14.12.2012 Views

PAN BIRMINGHAM CANCER NETWORK - NHS Pan Birmingham ...

PAN BIRMINGHAM CANCER NETWORK - NHS Pan Birmingham ...

PAN BIRMINGHAM CANCER NETWORK - NHS Pan Birmingham ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>PAN</strong> <strong>BIRMINGHAM</strong> <strong>CANCER</strong> <strong>NETWORK</strong><br />

MINUTES OF SUPPORTIVE AND PALLIATIVE CARE <strong>NETWORK</strong> SITE SPECIFIC<br />

GROUP<br />

Present:<br />

Held on Monday 11 July 2011 at <strong>Birmingham</strong> Research Park<br />

Dr John Speakman JS University Hospitals <strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation<br />

Trust<br />

Mrs Mandy Wilson MW <strong>Pan</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> Cancer Network<br />

Dr Nikki Read NR St Giles Hospice<br />

Mrs Helen Meehan HM Solihull Community Trust<br />

Ms Liz Cottier LC Marie Curie Hospice<br />

Mr David George DG <strong>Pan</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> User Partnership Group<br />

Ms Lara Barnish LB <strong>Pan</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> Cancer Network<br />

Dr Jackie Dominey JD <strong>NHS</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> East and North<br />

Mrs Trisha Castenheira TC St Mary’s Hospice<br />

Dr Inigo Tolosa IT University Hospitals <strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation<br />

Trust<br />

Dr Chantal Meystre CM Heart of England <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust<br />

Ms Karen Green KG <strong>Birmingham</strong> Specialised Community <strong>NHS</strong> Trust<br />

Ms Kate Claridge KC University Hospitals <strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation<br />

Trust<br />

In Attendance:<br />

Ms Kate Armour KA Heart of England <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust<br />

Dr Tatyana Guveli TG <strong>Pan</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> Cancer Network<br />

(for part of the meeting)<br />

Ms Laura Pitt LP Sandwell and West <strong>Birmingham</strong> Hospitals <strong>NHS</strong> Trust<br />

1. Apologies:<br />

Mrs Pat Bennett PB Walsall Healthcare <strong>NHS</strong> Trust<br />

Mrs Sindy Dhallu SD Walsall Healthcare <strong>NHS</strong> Trust<br />

Ms Katherine Hall KHal Sandwell and West <strong>Birmingham</strong> Hospitals <strong>NHS</strong> Trust<br />

Mrs Kay Harries KHar <strong>Pan</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> Cancer Network<br />

Ms Shareen Jwule SJ Walsall Healthcare <strong>NHS</strong> Trust<br />

Ms Anna Lock AL Sandwell and West <strong>Birmingham</strong> Hospitals <strong>NHS</strong> Trust<br />

Ms Lisa Parton LP <strong>Birmingham</strong> Women's <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust<br />

Dr Steve Plenderleith SP St Mary’s Hospice<br />

S:\Cancer Network\Network Site Specific Groups\Supportive and Palliative Care\2011\October\Minutes - 11 July 2011 -<br />

Approved.doc<br />

Page 1 of 7


2. Minutes of Last Meeting Held on 09 May 2011<br />

These were agreed with the following amendment:<br />

CM and KA were present at the meeting.<br />

MW will amend the minutes accordingly.<br />

3. Matters Arising<br />

3.1 Update on FSF Bid<br />

JS outlined that this bid was in relation to providing funding for a<br />

Band 7 Research Nurse who be employed by University Hospitals<br />

<strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust but would work across the<br />

Network.<br />

It was noted that previously there has been very small recruitment to<br />

trials for supportive and palliative care and is hoped that the<br />

successful applicant will encourage a higher intake of patients into<br />

trial recruitment.<br />

At this point of the meeting DG asked how feasible it was to include<br />

Social Workers in research and trial recruitment. It was felt to be<br />

unclear how this involvement could be taken forward although those<br />

present deemed it a good idea.<br />

3.2 Position of Deputy Chair – update<br />

At the last meeting it was agreed that MW would circulate a<br />

nomination form for the position of Deputy Chair, which had been<br />

undertaken. TC was successful in being nominated for this position<br />

and has agreed to undertake this role.<br />

It was clarified that the role of Deputy Chair does not automatically<br />

take over the role of Chair once their tenure has been completed a<br />

similar process of nominations being sought would be undertaken.<br />

3.3 Update on 24\7 and 7\7 Visits<br />

The group were informed that visits have already been undertaken to<br />

St Giles Hospice and Heart of England <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust and<br />

members were thanked for making JS and LB welcome and also for<br />

being open and honest in the discussions undertaken.<br />

An article in the recent publication of Palliative Medicine showed the<br />

benefits in having a six day service. In addition University Hospitals<br />

<strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust piloted a service earlier this year<br />

S:\Cancer Network\Network Site Specific Groups\Supportive and Palliative Care\2011\October\Minutes - 11 July 2011 -<br />

