of the RCH-IEC activities is planned at the village<br />
level.<br />
The project proposal which was approved by MOHFW had a provision<br />
for Preraka/Anganwadi worker/ANM as co-ordinators and elected Gram<br />
Panchayat members and local school teacher as the members of the local<br />
team for the effective implementation of various IEC activities under the<br />
scheme. But during the evaluation, no such local team was identified in<br />
any of the villages covered for the evaluation.<br />
The Taluka <strong>Samitis</strong> are required to submit to the <strong>ZSS</strong> the monthly report<br />
of the progress of activities as well as the monthly expenditure incurred.<br />
The monthly reports thus received are compiled and incorporated in the<br />
report of the activities and expenditure of the <strong>ZSS</strong>, and are sent to<br />
MOHFW, with copies to Joint Director and RCH Project Director,<br />
Directorate of Health Services, Bangalore; Director, Directorate of Mass<br />
Education, Bangalore; Director, State Resource Centre, Mysore; DHO and<br />
RCH Officer, Chitradurga.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
15<br />
A statement showing the activities proposed and conducted in the district<br />
under the scheme at the time of the evaluation study is presented in Table<br />
1. The table indicates that the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> has made certain<br />
modifications in some of the activities sanctioned by MOHFW without<br />
informing the changes to the funding agency prior to implementation.<br />
Similarly, some of the activities for which funds are sanctioned are not<br />
carried out, and in some cases, the sanctioned funds are utilized for<br />
conducting activities other than those for which funds were sanctioned by<br />
the funding agency.<br />
) 3 " ) 41.)<br />
Under this activity, it was proposed and approved to carry out a two-day<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong> level workshop for Rs. 5,000 and 7 Taluka-level one-day workshops<br />
at the cost of Rs. 1,000 per workshop, for 25-30 participants each.<br />
At the time of this evaluation, the proposed <strong>ZSS</strong>-level workshop has not<br />
been organised. But the Taluka-level workshops were organised in all<br />
Talukas except Hiriyur. In Challakere, this workshop was organised<br />
exclusively for the Taluka-level officials. In other Talukas, however,<br />
journalists, elected members to various civic bodies, Gram Panchayat<br />
secretaries also participated along with the Taluka-level officials. In<br />
Holalkere Taluka, this workshop was organised only for half day. As per<br />
the information of various Taluka Co-ordinators the amount spent for this<br />
workshop ranges from Rs. 400 to Rs. 2350. The total amount spent for<br />
this activity is about Rs. 5,270. In total, 399 persons had participated in<br />
these workshops organised in the five Talukas, and the number ranges<br />
from 34 to 250 per workshop. It may be noted that in Hosadurga Taluka,<br />
250 persons had participated in the one-day workshop.<br />
The proposal, approved by MOHFW, does not indicate the types of<br />
persons who will be trained, the topics to be covered for the training, the<br />
resource persons, and the subsequent use of these trained persons in the<br />
scheme. It is important to note that only six Talukas are existing in the<br />
district but the sanctioned proposal provided budget for carrying out seven<br />
Taluka-level workshops.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
0 " 3 "<br />
16<br />
The proposed activities under material development include a two-day<br />
workshop on posters, two-day workshop on folk songs and a five-day<br />
workshop on street plays. The details about the themes to be covered,<br />
number of posters, street plays and folk songs to be developed and<br />
resource persons for this workshop were not mentioned in the approved<br />
proposal.<br />
As against the proposal, the <strong>ZSS</strong> organized (1) a three-day workshop to<br />
develop the scripts for 4 street plays, 12 folk songs and 1 Rupaka, (2) a<br />
three-day workshop for directors and artists for street plays and folksongs,<br />
and (3) another three-day workshop for the artists at Taluka level. Of the<br />
three workshops, two were conducted for Chitradurga and Davanagere<br />
districts combined. No workshop was conducted for the development of<br />
posters, and the workshops were not organized separately for the<br />
development of street plays and folksongs.<br />
Thus it is evident that the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> has taken very keen interest in<br />
developing the scripts for street plays and folk songs and also in directing<br />
and training 6 troupes each consisting of 12 performers, one troupe in<br />
each Taluka, for presentation of these street plays and folk songs.<br />
A three-day material development workshop for writers was organised in<br />
Chitradurga during 29-31, December, 1999. It was a combined workshop<br />
for both Chitradurga and Davanagere districts since the same person was<br />
officiating as Secretary for both the District <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong>. Several<br />
prominent artists and writers from both the districts attended the<br />
workshop. Scripts for 4 street plays, namely Betalana Kathe, Sandesha<br />
(meaning message), Harake (meaning offerings to God) and Udho Udho,<br />
were developed during the workshop. In addition, 12 songs and a short<br />
play named Sonku Rogagalu were also developed. The DHEO,<br />
Chitradurga and two health educators from State Resource Centre, Mysore<br />
participated as resource persons. About 35 persons attended this workshop<br />
(15 from the <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga). The expenditure incurred for this<br />
workshop is about Rs. 12,000. It is reported that <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga has<br />
paid an honorarium of Rs. 200 to persons from SRC and Rs. 100 to other<br />
participants.<br />
Although scripts for four street plays were developed in the workshop,<br />
only three were used by the <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga. The evaluation team<br />
obtained the scripts of 3 street plays and 12 folk songs from the <strong>ZSS</strong> and<br />
these materials are briefly described as under:<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
17<br />
1. Street play - Bethalana Kathe: Mainly provides messages on: the<br />
consequences of marrying at an early age; importance of consulting an<br />
Anganwadi worker, ANM or Doctor immediately after knowing that<br />
the woman is pregnant; ante-natal care check-ups; importance of<br />
conducting delivery by trained persons; five-cleans to be observed<br />
during delivery, post-natal care, signs of a healthy new-born baby,<br />
breastfeeding immediately after the birth and immunization of the<br />
child.<br />
2. Street play - Sandesha: Gives specific information about various<br />
family planning methods used for spacing and limiting births. The play<br />
also gives importance of use of Nirodh in avoiding AIDS.<br />
3. Street play – Harake: Highlights the blind-beliefs and superstitions<br />
existing among the villagers in the treatment of children. The specific<br />
messages spread through this street play are: symptoms and treatment<br />
of diarrhoea and pneumonia among children, importance of breast<br />
feeding, reasons and prevention of night-blindness among children,<br />
importance of child immunization and the importance of male<br />
participation in the utilization of various health services.<br />
4. Short play - Appa Nanna Hodiya Bedappa: It describes the gender<br />
discrimination and the ill-effects of alcoholism.<br />
5. The 12 folk songs also conveyed the above said messages in addition<br />
to infertility, use of safe drinking water, sanitation, and various modes<br />
of transmission and prevention of AIDS.<br />
During 14-16 February, 2000, a three-day workshop for Directors and<br />
Folk Singers from different Talukas was organised at Thirtharameshwar<br />
in Honnali Taluka of Davanagere district. The workshop was a combined<br />
activity for both Chitradurga and Davanagere districts. A total of 31<br />
participants from the two districts were present. The state resource persons<br />
– Mr. Police Patil and Mr. Sambashiva Dalwai conducted the workshop.<br />
During the workshop, the scripts of the street plays developed at<br />
Chitradurga workshop were reviewed and revised. While the directors<br />
were involved in directing the street plays, the singers were engaged in<br />
setting the tune for the songs. No money was spent on this workshop from<br />
the budget meant for Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />
Similarly, a three-day workshop for street play and folk song artists was<br />
organised in each Taluka in March, 2000. The resource persons for these<br />
workshops included a state resource person, district co-ordinator, Talukalevel<br />
street play director, Taluka Medical Officer and Taluka co-ordinator.<br />
A team consisting of about 12 artists – both male and female – were<br />
trained in these workshops. . The Taluka Co-ordinator was given the<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
18<br />
responsibility of selecting the 12 artists for this workshop. However, in<br />
Molakalmuru Taluka no female artisits was trained. The Taluka Medical<br />
Officer explained about the various technical issues and availability of<br />
health services. During this workshop the artists rehearsed the folk songs<br />
and street plays developed for the scheme. In some of the Talukas, the<br />
artists carried out pre-testing of street plays and folk songs in a village.<br />
Based on this field practice, appropriate modifications were made in the<br />
tuning as well as the script of folk songs and street plays. A sum of Rs.<br />
17,392 was spent for these workshops organised in the six Talukas of the<br />
district.<br />
! 5 ,<br />
The sanctioned proposal included a provision for conducting 100<br />
performances each of street plays and folk songs, separately, by involving<br />
local NGOs.<br />
The available records as well as the discussions with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary<br />
indicate that the same troupe performed both the street plays and<br />
folksongs at one occasion, and they were combined to make the campaign<br />
more effective. The total number of street-play and folk song<br />
performances also were more than the number proposed – a total of 351<br />
performances in rural areas.<br />
The street plays and folk songs in each Taluka were performed by a<br />
trained troupe of 12 members. In one of the Talukas a ‘technician’ from<br />
the Health Department accompanied the troupe throughout their<br />
performance.<br />
The actual planning and implementation of this activity was left to the<br />
Taluka Aksharavani Samiti in each Taluka while the <strong>ZSS</strong> monitored and<br />
supervised the street play and folk song performances. Various Taluka<br />
Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> were asked to stage between 40 and 75 street plays<br />
and between 40 and 51 folk song performances in selected villages and set<br />
a timetable for the same (between March and May, 2000, at the rate of a<br />
maximum of three performances a day). The TSS was asked to select the<br />
villages where the number of illiterates and neo-literates were more. The<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong> sanctioned a total amount of Rs. 73,500 for staging street plays (at<br />
the rate of Rs. 750 per day) and Rs. 39,200 for folk song performances (at<br />
the rate of Rs. 400 per day) to the six Taluka <strong>Samitis</strong>. The food and<br />
accommodation facilities for the troupe were to be arranged with the help<br />
of local people.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
19<br />
Although the <strong>ZSS</strong> sanctioned the amount separately for street plays and<br />
folk songs, the two programmes were actually combined, and the same<br />
troupe performed both the activities on one occasion.<br />
The number of performances planned and actually organised in selected<br />
villages of six Talukas of the Chitradurga district is given in Table-2.<br />
The Co-ordinator of the TSS took the complete responsibility of<br />
organizing the street plays and folksongs in selected villages according to<br />
schedule. Every Taluka Aksharavani Samiti printed handbills containing<br />
few RCH messages and the time-schedule of the performance of street<br />
plays and folk songs in the selected villages of the respective Taluka. The<br />
performances were well-publicized by giving these handbills to the<br />
concerned Gram Panchayat for distribution and also giving it in the local<br />
news paper, 3-4 days prior to the actual performance. The Taluka<br />
Aksharavani Samiti also made an appeal, well in advance, to all the<br />
elected representatives, government employees, teachers, Anganwadi<br />
workers, persons from the Health Department, Panchayat/Village Coordinators,<br />
and representatives of NGOs to welcome the troupe and<br />
participate in the program as per the schedule.<br />
Once the troupe reached the village, it walked through the village singing<br />
folk songs and inviting the residents to come and watch the street plays.<br />
Some of the TSSs maintained a register to record the attendance and<br />
views of the audience selected randomly.<br />
The arrangements for the transportation, accommodation and food for the<br />
troupe is organized with the assistance from Taluka Panchayat, GPS etc.<br />
In a day, a troupe performed street plays and folk songs in three villages –<br />
one in the morning, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. In most<br />
of the Talukas, the street plays and folk songs were organized in 2 or 3<br />
phases for a total period of 20 days covering 60 villages. The artists were<br />
generally given a rest for 1 or 2 weeks after completing the performance<br />
in each phase. In most villages, the performance was carried in front of the<br />
Gram Panchayat Office or in front of a Temple or in the school premises.<br />
Duration of each performance was about 2 hours.<br />
The selected 12 villages for the evaluation included 6 where both street<br />
plays and folk songs were carried out. Detailed discussions were held with<br />
the concerned Gram Panchayat officials/village co-ordinator as well as the<br />
health officials. During the interviews with the TSS co-ordinators as well<br />
and Taluka-level health functionaries, their remarks on street plays and<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
20<br />
folk songs were noted. Following are some of the remarks made on the<br />
street plays and folksongs, by the various <strong>ZSS</strong> and Health personnel<br />
interviewed:<br />
1. Of all the RCH-IEC activities, the street plays and folk songs are the<br />
most effective.<br />
2. The turnout of the audience is generally very good in villages where<br />
the performance was organized in the evenings, and turnout was very<br />
poor in villages where the performance was scheduled for the<br />
afternoons.<br />
3. The IEC activities on health issues through street plays and folk songs<br />
are needed since exposure to other mass media like posters,<br />
magazines, newspapers, pamphlets etc is very poor in rural areas.<br />
4. The street plays and folk songs are more effective because they use<br />
folk media and local artists. They give entertainment that is often<br />
absent in villages; attract huge crowd and also give messages through<br />
acting and jokes that can easily be understandable to the illiterate<br />
mass. Similarly, people's attention will be more on such activities.<br />
Since, the messages through street plays and folk songs were<br />
communicated using open stage, people do not have any hesitation to<br />
talk and discuss about various health issues. They also come forward<br />
to clear their doubts and misconceptions. Often the artists come from<br />
