16.12.2012 Views

SPECIAL BOARD MEETING - Northland Pines School District

SPECIAL BOARD MEETING - Northland Pines School District

SPECIAL BOARD MEETING - Northland Pines School District

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SPECIAL</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong> <strong>MEETING</strong> – July 6, 2011<br />

The special meeting of the <strong>Northland</strong> <strong>Pines</strong> Board of Education of Wednesday, July 6, 2011, was<br />

called to order by President Jim Mulleady at six o’clock p.m. (6:00 p.m.) in the Large Group<br />

Instruction Room located in the <strong>Northland</strong> <strong>Pines</strong> High <strong>School</strong>, Eagle River, Wisconsin. Present<br />

were board members: Mark Vander Bloomen; Holly McCormack; John Sarama; Jim Mulleady; and<br />

Mike Jovanovic. Eric Neff and Mike Sealander were absent. Quorum was established. Also<br />

present were Mike Richie, <strong>District</strong> Administrator; Jackie Coghlan, Middle <strong>School</strong> Principal; and<br />

Susie Block, Recording Secretary. There were 20 citizens in attendance.<br />

Open Meeting Verification<br />

Jim Mulleady stated that the meeting had been duly called with meeting notices posted at the<br />

following locations:<br />

1. The <strong>Northland</strong> <strong>Pines</strong> High <strong>School</strong> and Middle <strong>School</strong> in Eagle River<br />

2. The <strong>Northland</strong> <strong>Pines</strong> Elementary <strong>School</strong>s in Eagle River, Land O’Lakes and St. Germain<br />

3. The Vilas County Courthouse - Eagle River<br />

4. The Eagle River City Hall<br />

5. Additional notice has been given:<br />

I. The Vilas County News Review-Eagle River<br />

II. WERL/WRJO Radio Station-Eagle River<br />

III. The Rhinelander Daily News-Rhinelander<br />

IV. WHDG Radio Station-Rhinelander<br />

Approval of Agenda<br />

MOTION by Mike Jovanovic that the Board approves the agenda as presented. Second by Mark<br />

Vander Bloomen. Voice vote 5-0. Motion carried.<br />

Employee Handbook discussion<br />

Stu Waller presented the Board with Neola’s outline of a handbook for professional staff, noting<br />

that this would be online and the policies which are referred to throughout the handbook would be<br />

linked to the handbook. The cost of the handbook is $250.00 which is a one time cost. Waller<br />

noted that if he comes up to help with the handbook then it would be another $250.00 for that<br />

service.<br />

The Board indicated they would purchase the Neola policy handbook, noting that Neola is backed<br />

by the law firm of Davis & Kuelthau, which reviews everything that Neola puts out to Wisconsin<br />

school districts.<br />

Jim Mulleady asked those in attendance if they had any input for the Board regarding the Employee<br />

Handbook.<br />

Jennifer Nickel expressed concern over the proposed 7:30 to 3:30 workday, noting she is concerned<br />

with parents being able to get their children to daycare and then get to work by 7:30 a.m. Nickel<br />

also noted concern regarding supervision of students between 7:30 and 8:00 a.m. if teachers are in<br />

staff or department meetings.<br />

Amanda Acklam expressed concern over the 7:30 to 3:30 workday indicating agreement with<br />

Nickel. Acklam stated that most teachers already work well beyond their work day; she has given<br />

up her prep time to volunteer to work on projects or other needs of the district. Acklam noted she<br />

1


did not want the guaranteed prep minutes removed. Acklam asked that the Board does not cut the<br />

mileage rate in half for the district’s traveling teachers, as part of her job is traveling between three<br />

school buildings and she puts a lot of miles on her vehicle.<br />

Mike Richie said as of right now the plan is to keep prep time the same but noted that if we have a<br />

three or four million dollar shortfall due to a failed referendum then we may need to look at cutting<br />

prep time in the future.<br />

Annette Numrich expressed concern regarding any reduction in travel reimbursement. Numrich<br />

indicated she gives up lunch time to travel to IEP meetings, never takes a break during the day,<br />

never goes down to the lounge to take a break. Numrich said she is here by 7:00 a.m. every day to<br />

prepare for her kids and be ready when they come in. Numrich feels it is an insult that teachers are<br />

not considered to be already putting in their time.<br />

Becky Boxrucker spoke regarding 7:30 to 3:30 workday, noting that she will get her kids to daycare<br />

when they need to be and that is not the Board’s problem, but her concern is how the students are<br />

taken care of during that time for 30 to 40 minutes before the school day begins; her kids in special<br />

education can not go in to the lunch room in the morning and if they did, it would start out their day<br />

horribly. Boxrucker noted she wishes she could punch a clock because the district would be paying<br />

her a lot more money. Boxrucker was also concerned about kids missing at the end of the day if<br />

teachers leave just five minutes after the kids; they are usually there beyond that and are going back<br />

and forth with the bus drivers and secretaries to make sure all kids are accounted for and on their<br />

buses or being transported home via family. Boxrucker asked that the Board please consider that<br />

we need to have a very good plan for the kids in the morning if they are going to be here longer then<br />

