SPECIAL BOARD MEETING - Northland Pines School District
SPECIAL BOARD MEETING - Northland Pines School District
SPECIAL BOARD MEETING - Northland Pines School District
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>SPECIAL</strong> <strong>BOARD</strong> <strong>MEETING</strong> – July 6, 2011<br />
The special meeting of the <strong>Northland</strong> <strong>Pines</strong> Board of Education of Wednesday, July 6, 2011, was<br />
called to order by President Jim Mulleady at six o’clock p.m. (6:00 p.m.) in the Large Group<br />
Instruction Room located in the <strong>Northland</strong> <strong>Pines</strong> High <strong>School</strong>, Eagle River, Wisconsin. Present<br />
were board members: Mark Vander Bloomen; Holly McCormack; John Sarama; Jim Mulleady; and<br />
Mike Jovanovic. Eric Neff and Mike Sealander were absent. Quorum was established. Also<br />
present were Mike Richie, <strong>District</strong> Administrator; Jackie Coghlan, Middle <strong>School</strong> Principal; and<br />
Susie Block, Recording Secretary. There were 20 citizens in attendance.<br />
Open Meeting Verification<br />
Jim Mulleady stated that the meeting had been duly called with meeting notices posted at the<br />
following locations:<br />
1. The <strong>Northland</strong> <strong>Pines</strong> High <strong>School</strong> and Middle <strong>School</strong> in Eagle River<br />
2. The <strong>Northland</strong> <strong>Pines</strong> Elementary <strong>School</strong>s in Eagle River, Land O’Lakes and St. Germain<br />
3. The Vilas County Courthouse - Eagle River<br />
4. The Eagle River City Hall<br />
5. Additional notice has been given:<br />
I. The Vilas County News Review-Eagle River<br />
II. WERL/WRJO Radio Station-Eagle River<br />
III. The Rhinelander Daily News-Rhinelander<br />
IV. WHDG Radio Station-Rhinelander<br />
Approval of Agenda<br />
MOTION by Mike Jovanovic that the Board approves the agenda as presented. Second by Mark<br />
Vander Bloomen. Voice vote 5-0. Motion carried.<br />
Employee Handbook discussion<br />
Stu Waller presented the Board with Neola’s outline of a handbook for professional staff, noting<br />
that this would be online and the policies which are referred to throughout the handbook would be<br />
linked to the handbook. The cost of the handbook is $250.00 which is a one time cost. Waller<br />
noted that if he comes up to help with the handbook then it would be another $250.00 for that<br />
service.<br />
The Board indicated they would purchase the Neola policy handbook, noting that Neola is backed<br />
by the law firm of Davis & Kuelthau, which reviews everything that Neola puts out to Wisconsin<br />
school districts.<br />
Jim Mulleady asked those in attendance if they had any input for the Board regarding the Employee<br />
Handbook.<br />
Jennifer Nickel expressed concern over the proposed 7:30 to 3:30 workday, noting she is concerned<br />
with parents being able to get their children to daycare and then get to work by 7:30 a.m. Nickel<br />
also noted concern regarding supervision of students between 7:30 and 8:00 a.m. if teachers are in<br />
staff or department meetings.<br />
Amanda Acklam expressed concern over the 7:30 to 3:30 workday indicating agreement with<br />
Nickel. Acklam stated that most teachers already work well beyond their work day; she has given<br />
up her prep time to volunteer to work on projects or other needs of the district. Acklam noted she<br />
1
did not want the guaranteed prep minutes removed. Acklam asked that the Board does not cut the<br />
mileage rate in half for the district’s traveling teachers, as part of her job is traveling between three<br />
school buildings and she puts a lot of miles on her vehicle.<br />
Mike Richie said as of right now the plan is to keep prep time the same but noted that if we have a<br />
three or four million dollar shortfall due to a failed referendum then we may need to look at cutting<br />
prep time in the future.<br />
Annette Numrich expressed concern regarding any reduction in travel reimbursement. Numrich<br />
indicated she gives up lunch time to travel to IEP meetings, never takes a break during the day,<br />
never goes down to the lounge to take a break. Numrich said she is here by 7:00 a.m. every day to<br />
prepare for her kids and be ready when they come in. Numrich feels it is an insult that teachers are<br />
not considered to be already putting in their time.<br />
Becky Boxrucker spoke regarding 7:30 to 3:30 workday, noting that she will get her kids to daycare<br />
when they need to be and that is not the Board’s problem, but her concern is how the students are<br />
taken care of during that time for 30 to 40 minutes before the school day begins; her kids in special<br />
education can not go in to the lunch room in the morning and if they did, it would start out their day<br />
horribly. Boxrucker noted she wishes she could punch a clock because the district would be paying<br />
her a lot more money. Boxrucker was also concerned about kids missing at the end of the day if<br />
teachers leave just five minutes after the kids; they are usually there beyond that and are going back<br />
and forth with the bus drivers and secretaries to make sure all kids are accounted for and on their<br />
buses or being transported home via family. Boxrucker asked that the Board please consider that<br />
we need to have a very good plan for the kids in the morning if they are going to be here longer then<br />
10 or 15 minutes without supervision and we also need a good plan for the end of the school day to<br />
ensure that kids are safely transported home.<br />
Ann Hewitt asked if the Board was going to put this employee handbook document out for the<br />
public. Mike said at this point this is a draft and we will be working on it and changing it daily so it<br />
will not go out to the public until it is in final form. Our goal is to make it as brief as possible and<br />
concise.<br />
Ann Hewitt said that it was hurtful that the Board did not want to negotiate the contract extension<br />
for the teachers and she is already feeling unappreciated in many other ways. She is also<br />
disappointed that the Board wanted to change the workday from 7:30 to 3:30 and hopes that we<br />
reconsider the workday.<br />
Mike Gerlach asked do we know what financial shape we are in? Margo Smith, Business Manager,<br />
said we will have a much tighter budget because of the 5.5% per pupil reduction in revenue;<br />
however, we didn’t get much funding from the state so we are in better shape than many other<br />