the audience themselves, and sometimes the artists themselves act as<br />
the audience reacting to the performance providing a total involvement<br />
of the audience and the artists. Through this activity mass awareness<br />
is created within a short duration of time and by spending less amount<br />
of money. Similarly during the time of staging and afterwards the<br />
villagers discuss on various issues covered through street plays and<br />
folk songs.<br />
5. In some of the villages, the people expressed that the things that<br />
happen in their villages are told through this street plays and<br />
folksongs.<br />
6. At the same time, it is also doubtful whether the people will just watch<br />
and have fun or they will be able to grasp the messages provided in<br />
these street plays and folksongs.<br />
7. It is not possible to provide detailed information on all the different<br />
issues related to RCH, within a short period.<br />
8. The rural people, who depend mainly on daily wages for their<br />
livelihood, will not come to see such performances if conducted during<br />
the daytime. Hence such activities should be organised in the evenings<br />
and during the months after the end of harvesting season.<br />
9. The street plays and folk songs were performed in some of the<br />
resistant villages in terms of utilisation of health services and after the<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
!<br />
21<br />
programme there has been some improvement in the attitude of the<br />
people in these villages.<br />
10. The frequency and duration of such programme is important for<br />
registering the messages in the minds of the people. It is necessary to<br />
repeat and continue such activities in order to make the villagers<br />
remember the messages for longer duration.<br />
11. Instead of performing these activities in selected villages, the street<br />
plays and folksongs should cover all the villages of a Taluka.<br />
12. There has been demand from villagers (where the programme was not<br />
organised) to organise the street plays and folk songs in their village to<br />
provide knowledge on various health issues.<br />
13. The street plays and folk songs were attended by all types of people<br />
such as young, old, males, females etc.<br />
14. The street plays and folksongs performed help in removing<br />
misconception/blind beliefs among the people, to know about various<br />
health issues and facilities available to them. It was informed that<br />
during the mass campaign in some of the villages mothers were<br />
realised that they are not treating their children well due to disbelieves.<br />
Similarly, one woman expressed that if she should have the knowledge<br />
regarding the care and treatment during pregnancy her child should not<br />
have became night-blind. It was reported that after the staging of street<br />
plays and folksongs in one of the village a person realised his mistake<br />
of sending his wife to her home for not delivering a male child and<br />
brought her back.<br />
15. People's faith on health department would improve through such<br />
programmes. It was reported by some of the grass-root level health<br />
workers that this type of programme made their work simple and easy.<br />
For example, after watching these street plays and folk songs, many<br />
mothers-in-law who were earlier opposing their daughters-in-law to<br />
utilise the health services such as ANC, hospital deliveries,<br />
immunisation, family planning etc. had changed.<br />
It was proposed to develop and print posters under the scheme. According<br />
to the sanctioned proposal, the <strong>ZSS</strong> Chitradurga has to print 10,000<br />
posters. The sanctioned proposal did not mention about the content, size<br />
and type of posters to be developed. It also did not give any idea about the<br />
subsequent utilisation of these posters in this scheme.<br />
The <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary reported that they printed one brochure and 4 posters.<br />
As discussed earlier, these posters and brochures were not developed in a<br />
workshop as it was proposed in the project plan. While the posters were<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
22<br />
designed and developed by the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary and a District Co-ordinator,<br />
the brochures were borrowed from the DHO, and printed in the name of<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga. In all 4,000 brochures and 6,000 posters (1,500 copies<br />
of each type) were printed. An amount of Rs. 44,750 has been spent for<br />
printing these materials. It is told that around 1,400 posters of each type<br />
was given to the six Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong>.<br />
Discussion with the six Taluka Aksharavani Samiti co-ordinators revealed<br />
that they received the posters and brochures from the <strong>ZSS</strong> but did not<br />
mention the exact number of copies. The brochures were mainly<br />
distributed to the participants who attended various orientation training<br />
programmes organised at Taluka and Gram Panchayat levels. The posters<br />
were distributed to the various Secretaries of Gram Panchayats to display<br />
them in prominent places. The evaluation team saw the posters displayed<br />
in few of the Gram panchayat Offices visited. Some of the participants of<br />
the orientation and training workshops who were interviewed reported that<br />
they received the brochure on RCH during the programme that they<br />
attended.<br />
However, the evaluation team found it difficult to assess the total number<br />
of posters and brochures distributed and the balance remaining with the<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />
A brief description of the four posters are as follows:<br />
1. Title - Reproductive and child health programme: The poster provides<br />
the information on the objectives of the RCH programme, and specific<br />
activities under maternal health, child health, and family planning.<br />
The poster also provides the child immunization schedule. However,<br />
the poster looks very crowded with too much of information, and the<br />
maps and figures provided in the poster do not convey any meaningful<br />
information. The poster has many editorial errors. Under family<br />
planning, the poster does not mention oral pill along with Nirodh and<br />
Copper-T to space births. There is also no mention of permanent<br />
methods of family planning in the poster.<br />
2. Title – Do you know about Child Health? Healthy child is nation’s<br />
asset: This two-coloured (red and green) poster contains few poorly<br />
worded messages on what care should be taken to promote child’s<br />
health. Early initiation of breastfeeding, immunization, clean<br />
surroundings and nutrition are the messages provided.<br />
3. Title – Do you know about pregnant woman? : The poster provides<br />
eight steps to be followed to achieve better maternal and child health –<br />
check-up from a trained doctor, provision of TT injections, IFA<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
3 3<br />
23<br />
tablets, delivery by health professionals, following the five principles<br />
of cleanliness during delivery, breastfeeding the new-born, bathing the<br />
child, and nutritious food to lactating mothers.<br />
4. Title – Activities under Continuing Education Programme: This<br />
poster, although printed under the RCH-IEC scheme, does not directly<br />
relate to the RCH issues that need to be addressed. The poster simply<br />
lists various activities under the CEP.<br />
The brochure gives a brief overview of the various components of the<br />
RCH programme and various services that are available under the<br />
programme.<br />
The sanctioned proposal suggested carrying out 500 wall-writings. The<br />
Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong> reported that 10 slogans on RCH have been prepared for<br />
writing on the walls. Stencils on the selected slogans are cut and 5 stencils<br />
were distributed to various Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> for writing the<br />
messages on the walls of various Gram Panchayats. The slogans are<br />
generally written on the walls of Government buildings such as Panchayat<br />
office, Anganwadi centre, schools, colleges, etc. At the time of evaluation<br />
study, the Secretary reported that this activity was initiated in all the<br />
Talukas except Chitradurga Taluka and was completed in Challakere and<br />
Hiriyur Talukas. But the TSS Co-ordinator of Molkalmuru Taluka<br />
reported that the wall-writings are not initiated in his Taluka also.<br />
However, the evaluation team could not determine the actual number of<br />
wall-writings. The evaluation team spotted a few wall-writings in some<br />
Government buildings located in the Taluka headquarters, and none in the<br />
selected villages. The following are the slogans prepared for the wall<br />
writing:<br />
1. Akshara Arogya (Literacy is health).<br />
2. Garbhini Mahilayennu Kudale Thapasane Nadesi (Pregnant woman<br />
should go for check-up immediately).<br />
3. Sadruda Mahile Maththu Magu Arogyavantha Samajada Bunadi<br />
(Healthy woman and child is a base for healthy society).<br />
4. Arogyavantha Magu Deshada Aasthi (Healthy child is country’s asset)<br />
5. Chikka Kutumba Sukhee Kutumba (Small family is happy family).<br />
6. Condom Balasi Lyngika Rogadinda Mukti Padeyiri (Use condom to<br />
prevent sexual diseases).<br />
7. Polio Tappisalu Lesike Hakisi (Take drops to avoid polio).<br />
8. Hennondu Kalithare Shaleyondu Theradanthe (Educating a woman is<br />
equivalent to opening a school).<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
24<br />
9. Magu Ondu Irali Mane Thumba Nagu Irali (Let there by one child and<br />
let the laughter fill the family).<br />
The Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong> reported that in addition to the wall writing they<br />
prepared 9 big hoardings carrying messages on RCH issues (selected from<br />
the wall-writings). Three hoarding were given to Chitradurga Aksharavani<br />
Samiti, two were given to Hiriyur Aksharavani Samiti and one each to the<br />
other four Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong>. These hoarding were erected<br />
mainly in the premises of DC office, Taluka Panchayat Office and<br />
National Highways. In some places the evaluation study team saw the<br />
hoarding.<br />
43 " 4! 5 46 &<br />
According to the sanctioned scheme, the <strong>ZSS</strong> had to organize 240<br />
seminars/workshops at Taluka/Gram Panchayat/Village levels for PRI<br />
representatives, literacy volunteers, women leaders, NGO and neoliterates.<br />
The proposal, however, does not indicate the number of<br />
participants, number of seminars/workshops to be organised at each level,<br />
the duration, topics to be covered, and the resource persons to be used.<br />
It was reported by the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary that a total of 35 workshops at<br />
Taluka/Gram Panchayat/Village level were organised in the district as a<br />
whole.<br />
Against the proposed 240 seminars/workshops to be organized at the<br />
Village/Panchayat level, the <strong>ZSS</strong> gave each Taluka Aksharavani Samiti an<br />
action plan to be implemented: (1) A one-day orientation programme for<br />
journalists at Taluka level, [a total of 6 orientation programmes, one in<br />
each Taluka]; and (2) Orientation programmes at the Gram Panchayat<br />
level for Anganwadi workers, teachers, literacy workers, health workers<br />
and neo-literates between July and August, 2000 [a total of 202<br />
workshops]. In addition, the TSSs were also instructed to carry out a oneday<br />
training on adolescent issues for science teachers of high schools at<br />
Taluka level [a total of 6 workshops, one per Taluka]. The number of<br />
orientation training programmes planned and organised at Village/Gram<br />
Panchayat levels in the six Talukas of the district, as reported by the<br />
respective TSS Co-ordinator, is given in Table-3. The Taluka level<br />
training programmes for the science teachers of high school were<br />
organized in all Talukas except Hiriyur and Holalkere.<br />
The <strong>ZSS</strong> directed the TSS to involve Medial Officer and Child<br />
Development Project Officer as resource persons for all these workshops.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
25<br />
However, the actual topics to be covered in these workshops are not<br />
mentioned.<br />
Although an action plan was distributed to the six Taluka Aksharavani<br />
<strong>Samitis</strong> for carrying out these activities, some of the <strong>Samitis</strong> did not<br />
follow the instructions completely. For example, in none of Talukas,<br />
workshops were organised exclusively for journalists. This workshop was<br />
combined with some other workshops at the Taluka-level. Similarly, the<br />
Hosadurga TSS combined all types of Taluka-level workshops into one –<br />
inviting various types of participants such as Taluka level officials, elected<br />
members, journalists, neo-literates, GP Secretaries etc for the same<br />
workshop. Thus the Taluka-level workshops were not organized<br />
uniformly, as per the action plan provided by the <strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />
With regard to the Gram Panchayat level workshops, the actual number of<br />
workshops organized varies among the Talukas – ranging from a high of<br />
11 in Chitradurga Taluka to a low of 1 in Molkalmuru Taluka. The Gram<br />
Panchayat-level orientation programmes were generally organized at<br />
Hobli place, covering several Gram Panchayats, instead of carrying out<br />
workshops/seminars separately for each Gram Panchayat.<br />
These workshops were generally organized with the involvement and cooperation<br />
of several officers at different levels. In many Talukas, the<br />
elected members of the <strong>Zilla</strong> Panchayat and Taluka Panchayats were<br />
informed in advance by the Executive Officer of the Taluka Panchayat.<br />
Similarly, the Gram Panchayat Secretaries informed the President, Vicepresident<br />
and other members of the Gram Panchayat regarding the<br />
orientation training programme 2 or 3 days in advance. The<br />
headmasters/headmistress of primary schools and science teachers were<br />
instructed by the respective Block Education Officers to depute few<br />
teachers from his/her school for the orientation programme. The<br />
Anganwadi workers were informed about the orientation programme<br />
through the Child Development Project Officer (CDPO). The Taluka<br />
Medical officer informed the medical officers of various PHCs to depute<br />
ANM/BHW for the training programme at Gram Panchayat level. The<br />
Taluka co-ordinator informed other categories of people to participate in<br />
the orientation training programme.<br />
As reported by the various Taluka-level officials, the average duration of<br />
the training programme was about five hours. The number of participants<br />
for these orientation programmes ranged from 40 to 60 for the Talukalevel<br />
orientation programmes and between 60 and 160 for the Gram<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
26<br />
Panchayat level programmes. Only a few TSS Co-ordinators maintained a<br />
detailed report regarding these orientation training programmes.<br />
The topics discussed during these orientation programmes included:<br />
population control, cleanliness during menstruation, age at marriage,<br />
antenatal and postnatal care, breastfeeding, child immunization, Oral<br />
Rehydration Salt, spacing of births and RTI/STD/AIDS. The Taluka<br />
Medical Officers and Medical Officers from the Taluka hospital were the<br />
resource persons for the Taluka-level orientation programmes. For the<br />
Gram Panchayat-level orientation programmes, the Medical Officers and<br />
BHEs from the concerned PHC and Head Masters/Assistant Teachers<br />
participated as resource persons.<br />
In most of the Talukas, folk songs were also staged along with the<br />
orientation programmes.<br />
The views of the several <strong>ZSS</strong> and health personnel interviewed during this<br />
