Law Enforcement Intelligence - Cops - Department of Justice

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Summary of New Initiatives • Development of the FBI Intelligence Program with its new emphasis on intelligence requirements, new intelligence products, and creation of the Field Intelligence Group (FIG) in every FBI Field Office as the primary intelligence contact point among state, local, and tribal law enforcement and the FBI. • Development of new FBI counterterrorism initiatives and programs. • New intelligence products from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as well as a substantive input role of raw information into the DHS intelligence cycle by state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies. • Expansion and articulation of the Intelligence-Led Policing concept. • Implementation of the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan. • Creation of a wide variety of initiatives and standards as a result of the Global Intelligence Working Group (GIWG) of the Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative. • Renewed vigor toward the adoption of 28 CFR Part 23, Guidelines for Criminal Intelligence Records Systems, by law enforcement agencies that are not required to adhere to the regulation. • Secure connections for email exchange, access to advisories, reports, and information exchange, as well as integration and streamlining the use of Law Enforcement Online (LEO), Regional Information Sharing Systems' RISS.net, and creation of the Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange (ATIX). • New operational expectations and training opportunities for intelligence analysts, law enforcement executives, managers, and line officers. x Law Enforcement Intelligence: A Guide for State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies
Challenges to be Faced by Law Enforcement Executives • Recognize that every law enforcement agency – regardless of size or location – has a stake in this global law enforcement intelligence initiative and, as such, must develop some form of an intelligence capacity in order to be an effective consumer of intelligence products. • Develop a culture of collection among officers to most effectively gather information for use in the intelligence cycle. • Operationally integrate Intelligence-Led Policing into the police organization. • Recognize that increased information sharing at and between law enforcement at all levels of government requires new commitments by law enforcement executives and managers. • Increase information sharing, as appropriate, with the broader public safety and private security sectors. • Protect data and records along with rigid accountability of the intelligence function. • Keep law enforcement intelligence and national security intelligence separate, particularly with respect to state and local officers on Joint Terrorism Task Forces. • Broader scrutiny of intelligence records and practices by civil rights groups. • Routinely use intelligence to make better tactical and strategic decisions. • Increase regionalization in all aspects of the intelligence function as an ongoing initiative of law enforcement agencies at all levels of government. • Ensure that non-law enforcement government officials and the community understand what law enforcement intelligence is and the importance of their role in the intelligence function. Executive Summary xi
Page 1: David L. Carter, Ph.D. School of Cr
Page 5 and 6: Preface The world of law enforcemen
Page 7 and 8: Executive Summary New expectations
Page 9 and 10: Management and Human Resources Read
Page 11: Intelligence Center (EPIC), Nationa
Page 16 and 17: CHAPTER 6: LAW ENFORCEMENT INTELLIG
Page 18 and 19: High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Are
Page 21 and 22: Introduction 1
Page 23 and 24: Every law enforcement agency in the
Page 25 and 26: To be effective, the law enforcemen
Page 27 and 28: Understanding Contemporary Law Enfo
Page 29 and 30: Understanding Contemporary Law Enfo
Page 31 and 32: Defining Intelligence Definitions b
Page 33 and 34: Figure 1-2: Comparative Illustratio
Page 35 and 36: Chapter 3 will show that there is a
Page 37 and 38: Figure 1-3: Intelligence Community
Page 39: The lessons learned from this brief
Page 42 and 43: CHAPTER THREE
Page 44 and 45: Aggravating these factors has been
Page 46 and 47: 22 Among the most often cited are M
Page 48 and 49: 25 United States Senate Select Comm
Page 50 and 51: In 1975, the Rockefeller Commission
Page 52 and 53: 37 The President's Commission on La
Page 54 and 55: 47 Commission on Accreditation for
Page 56 and 57: 49 Maureen Baginski, FBI Executive
Page 58 and 59: ecords mandates that the distinctio
Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER FOUR
Page 62 and 63:
55 http://it.ojp.gov/topic.jsp? top
Page 64 and 65:
57 For a good contemporary discussi
Page 66 and 67:
timely and effective deployment of
Page 68 and 69:
officers and members of the communi
Page 70 and 71:
61 Oftentimes, targets may not be r
Page 72 and 73:
64 The official Justice Department
Page 74 and 75:
68 Source: http://www.ci.austin.tx.
Page 76 and 77:
Figure 4-4: Austin, Texas Police De
Page 78 and 79:
CHAPTER FIVE
Page 80 and 81:
69 See http://www.nationalcrimesqua
Page 82 and 83:
71 N.B. = “nota bene” means “
Page 84 and 85:
Figure 5-3: Commodity Flow Chart Il
Page 86 and 87:
74 NOTE: Discussion of or reference
Page 88 and 89:
75 Of course, software compatibilit
Page 90 and 91:
