13.08.2018 Views

Food & Beverage Reporter August 2018

South Africa's leading B2B magazine for the food & beverage sector and its allied industries in processing/packaging etc

South Africa's leading B2B magazine for the food & beverage sector and its allied industries in processing/packaging etc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HOT TOPIC<br />

ACKERMAN TRASHES BAG LEVY<br />

In July, Pick n Pay became the first SA<br />

retailer to trial compostable bags as<br />

an environmentally-friendly alternative<br />

to plastic.<br />

The “not made from plastic” carrier<br />

bags were given free to customers at the<br />

V&A Waterfront store. Made from maize<br />

and potato starch, the compostable bags<br />

are designed to collect organic waste<br />

such as kitchen scraps and then added<br />

to a home compost environment. They<br />

break down after three to six months,<br />

compared to the reported 500 to 1 000<br />

years it takes for plastic.<br />

Compostable bags have already been<br />

rolled out across Europe, North America<br />

and Australia, as well as with retailers<br />

in Italy.<br />

Speaking at the trial, Pick n Pay<br />

chairman Gareth Ackerman said although<br />

much had been done to reduce plastic<br />

use, it was clear that more effort was<br />

needed to make an impact.<br />

“Sustainable solutions require all<br />

parties involved – retailers, government,<br />

plastic manufacturers, consumers<br />

and recyclers – to work together<br />

collaboratively – and well beyond plastic<br />

bags to all forms of waste.”<br />

Ackerman hit out at the the plastic<br />

bag levy, introduced in 2003 in an effort<br />

to make consumers think more carefully<br />

about their plastic bag usage, saying<br />

funds generated from the levy have not<br />

improved the environment and created<br />

jobs, as was promised at the time.<br />

“These funds need to be put to<br />

proper use – not as a tax collection<br />

mechanism but as a fully-funded<br />

programme to make a real environmental<br />

impact and create much needed jobs.<br />

We look forward to the completion of<br />

“Stop making consumers feel<br />

guilty and target the real<br />

culprits ... the food industry!”<br />

By Alan Todd<br />

All Told’s director of research<br />

Inspect the contents of an average bag of groceries and<br />

you will find that there is way more plastic around the<br />

products inside the bag than there is in the carrier bag<br />

itself. The plastic milk bottle, the plastic honey jar, the<br />

plastic bag of rice, the plastic-wrapped chicken and the<br />

plastic-wrapped cheese all add up to far more plastic than<br />

the plastic used to make the carrier bag.<br />

Why then is there such an uproar about plastic carrier<br />

bags? In order to solve the plastic pollution problem, it<br />

seems obvious to anyone who thinks about it that, in<br />

addition to making consumers feel guilty about using<br />

plastic bags, the product manufacturers need to be forced<br />

into using far less plastic in their product packaging.<br />

This would really go a long way to solving the plastic<br />

pollution problem.<br />

In the big picture, the pollution from plastic carrier<br />

bags is negligible compared to the pollution caused by<br />

the plastic in product packaging itself. If we’re honest,<br />

going after consumers to get them to stop using plastic<br />

carrier bags is nothing more than token gesture and<br />

blatant virtue signalling by retailers. If they were genuinely<br />

concerned about the plastic pollution problem, they would<br />

be going after the product manufacturers to force them to<br />

find alternatives to plastic packaging.<br />

Although it is vitally important for brands to<br />

demonstrate good moral principles, they need to do so<br />

in ways that are perceived not only to be admirable, but<br />

in ways which actually work. Being seen to be doing good<br />

things is not the same as doing good things. It does not<br />

take too long for consumers to realise when a brand is<br />

making shallow, sycophantic attempts to ingratiate itself<br />

to them rather than to make a real change. Ultimately, this<br />

kind of virtue signalling does much more harm than good<br />

to a brand’s reputation.<br />

Climbing onto bandwagons, echoing popular beliefs,<br />

groupthink and following the herd is not the stuff of real<br />

brand differentiation. This is because most brands are<br />

doing and saying these same things. Brands are only<br />

noticed and admired by consumers when they do and say<br />

meaningful, unique and different things. The ones who do<br />

this are the leaders and the rest are the followers.<br />

Undoubtedly, plastic pollution is a major problem,<br />

but cajoling consumers to stop using plastic bags will<br />

only solve a small part of the problem. For this reason,<br />

it is a useless way for any brand to try to differentiate<br />

itself. When all things are considered, tackling the plastic<br />

pollution problem in a big and meaningful way is the only<br />

way for a brand to achieve differentiation at the same<br />

time as actually helping solve a serious problem facing<br />

the planet.<br />

For consumers, it’s a case of “stop telling us how<br />

noble you are and start impressing us with some<br />

decisive action.”<br />

www.alltold.co.za<br />

28 AUGUST <strong>2018</strong> | FOOD & BEVERAGE REPORTER www.fbreporter.co.za

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!