evaluation on the orientation programmes are summarized as under:<br />
1. Such orientation programmes are required because the grass-root level<br />
health workers and health educators have not been carrying out the<br />
routine health education due to various factors such as heavy work<br />
load and an absence of concrete action plan. Also the number of<br />
health facilities and health workers is less. This type of activity is<br />
required to control population and to increase the voluntary acceptance<br />
of various health services by the community members. There is a<br />
tendency among community members to neglect the information<br />
provided by the grass root-level health workers.<br />
2. It is useful to give training to Anganwadi workers and<br />
headmasters/teachers because these people are available in almost all<br />
the villages and people have faith in them. Anganwadi workers and<br />
headmasters will propagate the messages to the community.<br />
3. In recent period, more illiterates and backward class people are<br />
becoming Chairman/Vice-chairman of Grama Panchayats. Such<br />
training programmes will help them to know about various health<br />
issues.<br />
4. The orientation training programme for the elected members was not<br />
very successful, mainly because, most of the elected members did not<br />
show any interest in it. However, the Anganwadi workers and<br />
headmasters/teachers took the training very seriously and got their<br />
doubts clarified.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
27<br />
5. The training programmes were more helpful to teachers and<br />
Anganwadi workers rather than the health department persons, for<br />
whom it was only a refresher course.<br />
6. The training helped them to know about first-aid in case of emergency<br />
and people are coming forward voluntarily to accept various health<br />
services.<br />
Most of the Gram Panchayat Presidents/Vice-presidents interviewed told<br />
that they did not know about the purpose of training, content of the<br />
training etc before attending the programme. Some of them informed that<br />
they could not participate in the programme due to several reasons.<br />
However, almost all Gram Panchayats extended full co-operation and<br />
arranged tea, snacks and meals for the participants.<br />
Majority of the village level <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti functionaries interviewed<br />
appreciated the orientation programme and opined that such programmes<br />
help: (1) them to know about various health issues; (2) in reducing the<br />
superstitions prevailing among the villagers; and (3) such programmes<br />
should be organised once a month so that people will remember the<br />
messages.<br />
& 3 " &<br />
It was proposed to organise five district-level workshops for<br />
representatives of Panchayati Raj Institutions, NGOs, women leaders,<br />
journalists and literacy workers. However, as is the case with regard to<br />
other orientation programmes planned and approved, the proposal did not<br />
mention the number of participants, topics to be discussed, resource<br />
persons to be used, the purpose, and the subsequent utilisation of these<br />
trainees in the scheme. It is very surprising to note that almost the same<br />
type of target group as in the Taluka/Panchayat/Village level workshops<br />
was mentioned for the district-level workshop too.<br />
During the discussion, the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary reported that the district-level<br />
workshop originally proposed has been changed into Taluka-level<br />
workshop for elected members, and members of the Yuvak and Yuvati<br />
mandals.<br />
At the time of the evaluation study, these Taluka-level workshops were<br />
organised only in three Talukas namely Chitradurga, Challakere and<br />
Molkalmuru. As per the information from the Taluka Co-ordinators an<br />
amount of Rs. 1,850 was spent for these three workshops.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
,0 !<br />
28<br />
- " "<br />
The <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga had organised two RCH-IEC activities other than<br />
the ones sanctioned under the scheme – airing RCH messages through FM<br />
radio (Chitradurga, AIR) and a debate competition for Pre-university and<br />
High school students. Both these activities were not proposed at all in the<br />
proposal sanctioned by the MOHFW.<br />
This programme was organised as a part of the tenth anniversary of<br />
Chitradurga AIR. Under this programme, messages on RCH were aired<br />
for 13 weeks on every Friday between 6.00 to 6.20 PM. This programme<br />
was mainly based on the street plays and folk songs developed by the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
under this scheme.<br />
Before the programme was aired through the FM channel, an appeal was<br />
made to the public to register their names with AIR for a competition<br />
testing their knowledge on RCH, which will be conducted after the<br />
programme was aired. About 120 persons registered their names with the<br />
AIR and 63 participated in the competition held at the district<br />
headquarters. The <strong>ZSS</strong> and AIR together prepared a set of 25 objective<br />
type questions related to the messages spread through this programme. A<br />
certificate and a FM radio worth Rs. 500 were given to the first 20<br />
winners.<br />
An amount of Rs. 4000/- was spent for the travel from this scheme and the<br />
<strong>Zilla</strong> panchayat, Chitradurga, met the expenditure for the purchase of 20<br />
FM radios.<br />
% " ! - 5<br />
The <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga instructed all the Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> to<br />
organise a debate competition for Pre-university and High school students.<br />
The topic for the debate competition was left to the TSS. An amount of<br />
Rs. 2000 from this scheme was allotted to each TSS for carrying out this<br />
activity.<br />
This activity was conducted only in two Talukas viz. Chitradurga and<br />
Challakere. The competition was organized at two levels – college level<br />
and Taluka level. In the first stage, principals of all the Junior Colleges in<br />
each Taluka were asked to organise a debate competition for the students<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
29<br />
in their college and send the list of first 3 winners to TSS. The following<br />
topics were provided by the TSS for the competition:<br />
1. Hadi Hareyeda Shikshana Aadhunika Samajada Anivarya<br />
(Adolescent education is required for modern society).<br />
2. Hadi Harayedavarge Lyngika Shikshana Needuvalli Sarkarada Mattu<br />
Poshakara Patra (Role of Government and parents in providing sex<br />
education to adolescents).<br />
3. Hadi Harayedavarge Lyngika Shikshana Needuvalli Yeduraguva<br />
Savalugalu (Facing of challenges in providing sex education to<br />
adolescents).<br />
In the second stage debate competition was again organised at the Taluka<br />
level for those students who won the competition at the college level. The<br />
number of participants varied from 12 in Challakere to 16 in Chitradurga<br />
Taluka. In Chitradurga the first three winners were given prize money of<br />
Rs. 200, Rs. 150 and Rs. 100 and the remaining participants were given a<br />
small dictionary. However, in Challakere the first three students were<br />
given trophies. The TSS reimbursed the travel expenses for the<br />
participants and one accompanied person.<br />
" -<br />
One of the objectives of the evaluation study is to examine the coordination<br />
and co-operation of various officials from the department of<br />
health and family welfare in the scheme of RCH-IEC activities though<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong>, at various stages. It was expected that the District health personnel<br />
be involved at every stage of the implementation of the scheme including<br />
the preparation of the project proposal, development of campaign<br />
materials, organizing training and orientation programmes, etc. The<br />
discussion with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, selected Taluka Medical Officers,<br />
Medical Officers of the PHCs, and BHEs/LHVs/ANMs of selected<br />
Subcentres revealed that the officers of department of health and family<br />
welfare in the district was involved in various capacities in all the<br />
activities of the scheme, mostly as resource persons in various orientation<br />
programmes. The District Health Education Officer is reported to have<br />
been involved in the preparation of the project proposal.<br />
The development of scripts for the street plays and folk songs was<br />
organised in the Chitradurga and the DHO, Chitradurga had participated<br />
in this. However, the DHO, Davanagere attended the workshop organised<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
30<br />
in Kondajji for directors and artists and appreciated the efforts of <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
after knowing the contents of street plays and folk songs.<br />
Taluka medical officers were involved in various Taluka-level orientation<br />
programmes as resource persons and some of them attended the<br />
inauguration function of the street plays and folk songs. Some of the<br />
Medical Officers from the Taluka Hospitals are also reported to have<br />
participated in the orientation training programme as resource persons.<br />
Similarly, there is a strict instruction from the Taluka Medical Officer to<br />
all the Medical and Paramedical staffs of various PHCs to attend and<br />
assist in various activities of the <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti. As mentioned earlier,<br />
the Medical Officers and BHEs from various PHCs were involved in the<br />
Gram Panchayat-level orientation programmes as resource persons.<br />
In almost all the villages, the grass-root level workers were present during<br />
the street plays and folk songs. It was reported that in most Talukas, after<br />
the completion of street plays and folk songs, some of the health<br />
functionaries explained to the gathered public, the information provided in<br />
these plays and songs. In Hosadurga Taluka, the Kalajatha team was<br />
accompanied by a technician from the Health Department throughout the<br />
campaign.<br />
Most Taluka Aksharavani <strong>Samitis</strong> reported that the health department<br />
supplied Copper-T, Condoms, Mala-D tablets, IFA tablets, and ORS<br />
packets to be used in mass campaigns as well as in orientation<br />
programmes. Similarly, the health department gave some<br />
posters/brochures/flip charts on AIDS, immunisation, family planning<br />
methods, care during pregnancy and delivery, elements and objective of<br />
RCH etc. These materials were used both in the training programmes and<br />
in street plays and folk songs. Some of the posters were supplied to Gram<br />
Panchayat Secretaries or Co-ordinators for display in important spots<br />
within the village.<br />
As mentioned earlier, the <strong>ZSS</strong> used some of the IEC materials and the<br />
assistance from the health department in developing the posters and the<br />
brochure.<br />
The Taluka Medical Officers told that sometimes they provided vehicle<br />
during the performance of street plays and folk songs in various villages<br />
of the Taluka.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
31<br />
Thus, as per the information from the health and <strong>Saksharata</strong> Samiti<br />
functionaries, there is a total involvement of the health personnel at every<br />
type of the RCH-IEC activities through <strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />
, 7 2 "<br />
As discussed earlier, the Department of Family Welfare, Ministry of<br />
Health and Family Welfare released an amount of Rs. 450,000 to<br />
Secretary (Family Welfare), Government of Karnataka for carrying out<br />
RCH-IEC activities in Chitradurga District through the <strong>ZSS</strong>. There seems<br />
to be a mistake in totalling the cost of the project in the letter from<br />
MOHFW, New Delhi, bearing the sanctioning of the project. While the<br />
actual amount to be sanctioned to the project as per the letter sums up to<br />
Rs. 460,000, the total printed on the sanctioned proposal is Rs. 450,000.<br />
The fund for the project is deposited in a separate bank account opened in<br />
the joint names of President (District Deputy Commissioner) and<br />
Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong> in the Chitradurga Grameen Bank, Chitradurga. The<br />
expenditure incurred in the scheme is entered in a separate account book<br />
with vouchers and is maintained by the Secretary, <strong>ZSS</strong>. The Secretary gets<br />
prior permission from the President for spending on various activities<br />
under the scheme.<br />
The expenditure incurred in the scheme at the time of evaluation study,<br />
i.e, as on September, 2000 was prepared after verifying the account books<br />
and the monthly account statements that were submitted to the MOHFW,<br />
New Delhi and is provided in Table-4. The Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> has so far<br />
spent an amount of Rs. 369,561 against Rs. 450,000 sanctioned for<br />
carrying out various RCH-IEC activities in the district.<br />
Comparing the discussion with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary as well as the Taluka<br />
Co-ordinators, the Quarterly reports of activities and expenditure<br />
submitted to MOHFW, the following points need further clarifications:<br />
a) According to the Quarterly progress report submitted by Chitradurga<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong> to MOHFW, New Delhi, an expenditure of Rs. 6,635 is spent<br />
against 10 Orientation Workshops for Officials/NGOs. However, only<br />
five such orientation training programmes were reported to the<br />
evaluation team by the Taluka Co-ordinators and the total expenditure<br />
reported for this activity is Rs.5,270.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
32<br />
b) Under the item – wall writing – it is reported that the <strong>ZSS</strong> has spent an<br />
amount of Rs. 24,900 in the month of July, 2000. But at the time of the<br />
evaluation, this activity was in progress only in four of the six Talukas.<br />
c) The <strong>ZSS</strong> has reported a total of 217 seminars/workshops at<br />
Taluka/GP/Village levels for an expenditure of Rs. 116,836.<br />
However, the Taluka Co-ordinators reported only 47 such<br />
seminars/workshops (8 Taluka-level and 39 Gram Panchayat level<br />
workshops covering 190 Gram Panchayats).<br />
d) An expenditure of Rs. 6,950 was shown against five district-level<br />
workshops. As discussed earlier this activity was changed to<br />
Workshop exclusively for PRI representatives at the Taluka level. At<br />
the time of evaluation study, i.e. on October, 2000, only three such<br />
workshops were reported to be organised exclusively for the PRI<br />
representatives at Taluka level and the total amount spent for these<br />
three workshops was Rs. 1,850.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
33<br />
Chapter<br />
9<br />
8" -<br />
Knowledge on Selected RCH Issues Among Village Communities<br />
One of the main objectives of the scheme of RCH-IEC through <strong>ZSS</strong> has<br />
been to create mass awareness and to facilitate the individuals and<br />
families in their decision-making in the direction desired for achieving the<br />
goal of the RCH programme. As presented in the previous section, various<br />
IEC activities on RCH issues have been planned and implemented by<br />
Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> under the scheme. This evaluation tried to assess the<br />
reach-effectiveness of these IEC activities, and to some extent, measure<br />
and compare the knowledge and awareness of community members who<br />
were exposed to these activities and those who were not.<br />
As mentioned earlier, 120 community members and 58 opinion leaders<br />
were randomly selected from the 12 study villages, who were asked<br />