Approved.doc<br />

Page 2 of 7<br />

ACTION<br />

MW


over the long bank holiday weekends.<br />

S:\Cancer Network\Network Site Specific Groups\Supportive and Palliative Care\2011\October\Minutes - 11 July 2011 -<br />

Approved.doc<br />

Page 3 of 7


University Hospitals <strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust specialist<br />

palliative care team now plan to start a six day service in September<br />

2011. It is intended for an audit to be undertaken to ascertain how<br />

viable the new changes are although KC reported that a decrease in<br />

workload has already been noted especially on Fridays and<br />

Mondays\Tuesdays before or after the bank holiday weekends.<br />

3.4 Patient Information Leaflets<br />

TG outlined that an agreement had been made to have a section on<br />

the Network website for patients and carers and that she had been<br />

working with members to take this idea forward.<br />

TG reported that she would soon be leaving the Network but that a<br />

colleague would be continuing this piece of work.<br />

TG was thanked for the work she has undertaken with the group and<br />

wished well in her future role.<br />

4. Research<br />

JS informed the group that SS was unable to attend today’s meeting<br />

to present the item for research and asked for this to be deferred.<br />

A discussion was undertaken during this agenda item in relation to<br />

the Network organising a half day seminar in October 2011 which<br />

would be dedicated to research in palliative care within the <strong>Pan</strong><br />

<strong>Birmingham</strong> Cancer Network.<br />

JS proposed that presentations from the LCRN\FSF Research post<br />

holder and also KA, Research Facilitator at Marie Curie Hospice,<br />

and also others from the Network who are currently involved in<br />

active research.<br />

It is hoped that the seminar will be well attended by members of the<br />

group and that discussions would stimulate interest in research and<br />

also provide a valuable starting point for increasing palliative care<br />

research activity in <strong>Pan</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> Cancer Network.<br />

The proposal for a half day seminar was accepted by those present<br />

and the next step will be for MW, JS and LB to identify a date, venue<br />

and produce a programme which will be circulated to the group.<br />

S:\Cancer Network\Network Site Specific Groups\Supportive and Palliative Care\2011\October\Minutes - 11 July 2011 -<br />

Approved.doc<br />

Page 4 of 7<br />

ACTION<br />

SS\<br />

Agenda<br />

MW\JS\<br />

LB


5. Network Board Report\Presentation<br />

As part of his role as Chair, JS will be expected to attend the<br />

Network Board annually to present the report on the work<br />

undertaken by this group, what achievements have been made and<br />

what challenges are being experienced.<br />

One of the issues that will be raised is in relation to 24\7 and 7\7<br />

provision and the outcome of the visits. Another issue that was felt<br />

should be discussed is in relation to staff issues across the Network<br />

especially as the Network are low when compared to other<br />

Networks.<br />

During a discussion it was agreed that other issues to be raised<br />

included the concern over the MSCC pathway, non-cancer workload<br />

support and the transition of children to adult services.<br />

During this item JD took the opportunity to update the group on the<br />

development of imaging guidelines for patients with MSCC which<br />

had been produced by the Radiology Network Site Specific Group<br />

and circulated to this group and the Bony Metastases Network Site<br />

Specific Group for consultation.<br />

The general comments received indicated that the guidance needed<br />

to be more in line with the NICE Guidance which states that the<br />

service should be provided 7\7. It was outlined that if this guidance<br />

was to be followed then Acute Trusts need to be made aware of the<br />

decision and that all patients with MSCC should be managed with<br />

appropriate clinical rapidity and that liaison should be undertaken<br />

with the Oncology Team at University Hospitals <strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong><br />

Foundation Trust.<br />

It was outlined that while in theory this service is acceptable in reality<br />

it is not available largely due to the non-provision of oncology<br />

support 24 hours, 7 days a week. JS expressed the view that all<br />

Acute Trusts in the Network should be aiming to provide a 7 day a<br />

week MRI service for patients with suspected MSCC and went on to<br />

say that it was unacceptable in his view to continue to transfer often<br />

sick patients from one hospital to another (‘out of hours’) in order to<br />

have imaging performed that could often be carried out in the original<br />

referring hospital provided a 7 day a week MRI service was put in<br />

place.<br />

Several members of the group also felt that the pathway for<br />

suspected MSCC for patients who are not currently in either the<br />

Royal Orthopaedic Hospital <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust or University<br />

Hospitals <strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust was still not clear –<br />

especially ‘out of hours’ when imaging was once again raised as an<br />

S:\Cancer Network\Network Site Specific Groups\Supportive and Palliative Care\2011\October\Minutes - 11 July 2011 -<br />

Approved.doc<br />

Page 5 of 7<br />

ACTION


issue<br />

S:\Cancer Network\Network Site Specific Groups\Supportive and Palliative Care\2011\October\Minutes - 11 July 2011 -<br />

