13.12.2018 Views

Effect of different concentrations of kinetin on seed germination in tomato

Abstract Fresh seeds of tomato cultivars Narc-2012 and Narc-2013 were subjected to osmopriming treatments with an objective to improve germination and seedling vigor by dormancy breakdown. For osmopriming seeds were soaked in aerated solution of 10, 50 and 100 ppm kinetin for 24 hours at 25°C. All the treatments resulted in improved germination and seedling vigor by dormancy breakdown compared with untreated seeds; however, highest vigor was observed in seeds subjected to 10 ppm kinetin followed by 50 ppm kinetin and 100 ppm kinetin.

Abstract
Fresh seeds of tomato cultivars Narc-2012 and Narc-2013 were subjected to osmopriming treatments with an objective to improve germination and seedling vigor by dormancy breakdown. For osmopriming seeds were soaked in aerated solution of 10, 50 and 100 ppm kinetin for 24 hours at 25°C. All the treatments resulted in improved germination and seedling vigor by dormancy breakdown compared with untreated seeds; however, highest vigor was observed in seeds subjected to 10 ppm kinetin followed by 50 ppm kinetin and 100 ppm kinetin.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Int. J. Agr<strong>on</strong>. Agri. R.<br />

RESEARCH PAPER<br />

OPEN ACCESS<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>different</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>seed</strong><br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong><br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Agr<strong>on</strong>omy and Agricultural Research (IJAAR)<br />

ISSN: 2223-7054 (Pr<strong>in</strong>t) 2225-3610 (Onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

http://www.<strong>in</strong>nspub.net<br />

Vol. 12, No. 2, p. 1-8, 2018<br />

Aqib Zeb * , Abdullah Khan, Rizwan Khan, Farrukh Shabbir<br />

Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Genetics, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan<br />

Article published <strong>on</strong> February 12, 2018<br />

Key words: Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g, Tomato, Seed germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>, Seed prim<strong>in</strong>g, Seedl<strong>in</strong>g vigor.<br />

Abstract<br />

Fresh <strong>seed</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong> cultivars Narc-2012 and Narc-2013 were subjected to osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g treatments with<br />

an objective to improve germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g vigor by dormancy breakdown. For osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>seed</strong>s<br />

were soaked <strong>in</strong> aerated soluti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10, 50 and 100 ppm <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> for 24 hours at 25°C . All the treatments<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> improved germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g vigor by dormancy breakdown compared with untreated<br />

<strong>seed</strong>s; however, highest vigor was observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>seed</strong>s subjected to 10 ppm <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> followed by 50 ppm <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

and 100 ppm <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

* Corresp<strong>on</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Author: Aqib Zeb aqibzeb@yahoo.com<br />

Zeb et al. Page 1


Int. J. Agr<strong>on</strong>. Agri. R.<br />

Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

Tomato (Lycopersic<strong>on</strong> esculentum L.) bel<strong>on</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

solanaceae and its orig<strong>in</strong> is the Andean z<strong>on</strong>e<br />

particularly Peru-Ecuador-Bolivian areas but<br />

cultivated <strong>tomato</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> Mexico. Tomato is <strong>on</strong>e<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the most highly praised vegetables c<strong>on</strong>sumed<br />

widely and it is a major source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vitam<strong>in</strong>s and<br />

m<strong>in</strong>erals. It is <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the most popular Salad<br />

vegetables and is taken with great relish. It is widely<br />

employed <strong>in</strong> cannery and made <strong>in</strong>to soups c<strong>on</strong>serves,<br />

pickles, ketchup, sauces, juices etc. Tomato juice has<br />

become an exceed<strong>in</strong>gly popular appetizer and<br />

beverage. The well ripe <strong>tomato</strong> (per 100 g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> edible<br />

porti<strong>on</strong>) c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s water (94.1%), energy (23 calories),<br />

calcium (1.0 g), magnesium (7.0 mg), vitam<strong>in</strong> A<br />

(1000 IU),ascorbic acid (22 mg), thiam<strong>in</strong> (0.09 mg),<br />

rib<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>lav<strong>in</strong> (0.03 mg) and niac<strong>in</strong> (0.8 mg). Plant<br />

growth regulators are essential for growth and<br />

development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong> plant (Salunkhe et al., 1987).<br />

Cytok<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>s comprise a separate class <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth<br />

substances and growth regulators. They produce<br />

various effects when applied to <strong>in</strong>tact plants. They<br />

particularly stimulate prote<strong>in</strong> synthesis and<br />

participate <strong>in</strong> cell cycle c<strong>on</strong>trol. It is perhaps for this<br />

reas<strong>on</strong> that they can promote the maturati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

chloroplasts and delay the senescence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> detached<br />

leaves. Cytok<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong> applicati<strong>on</strong> to a s<strong>in</strong>gle site <strong>in</strong> the<br />

plant (e.g. to <strong>on</strong>e leaf) causes the treated organ to<br />

become an active s<strong>in</strong>k for am<strong>in</strong>o acids, which then<br />