several questions on their exposure to various IEC activities on health and<br />
family welfare, as well as on their knowledge about various health and<br />
family welfare issues. The responses to these questions are analysed and<br />
discussed in this chapter.<br />
8" -<br />
The following question was asked to all the selected opinion leaders and<br />
community members to assess their exposure to RCH-IEC activities:<br />
“During the last one year, did you see/participate in any kind of activity<br />
where people were given information on health and family welfare?” A list<br />
of all the activities seen/participated was prepared for those who answered<br />
positively to the question. Table-5 presents the percentage of respondents<br />
who reported exposure to any IEC activity, to street-plays, to folk songs,<br />
and to orientation training programmes, according to their selected<br />
background characteristics.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
34<br />
A large majority of the respondents (84 percent) reported an exposure to at<br />
least one IEC activity on health and family welfare during the year<br />
preceding the interview. The specific activities seen/participated, as<br />
reported by the respondents are: posters/hoarding/handbill – 68 percent;<br />
advertisement on television – 38 percent; street plays – 32 percent;<br />
folksongs – 26 percent; Orientation/training – 11 percent; Jatha – 11<br />
percent; and other activity – 4 percent.<br />
Among these specific activities seen/participated by the respondents, the<br />
three activities – orientation/training, street plays and folksongs – are the<br />
most important ones aimed at the direct participation of the community<br />
members.<br />
Although street plays and folksongs were the major RCH-IEC activities<br />
carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong>, only 32 and 26 percent, of the respondents,<br />
respectively, have seen these programmes. Even in villages where these<br />
activities are conducted (Out of the 12 villages selected for the study, 6<br />
were the villages where the <strong>ZSS</strong> had organized street plays and folk<br />
songs), only 46 and 32 percent have reported seeing street play and<br />
folksong performances, respectively. The orientation and training<br />
workshops, which were organized in 4 of the 12 villages selected, are<br />
attended by 11 percent of the respondents, overall, and only 9 percent of<br />
the respondents from villages where this activity was performed.<br />
The street plays and folksongs are less likely to be seen by women,<br />
members of community who are not opinion leaders, and of course by the<br />
respondents from villages where the <strong>ZSS</strong> has not organized these<br />
programmes. On the other hand, orientation/training programmes are<br />
attended more by women, persons above age 25, persons who have<br />
studied beyond middle school, married persons, and opinion leaders. In<br />
fact, the orientation/training activity at the Gram Panchayat level catered<br />
mostly to the local Anganwadi teachers and female teachers of local<br />
school.<br />
Although the scheme aimed at exposing the poor and the illiterate persons<br />
to RCH messages, it is important to note that their exposure is limited to<br />
street plays and folk songs.<br />
Orientation training programmes are considered as the most important<br />
interpersonal communication media in disseminating various RCH issues.<br />
These channels involve face to face message transfer between a source<br />
and a receiver. As mentioned earlier, only 11 percent of the respondents<br />
were exposed to this medium of communication. In order to obtain a<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
35<br />
concrete idea about the effectiveness of this medium, people who attended<br />
this programme were asked to indicate the duration, method, topics<br />
covered, and major messages received. Due to small number of persons<br />
who reported to have participated in these training/orientation<br />
programmes, the results are not shown in tabular form.<br />
Majority of those who attended orientation programmes, did so only once.<br />
About half of them reported that Aksharavani Samiti had organised these<br />
orientation programmes. More than half of them reported that they<br />
received the communication 2 or more days in advance.<br />
The average reported duration of the orientation workshop is 5 hours. All<br />
the participants informed that lecture was the method of training; and<br />
mostly the local Medical Officer was the resource person. The different<br />
topics reported as included in these training programmes are: child care<br />
(47 percent), family planning (37 percent), maternal care (31 percent),<br />
environmental protection (26 percent), literacy (11 percent) and AIDS (11<br />
percent). The most important messages received from these training<br />
programmes were - “women should take nutritious food and go for health<br />
check-up during pregnancy”, “safe sex to avoid AIDS” and “small family<br />
is happy family”. The next most frequently reported message was -<br />
“immunisation should be provided to avoid polio attack, blind belief<br />
should not be followed and nutritious food to children for faster growth”.<br />
Folk media is another channel used in the RCH-IEC strategies of <strong>ZSS</strong>.<br />
This is considered to be more effective medium in sensitising various<br />
health issues among the illiterate rural mass, who are not exposed much to<br />
the modernizing influences. As mentioned earlier, street-plays and folksongs<br />
were the folk media used under this scheme in Chitradurga district.<br />
Some particulars regarding the street-plays and folk songs were asked to<br />
the respondents who were exposed to them, in order to ascertain the reach<br />
effectiveness of these media.<br />
As discussed earlier, around one-third each of the respondents reported<br />
that they have seen street plays and 26 percent of the respondents have<br />
heard folk-songs. Majority of those who had heard folksongs (89 percent)<br />
said that the folksongs were part of the street plays. Most (81 percent) of<br />
them reported that they have seen the street-play only once during the last<br />
one year. With regard to the place of staging, a substantial proportion (60<br />
percent) informed that the street-play was conducted in the premises of the<br />
school ground. Around two-fifth of the respondents correctly knew that<br />
the street plays were organized by the Aksharavani Samiti and one-fourth<br />
thought that the street plays were organized by Gram Panchayat. The<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
36<br />
average duration of the street play performance as reported by the<br />
audience was about 2 hours.<br />
Almost all the respondents who have seen a street play said that it was<br />
organised on no special occasion, but on usual day. When asked regarding<br />
the advance publicity about the street-plays, more than three-fifths of<br />
those who had seen a street play had received notification about it<br />
adequately in advance. It is surprising to note that more than three-fourths<br />
(79 percent) of those who had seen the street play could not recall the<br />
name of at least one street play.<br />
Each respondent who had seen a street play was asked about the themes<br />
covered in the street-play that they saw last. The different themes reported<br />
by those who have seen street plays in the order of frequency of reporting<br />
are: literacy (37 percent), environmental protection (30 percent), AIDS<br />
(26 percent), maternal care (21 percent), child care (19 percent), blind<br />
beliefs on health care practices (16 percent), and family planning (16<br />
percent). The street play performance was satisfactory according to the<br />
majority (83 percent) of the respondents.<br />
The reported themes covered in folksongs, in the order of frequency are:<br />
child care (35 percent), AIDS (22 percent), environmental protection (20<br />
percent), literacy (13 percent), blind beliefs on health care practices (11<br />
percent), maternal care (6 percent) and family planning (4 percent).<br />
According to the respondents who had seen a street play, the most<br />
important message conveyed through these street plays are:<br />
a. Safe sex to avoid AIDS (12 percent)<br />
b. Environmental protection/ sanitation to avoid diseases (12 percent)<br />
c. Blind beliefs should not be followed for health care practices (7<br />
percent)<br />
d. Small family is happy family (7 percent)<br />
e. When child is sick he/she should be taken to hospital (5 percent)<br />
f. Pregnant woman should take nutritious food (5 percent)<br />
g. Children should go to school not for work (5 percent)<br />
The important messages received through the folk-songs, as reported by<br />
those who were exposed to folk-songs are:<br />
a. Safe sex to avoid AIDS (13 percent)<br />
b. Immunisation should be provided to avoid polio attack (11 percent)<br />
c. Habitual alcohol consumption leads to increase the family size (7<br />
percent)<br />
d. Children should go to school not for work ( 7 percent)<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
37<br />
$<br />
e. Marriage age for girls is 18 and for boys it is 21 years (4 percent)<br />
f. Blind beliefs should not be followed for health care practices (4<br />
percent)<br />
g. When child is sick he/she should be taken to hospital (4 percent)<br />
In order to assess the knowledge generated on various RCH issues<br />
through this scheme, structured questions were asked to the randomly<br />
selected opinion leaders and community members in the 12 selected<br />
villages of the District. The questions asked related mainly to the topics or<br />
themes included in the various RCH-IEC activities of <strong>ZSS</strong>. It is very<br />
difficult to determine whether the knowledge and awareness of the<br />
community member measured in this evaluation is due to the specific<br />
scheme under evaluation or due to other similar influences prevailing on<br />
the community. In order to overcome this problem to some extent,<br />
knowledge on various RCH issues are analysed separately for respondents<br />
who were exposed to any RCH-IEC activity of <strong>ZSS</strong> (either street play, or<br />
folksongs or orientation/training programme) and those who were not<br />
exposed to these activities. The two groups are referred in the discussion<br />
as ‘exposed’ and ‘not-exposed’ groups, respectively.<br />
Table-6 presents the distribution of exposed and non-exposed respondents<br />
according to their responses to questions on selected health and family<br />
welfare issues. The results are discussed separately by themes covered in<br />
the awareness questionnaire.<br />
Age at marriage is an important issue discussed and included in the<br />
various RCH-IEC activities of <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga. The knowledge<br />
generated regarding this aspect was examined by the legal minimum age<br />
at marriage for boys and girls reported by those who were exposed to the<br />
RCH-IEC activities of <strong>ZSS</strong> and those were not. A larger proportion of the<br />
exposed and non-exposed group reported correctly the legal minimum age<br />
at marriage for girls (73 and 75 percent respectively) compared to the<br />
legal minimum age at marriage for boys (36 and 40 percent respectively).<br />
This indicates that more respondents know about the minimum legal age<br />
at marriage for girls than boys.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
38<br />
Under the theme three questions on breastfeeding, three questions on<br />
management of diarrhoea and four questions on childhood vaccinations<br />
were asked to each respondent. The questions on breastfeeding are: how<br />
soon after childbirth should the child be put to breast for the first time,<br />
whether the first breast milk should be given to the new-born or not, and<br />
the age till which a child should be breastfed. Under the theme of<br />
management of childhood diarrhoea, the questions asked are: the danger<br />
signs of diarrhoea, treatment of and feeding during diarrhoea. With regard<br />
to childhood vaccinations, questions were included on names of<br />
vaccinations against specific diseases, and the timing of measles<br />
vaccination.<br />
While 53 percent of persons who were exposed reported that a child<br />
should be initiated to breastfeeding immediately after childbirth, this<br />
proportion for not exposed group is only 34 percent. A greater percentage<br />
of respondents who were not exposed mentioned that the breastfeeding<br />
should be initiated only a day after childbirth. The difference between<br />
those exposed and not exposed categories are found to be statistically<br />
significant with more persons from the exposed group giving correct<br />
answer.<br />
With regard to feeding colostrum to the new-born, 60 and 33 percent of<br />
exposed group and non-exposed group, respectively, are of the opinion<br />
that the first breast milk should be given to the child, without discarding it.<br />
Similarly, more persons who were not exposed to the IEC-RCH activities<br />
of <strong>ZSS</strong> reported that they don't know the ideal duration of breastfeeding.<br />
More than one-third of the persons exposed reported that repeated watery<br />
stools (43 percent), repeated vomiting (35 percent) and fever (35 percent)<br />
are the symptoms of diarrhoea which would tell that the child should be<br />
taken to a health facility. The corresponding proportions for non-exposed<br />
category are 47, 36 and 39, respectively. Other danger signs of diarrhoea<br />
mentioned by a substantial proportion of respondents are: any vomiting<br />
(28 percent for exposed and 31 percent for non-exposed), not getting<br />
better (28 percent for exposed and 23 percent for non-exposed), and any<br />
watery stools (27 percent for exposed and 16 percent for non-exposed).<br />
The persons who were exposed to the IEC activities of <strong>ZSS</strong> seem to have<br />
better knowledge of ORS and increased fluid intake during diarrhoea,<br />
which are emphasised in the Indian programme on diarrhoea<br />
management, compared to persons who were not exposed. To a question<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
0<br />
39<br />
on what should one do if a child suffers from diarrhoea, 65 percent of the<br />
exposed group reported that the child should be taken to a doctor, 48<br />
percent reported that the child should be given ORS, and 24 percent<br />
reported that the child should be given more liquids. The corresponding<br />
proportions among non-exposed category are: 65, 32 and 8 percent<br />
respectively.<br />
A higher proportion of respondents who were exposed, compared to those<br />
who were not exposed, reported that the child with diarrhoea should be<br />
given more to drink (64 percent and 46 percent).<br />
Significant difference is observed in the knowledge of the exposed and the<br />
non-exposed groups regarding BCG as the vaccination given to children<br />
against TB. A higher proportion of the non-exposed group doesn't know<br />
the name of the vaccination given to children against TB. DPT is known<br />
as the vaccination given to the children against diphtheria, whooping<br />
cough and tetanus to only one-third of exposed group and a quarter of<br />
non-exposed group. Both the exposed and non-exposed respondents are<br />
most familiar with the vaccination against poliomyelitis. While 28 percent<br />
of the exposed group reported 9 months as the age at which a child should<br />
be given measles vaccines, this percentage for non-exposed groups is 20.<br />
Maternal care is one of the important aspects of RCH programme. A<br />
substantial proportion of respondents who were exposed to the IEC<br />
activities of <strong>ZSS</strong> reported that maternal care was one of the major topics<br />
covered by these programmes. Various indicators of maternal care such as<br />
the month of first antenatal check-up, minimum number of antenatal<br />
check-ups that are recommended for pregnant women, the recommended<br />