10 or 15 minutes without supervision and we also need a good plan for the end of the school day to<br />

ensure that kids are safely transported home.<br />

Ann Hewitt asked if the Board was going to put this employee handbook document out for the<br />

public. Mike said at this point this is a draft and we will be working on it and changing it daily so it<br />

will not go out to the public until it is in final form. Our goal is to make it as brief as possible and<br />

concise.<br />

Ann Hewitt said that it was hurtful that the Board did not want to negotiate the contract extension<br />

for the teachers and she is already feeling unappreciated in many other ways. She is also<br />

disappointed that the Board wanted to change the workday from 7:30 to 3:30 and hopes that we<br />

reconsider the workday.<br />

Mike Gerlach asked do we know what financial shape we are in? Margo Smith, Business Manager,<br />

said we will have a much tighter budget because of the 5.5% per pupil reduction in revenue;<br />

however, we didn’t get much funding from the state so we are in better shape than many other<br />

districts she knows of that are making a 25% layoff in staff due to a huge funding cliff. Margo said<br />

she is still putting together the budget and there are still many unknown factors that will affect the<br />

budget. Gerlach said the teachers have already taken a hit and he is hoping the Board is not going<br />

to use tools to take more away from the teachers.<br />

Jim Mulleady noted that we are getting constantly changing information from the state and we will<br />

not have the final numbers for a while.<br />

John Sarama asked the other board members what the negotiation process was in the past, noting he<br />

did not appreciate being chastised by teachers regarding negotiations when the Board did put in a<br />

2


good faith effort to negotiate. Mike Jovanvoic said that the last two two-year contracts took us<br />

eight months to negotiate and it went through Personnel Committee and then went to the full Board<br />

in closed session for approval. Those contracts were negotiated by Josh Skubal as NPEA President.<br />

Holly McCormack noted these are all unchartered waters and new to everyone so it is not going to<br />

be the same as negotiations were in the past.<br />

Deb Foster asked if the issue is financial then why the language changes that are not financial?<br />

Holly McCormack responded that the issues are not just financial, that we also need to be doing<br />

what is best for the students and the taxpayers so the Board is looking at language changes. Mike<br />

Richie said for example the Board is changing the bell schedule in 2012-2013 so that we can share<br />

staff between the high school and middle school more effectively. We are also eliminating seniority<br />

as the Board’s goal is to keep the best teachers in the classroom, regardless of seniority.<br />

Annette Numrich asked if you have two equally qualified teachers then you wouldn’t exclude the<br />

more senior one? Mike said no in that case you would not exclude the senior staff member; at that<br />

point you would review qualifications and conduct an interview process between the two staff<br />

members.<br />

Becky Pokrandt asked about the co-curricular contracts area. Mike Richie said Brian Margelofsky,<br />

Activities Director, is working with the Athletic Committee on a Co-Curricular Handbook and they<br />

are reviewing co-curricular salaries as well, but that will be completely separate and not a part of<br />

the Employee Handbook. Pokrandt said this has been a tough year, that she does not want any more<br />

“he said she said” emails or letters, that she wants to go into next year and get all of this settled.<br />

Pokrandt said we all need to work together on this because when we are upset students pick up on<br />

and reflect on these issues. We need to show support for each other. We understand we need set<br />

hours but she puts in a lot of additional time as it is.<br />

Jennifer Nickel asked about the dental plan. Mike Richie said the plan right now is to stay with the<br />

same dental plan that staff has now; there is no plan to change anything with dental.<br />

Jason Foster asked will there be co-curricular salary changes and assistant changes? Mike said yes<br />

the Athletic Committee is looking at that and there will likely be changes proposed to the Board at a<br />

later date.<br />

Gretchen Yagow asked about whether the Board would be doing a wage freeze. Mike Richie said<br />

that is the one item that will be negotiated; it is referred to as Total Base Wages and the Board can<br />

negotiate up to CPI (Consumer Price Index). Yagow indicated teachers were trying to plan their<br />

personal budgets and wondering what their pay would be for 2011-2012. Richie said teachers could<br />

take your total wages from 2010-2011, deduct 5.8% retirement, deduct 12% insurance premium<br />

and that will give you a rough idea; teachers may also contact Tera Fritz, Payroll & Benefits, to<br />

assist with those calculations. Margo Smith cautioned that teachers can not hold Tera to those<br />

estimates because withholdings will change and there are factors we have no control over. Yagow<br />

concluded by saying that teachers have a division in our own staff and there is a lot of tension in<br />

this room tonight; some teachers want to have it the old way and some teachers want to just move<br />

forward. Yagow asked if the Board was considering a three tiered financial payment plan. Mike<br />

Richie said we have heard about it but have not seen it and the Board is still considering items<br />

related to salary structure.<br />

3


Ann Hewitt asked when are pay periods and what about sick leave? Hewitt indicated that if we<br />

require sick notes every time that staff members will be afraid to call in sick or running to the doctor<br />

for every sick day. The Board indicated they are more concerned with patterns of sick leave abuse<br />

and may ask for doctor’s notes in cases where there are patterns of calling in sick every Friday or<br />

every Monday type of thing.<br />

Annette Numrich asked if we look at a three tiered payment plan will we also look at professionals<br />

outside of the teachers on it like her position? Numrich indicated she is an Occupational Therapist<br />

but has always been lumped in with teachers.<br />

Tera Fritz suggested keeping the handbook vague so the Board would have room for adjustments.<br />

Mark Vander Bloomen said some of it needs to be very detailed and the Board does have the right<br />

to change the handbook at any time if something is not working.<br />

Ann Hewitt suggested that the Board have listening sessions to talk about issues.<br />

Diane Reimer asked about side letter #6 to the old contract and Mike said we need to get some legal<br />

clarification on the language. Mike said the employee hits 65 and the employee’s spouse was never<br />

employed by the district then it may be illegal to keep the spouse on our insurance.<br />

At this point all input was completed. The Board thanked the staff in attendance for their input and<br />

reminded them the handbook is a work in progress. The Board reminded everyone the next meeting<br />

for the handbook will be Wednesday, August 13, 2011, at 6:00 p.m. as posted.<br />

Mike Richie thanked staff in attendance for remaining professional and giving great input to the<br />

Board to consider.<br />

Adjournment<br />

MOTION by Mark Vander Bloomen that the Board adjourns. Second by John Sarama. Voice vote<br />

5-0. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!