Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Pips Alert Claims / Reviews<br />
Pips Alert Claims / Reviews Reviewing Signals Claim Reports & Back-Testing Them!<br />
Hello,<br />
The internal investigation team went in and looked at the data pip by pip, down to the micro. It’s true,<br />
we hit BE by just 2.9 <strong>pips</strong>, <strong>pips</strong><strong>alert</strong> <strong>review</strong> in turn we have over ruled the trade. At times we make<br />
human error, but will always 100% make sure it’s fixed.<br />
We have made correct changes and announced it as well.<br />
If ever find any trade that is not tracked in the correct manner, always contact us and our internal<br />
investigation team will double check and report properly. We always let the charts speak for<br />
themselves.<br />
Thanks for understanding and reporting that in.<br />
Another internal investigation was done and things have been corrected. The data entry team had to<br />
work on two platforms this week with the trading departments, and especially a crazy week as things<br />
are transitioning to a new platform. This is in no way of us making excuses, but we shall live to our goal<br />
of being honest.<br />
The trade was over ruled.<br />
Investor X – USDCHF Sell, Pips Alert Reviews/Results Stand<br />
Posted on 5th November 2018 by admin<br />
A trader reported that the signal below ended up only doing 55 <strong>pips</strong>, <strong>pips</strong> <strong>alert</strong> <strong>review</strong> instead of the<br />
claimed 90+ <strong>pips</strong> by the company.<br />
Our team decided to dig deeper and see what actually happened.<br />
First Signal<br />
USDCHF SELL 1.00400<br />
TP 0.99400 | SL 1.00700
Later Update<br />
Move Stoploss 1.00900<br />
And Set Sell Limit 1.00600<br />
As you can see above 10/24-25 is when the first signal was sent out;<br />
Then they later updated for a pending order to add in on 10/29 and also move of stop loss.<br />
The pending order ended up hitting, then the BE <strong>alert</strong> got posted on 11/1, this is where the trader might<br />
have mistaken for a close of 55 <strong>pips</strong>, Pips Alert signals <strong>review</strong> instead the BE did not return as you can<br />
see.<br />
They signal a close of original entry at 0 <strong>pips</strong> after major pull back/draw-down, but later they closed 90<br />
<strong>pips</strong> with the other entry.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Lost Claim<br />
Pips Alert results stand on this.<br />
Changes from company<br />
No changes needed as the results were back-tested and stand corrected.<br />
Website: https://<strong>pips</strong><strong>alert</strong>claims.com/
Change language