number of doses of tetanus toxoid injections, important tests that a<br />
pregnant woman should undergo during pregnancy, types of pregnancies<br />
that may be categorised as risk pregnancies, and the common health<br />
problems experienced during pregnancy were asked to each respondent.<br />
With regard to the month of first antenatal check-up, majority of both<br />
those who were exposed and those who were not (75 percent and 71<br />
percent, respectively) reported that during the first trimester itself,<br />
antenatal check-up should be received. Similarly, a comparatively higher<br />
proportion of persons (35 percent) who were exposed reported six or more<br />
number of antenatal check-ups as the minimum that a pregnant woman<br />
should receive. To a question on the number of tetanus toxoid injections a<br />
pregnant woman should receive, more respondents from the exposed<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
, 5"<br />
40<br />
group reported two doses than non-exposed group (25 percent and 19<br />
percent).<br />
A relatively higher proportion of exposed group mentioned abdominal<br />
check-up (45 percent), urine test (36 percent) and blood test (35 percent)<br />
as the important tests that a woman should undergo during pregnancy.<br />
About half of the non-exposed category do not know about the important<br />
tests that a woman should undergo during pregnancy.<br />
To a question on what type of pregnancy is called risk pregnancy, 25<br />
percent of respondents who were exposed and only 4 percent of those who<br />
were not exposed reported that pregnancy under age 20 is a risk<br />
pregnancy, the difference being statistically significant. Too short a birth<br />
interval is considered as risk pregnancy by 12 and 3 percent of those who<br />
were exposed and who were not. A significantly higher proportion of<br />
those who were not exposed did not know about the type of pregnancy<br />
that is considered as risk pregnancy (82 percent against 55 percent).<br />
The reported major health problems that some women may experience<br />
during pregnancy are: swelling of hands and feet (17 percent of the<br />
exposed and 10 percent of the non-exposed), weakness or tiredness (17<br />
percent of the exposed and 17 percent of the non-exposed), bleeding (9<br />
percent of the exposed and 5 percent of the non-exposed) and abnormal<br />
presentation (12 percent of the exposed and 7 percent of the non-exposed).<br />
A relatively greater proportion of the exposed group mentioned delivery<br />
by trained professionals and sterile blade as precautionary measures that<br />
need to be taken during delivery.<br />
To a question on the family planning methods that couples can use if they<br />
want to space births, more than half of the persons exposed as well as nonexposed<br />
reported IUD. The results indicate that the two groups do not<br />
differ much with regard to the knowledge of oral pill as a spacing method.<br />
However, a relatively higher proportion of the exposed group reported<br />
condom as a spacing method (49 percent against 42 percent).<br />
In order to compare the awareness on AIDS between exposed and nonexposed<br />
groups, each respondent was first asked if she/he had ever heard<br />
of an illness called AIDS. Respondents who reported the knowledge of<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
41<br />
AIDS were asked further questions on the mechanisms of HIV<br />
transmission and the precautions a person can take to avoid AIDS.<br />
A greater proportion of exposed category and non-exposed category have<br />
heard of an illness called AIDS (89 percent and 87 percent). The correct<br />
knowledge of transmission of AIDS is also more among exposed category<br />
than non-exposed category. Majority of exposed persons who have heard<br />
of the disease (66 percent) reported sexual intercourse as a mode of<br />
transmission of AIDS followed by needles/blades/skin punctures (48<br />
percent), transfusion of infected blood (36 percent) and heterosexual<br />
intercourse (24 percent). The corresponding proportions for non-exposed<br />
category are: 53 percent, 38 percent, 28 percent and 22 percent. The<br />
proportion who did not know about the modes of transmission of AIDS is<br />
almost twice among the non-exposed than among the exposed (19 percent<br />
versus 8 percent).<br />
In order to understand the misconceptions among exposed persons and<br />
non-exposed persons about the disease, the respondents were asked if they<br />
thought that one could get AIDS from various commonly occurring social<br />
situations such as shaking hands with someone who has AIDS, sharing<br />
clothes or eating utensils with someone who has AIDS, or stepping on<br />
urine or stools of a person who has AIDS. Respondents were also asked<br />
whether they thought they could get AIDS from mosquito, flea or bedbugs<br />
bites. Medical professionals believe that these situations pose an<br />
extremely low risk of transmission of AIDS.<br />
Respondents who heard of AIDS have a number of misconceptions about<br />
the disease and not much difference was observed between these two<br />
groups in this regard. The most common misconception is that AIDS can<br />
be transmitted through mosquito/flea/bedbug bites (58 percent nonexposed<br />
and 63 percent exposed). About half of the exposed and nonexposed<br />
group believe that AIDS can be transmitted through stepping on<br />
urine.<br />
A greater proportion of exposed group than non-exposed group mentioned<br />
specific modes of prevention. ‘Safe sex’ and ‘sterilising needles and<br />
syringes’ are mentioned by 70 and 40 percent of exposed group and the<br />
corresponding percentages among non-exposed group are 68 and 27.<br />
Similarly, the proportion who did not know about the methods of<br />
prevention of AIDS is greater among the non-exposed (21 percent)<br />
compared with the exposed group (16 percent).<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
42<br />
To a specific question on whether a woman who has AIDS virus can give<br />
birth to a child with AIDS virus, 84 percent of the exposed category and<br />
79 percent of the non-exposed category answered in the affirmative. Onefifth<br />
of the non-exposed group do not know that whether it is possible for<br />
a woman who has AIDS virus to give birth to a child with AIDS virus.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
43<br />
Chapter<br />
:<br />
5<br />
At the instance of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW),<br />
Government of India, the Population Research Centre, JSS Institute of<br />
Economic Research, Dharwad undertook an evaluation of the scheme<br />
‘RCH-IEC Activities through <strong>Zilla</strong> <strong>Saksharata</strong> <strong>Samitis</strong> (<strong>ZSS</strong>)’ in District<br />
Chitradurga, Karnataka. The Scheme itself aimed at (1) promoting the<br />
participation of <strong>ZSS</strong>s in organizing IEC activities in the area of reproductive<br />
and child health, who had ample experience in carrying out mass literacy<br />
campaigns throughout the country, and (2) development and dissemination<br />
of IEC materials for RCH in the local language in the acceptable folk<br />
media, incorporating local images and idioms, themes and talents, so that<br />
the substantial proportion of the rural population who are not exposed to the<br />
regular IEC activities of the Department of Health and Family Welfare are<br />
reached.<br />
The MOHFW, in consultation with the Department of Education, Ministry<br />
of Human Resource Development, Government of India, invited the<br />
proposals from various Deputy Commissioners/<strong>ZSS</strong>s for carrying out IEC<br />
activities for reproductive and child health. The guidelines for the project<br />
proposal were also sent to the Deputy Commissioners/<strong>ZSS</strong>s in 1998. The<br />
project proposals received from the <strong>ZSS</strong>s were scrutinized at MOHFW, and<br />
were sanctioned after due modifications, to 216 <strong>ZSS</strong>s. After the lapse of<br />
one year following the sanctioning of the scheme, the performance of the<br />
scheme is being evaluated with the main objectives of (1) assessing whether<br />
the activities have been carried out according to the proposal, (2) the<br />
utilization of funds for specific approved activities, (3) coordination with<br />
the local health personnel, (4) the probable impact of the scheme on<br />
knowledge and awareness of the target population and (5) the perceived<br />
strengths and the weaknesses of the scheme as per the <strong>ZSS</strong> and health<br />
personnel at various levels as well as the beneficiaries.<br />
The evaluation was conducted involving detailed discussions with the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
and health functionaries at the district, Taluka and village levels. In<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
44<br />
addition, a randomly selected sample of 58 opinion leaders and 120<br />
community members were interviewed with the help of a semi-structured<br />
questionnaire on exposure to different IEC activities related to health and<br />
family welfare as well as their knowledge on the selected RCH themes.<br />
The important observations made during the evaluation are summarized<br />
below:<br />
1. It is reported by the present <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary Chitradurga that the project<br />
proposal for the district was prepared based on the experience during a<br />
workshop organised by State Resource Centre (SRC), Mysore. The<br />
actual proposal was prepared with the help of the then Assistant<br />
Director, Women and Child Development and the District Health<br />
Education Officer, Chitradurga.<br />
2. The <strong>ZSS</strong>, Chitradurga submitted its project proposal to the Ministry on<br />
8 January, 1999 – almost 7 months after the first call for proposals and 3<br />
months after the second communication regarding the guidelines.<br />
3. The proposal submitted by the <strong>ZSS</strong> was approved with little<br />
modification and an amount of Rs. 4,50,000 was released to Secretary<br />
(Family Welfare), Government of Karnataka vide letter dated 31,<br />
March, 1999 and the same was communicated to the District<br />
Collector. However the funds for the scheme was released to the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
on 22 September, 1999 and the amount was received only on 1<br />
January, 2000. Thus, the time gap between the sanction of the fund at<br />
the central level and receipt of the same by the <strong>ZSS</strong> is about 9 months.<br />
The scheme was actually launched in Chitradurga district on 3<br />
December, 1999 – before receiving the funds.<br />
4. The proposal submitted to and approved by the MOHFW did not<br />
include any district-specific content or activity, although the guidelines<br />
for the scheme suggested the same.<br />
5. Both the guidelines and the proposal sanctioned do not indicate, in<br />
detail, the operationalization of the proposed IEC activities. For<br />
instance, the guidelines for the preparation of the proposal provide, in<br />
detail, the various subject matter that should be included in the IEC<br />
activities but do not reveal how these contents should actually be<br />
incorporated in specific activities such as Kalajatha, folk songs etc.<br />
Similarly, the proposal did not mention specifically, with respect to the<br />
orientation and training programmes, the topics to be covered, the<br />
resource persons to be used and how the trained persons will be<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
45<br />
utilised subsequently in the scheme. The proposal was silent about the<br />
number of street plays and folk songs to be developed. It does not<br />
provide the details regarding the number of troupes and number of<br />
artists per troupe and the level at which these performances are to be<br />
organised.<br />
6. The project proposal which was approved by MOHFW had a<br />
provision for Preraka/Anganwadi worker/ANM as co-ordinators and<br />
elected Gram Panchayat members and local school teacher as the<br />
members of the local team for the effective implementation of various<br />
IEC activities under the scheme. But during the evaluation, no such<br />
local team was identified in any of the villages covered for the<br />
evaluation.<br />
7. The following activities - to be organized at the District, Taluka and<br />
village levels – were sanctioned under the scheme to Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong>:<br />
a. Orientation workshops for officials/NGOs, 1 to be organized at the<br />
district level and 7 at the Taluka level<br />
b. Material Development Workshop, one each to develop posters,<br />
folk-songs, and street plays, to be organized by the <strong>ZSS</strong> at the<br />
district level<br />
c. Street plays – 100 performances<br />
d. Folk songs – 100 performances<br />
e. Posters – about 10,000 posters to be displayed<br />
f. Wall-writing – 500 in number<br />
g. Seminars/Workshops at Taluka, Panchayat and village levels – a<br />
total of 240 workshops to be organized<br />
h. District-level workshops – a total of five – involving elected<br />
representatives, representatives of the NGOs, women leaders,<br />
journalists and literacy workers.<br />
8. Each TSS was given an action plan according to which various Taluka<br />
and Gram Panchayat/village level activities under the scheme were<br />
implemented. The <strong>ZSS</strong> sanctioned the related funds to the TSS.<br />
9. Under orientation workshops for the officials/NGOs, it was proposed<br />
and approved to carry out a two-day <strong>ZSS</strong> level workshop for Rs. 5,000<br />
and 7 Taluka-level workshops (there are only 6 Talukas in Chitradurga<br />
district) at the cost of Rs. 1,000 per workshop, for 25-30 participants<br />
each. However, the two-day <strong>ZSS</strong>-level workshop has not been<br />
organized so far. Five Taluka-level orientation programmes for<br />
officials of various Government departments have been organized.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
46<br />
However, in some Talukas, this workshop was combined with some<br />
other Taluka-level workshops.<br />
10. The proposed activities under material development includes a twoday<br />
workshop on posters, two-day workshop on folk songs and a fiveday<br />
workshop on street plays. As against the proposal, the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
organized :<br />
a. a three-day workshop to develop the scripts for 4 street plays,12<br />
folk songs and 1 Rupaka,<br />
b. a three-day workshop for directors and artists for street plays and<br />
folksongs, and<br />
c. another three-day workshop for the artists at the Taluka level.<br />
Of the three workshops, two were conducted together for Davanagere<br />
and Chitradurga districts. No workshop was conducted for the<br />
development of posters, and the workshops were not organized<br />
separately for the development of street plays and folksongs.<br />
It is evident that the Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> has taken very keen interest in<br />
developing the scripts for street plays and folk songs and also in<br />
directing and training 6 troupes each consisting of 12 performers, one<br />
troupe in each Taluka, for presentation of these street plays and folk<br />
songs.<br />
11. The sanctioned proposal included a provision for conducting 100<br />
performances each of street plays and folk songs, separately, by involving<br />
the local NGOs. However, the same troupe performed both the street<br />
plays and folksongs at one occasion, and they were combined to make the<br />
campaign more effective. The total number of street-play and folk song<br />
performances also were more than the number proposed – a total of 351<br />
performances.<br />
12. It was proposed to develop and print 10,000 posters under the scheme.<br />
The Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> printed 6,000 posters and 4,000 brochures showing<br />
important messages on RCH issues. However, these posters and<br />
brochures do not follow the principles of designing such communication<br />
