05.10.2018 Views

[Catalyst 2018]

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the emergence of NUMBER<br />

THEORETIC QUESTIONS<br />

from a geometric investigation<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Taking any regular even-sided polygon, one<br />

can make cross-cuts from each vertex and<br />

connect it to the midpoint of one of the<br />

opposite sides to create a smaller regular<br />

polygon contained within the original. The<br />

ratio between the area of this new polygon<br />

and the original has been shown to have<br />

some interesting values, specifically 1/5 for<br />

squares and 1/13 for hexagons. Building<br />

on this, a general formula that gives the<br />

ratio for an arbitrary regular polygon can<br />

be found. In this paper, we will explore<br />

how to generalize this result even further<br />

by allowing the crosscuts to connect to any<br />

side of the polygon, rather than just to the<br />

opposite side. We then explore the rationality<br />

of this expression, and discover interesting<br />

connections to number theoretic techniques<br />

looking into the relationship between<br />

Chebyshev Polynomials and the minimal<br />

polynomials of cosine.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Recent results have shown that there is an<br />

interesting relationship between the area of a<br />

regular polygon and the area of the polygon<br />

formed through<br />

crosscuts.<br />

Essentially, a<br />

second regular<br />

polygon is<br />

created from<br />

the first by<br />

connecting<br />

each vertex to<br />

the midpoint<br />

of the opposite side. Because even-sided<br />

polygons have two sides that can be opposite<br />

to any vertex, this implies that one side<br />

should be chosen and that direction should<br />

be repeated for every other vertex (See<br />

Figure 1). The area ratio has been calculated<br />

explicitly for squares and hexagons, and were<br />

found to be 1/5 and 1/13, respectively. 1,5,6<br />

In addition, for an odd-sided polygon, the<br />

crosscuts will connect in the center, so that<br />

the ratio will always be 0. After these specific<br />

results, the next question is whether a<br />

generalized formula can be found that agrees<br />

with these, as well as gives ratios for a regular<br />

polygon with an arbitrary number of sides. It<br />

is also important to explore the rationality of<br />

this function, as it is rational ratios that have<br />

motivated this research.<br />

Fig. 1: The crosscut formation of regular polygons when n=3, 4, 6.<br />

INITIAL FORMULAS<br />

The following are some necessary formulas<br />

that will be used later in the paper. The first<br />

is a simplified expression for the ratio of the<br />

areas, which gives R=a S2<br />

/a B2<br />

,where a S<br />

is the<br />

apothem of the smaller polygon, and<br />

a B<br />

is for the original polygon. The<br />

second is an explicit formula that<br />

gives the ratio in terms of only the<br />

number of sides of the polygons: R n<br />

=<br />

1/(1+4cot 2 (θ)) , where θ=π/n. This is<br />

the starting point for this paper, as<br />

this result will be generalized using<br />

similar methods as those used in the<br />

proof of R n<br />

.<br />

GENERALIZED EXPRESSION<br />

We want this new generalization to<br />

allow our crosscut to be connected<br />

to an arbitrary side of the polygon,<br />

instead of requiring that it connect to the side<br />

opposite of the vertex where it started. This<br />

new formula should give the area ratio only in<br />

terms of the number of sides of the polygon,<br />

n, and the number of vertices skipped<br />

before connecting the crosscut, denoted k.<br />

To do this, we first define a coordinate axis<br />

system that is<br />

suitable for our<br />

calculations. This<br />

coordinate axis<br />

can be created<br />

by placing one<br />

vertex and the<br />

center of the<br />

polygon on the<br />

line y=C that<br />

runs parallel to the x-axis. Then, the crosscut<br />

originating from this vertex would create an<br />

angle with this line. Connecting the other<br />

endpoint of the crosscut to the center of the<br />

polygon forms a triangle that has one known<br />

angle, ψ=2πk/n+(1/2)(2π/n)=(π(2k+1))/n, at<br />

the center. (We assume in this proof that<br />

0< ψ≤π, but we will later show that this<br />

formula actually holds for all values of ψ.) In<br />

addition to this known angle, two of the sides<br />

are known, as one, a B<br />

, is the apothem and<br />

another, r, is the radius of the polygon. This<br />

setup is detailed in Figure 2.<br />

As only one angle in this triangle is known, it<br />

is easiest to form two right triangles, so that<br />

known trigonometric formulas more readily<br />

apply. This is accomplished by taking a line<br />

By Jacob Kesten<br />

from E to E’, where is connects to the line<br />

y=Cat a right angle. In Figure 2, this new line<br />

is denoted b. Now using trigonometry, it is<br />

possible to find the slope of the crosscut by<br />

calculating the lengths of b and c. This gives<br />

Fig. 2: A diagram depicting the two triangles used to compute the slope<br />

of the specific crosscut. The first picture shows placement of the triangle<br />

on the polygon and coordinate axes. The second shows how the 2 right<br />

triangles were formed, and the third shows how this can be used to<br />

compute the length of the smaller apothem.<br />

the slope of the crosscut as m=(–a B<br />

sin(ψ))/<br />

(r–a B<br />

cos(ψ))=(–cos(θ)sin(ψ))/(1–cos(θ)cos(ψ)).<br />

Knowing the slope makes it possible to<br />

write an equation for the line containing<br />

the crosscut, as well as the equation of<br />

the line perpendicular to the crosscut that<br />

contains aS. These are given by y 1<br />

=mx+mr+C<br />

and y 2<br />

=–x/m+C, respectively. Finding the<br />

intersection of these two lines allows us to<br />

find a S<br />

2<br />

in terms of m and a B2<br />

. Dividing both<br />

sides by a B2<br />

, we get that a S2<br />

/a B<br />

2<br />

= R n,k<br />

= (m 4 +m 2 )/<br />

(cos 2 θ(1+m 2 ) 2 ) = (1–cos 2 (ψ))/(1–2cosψcos θ<br />

+cos 2 θ), where θ=π/n and ψ=(2k+1)θ. Notice<br />

that this formula depends only on n and k, as<br />

desired.<br />

We now check that this formula holds for<br />

values of π < ψ < 2π. This follows from the<br />

fact that for π < ψ < 2π, ψ=π+ψ’ where ψ‘ < π,<br />

and cosψ=cosψ’ so that the formula will be<br />

the same as the one for the corresponding<br />

complement angle. Essentially, the case<br />

where π < ψ < 2π reduces to a case where<br />

ψ≤π by looking at the angle going in the<br />

opposite direction of the obtuse angle. An<br />

example of this is given in Figure 3 using<br />

different crosscut octagons. Flipping the<br />

octagons on the bottom shows that they will<br />

be identical to the ones in the first row, so<br />

that they will produce identical ratios.<br />

Now that we have found the formula R n,k<br />

,we<br />

can check that it matches with the values<br />

already found for specific polygons. One such<br />

example is when the crosscuts connect to the<br />

36 | CATALYST

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!