migrate to the organ from surround<strong>in</strong>g sites. The<br />

effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cytok<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>s is most noticeable <strong>in</strong> tissue<br />

cultures where they are used, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten together with<br />

aux<strong>in</strong>s, to stimulate cell divisi<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />

morphogenesis. Added to shoot culture media, these<br />

compounds overcome apical dom<strong>in</strong>ance and release<br />

lateral buds from dormancy.<br />

Seed prim<strong>in</strong>g is a pre-sow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>seed</strong> treatment used for<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>seed</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> properties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> many crops<br />

particularly <strong>seed</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vegetables and small <strong>seed</strong>ed<br />

crops (Bradford, 1986). Appropriate prim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

treatments also synchr<strong>on</strong>ize <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g emergence and<br />

improve field performance <strong>in</strong> many crop species<br />

(Nakaune et al., 2012; Heydekker et al., 1973). Dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

prim<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>seed</strong>s are partially hydrated so that pregerm<strong>in</strong>ative<br />

metabolic activities proceed while radical<br />

protrusi<strong>on</strong> is prevented (Mc D<strong>on</strong>ald, 2000). Initiat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> processes before sow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duced by<br />

prim<strong>in</strong>g enhance germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crops (Sadeghian<br />

and Yavari, 2004; Khajeh-Hosse<strong>in</strong>i et al., 2003;<br />

Ghassemi-Golezani and Esmaeilpour, 2008; Parera<br />

and Cantliffe, 1994).<br />

Tomato is am<strong>on</strong>g the crops which are resp<strong>on</strong>sive to<br />

prim<strong>in</strong>g. The rati<strong>on</strong>ale <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>seed</strong> prim<strong>in</strong>g is to lessen the<br />

time between plant<strong>in</strong>g and emergence and to protect<br />

<strong>seed</strong>s from biotic and abiotic factor dur<strong>in</strong>g critical<br />

phase <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g establishment and to synchr<strong>on</strong>ize<br />

emergence, which leads to uniform stand as well as<br />

improved yield. These prim<strong>in</strong>g treatments which<br />

enhance <strong>seed</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude hydroprim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Afzal et al., 2002) osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g (Rouhi, 2011), solid<br />

matrix prim<strong>in</strong>g (Ghassemi-Golezani et al., 2010)<br />

haloprim<strong>in</strong>g (Nawaz et al., 2011) and horm<strong>on</strong>al<br />

prim<strong>in</strong>g (Afzal et al., 2011). Cytok<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>s can also be<br />

used as prim<strong>in</strong>g agent; they are ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the<br />

breakdown <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dormancy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some <strong>seed</strong>s, (Arteca,<br />

1996). In this prim<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>seed</strong>s are soaked <strong>in</strong> aerated<br />

soluti<strong>on</strong>, which helps to <strong>in</strong>vigorate the <strong>seed</strong> and<br />

facilitate the process <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>seed</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g<br />

emergence evenly under adverse envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Primed <strong>seed</strong>s perform better <strong>in</strong> a wider range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

temperatures and are less sensitive to oxygen<br />

deprivati<strong>on</strong> (Corb<strong>in</strong>eau et al., 1993) than unprimed<br />

<strong>on</strong>es. The favorable impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> prim<strong>in</strong>g has been<br />

associated with various, cellular, molecular and<br />

biochemical events <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g synthesis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> DNA and<br />

prote<strong>in</strong>s (Bewley and Black, 1994). Prim<strong>in</strong>g can also<br />

help to <strong>in</strong>crease enzyme activity and neutralize the<br />

effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>seed</strong> age<strong>in</strong>g. Prim<strong>in</strong>g techniques has been<br />

reported to help <strong>in</strong> dormancy breakdown <strong>in</strong> many<br />

vegetable crops <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>tomato</strong> (Bradford, 1986;<br />

Liu et al., 1996; Kester et al., 1997).<br />

The present study was therefore planned to evaluate<br />

the impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g techniques (if any) <strong>on</strong> the<br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g vigor, and dormancy<br />

breakdown <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong>.<br />

Zeb et al. Page 2


Int. J. Agr<strong>on</strong>. Agri. R.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Plant material<br />

Seeds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two <strong>tomato</strong> cultivars i.e. NARC-2012 and<br />

NARC-2013 were collected from Nati<strong>on</strong>al Agriculture<br />

Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan.<br />

Methodology<br />

Seeds were surface sterilized. These surface sterilized<br />

<strong>seed</strong>s were soaked <strong>in</strong> aerated soluti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10, 50 and<br />

100 ppm <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> for 24 hours at 25°C.The soluti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> was prepared while treat<strong>in</strong>g it with 1M NaOH.<br />

1M NaOH was prepared by tak<strong>in</strong>g 1 gram <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> NaOH<br />

and dissolv<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> 25ml <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> distilled water. K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

soluti<strong>on</strong> was prepared by dissolv<strong>in</strong>g 1 gram <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>in</strong> 125ml <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> distilled water by add<strong>in</strong>g 6-10 drops <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