materials, and suffer from several editorial errors.<br />
13. The proposed wall-writing activity has been initiated in four Talukas of<br />
the district. The messages are generally written on the walls of Gram<br />
Panchayats and other government buildings in villages and Government<br />
buildings located in Taluka head quarters.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
47<br />
14. In addition to these wall-writings, 9 hoardings were also erected at<br />
prominent places conveying messages on reproductive and child health.<br />
However, this activity was neither proposed nor sanctioned under the<br />
scheme.<br />
15. According to the sanctioned scheme, the <strong>ZSS</strong> had to organize 240<br />
seminars/workshops at Taluka/Gram Panchayat/Village levels for PRI<br />
representatives, literacy volunteers, women leaders, NGOs and neoliterates.<br />
However, a total of 8 Taluka-level workshops and 39 Gram<br />
Panchayat/Village level workshops covering 190 Gram Panchayats are<br />
reported to have been organized.<br />
16. It was proposed to organise five district-level workshops for<br />
representatives of Panchayati Raj Institutions and NGOs, women leaders,<br />
journalists and literacy workers. Instead, the <strong>ZSS</strong> instructed the six TSSs<br />
to carry out Taluka-level workshops exclusively for PRI representatives,<br />
and such workshops were organised in three Talukas.<br />
17. The <strong>ZSS</strong> and the DHO’s office together co-ordinated in almost all the<br />
activities under the scheme. The involvement was greater at the Taluka<br />
and Village-level activities – as the TMOs and MOs along various<br />
paramedical staff participated in the activities under the scheme. The<br />
contribution was in terms of resource persons, IEC materials, supply of<br />
ORS and contraceptives for demonstration purposes and transportation.<br />
18. Comparing the discussion with the <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary as well as the Taluka<br />
Co-ordinators, the Quarterly reports of activities and expenditure<br />
submitted to MOHFW, the following points need further clarifications:<br />
a) According to the Quarterly progress report submitted by<br />
Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> to MOHFW, New Delhi, an expenditure of Rs.<br />
6,635 is spent against 10 Orientation Workshops for<br />
Officials/NGOs. However, only five such orientation training<br />
programmes were reported to the evaluation team by the Taluka<br />
Co-ordinators and the total expenditure reported for this activity<br />
is Rs.5,270.<br />
b) Under the item – wall writing – it is reported that the <strong>ZSS</strong> has<br />
spent an amount of Rs. 24,900 in the month of July, 2000. But at<br />
the time of the evaluation, this activity was in progress only in<br />
four of the six Talukas.<br />
c) The <strong>ZSS</strong> has reported a total of 217 seminars/workshops at<br />
Taluka/GP/Village levels for an expenditure of Rs. 116,836.<br />
However, the Taluka Co-ordinators reported only 47 such<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
48<br />
seminars/workshops (8 Taluka-level and 39 Gram Panchayat<br />
level workshops covering 190 Gram Panchayats).<br />
d) An expenditure of Rs. 6,950 was shown against five district-level<br />
workshops. As discussed earlier this activity was changed to<br />
Workshop exclusively for PRI representatives at the Taluka<br />
level. At the time of evaluation study, i.e. on October, 2000, only<br />
three such workshops were reported to be organised exclusively<br />
for the PRI representatives at Taluka level and the total amount<br />
spent for these three workshops was Rs. 1,850.<br />
19. A large majority of the respondents (84 percent) reported an exposure to at<br />
least one IEC activity on health and family welfare during the year<br />
preceding the interview. The specific activities seen/participated, as<br />
reported by the respondents are: posters/hoarding/handbill – 68 percent;<br />
advertisement on television – 38 percent; street plays – 32 percent;<br />
folksongs – 26 percent; Orientation/training – 11 percent; Jatha – 11<br />
percent; and other activity – 4 percent. The exposure to any of the three<br />
activities carried out by <strong>ZSS</strong> (street plays, folksongs, and<br />
training/orientation programme) is to the extent of 42 percent of the<br />
respondents.<br />
20. Although street plays and folksongs were the major RCH-IEC activities<br />
carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong>, only around one-third of the respondents have<br />
seen these programmes. Even in villages where these activities are<br />
conducted (Out of the 12 villages selected for the study, 6 were the<br />
villages where the <strong>ZSS</strong> had organized street plays and folk songs), only 46<br />
and 32 percent have reported seeing street play and folksong<br />
performances, respectively. The orientation and training workshops,<br />
which were organized in 4 of the 12 villages selected, are attended by 11<br />
percent of the respondents, overall, and only 9 percent of the respondents<br />
from villages where this activity was performed.<br />
21. The street plays and folksongs are less likely to be seen by women,<br />
members of community who are not opinion leaders, and of course by the<br />
respondents from villages where the <strong>ZSS</strong> has not organized these<br />
programmes. On the other hand, orientation/training programmes are<br />
attended more by women, persons above age 25, persons who have<br />
studied beyond middle school, married persons, and opinion leaders. In<br />
fact, the orientation/training activity at the Gram Panchayat level catered<br />
mostly to the local Anganwadi teachers and female teachers of local<br />
school. Although the scheme aimed at exposing the poor and the illiterate<br />
persons to RCH messages, it is important to note that their exposure is<br />
limited to street plays and folk songs.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
49<br />
22. In general, the awareness on the measured RCH issues seems to be better<br />
among those who were exposed to either street play or folksong or<br />
orientation/training programme organized by <strong>ZSS</strong> compared to those who<br />
were not exposed to these activities.<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
50<br />
APPENDIX A<br />
TABLES<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
51<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
Table 1: Summary of activities sanctioned and conducted under RCH-IEC scheme by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
Activity Proposed/Sanctioned Status Date Place Resource persons Participants Specific activity<br />
Seven Taluka Level Workshops 5 organised April and Various DHEO, THO’s, MO’s Taluka Lecture on<br />
for 25-30 participants<br />
August, 2000 Taluka Head from General Hospital and Officials, various RCH<br />
Quarters One member from <strong>ZSS</strong>, Journalists, PRI issues<br />
Chitradurga<br />
representatives<br />
GP Secretaries<br />
Two-day workshop on folksongs 3 workshops were 28-30/12/99 Chitradurga DHO, Chitradurga; two 34 (District and 12 folksongs, 4<br />
held together for<br />
Health Educators from Taluka level streetplays and 1<br />
the development<br />
State Resource Centre, directors of both Rupaka on RCH<br />
of folksongs and<br />
Mysore; prominent script districts) messages were<br />
street plays<br />
writers of both Davanagere<br />
developed<br />
and Chitradurga districts<br />
Six-day workshop for street plays<br />
14-16/2/00 Thirtharam- Two resource persons from 31 (7 play Direction of the<br />
and folk songs<br />
eshwara, State Resource Centre, directors and 7 play and music<br />
Davanagere Mysore<br />
folk singers) for folksongs<br />
finalized<br />
3 days in Taluka level THO’s, State Resource 90 (in each 6 Troupes were<br />
March, 2000<br />
person, District Director, Taluka 15 artists trained in staging<br />
One member from <strong>ZSS</strong> were trained ) street plays and<br />
folksongs<br />
100 performances of street play Combined as one March- 351 villages Trained troupes Local leaders, Street plays and<br />
100 performances of folksongs activity; same July/2000 were covered<br />
Panchayat folksongs<br />
troupe performed<br />
members, local covering various<br />
both<br />
health personnel RCH issues<br />
and the public<br />
Two-day <strong>ZSS</strong> Level workshop Not conducted<br />
for 25-30 participants<br />
Two-day workshop on posters Not conducted
Table 1 (Contd): Summary of activities sanctioned and conducted under RCH-IEC scheme by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
Activity Proposed/Sanctioned Status Date Place Resource persons Participants Specific activity<br />
10,000 Posters<br />
6,000 posters were June, 2000 Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, District General Public About 1400<br />
printed (1500<br />
Co-ordinator, <strong>ZSS</strong> and<br />
posters were<br />
posters of 4<br />
DHEO<br />
distributed for<br />
different types)<br />
display in various<br />
GP’s<br />
4,000 brochures June, 2000 Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, District Distributed to Used in various<br />
were printed<br />
Co-ordinator, <strong>ZSS</strong> and participants of orientation<br />
DHEO<br />
various programmes<br />
orientation<br />
programmes<br />
500 Wall writings In progress September, Taluka’s and <strong>ZSS</strong> Secretary, District General Public Slogans on RCH<br />
2000 GP’s Co-ordinator, <strong>ZSS</strong> and<br />
were written in 10<br />
DHEO<br />
to 20 GP’s of 3<br />
Talukas<br />
240 Seminars/Workshops at 47 organised June- Various Local Medical Officers PRI<br />
Lectures on RCH<br />
Taluka/Panchayat/Village levels<br />
September, Taluka and and CDPOs<br />
representatives, issues<br />
2000 Hobli places<br />
literacy<br />
volunteers,<br />
women leaders,<br />
NGOs, neoliterates,<br />
Anganwadi<br />
workers and<br />
Lectures on RCH<br />
issues<br />
school teacher s<br />
PRI<br />
representatives<br />
Medical Officer and<br />
Lecturer in District<br />
Nursing School<br />
Taluka head<br />
quarters<br />
May-<br />
September,<br />
2000<br />
Changed to Taluka<br />
level workshops<br />
exclusively for<br />
elected<br />
represetatives and<br />
3 were orgnised<br />
Five District-level workshops for<br />
PRI representatives, NGOs,<br />
women leaders, Journalists and<br />
literacy workers<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />
2
Table 2: The number of street-play performances planned and organized in the Talukas of<br />
Chitradurga district under the RCH-IEC scheme.<br />
Date of<br />
inauguration of the<br />
Taluka Performances planned Performances organized programmes<br />
Chitradurga<br />
75<br />
72<br />
27 April, 2000<br />
Challakere<br />
60<br />
60<br />
10 April, 2000<br />
Hiriyur<br />
60<br />
57<br />
20 March, 2000<br />
Hosadurga<br />
60<br />
60<br />
21 April, 2000<br />
Holalkere<br />
60<br />
60<br />
22 April, 2000<br />
Molkalmuru<br />
40<br />
42<br />
10 April, 2000<br />
TOTAL<br />
Taluka<br />
Chitradurga<br />
Challakere<br />
Hiriyur<br />
Hosadurga<br />
Holalkere<br />
Molkalmuru<br />
TOTAL<br />
355<br />
351<br />
Table 3: The number of orientation programmes planned and organized by Talukas of Chitradurga<br />
District under RCH-IEC scheme.<br />
Taluka-level workshop GP-level workshop<br />
PlannOrga- Date Plan-ned Orga- GPs covered Date<br />
ednizednized 2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
12<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
8<br />
Apr/Sep., 2000<br />
June, 2000<br />
April, 2000<br />
Sep., 2000<br />
April, 2000<br />
July, 2000<br />
42<br />
33<br />
33<br />
33<br />
33<br />
33<br />
202<br />
11<br />
6<br />
4<br />
9<br />
8<br />
1<br />
39<br />
36<br />
39<br />
31<br />
33<br />
29<br />
16<br />
190<br />
July/Aug. 2000<br />
July, 2000<br />
Sept., 2000<br />
July, 2000<br />
August, 2000<br />
July, 2000
2<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
Total<br />
6,635<br />
12,000<br />
90,491<br />
37,242<br />
44,750<br />
24,900<br />
September<br />
2000<br />
700<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
August<br />
2000<br />
1,000<br />
-<br />
7,601<br />
490<br />
-<br />
-<br />
July<br />
2000<br />
-<br />
-<br />
6,000<br />
1,400<br />
-<br />
24,900<br />
June<br />
2000<br />
650<br />
-<br />
26,960<br />
13,960<br />
44,750<br />
-<br />
1,16,836<br />
6,950<br />
21,201<br />
8,556<br />
20,250<br />
5,100<br />
-<br />
1,050<br />
30,600<br />
18,50<br />
-<br />
1,127<br />
31,259<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
650<br />
-<br />
-<br />
6,379<br />
Table 4: Summary of the item-wise expenditure by Chitradurga <strong>ZSS</strong> under RCH-IEC Scheme<br />
Expenditure/Month<br />
Amount<br />
Activity<br />
Sanctioned March1 April May<br />
2000 2000 2000<br />
1. Orientation workshop for Officials/NGOs 12,000 - 4,285 -<br />
2. Material Development Workshop<br />
25,000 12,000 - -<br />
3. Street play<br />
1,00,000 5,250 35,980 8,700<br />
4. Folk songs<br />
50,000 2800 17,392 1,200<br />
5. Posters<br />
50,000 - - -<br />
6. Wall-writings<br />
25,000 - - -<br />
7. Seminars/Workshops at Taluka/GP/Village<br />
level<br />
1,20,000 31,077 3,000 -<br />
8. Five District-level Workshops<br />
9,000 - - -<br />
9. Miscellaneous programme expenses 23,000 8917 11,424 860<br />
10. Administrative expenses<br />
46,000 - - -<br />
Total 4,60,000 60,044 72,081 10,760 93,349 63,559 42,668 27,100 3,69,561
Table 5: Percentage distribution of respondents exposed to RCH-IEC activities by background characteristics, Chitradurga district<br />
Background characteristic Any IEC activity Exposed to RCH-IEC activity of <strong>ZSS</strong> Number<br />
Street play Folksong Orientation Any<br />
91<br />
87<br />
44.0<br />
40.2<br />
6.6<br />
14.9<br />
26.4<br />
25.3<br />
36.3<br />
27.6<br />
89.0<br />
78.2<br />
Sex<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
64<br />
114<br />
32.8<br />
47.4<br />
3.1<br />
14.1<br />
15.6<br />
31.6<br />
28.1<br />
34.2<br />
81.3<br />
85.1<br />
Age<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />
3
Table 6: Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to various RCH-IEC<br />
Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />
Exposed to IEC activity of<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong><br />
Item Yes No Total<br />
Age at marriage<br />
Legal minimum age at marriage for girls<br />
18 years<br />
Other<br />
Legal minimum age at marriage for boys<br />
21 years<br />
Other<br />
Child Care<br />
Till what age should a child be breastfed?<br />
2<br />
Table 6 (Contd.): Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to<br />
various RCH-IEC Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />
Exposed to IEC activity of<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong><br />
Item Yes No Total<br />
When a child is sick with diarrhoea, what signs of illness would tell that<br />
he/she should be taken to a health facility or health worker? 1<br />
Repeated watery stools<br />
Any watery stools<br />
Repeated vomiting<br />
Any vomiting<br />
Blood in stools<br />
Fever<br />
Marked thirst<br />
Not eating/not drinking well<br />
Getting sicker/very sick<br />
Not getting better<br />
Other<br />
Don’t know<br />
What is the vaccination given to children against TB?<br />
BCG<br />
Other<br />
Don’t know<br />
What is the vaccination given to children against diptheria, whooping<br />
cough and tetanus?<br />
DPT<br />
Other<br />
Don’t know<br />
What is the vaccination for polio?<br />
Polio<br />
Other<br />
Don’t know<br />
At what age should the child be given measles vaccine?<br />
9 months<br />
Other<br />
Total percent<br />
Number<br />
42.7<br />
26.7<br />
34.7<br />
28.0<br />
10.7<br />
34.7<br />
14.7<br />
17.3<br />
25.3<br />
28.0<br />
24.0<br />
2.7<br />
41.3<br />
10.7<br />
48.0<br />
33.3<br />
10.7<br />
56.0<br />
80.0<br />
4.0<br />
16.0<br />
28.0<br />
72.0<br />
100.0<br />
75<br />
46.6<br />
16.5<br />
35.9<br />
31.1<br />
4.9<br />
38.8<br />
14.6<br />
9.7<br />
12.6<br />
23.3<br />