districts she knows of that are making a 25% layoff in staff due to a huge funding cliff. Margo said<br />
she is still putting together the budget and there are still many unknown factors that will affect the<br />
budget. Gerlach said the teachers have already taken a hit and he is hoping the Board is not going<br />
to use tools to take more away from the teachers.<br />
Jim Mulleady noted that we are getting constantly changing information from the state and we will<br />
not have the final numbers for a while.<br />
John Sarama asked the other board members what the negotiation process was in the past, noting he<br />
did not appreciate being chastised by teachers regarding negotiations when the Board did put in a<br />
2
good faith effort to negotiate. Mike Jovanvoic said that the last two two-year contracts took us<br />
eight months to negotiate and it went through Personnel Committee and then went to the full Board<br />
in closed session for approval. Those contracts were negotiated by Josh Skubal as NPEA President.<br />
Holly McCormack noted these are all unchartered waters and new to everyone so it is not going to<br />
be the same as negotiations were in the past.<br />
Deb Foster asked if the issue is financial then why the language changes that are not financial?<br />
Holly McCormack responded that the issues are not just financial, that we also need to be doing<br />
what is best for the students and the taxpayers so the Board is looking at language changes. Mike<br />
Richie said for example the Board is changing the bell schedule in 2012-2013 so that we can share<br />
staff between the high school and middle school more effectively. We are also eliminating seniority<br />
as the Board’s goal is to keep the best teachers in the classroom, regardless of seniority.<br />
Annette Numrich asked if you have two equally qualified teachers then you wouldn’t exclude the<br />
more senior one? Mike said no in that case you would not exclude the senior staff member; at that<br />
point you would review qualifications and conduct an interview process between the two staff<br />
members.<br />
Becky Pokrandt asked about the co-curricular contracts area. Mike Richie said Brian Margelofsky,<br />
Activities Director, is working with the Athletic Committee on a Co-Curricular Handbook and they<br />
are reviewing co-curricular salaries as well, but that will be completely separate and not a part of<br />
the Employee Handbook. Pokrandt said this has been a tough year, that she does not want any more<br />
“he said she said” emails or letters, that she wants to go into next year and get all of this settled.<br />
Pokrandt said we all need to work together on this because when we are upset students pick up on<br />
and reflect on these issues. We need to show support for each other. We understand we need set<br />
hours but she puts in a lot of additional time as it is.<br />
Jennifer Nickel asked about the dental plan. Mike Richie said the plan right now is to stay with the<br />
same dental plan that staff has now; there is no plan to change anything with dental.<br />
Jason Foster asked will there be co-curricular salary changes and assistant changes? Mike said yes<br />
the Athletic Committee is looking at that and there will likely be changes proposed to the Board at a<br />
later date.<br />
Gretchen Yagow asked about whether the Board would be doing a wage freeze. Mike Richie said<br />
that is the one item that will be negotiated; it is referred to as Total Base Wages and the Board can<br />
negotiate up to CPI (Consumer Price Index). Yagow indicated teachers were trying to plan their<br />
personal budgets and wondering what their pay would be for 2011-2012. Richie said teachers could<br />
take your total wages from 2010-2011, deduct 5.8% retirement, deduct 12% insurance premium<br />
and that will give you a rough idea; teachers may also contact Tera Fritz, Payroll & Benefits, to<br />
assist with those calculations. Margo Smith cautioned that teachers can not hold Tera to those<br />
estimates because withholdings will change and there are factors we have no control over. Yagow<br />
concluded by saying that teachers have a division in our own staff and there is a lot of tension in<br />
this room tonight; some teachers want to have it the old way and some teachers want to just move<br />
forward. Yagow asked if the Board was considering a three tiered financial payment plan. Mike<br />
Richie said we have heard about it but have not seen it and the Board is still considering items<br />
related to salary structure.<br />
3
Ann Hewitt asked when are pay periods and what about sick leave? Hewitt indicated that if we<br />
require sick notes every time that staff members will be afraid to call in sick or running to the doctor<br />
for every sick day. The Board indicated they are more concerned with patterns of sick leave abuse<br />
and may ask for doctor’s notes in cases where there are patterns of calling in sick every Friday or<br />
every Monday type of thing.<br />
Annette Numrich asked if we look at a three tiered payment plan will we also look at professionals<br />
outside of the teachers on it like her position? Numrich indicated she is an Occupational Therapist<br />
but has always been lumped in with teachers.<br />
Tera Fritz suggested keeping the handbook vague so the Board would have room for adjustments.<br />
Mark Vander Bloomen said some of it needs to be very detailed and the Board does have the right<br />
to change the handbook at any time if something is not working.<br />
Ann Hewitt suggested that the Board have listening sessions to talk about issues.<br />
Diane Reimer asked about side letter #6 to the old contract and Mike said we need to get some legal<br />
clarification on the language. Mike said the employee hits 65 and the employee’s spouse was never<br />
employed by the district then it may be illegal to keep the spouse on our insurance.<br />
At this point all input was completed. The Board thanked the staff in attendance for their input and<br />
reminded them the handbook is a work in progress. The Board reminded everyone the next meeting<br />
for the handbook will be Wednesday, August 13, 2011, at 6:00 p.m. as posted.<br />
Mike Richie thanked staff in attendance for remaining professional and giving great input to the<br />
Board to consider.<br />
Adjournment<br />
MOTION by Mark Vander Bloomen that the Board adjourns. Second by John Sarama. Voice vote<br />
5-0. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m.<br />
4