The significant growth of wireless
Page 92 and 93:
82 Technology Considerations in the
Page 94 and 95:
See pg. 71 99 http://www.state.gov/
Page 96 and 97:
public. As a general rule, responsi
Page 99 and 100:
Law Enforcement Intelligence Classi
Page 101 and 102:
Law Enforcement Intelligence Classi
Page 103 and 104:
well as the collection and analytic
Page 105 and 106:
carefully consider the legal and et
Page 107 and 108:
geographic and temporal variables w
Page 109 and 110:
4. Lack of intelligence analysis. 5
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 6-1: Fact Sheet - National C
Page 113 and 114:
Managing the Intelligence Function
Page 115 and 116:
Managing the Intelligence Function
Page 117 and 118:
• Establishing the ability to det
Page 119 and 120:
(IALEIA) and the Law Enforcement In
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 7-1: Sample Mission Statemen
Page 123 and 124:
180 variables to assess in an intel
Page 125 and 126:
A key element to understand is that
Page 127:
http://www.terrorismcentral.com/New
Page 130 and 131:
CHAPTER EIGHT
Page 132 and 133:
131 For more detail, see: Wells, Ia
Page 134 and 135:
133 Bureau of Justice Assistance, C
Page 136 and 137:
137 See http://www.rcta.org/counter
Page 138 and 139:
141 For further information on DEA
Page 140 and 141:
146 See http://www.whitehousedrugpo
Page 142 and 143:
155 It is anticipated that the curr
Page 144 and 145:
122 Law Enforcement Intelligence: A
Page 146 and 147:
CHAPTER NINE
Page 148 and 149:
158 http://www.iir.com/riss/maglocl
Page 150 and 151:
Traditional support services provid
Page 152 and 153:
161 The LEO web page is at http://w
Page 154 and 155:
163 For more information on LEIU se
Page 156 and 157:
eal-time threat information at the
Page 158 and 159:
164 For contact information and mor
Page 160 and 161:
Organization (INTERPOL) 167 INTERPO
Page 162 and 163:
169 Regional Intelligence Centers a
Page 164 and 165:
Figure 9-4: Law Enforcement Intelli
Page 167 and 168:
Intelligence Requirements and Threa
Page 169 and 170:
Intelligence Requirements and Threa
Page 171 and 172:
Figure 10-1: Traditional Collection
Page 173 and 174:
Figure 10-2: Threat Assessment Mode
Page 175 and 176:
procedures can enhance this process
Page 177 and 178:
Figure 10-4: “Baseline” Intelli
Page 179 and 180:
IIN Modes of transportation and con
Page 181 and 182:
Federal Law Enforcement Intelligenc
Page 183 and 184:
Federal Law Enforcement Intelligenc
Page 185 and 186:
• “Confidential” shall be app
Page 187 and 188:
of officers while not jeopardizing
Page 189 and 190:
FBI Office of Intelligence The FBI
Page 191 and 192:
FBI Counterterrorism 190 Designated
Page 193 and 194:
a comprehensive, all-source-based p
Page 195 and 196:
question, or release the subject. I
Page 197 and 198:
and finance, energy, and transporta
Page 199 and 200:
Figure 11-3: DHS Information Bullet
Page 201 and 202:
Figure 11-5: DHS Cyber Advisory Fed
Page 203 and 204:
the Intelligence Division at DEA He
Page 205 and 206:
developed the National Clandestine
Page 207 and 208:
• It will rely on web-based commu
Page 209 and 210:
(HIDTA) Regional Intelligence Cente
Page 211 and 212:
During FY 2000, the Intelligence Di
Page 213 and 214:
FinCEN's information sources fall i
Page 215 and 216:
eing generated by federal law enfor
Page 217 and 218:
Summary, Conclusions, and Next Step
Page 219 and 220:
Summary, Conclusions, and Next Step
Page 221 and 222:
National Criminal Intelligence Shar
Page 223 and 224:
Refocusing Guided by the results of
Page 225 and 226:
Appendices
Page 227 and 228:
Advisory Board 205
Page 230 and 231:
APPENDIX B
Page 232 and 233:
212 Reproduced with permission of t
Page 234 and 235:
B. Specific types of records (inclu
Page 236 and 237:
several pieces of information indic
Page 238 and 239:
(2) Probable - The information is c
Page 240 and 241:
criteria that would indicate when s
Page 242 and 243:
Security Level Sensitive Confidenti
Page 244 and 245:
C. Manner of Destruction: Material
Page 246 and 247:
APPENDIX C
Page 248 and 249:
213 Prepared by David L. Carter, Mi
Page 250 and 251:
228 The questions in this audit out
Page 252 and 253:
229 For example, Intelligence repor
Page 254 and 255:
3. How often does a review and purg
Page 256 and 257:
a. How is the possession of persona
Page 258 and 259:
11. How are physical records secure
Page 260 and 261:
4. Does the police department have
Page 262 and 263:
231 Note: Training should go beyond
Page 264 and 265:
233 For example, grants, cooperativ
Page 266 and 267:
Section F. Collection 1. Is there a
Page 268 and 269:
236 A Pointer System - also known a
Page 270 and 271:
APPENDIX D
Page 272 and 273:
238 Based on Executive Order 12291,
Page 274 and 275:
(b) A project shall not collect or
Page 276 and 277:
(4) The project must institute proc
Page 278 and 279:
§ 23.30 Funding guidelines. The fo
Page 280 and 281:
28 CFR Part 23: 1993 Revision and C
Page 282 and 283:
EFFECTIVE DATE: This clarification
Page 284 and 285:
“Northwest Market” would not be
Page 286 and 287:
APPENDIX E
Page 288 and 289:
Federal Security Clearance Process
Page 290 and 291:
classified information. Applicants
Page 292 and 293:
APPENDIX F
Page 294:
David L. Carter (Ph.D., Sam Houston
Page 297:
Intelligence Unit Management Audit
Page 300 and 301:
Law Enforcement Intelligence: A Gui
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320:
show all

Law Enforcement Intelligence - Cops - Department of Justice

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?