18.5<br />
2.9<br />
31.2<br />
7.8<br />
61.2<br />
26.2<br />
8.7<br />
65.1<br />
78.6<br />
5.8<br />
15.5<br />
20.4<br />
79.6<br />
100.0<br />
103<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />
44.9<br />
20.8<br />
35.4<br />
29.8<br />
7.3<br />
37.1<br />
14.6<br />
12.9<br />
15.0<br />
25.3<br />
20.8<br />
2.8<br />
35.3<br />
9.0<br />
55.6<br />
29.2<br />
9.6<br />
61.2<br />
79.2<br />
5.1<br />
15.7<br />
23.6<br />
76.4<br />
100.0<br />
178
3<br />
Table 6 (Contd.): Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to<br />
various RCH-IEC Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />
Exposed to IEC activity of<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong><br />
Item Yes No Total<br />
Maternal care<br />
At what month of pregnancy should a pregnant mother receive her first<br />
antenatal checkup?<br />
1 st trimester<br />
2 nd trimester<br />
3 rd trimester<br />
Don’t Know<br />
What is the minimum number of antenatal checkups that are<br />
recommended for a pregnant woman?<br />
4<br />
Table 6 (Contd.): Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to<br />
various RCH-IEC Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />
Exposed to IEC activity of<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong><br />
Item Yes No Total<br />
What are the health problems that some women may experience during<br />
pregnancy which are dangerous to the health and life of the mother as<br />
well as the child? 1<br />
Swelling of hands and feet<br />
Paleness<br />
Weakness or tiredness<br />
Dizziness<br />
Visual disturbances<br />
Bleeding<br />
Convulsion<br />
Weak or no movement of foetus<br />
Abnormal presentation<br />
Other<br />
Don’t know<br />
What are different precautions that need to be taken during delivery? 1<br />
Use of DDK<br />
Hospital delivery<br />
Delivery by trained person<br />
Delivery in a clean place<br />
Use of sterile blade<br />
Use of sterile thread<br />
Other<br />
Don’t know<br />
Family Planning<br />
What are the family planning methods that couples can use if they want<br />
to space births? 1<br />
IUD<br />
Oral pill<br />
Condom<br />
Rhythm/periodic abstinence<br />
Other<br />
Don’t know<br />
AIDS<br />
Have you heard of an illness called AIDS?<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
Total percent<br />
Number<br />
17.3<br />
0.0<br />
17.3<br />
5.3<br />
1.3<br />
9.3<br />
2.7<br />
9.3<br />
12.0<br />
24.0<br />
49.3<br />
2.6<br />
66.7<br />
33.3<br />
0.0<br />
8.0<br />
2.7<br />
2.7<br />
30.6<br />
54.7<br />
49.3<br />
49.3<br />
4.0<br />
8.0<br />
25.3<br />
89.3<br />
10.7<br />
100.0<br />
75<br />
10.4<br />
1.9<br />
16.5<br />
11.7<br />
1.9<br />
4.9<br />
1.0<br />
6.8<br />
6.8<br />
9.7<br />
58.3<br />
0.0<br />
67.0<br />
29.1<br />
0.0<br />
3.9<br />
4.9<br />
4.9<br />
24.3<br />
54.4<br />
50.5<br />
41.7<br />
2.9<br />
11.7<br />
21.3<br />
87.4<br />
12.6<br />
100.0<br />
103<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />
13.4<br />
1.1<br />
16.9<br />
9.0<br />
1.7<br />
6.7<br />
1.7<br />
7.9<br />
9.0<br />
15.7<br />
54.5<br />
1.1<br />
66.8<br />
30.9<br />
0.0<br />
5.6<br />
3.9<br />
2.8<br />
27.0<br />
54.5<br />
50.0<br />
44.9<br />
3.4<br />
10.1<br />
23.0<br />
88.2<br />
11.8<br />
100.0<br />
178
5<br />
Table 6 (Contd.): Knowledge and attitude of respondents exposed and not exposed to<br />
various RCH-IEC Activities of the <strong>ZSS</strong> on selected RCH issues<br />
Exposed to IEC activities<br />
of <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
Item Yes No Total<br />
AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE HEARD OF AIDS:<br />
How is AIDS transmitted? 1<br />
Sexual intercourse<br />
Homosexual intercourse<br />
Heterosexual intercourse<br />
Needles/blades/skin puncture<br />
Mother to child<br />
Transfusion of infected blood<br />
Other<br />
Don’t know<br />
Do you think that one can get AIDS from:<br />
Shaking hands<br />
Hugging<br />
Kissing<br />
Sharing clothes<br />
Sharing eating utensils<br />
Stepping on urine/stool<br />
Mosquito/flea/bedbug bites<br />
How do you think one can avoid AIDS? 1<br />
Using condom during intercourse<br />
Safe sex<br />
Checking blood prior to blood transfusion<br />
Sterilizing needles and syringes<br />
Avoiding pregnancy when having AIDS<br />
Other<br />
Don’t know<br />
Is it possible for a woman who has the AIDS virus to give birth to a child<br />
with AIDS virus?<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
Don’t know<br />
Total percent<br />
Number who have heard of AIDS<br />
1<br />
The total does not add to 100.0 because multiple responses were allowed<br />
65.7<br />
0.0<br />
23.8<br />
47.8<br />
10.5<br />
35.8<br />
5.9<br />
7.5<br />
25.4<br />
32.8<br />
46.3<br />
37.3<br />
38.8<br />
49.2<br />
58.2<br />
20.9<br />
70.2<br />
14.9<br />
40.3<br />
1.5<br />
17.9<br />
16.4<br />
83.6<br />
3.0<br />
13.4<br />
100.0<br />
67<br />
53.3<br />
1.1<br />
22.2<br />
37.8<br />
8.9<br />
27.8<br />
4.4<br />
18.9<br />
25.6<br />
33.3<br />
44.4<br />
44.2<br />
46.7<br />
50.0<br />
63.3<br />
18.9<br />
67.8<br />
12.2<br />
26.7<br />
4.4<br />
16.7<br />
21.1<br />
78.9<br />
1.1<br />
20.0<br />
100.0<br />
90<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />
58.6<br />
0.6<br />
22.9<br />
42.0<br />
9.5<br />
31.2<br />
5.2<br />
14.1<br />
25.5<br />
33.1<br />
45.2<br />
40.1<br />
43.3<br />
49.7<br />
61.1<br />
19.8<br />
68.8<br />
13.4<br />
32.5<br />
3.2<br />
17.2<br />
19.1<br />
80.9<br />
1.9<br />
17.2<br />
100.0<br />
157
6<br />
APPENDIX B<br />
QUESTIONNAIRES<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
! " #<br />
6 5 $ ; $ $ " * " " " " ?<br />
3. Who are the persons/ agencies consulted during the project proposal<br />
preparation?<br />
4. How much time was taken to prepare and finalize the proposal?<br />
5. When was the project proposal submitted? RECORD DATE<br />
6. When did you receive the sanctioning letter from MOHFW? RECORD<br />
DATE<br />
7. Was the proposal accepted by MOHFW in total or were there<br />
modification suggested?<br />
8. IF MODIFIED: What were the specific modifications done to the<br />
proposal?<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
8<br />
9. When did you receive the funds for the project? RECORD DATE<br />
10. When did you actually launch the project? RECORD DATE<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
9<br />
11. IF THE TIME GAP BETWEEN RECEIVING FUNDS AND<br />
LAUNCHING OF THE PROGRAM IS GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS,<br />
ASK <strong>FOR</strong> THE REASONS:<br />
ACTIVITIES<br />
1. Orientation workshops/awareness camps/seminars:<br />
12. Was there any orientation workshop/awareness camp conducted as<br />
a part of this project?<br />
13. IF NO RECORD REASONS:<br />
14. IF YES: How many?<br />
15. IF THE NUMBER OF WORKSHOPS/CAMPS REPORTED IS<br />
DIFFERENT FROM THE PROPOSED NUMBER, PROBE AND<br />
RECORD EXPLANATIONS<br />
16. <strong>FOR</strong> EACH WORKSHOP/CAMP RECORD:<br />
Date (From and To):<br />
Place (village/town):<br />
Target group (For whom was this orientation workshop/camp<br />
organized?):<br />
Level at which organized (District/Taluka/GP/Village):<br />
List of participants by name, affiliation and designation (OBTAIN FROM<br />
THE <strong>ZSS</strong>):<br />
Programmes (OBTAIN A COPY OF THE PROGRAM SHEET):<br />
Topics covered:<br />
Resource persons – Name, affiliation and designation:<br />
Was there any report prepared on this workshop/camp/seminar? IF YES,<br />
OBTAIN A COPY<br />
The total amount spent on the workshop/camp/seminar:<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
2. IEC Materials developed:<br />
9>0 9>0 "<br />
"<br />
10<br />
17. Was any IEC material developed under this project?<br />
If No: Why?<br />
18. IF NO, RECORD REASONS<br />
19. IF YES: What are the different types of materials developed?<br />
(RECORD IN TERMS OF POSTERS, FOLK SONGS, STREET PLAYS,<br />
HOARDINGS, PAMPHLETS HANDBILL ETC.)<br />
20. <strong>FOR</strong> EACH TYPE OF MATERIAL, RECORD THE FOLLOWING:<br />
The method of development of the material (through workshop, contract):<br />
Resource persons involved in material development:<br />
Artists involved in material development:<br />
Topics covered:<br />
Time taken to develop the material:<br />
Target Group:<br />
Number produced:<br />
Number in stock:<br />
Number distributed:<br />
Method of distribution (channels of distribution):<br />
GP’s covered for the distribution:<br />
Whether the material reflects local culture, theme, medium, health<br />
problems, etc?<br />
IF YES: Examples of inclusion of such local culture, theme, medium,<br />
health problems, etc.<br />
Total cost for this activity:<br />
OBTAIN A SAMPLE OF THE MATERIAL DEVELOPED:<br />
Under the project did the <strong>ZSS</strong> conduct any mass campaign? (eg., Jatha,<br />
hoardings, wall-writings, street play, folk songs, concention/public<br />
meetings/counselling, competitions, handbill distribution,)<br />
IF NO RECORD REASONS:<br />
IF YES: What are the different types of campaigns carried out?<br />
<strong>FOR</strong> EACH TYPE OF CAMPAIGH, RECORD THE FOLLOWING AS<br />
APPROPRIATE:<br />
Total number of times the campaign was organized:<br />
On which occasion/s?<br />
Date/s:<br />
Place/s (OBTAIN THE LIST OF PLACES):<br />
Who organized? (<strong>ZSS</strong>, TSS, VSS)<br />
Resource persons/arists?<br />
Target groups:<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
'<br />
11<br />
Content/s:<br />
Coverage (number of persons reached)<br />
Total cost for this activity:<br />
COMPARE THE ACTIVITIES REPORTED WITH THE ACTIVITIES<br />
PROPOSED. IF DIFFERENT, PROBE AND RECORD<br />
EXPLANATION.<br />
OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE<br />
What is the budget sanctioned for this scheme?<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
12<br />
) ' ' 7! 7! ), ),<br />
0 0 ,) ,) 3 3<br />
0 0 )1 )1 @<br />
@<br />
1 1 )1<br />
)1<br />
0 5 "<br />
0 5<br />
, , 0 0 )71 )71 ! ! 1 1<br />
,, ,, , , )0 )0 0 0 ) )71 ) 71<br />
1 1 )1 )1 ! ! )' )' 1 1<br />
) ) A!& A!& 1 1 )1<br />
)1<br />
)' )' 1 1 ,7&& ,7&& ) ) 70 7<br />
0 1 1 & & ) ) )71<br />
)71<br />
0 0 1 1 1 1 '@ '@ 1 1<br />
,) ,) ,)&& ,)&&)3 ,)&& )3 1.B 1.B<br />
1.B<br />
Whether quotations have been called?<br />
Yes for all occasions<br />
Yes for few occasions<br />
No<br />
Whether payments are supported by stamped receipts?<br />
Yes for all occasions<br />
Yes for few occasions<br />
No<br />
3 3 % % ?<br />
?<br />
) ) C<br />
C<br />
What was the involvement of DHO/other IEC officers in FW department/<br />
other district health and family welfare officers in the planning and<br />
implementation of the project?<br />
PROBE <strong>FOR</strong>:<br />
The persons involved: Name, affiliation, designation<br />
In what capacity was he/she involved:<br />
At what stage (planning, implementation, review, training/orientation,<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
0<br />
13<br />
monitoring)<br />
Problems of coordination, if any:<br />
Are you using any of the IEC materials that are used in the routine IEC<br />
activities of the DHO?<br />
How is the scheme implementation monitored by the <strong>ZSS</strong>?<br />
Was there any evaluation study conducted by <strong>ZSS</strong>?<br />
RECORD DETAILS<br />
What is the reporting mechanism of the programme from GP-TSS-<strong>ZSS</strong>?<br />
How many review meetings were conducted?<br />
At what levels?<br />
How often it is conducted?<br />
What is reviewed?<br />
When was the last meeting held?<br />
What is the follow-up action taken?<br />
What is your perception of the impact of the scheme?<br />
If you are asked to submit a new project proposal, which of the activities<br />
that you have already carried out will be included and which activities will<br />
be excluded?<br />
RECORD REASONS:<br />
Would you like to include some new items to this proposal?<br />
IF YES: Which activities will be included?<br />
How do you think the IEC activities that you are carrying out under the<br />
scheme is different from the regular IEC activities conducted by the<br />
Department of Family Welfare?<br />
In your opinion, the IEC activities proposed/conducted through the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
are more effective, less effective or of the same effectiveness compared<br />
to the regular IEC activities carried out by the Department of Family<br />
Welfare?<br />
RECORD REASONS<br />
What are the difficulties/bottlenecks that you experienced in<br />
implementing the project in the following aspects?<br />
Finance:<br />
Organization:<br />
Implementation:<br />
Coordination:<br />
Monitoring:<br />
What are your suggestions for overcoming these problems/for improving<br />
the scheme?<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
14<br />
QUESTIONNAIRE <strong>FOR</strong> HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE<br />
FUNCTIONARIES<br />
Name:<br />
Designation:<br />
Were you/your Department involved in the preparation of the project plan<br />
by the <strong>ZSS</strong>? [DHO and DMO]<br />
, @ B $ $ 5 5 45 " %<br />
" " " * " ?<br />
Did you/anyone from your Department participate in any of the activities<br />
carried out by the <strong>ZSS</strong> under the scheme?<br />
, @ B 3 5 4" 5<br />
" $ ?<br />
Training/Orientation?<br />
Material Development?<br />
Mass campaign?<br />
Any other activities?<br />
Did you supply the <strong>ZSS</strong> (for use in the scheme) any of the IEC materials<br />
generally used by your Department?<br />
In your opinion, what was the need for involving <strong>ZSS</strong> in the RCH IEC<br />
efforts?<br />
What is your perception of the impact of the scheme?<br />
In what way, according to you, the IEC activities that are being carried<br />
out by <strong>ZSS</strong> under the scheme is different from the regular IEC activities<br />
conducted by your Department?<br />
In your opinion, the IEC activities proposed/conducted through the <strong>ZSS</strong><br />
are more effective, less effective or of the same effectiveness compared<br />
to the regular IEC activities carried out by your Department?<br />
RECORD REASONS<br />
Do you think that the <strong>ZSS</strong> should continue to be involved in this way in<br />
the RCH-IEC activities?<br />
RECORD REASONS:<br />
What are the IEC needs of the District that are satisfied through this<br />
scheme of the <strong>ZSS</strong>?<br />
What are the other activities that you suggest should be included by the<br />
<strong>ZSS</strong> if they are asked to prepare a fresh proposal?<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
! " #<br />
6 5 $ ;
(> (> B<br />
B<br />
/> /> /> BB<br />
B B<br />
9>. 9>. ! ! 5 5 B<br />
B<br />
:>6 :>6 :>6 B<br />
B<br />
;>1 ;>1 ;>1 " " " B<br />
B<br />
16<br />
1. Opinion Leader<br />
2. Community member ⇐ 7<br />
D> D> 5" 5" "B<br />
"B<br />
E>1 E>1 " " B<br />
$ $ B<br />
B<br />
F>1 F>1 $ $ $ B<br />
B<br />
'<br />
10. Sex of the respondent:<br />
1. Male<br />
2. Female<br />
11. How old were you at your last birth day? (RECORD AGE IN<br />
!<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
17<br />
COMPLETED YEARS):<br />
12. What is your current marital status?<br />
1. Currently married<br />
2. Separated<br />
3. Widowed<br />
4. Divorced<br />
5. Never married<br />
13. Have you ever attended any literacy classes?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
18<br />
14. Can you read and write?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No<br />
15.What is the highest grade you have completed? (RECORD GRADE)<br />
16. To which religion do you belong?<br />
1. Hindu<br />
2. Muslim<br />
3. Christian<br />
4. Jain<br />
5. Other<br />
17. To which caste do you belong? (RECORD NAME OF THE CASTE)<br />
8" 4! "<br />
18. During the last one year, did you see/ participate in any kind of<br />
activity where people were given information on health and family<br />
welfare?<br />
1.Yes<br />
2. No ⇐20<br />
19. What are the different activities did you see/participate? (RECORD<br />
ALL ACTIVITIES MENTIONED)<br />
20. During the last one year, did you attend any orientation<br />
workshop/seminar/awareness camp on health and family welfare<br />
