10.09.2018 Views

Evaluation of desertification hazard in the Jaz_Murian aquifer based on analysis of climate and groundwater criteria

Abstract Desertification is a major concern of this century and occurs as a result of climatic and human induced factors. The current work aims to depict the desertification hazard map in the Jaz_Murian region using an Iranian Model of Desertification Potential Assessment (IMDPA) based on groundwater and climate criteria. For the evaluation of groundwater criterion, four indices included Electrical Conductive (Ec), Sodium Absorption Ratio (SAR), Chloride (CL), and groundwater depletion are usually used. As well as, two climatic (precipitation and aridity) indices were considered. As the groundwater quality data are collected in a much-dispersed network of wells, this problem is moderated by various geostatistical methods that have been developed to predict values at the unmeasured locations. This paper used Kriging's method to interpolate groundwater quality variables. In order to better understanding the groundwater level of Jaz_Murian aquifer, the groundwater hydrograph was generated. The results showed that the groundwater level depleted about 6.8 meter during the last 11 years. Moreover, evaluation of desertification based on climatic indices showed that the Jaz_Murian aquifer faces a critical desertification hazard. Results have shown that about 49% of the area fell into the moderate category and the rest (51%) fell into the high category for desertification hazard. Decrease in precipitation and severe utilization of groundwater particularly in the agricultural sector led to desertification that calls for urgent establishment of watershed management projects in this region.

Abstract
Desertification is a major concern of this century and occurs as a result of climatic and human induced factors. The current work aims to depict the desertification hazard map in the Jaz_Murian region using an Iranian Model of Desertification Potential Assessment (IMDPA) based on groundwater and climate criteria. For the evaluation of groundwater criterion, four indices included Electrical Conductive (Ec), Sodium Absorption Ratio (SAR), Chloride (CL), and groundwater depletion are usually used. As well as, two climatic (precipitation and aridity) indices were considered. As the groundwater quality data are collected in a much-dispersed network of wells, this problem is moderated by various geostatistical methods that have been developed to predict values at the unmeasured locations. This paper used Kriging's method to interpolate groundwater quality variables. In order to better understanding the groundwater level of Jaz_Murian aquifer, the groundwater hydrograph was generated. The results showed that the groundwater level depleted about 6.8 meter during the last 11 years. Moreover, evaluation of desertification based on climatic indices showed that the Jaz_Murian aquifer faces a critical desertification hazard. Results have shown that about 49% of the area fell into the moderate category and the rest (51%) fell into the high category for desertification hazard. Decrease in precipitation and severe utilization of groundwater particularly in the agricultural sector led to desertification that calls for urgent establishment of watershed management projects in this region.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2016<br />

Desertificati<strong>on</strong> is a compound phenomen<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> occurs<br />

because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> many factors such as <strong>climate</strong>, soil, vegetati<strong>on</strong><br />

cover, water, erosi<strong>on</strong>, agriculture, geology &<br />

geomorphology, socio & ec<strong>on</strong>omic, urban<br />

development & technogenic.<br />

Fig. 3. Dispersi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>on</strong>itor<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g wells which<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidered to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terpolati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> quality properties.<br />

Iranian Model <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Desertificati<strong>on</strong> Potential<br />

Assessment (IMDPA)<br />

The Iranian Model <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Desertificati<strong>on</strong> Potential<br />

Assessment (IMDPA) was presented by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Tehran <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2005, as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a project entitled<br />

“Determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> methodology <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>desertificati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>criteria</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dices <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> arid <strong>and</strong> semi-arid regi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Iran”<br />

(Shakerian et al., 2011).<br />

The IMDPA model classifies <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se factors <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> four<br />

groups, wea<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r group (<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cludes <strong>climate</strong> <strong>and</strong> water<br />

<strong>criteria</strong>), l<strong>and</strong> group (geology & geomorphology, soil<br />

<strong>and</strong> erosi<strong>on</strong> <strong>criteria</strong>), vegetati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> ground group<br />

(vegetati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> agriculture <strong>criteria</strong>), <strong>and</strong> human<br />

group (socio & ec<strong>on</strong>omic, urban development &<br />

technogenic <strong>criteria</strong>). Each criteri<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cludes some<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dices (Tahmoures, 2013). The goal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this research<br />

is to evaluate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>desertificati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hazard</str<strong>on</strong>g> accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to<br />

wea<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r group factors.<br />

For assessment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>desertificati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hazard</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

each <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dex (Fig. 4) was weighted <str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> manual <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

model (Table 1) <strong>and</strong> comb<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed with each o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> GIS<br />

10.1 s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware by calculat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g geometric mean <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dices accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> follow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g equati<strong>on</strong><br />

(Zehtabian et al., 2014):<br />

Table 1. Classificati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> water <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>criteria</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> order to <str<strong>on</strong>g>desertificati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> assessment.<br />

<strong>criteria</strong> Index Score <strong>and</strong> Classificati<strong>on</strong><br />

1-1.5<br />

(Low)<br />

1.51-2.5<br />

(Moderate)<br />

2.51-3.5<br />

(High)<br />

3.51 – 4<br />

(Severe)<br />

Water Groundwater depleti<strong>on</strong> 280 150-280 75-150 0.45 0.2-0.45 0.05-0.2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!