Approved.doc<br />

Page 6 of 7


JD informed the group that an information sheet had been produced<br />

for use by specialists outlining how the service can be accessed and<br />

that a similar leaflet for use by patients has also been produced.<br />

Although it was reported that this leaflet is due for review soon and<br />

that this review would be undertaken by the Bony Metastases<br />

Network Site Specific Group.<br />

As a member of the Bony Metastases Network Site Specific Group<br />

JD agreed to keep members updated with discussions around<br />

MSCC provision and any other relevant issues.<br />

6. Non EU Nationals and Care Provision<br />

This item relates to provision of care for non-EU nationals, in<br />

particular those patients who do not have a <strong>NHS</strong> number and how<br />

funding is provided for this group of patients.<br />

This is relevant to all across the Network but has been raised as a<br />

more frequent issue of late relating to patients at University Hospitals<br />

<strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> Foundation Trust and St Mary’s Hospice. TC<br />

reported that a meeting between these two organisations has been<br />

held to discuss this issue and the outcome of this meeting is that<br />

hospice support will be provided both in the in patient hospice setting<br />

and in the community according to the patient ‘s clinical need and<br />

not constrained by funding or nationality issues .<br />

TC outlined that the purpose of presenting this item at today’s<br />

meeting was to identify what process is undertaken in other<br />

organisations for this group of patients. Those present reported<br />

similar problems had been experienced but unclear where the<br />

funding for these patients had been received from.<br />

It was clarified that from a GP perspective non EU patients must be<br />

registered as private patients and would therefore be responsible for<br />

purchasing any treatment, such as medicines, that might be<br />

required.<br />

LC agreed to find out what the procedure is at Marie Curie Hospice<br />

in Hampstead as this is a problem that is probably more prevalent in<br />

London, she will provide an update on this at the next meeting.<br />

S:\Cancer Network\Network Site Specific Groups\Supportive and Palliative Care\2011\October\Minutes - 11 July 2011 -<br />

Approved.doc<br />

Page 7 of 7<br />

ACTION<br />

JD<br />

LC\<br />

Agenda


7. Specialist Palliative Care Section on the Website<br />

Earlier this year members had been asked what they would like to<br />

see included as part of the newly designed Network website and<br />

some of the suggestions submitted had been included and a<br />

presentation of the new website was given at today’s meeting by LB.<br />

It was outlined that the website is split into two categories a section<br />

for patients and a section for professionals. Both sections contain<br />

relevant information and can be easily accessed with no restrictions<br />

to the information being made available.<br />

In terms of patient involvement during the development of the<br />

website DG reported that extensive involvement had been<br />

undertaken by the User Partnership Group to ascertain how user<br />

friendly the site was and whether the information provided was<br />

transparent and easily accessible.<br />

8. Psychology Network Site Specific Group – update<br />

IT reported that due to the vast amount of work needed to be<br />

undertaken by this group that some work had been undertaken via email<br />

to avoid a delay especially in relation to gathering evidence for<br />

Peer Review.<br />

In terms of the work being taken nationally <strong>Pan</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> Cancer<br />

Network are currently ahead of other Networks and IT and the<br />

Network Site Specific Group were congratulated on this.<br />

The main issue surrounding the group is in relation to funding<br />

especially for level 2 supervision and IT has been in communication<br />

with Commissioners to identify how this problem can be addressed.<br />

JD also informed the group about the CBT first aid training course<br />

she had recently attended which had been run by Marie Curie<br />

Hospice and the Department of Health. She had found the course<br />

very useful and it had been very well attended. It is hoped that the<br />

course can be provided again in <strong>Pan</strong> <strong>Birmingham</strong> Cancer Network<br />

and a bid has been submitted to Macmillan Cancer Support for<br />

funding for these courses.<br />

S:\Cancer Network\Network Site Specific Groups\Supportive and Palliative Care\2011\October\Minutes - 11 July 2011 -<br />

Approved.doc<br />

Page 8 of 8<br />

ACTION


9. ACST – update<br />

The group were informed that from April 2011 the ACST courses are<br />

now being co-ordinated by University Hospitals <strong>Birmingham</strong> <strong>NHS</strong><br />

Foundation Trust and although funding has been agreed for<br />

2011\2012 Trusts are being encouraged to send as many core Multi<br />

Disciplinary Team members as possible to these courses.<br />

It was outlined that a pilot project is being undertaken to ascertain<br />

how feasible it is to provide this course over a 2 day period rather<br />

than the current 3 days. At present this is still a pilot project and as<br />

yet it is unclear how feasible this will be.<br />

10. SPAGG – update<br />

JD reported the next meeting is scheduled for 20 July 2011 and the<br />

main issue to be discussed is in relation to the VTE audit. JD will<br />

provide an update of discussions at the next meeting.<br />

11. Any Other Business<br />

There were no items of any other business.<br />

12. Date and Time of Next Meeting<br />

The date and time of the next meeting is Monday 17 October 2011 at<br />

10.00 a.m. in Network Meeting Room 2, <strong>Birmingham</strong> Research Park.<br />

S:\Cancer Network\Network Site Specific Groups\Supportive and Palliative Care\2011\October\Minutes - 11 July 2011 -<br />

Approved.doc<br />

Page 9 of 9<br />

ACTION<br />

JD\<br />

Agenda

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!