aspects?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No ⇐31<br />
21. How many such workshops/seminars/camps did you attend during<br />
the last one year?<br />
22. [Now I would like to ask some more details about the<br />
workshop/seminar/camp that you last attended.] Who had organized this<br />
orientation workshop/seminar/awareness camp?<br />
23. Who had asked you to participate in this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
19<br />
24. Where was this workshop/seminar/camp organized?<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
20<br />
25. How many days in advance did you come to know about this<br />
programme?<br />
26. What was the duration of this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />
27. Through which method was this orientation/training given? RECORD ALL<br />
MODES<br />
1. Lecture<br />
2. Question-answer<br />
3. Demonstration<br />
4. Exhibition<br />
5. Posters/pamphlets<br />
6. Other<br />
28. Who were the resource persons in this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />
29. What were the different topics covered in this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />
30. In your opinion, what is the most important message that you have received<br />
during this workshop/seminar/camp?<br />
31. During the last one year, did you see any street play carrying messages on<br />
health and family welfare aspects?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No⇐ 43<br />
9/> $ 5 " 5 5 5 ?<br />
33. [Now I would like to ask you some more details about the street play that you<br />
saw the last time]. Where was this street play organized?<br />
34. Who had organized this street play?<br />
35. On what occasion was this street play organized?<br />
36. For how long was this street play staged?<br />
37. Was there any publicity about the street play before it was staged?<br />
38. What was the name/s of the street play that you saw last?<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
21<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
39. What are the different themes covered by each of the street plays? RECORD<br />
THE THEME BY TITLE<br />
40. How do you rate the street play? Do you think the street play was satisfactory or<br />
not satisfactory?<br />
41. What is the most important message that you received from this street play?<br />
22<br />
42. What suggestions would you give to make these street plays more<br />
effective?<br />
43. During the last one year, did you listen to any folk song carrying messages on<br />
health and family welfare aspects?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No⇐53<br />
44. Is this folk song performed separately?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No<br />
45. How many times, during the last one year, did you listen to these folksongs?<br />
46. Through what medium did you listen to these folk songs?<br />
1. Stage performance<br />
2. Street performance<br />
3. Radio<br />
4. Television<br />
5. Cassette<br />
6. Printed material<br />
7. Any other (Specify)<br />
47. Who had organized these folk songs?<br />
48. Where was this organized?<br />
49. On which occasion was folk songs programme organized?<br />
50. What was the duration of this folk songs programme?<br />
51. What are the different topics covered by these folk songs?<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
52. What is the most important message that you received through these folk<br />
songs?<br />
53. During the last one year, did you see (show some poster/hand bills) any<br />
posters/wall writings/hand bills/hoarding carrying messages on health and<br />
family welfare aspects?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No⇐59<br />
54. Which one did you see, posters, handbills or wall-writings? RECORD ALL<br />
1. Posters<br />
2. Wall-writings<br />
3. Handbills<br />
4. Hoardings<br />
5. Others (Specify)<br />
55. How many such items in total did you see during the last one year?<br />
56. Where did you see them?<br />
57. What are the different topics that were covered by these posters/handbills/wallwritings?<br />
58. What is the most important message that you received from these<br />
posters/handbills/wall-writings?<br />
59. During the last one year, did you see any advertisement on TV carrying<br />
messages<br />
on health and family welfare aspects?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No⇐63<br />
60. How many advertisements did you see on TV?<br />
23<br />
61. On what topic/s was the advertisement?<br />
62. What is the most important message that you received from this advertisement?<br />
63. During the last one year, did you see/participate in any jatha/rallies<br />
displaying/carrying messages on health and family welfare aspects?<br />
1. Yes<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
2. No⇐71<br />
64. How many such jathas/rallies did you see/participate?<br />
24<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
65. [Now I would like to ask you some more details on the jatha/rally that you<br />
attended the last time.] Who had organized this jatha/rally?<br />
66. Where was this programme organized?<br />
67. On what occasion was this programme organized?<br />
68. Who else had participated in this programme?<br />
69. What was/were the theme/s covered by this jatha/rally?<br />
70. What is the most important message that you received from this jatha/rally?<br />
25<br />
71. During the last one year, did you participate in any essay<br />
competition/debate in your area on health and family welfare issues?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No⇐78<br />
72. How many such competitions did you participate during the last one<br />
year?<br />
73. Who had organized this competition?<br />
74. Where was this organized?<br />
75. Who were the participants in this competition?<br />
76. On what topic/s the competition was organized?<br />
77. What is the most important message that you received through this competition?<br />
78. CHECK QUESTION 18 AND MARK:<br />
1. Has seen/participated in any IEC activity<br />
2. Has not seen/partcipated in any IEC activity ⇐80<br />
79. Did you share the knowledge that you received through these programmes with<br />
any other person?<br />
1. Yes<br />
2. No<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
Knowledge on health and family welfare issues<br />
80 What is the legal minimum age at marriage for the girls<br />
in India?<br />
81 What is the legal minimum age at marriage for the boys<br />
in India?<br />
82 Till what age should a child be breastfed?<br />
83 How soon after childbirth should the child be put to<br />
breast, for the first time?<br />
84 In you opinion, should the first breastmilk be given to<br />
the child or should it be discarded?<br />
85 What should one do if a child suffers from diarrhoea?<br />
26<br />
RECORD ALL MENTIONED<br />
86 When a child has diarrhoea, should he/she be given less<br />
to drink than usual, about the same amount, or more than<br />
usual?<br />
87 When a child is sick with diarrhoea, what signs of<br />
illness would tell you that he or she should be taken to<br />
a health facility or health worker?<br />
88 What is the vaccination given to children against<br />
tuberculosis?<br />
89 At what age should the child be given BCG vaccination?<br />
RECORD ‘7’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘7 AND ABOVE’<br />
AGE IN YEARS……………………………………………………….<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />
AGE IN YEARS……………………………………………………….<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />
AGE IN MONTHS……………………………………………………….<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />
IMMEDIATELY……………………………………………………….……00<br />
HOURS…………………………………………………………….…….1<br />
DAYS……………………………………………………………..………2<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />
SHOULD BE GIVEN……………………………………….……….1<br />
SHOULD BE DISCARDED………………………………..….2<br />
TAKE TO DOCTOR………………………………………………..……A<br />
GIVE ORS……………………………………………………………..………B<br />
GIVE MORE LIQUIDS………………………………………….……C<br />
GIVE MEDICINES………………………………………………..….D<br />
OTHER K<br />
(SPECIFY)<br />
DK………………………………………………………………………………..……X<br />
LESS TO DRINK……………………………………………………...1<br />
ABOUT SAME AMOUNT TO DRINK…………………...2<br />
MORE TO DRINK………………………………………………..…..3<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />
REPEATED WATERY STOOLS………………………..…..A<br />
ANY WATERY STOOLS………………………………………....B<br />
REPEATED VOMITING…………………………………………..…C<br />
ANY VOTMITTING……………………………………………..…..D<br />
BLOOD IN STOOLS……………………………………………..….E<br />
FEVER…………………………………………………………………………..…F<br />
MARKED THIRST……………………………………………………...G<br />
NOT EATING/NOT DRINKING WELL……………..…H<br />
GETTING SICKER/VERY SICK……………………..……I<br />
NOT GETTING BETTER……………………………………....J<br />
OTHER K<br />
(SPECIFY)<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..…….X<br />
BCG………………………………………..…………………………………...1<br />
OTHER…………………………………………………..…………………...2<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />
AGE IN MONTHS………………………………………………...……<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
NO. QUESTIONS CODING CATEGORIES<br />
90 What is the vaccination given to children against<br />
diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus?<br />
91 In total, how many doses of DPT should be given?<br />
RECORD ‘8’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘DON’T KNOW’<br />
92 What is the vaccination given to children against polio?<br />
93 In total, how many doses of polio vaccine should be<br />
given? RECORD ‘8’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘DON’T KNOW’<br />
94 At what age should the child be given measles<br />
vaccination?<br />
95 At what month of pregnancy should a pregnant mother<br />
receive her first antenatal checkup?<br />
RECORD ‘7’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘7 AND ABOVE’<br />
96 What is the minimum number of antenatal check ups that<br />
are recommended for a pregnant woman?<br />
RECORD ‘7’ <strong>FOR</strong> ‘7 AND ABOVE’<br />
97 How many doses of tetanus toxoid injections are<br />
recommended during pregnancy?<br />
98 What are the important tests that a woman should undergo<br />
during pregnancy?<br />
27<br />
RECORD ALL MENTIONED<br />
99 What type of pregnancy is considered as risk pregnancy?<br />
RECORD ALL MENTIONED<br />
DPT………………………………………..…………………………………...1<br />
OTHER…………………………………………………..…………………...2<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />
NUMBER OF DPT DOSES……………………………..……..<br />
POLIO…………………………………..…………………………………...1<br />
OTHER…………………………………………………..…………………...2<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />
NUMBER OF POLIO DOSES……………………………..……..<br />
AGE IN MONTHS……………………………………………….<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………..…….98<br />
MONTHS……………………………………………………..………………..<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />
NUMBER OF ANC CHECKUPS……………………..……..<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />
NUMBER OF TT INJECTIONS…………………..……..<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..…..8<br />
HEIGHT……………………………………………………………………….………A<br />
WEIGHT……………………………………………………………………..…….B<br />
ABDOMINAL CHECKUP…………………………………………..….C<br />
INTERNAL EXAMINATION……………………………………...D<br />
BLOOD TEST……………………………………………………………..….E<br />
URINE TEST…………………………………………………………..…..F<br />
BLOOD PRESSURE TEST…………………………………..…..G<br />
X-RAY………………………………………………………………………..…..H<br />
SONOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………..…..I<br />
AMNIOSYNTESIS…………………………………………………..…..J<br />
OTHER K<br />
(SPECIFY)<br />
DK……………………………………………………………………………..……….X<br />
FIRST PREGNANCY……………………………………………………..A<br />
SHORT STATURED MOTHER……………………………….………B<br />
PREGNANCY UNDER 20……………………………………..…….C<br />
PREGNANCY AFTER 30………………………………………..….D<br />
THIRD OR HIGHER ORDER BIRTHS………………...E<br />
PREVIOUS INTERVAL TOO SHORT………………..….F<br />
OTHER K<br />
(SPECIFY)<br />
DK………………………………………………………………………………..…….X<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
NO. QUESTIONS CODING CATEGORIES<br />
100 What are the health problems that some women may<br />
experience during pregnancy, which are dangerous to the<br />
health and life of the mother as well as the child?<br />
101 What are the different precautions that need to be taken<br />
during delivery?<br />
102 What are the five important ‘cleanliness measures’ that<br />
one should follow during delivery?<br />
103 What are the family planning methods that the couple can<br />
use if they want to space births?<br />
104 Have you heard of an illness called AIDS?<br />
105 How is AIDS transmitted?<br />
28<br />
SWELLING OF HANDS AND FEET………………….………A<br />
PALENESS……………………..……………………………………..…….B<br />
WEAKNESS OR TIREDNESS………………………………..….C<br />
DIZZINESS……………………………………………..………………...D<br />
VIUSAL DISTURBANCES…………………………..……..….E<br />
BLEEDING………………………………………………………………..…….F<br />
CONVULSIONS………………………………………………………..…..G<br />
WEAK OR NO MOVEMENT OF FOETUS…………..……H<br />
ABNORMAL PRESENTATION………………………………....I<br />
OTHER K<br />
(SPECIFY)<br />
DK………………………………………………………………………………..…….X<br />
USE OF DDK……………………..………………………………………..A<br />
HOSPITAL DELIVERY………………………………………………..B<br />
DELIVERY BY TRAINED PERSON………………………..C<br />
DELIVERY IN A CLEAN PLACE.…………………....D<br />
USE OF STERILE BLADES……………………………………..E<br />
USE OF STERILE THREAD………………………………....F<br />
OTHER K<br />
(SPECIFY)<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X<br />
CLEAN PLACE……………………..……………………………………..A<br />
CLEAN HANDS.………………..………………………………………..B<br />
CLEAN THREAD…………………………………..……………………..C<br />
CLEAN BLADE……..………………………..…………………....D<br />
CLEAN UMBELICAL CORD.……………………………………..E<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X<br />
IUD/LOOP/COPPER-T………………………………………………..A<br />
ORAL PILL……………………………………………………………………..B<br />
CONDOM……………………………………………………………………………..C<br />
RHYTHM/PERIODIC ABSTINENCE…………………....D<br />
WITHDRAWAL…………………………………………………………………..E<br />
OTHER K<br />
(SPECIFY)<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X<br />
YES…………………………………………………………………………………………1<br />
NO……………………………………………………………………………………...2<br />
SEXUAL INTERCOURSE…………………………………………...A<br />
HOMOSEXUAL INTERCOURSE……………………………....B<br />
HETEROSEXUAL INTERCOURSE………………………….….C<br />
NEEDLES/BLADES/SKIN PUNCTURE……………..….D<br />
MOTHER TO CHILD………………………………………………....E<br />
TRANSFUSION OF INFECTED BLOOD…………..….F<br />
OTHER K<br />
(SPECIFY)<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA
NO. QUESTIONS CODING CATEGORIES<br />
106 Is it possible for a woman who has the AIDS virus to<br />
give birth to a child with AIDS virus?<br />
107 Do you think that one can get AIDS from:<br />
29<br />
Shaking hands with someone who has AIDS?<br />
Hugging someone who has AIDS?<br />
Kissing someone who has AIDS?<br />
Wearing the clothes of someone who has AIDS?<br />
Sharing eating utensils with someone who has AIDS?<br />
Stepping on the urine or stool of someone with AIDS?<br />
Mosquito, flea or bedbug bites?<br />
YES…………………………………………………………………………………...1<br />
NO……………………………………………………………………………………..…2<br />
DK………………………………………………………………………………………..8<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA<br />
YES NO DK<br />
HAND SHAKING………………………………………..1 2 8<br />
HUGGING……………..…………………………………..1 2 8<br />
KISSING……….…………………………………………..1 2 8<br />
SHARING CLOTHES………………………………..1 2 8<br />
SHARING EATING UTENSILS…………..1 2 8<br />
STEPPING ON URINE/STOOL…………….1 2 8<br />
MOSQUITO/FLEA/BEDBUG BITES…….1 2 8<br />
108 How do you think one can avoid AIDS? USING CONDOMS DURING EACH<br />
SEXUAL INTERCOURSE…………………………………………….A<br />
SAFE SEX……………………………………………………………………..…B<br />
CHECKING BLOOD PRIOR TO<br />
TRANSFUSION………………………………………………………....C<br />
STERILIZING NEEDLES AND<br />
SYRINGES <strong>FOR</strong> INJECTION…………………………….….D<br />
AVOIDING PREGNANCY WHEN<br />
HAVING AIDS VIRUS………………………………………..….E<br />
OTHER K<br />
(SPECIFY)<br />
DK…………………………………………………………………………………....X
APPENDIX C<br />
List of persons involved in the evaluation<br />
Principal Investigators<br />
Dr. B.M. Ramesh<br />
Dr. S. Rajaram<br />
Mr. R.V. Deshpande<br />
Field Investigators<br />
Mr. G.C. Jadar<br />
Mr. A.S. Kulkarni<br />
Mrs. A.S. Joshi<br />
Mrs. H.W. Hombal<br />
Mr. K.E.T. Rajarama<br />
Mrs. M.N. Korkoppa<br />
30<br />
EVALUATION OF RCH - IEC ACTIVITIES THROUGH <strong>ZSS</strong> - DISTRICT CHITRADURGA