NaOH Soluti<strong>on</strong> respectively.<br />

N<strong>on</strong> primed <strong>seed</strong>s were c<strong>on</strong>sidered as c<strong>on</strong>trol. For<br />

hydro prim<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>seed</strong>s were soaked <strong>in</strong> distilled water.<br />

After respective prim<strong>in</strong>g treatment for specific period,<br />

<strong>seed</strong>s were washed with distilled water and dried at<br />

room temperature <strong>on</strong> filter paper <strong>in</strong> shade for 24 h.<br />

The c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> used for treatment was 10ppm, 50<br />

ppm and 100ppm.<br />

Germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> test<br />

Twelve <strong>seed</strong>s with three replicates per treatment were<br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ated at room temperature <strong>in</strong> Petri dishes <strong>on</strong><br />

two layers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> filter paper and moistened with 2 ml<br />

distilled water for 12 days.<br />

Time to 50% germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> (T50) was calculated<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the formulae <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Coolbear et al., (1984).<br />

Mean germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> time (MGT) was calculated<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ellis and Roberts (1981).<br />

Germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex (GI) was calculated as described<br />

<strong>in</strong> the AOSA (1983). Energy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> was<br />

recorded 4th day after plant<strong>in</strong>g. It is the percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

germ<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>seed</strong>s 4th day after plant<strong>in</strong>g relative to<br />

the total number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>seed</strong>s tested.<br />

T50 = ti + (N − ni) (tj − ti)<br />

2<br />

nj − ni<br />

Where N is the f<strong>in</strong>al number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and ni, nj<br />

cumulative number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>seed</strong>s germ<strong>in</strong>ated by adjacent<br />

counts at times ti and tj when ni


Int. J. Agr<strong>on</strong>. Agri. R.<br />

Table 1. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> the germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> ability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong> cultivars.<br />

Treatments FGP% MGT(Days) T50 (Days) G.I<br />

NARC- 2012 C<strong>on</strong>trol 77.77 7.77 6.25 4.108<br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

100 0.66 0.24 27<br />

(10ppm) K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

86 8.6 5.35 11.527<br />

(50ppm) K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

50 7 5 10.055<br />

(100ppm) K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

NARC- 2013 C<strong>on</strong>trol 52.77 5.27 5.37 2.524<br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

86 2.58 1.29 26.33<br />

(10ppm) K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

69.40 6.94 4.88 17.327<br />

(50ppm) K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(100ppm) K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

53 5.2 5.5 13.747<br />

All the <strong>seed</strong> treatments resulted <strong>in</strong> lower T50 and MGT<br />

and higher FGP, GI was compared with untreated<br />

<strong>seed</strong>s (Table 1). In all the cultivars lowest T5o was<br />

noted <strong>in</strong> <strong>seed</strong>s osmoprimed with <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 ppm that<br />

was followed by 50ppm and 100ppm <strong>in</strong> Narc-2012<br />

and Narc-2013 respectively. (Table 1) (Fig. 2).<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum MGT was noted <strong>in</strong> <strong>seed</strong>s subjected to<br />

10ppm <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> all the cultivars (Table 1) (Fig. 4).<br />

Maximum FGP, T50, GI and MGT were noted <strong>in</strong> <strong>seed</strong>s<br />

osmoprimed with 10 ppm <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> all the cultivars<br />

(Table 1) (Fig. 1; Fig. 2; Fig.3; Fig. 4). Significant<br />

effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g treatments <strong>on</strong> the <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g<br />

vigor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all the <strong>tomato</strong> cultivars was observed (Table<br />

2).<br />

Table 2. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g vigor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong> cultivars.<br />

Treatments MET (days) FEP (%) Root length (cm) Shoot length (cm)<br />

NARC- 2012 C<strong>on</strong>trol 17.5 19.6 54 44.67<br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g (10ppm) 12 22 58 49<br />

K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g (50ppm) 12 27 44 37<br />

K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

6 31 36 28<br />

(100ppm) K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

NARC- 2013 C<strong>on</strong>trol 8.2 20 48 46.67<br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g (10ppm) 8.2 25 53 51.45<br />

K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g (50ppm) 8 30 48 44.98<br />

K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(100ppm) K<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong><br />

9 33 40 37.78<br />

All the <strong>seed</strong> treatments resulted <strong>in</strong> lower MET<br />

compared with c<strong>on</strong>trol while Narc-2012 behaved<br />

similar to that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> untreated <strong>seed</strong>s (Table 2).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g resulted <strong>in</strong> highest FEP, root<br />

and shoot length compared with all other treatments<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>trol.<br />

In all the cultivars, all the <strong>seed</strong> treatments resulted <strong>in</strong><br />

higher FEP, root and shoot length compared with<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trol (Table 2). Tomato <strong>seed</strong>s subjected to 10 ppm<br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g had significant effect <strong>on</strong> the<br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g vigor <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong> cultivars used <strong>in</strong><br />

the present <strong>in</strong>vestigati<strong>on</strong> (Tables 1, 2) (Fig. 1).<br />

Zeb et al. Page 4


Int. J. Agr<strong>on</strong>. Agri. R.<br />

Fig. 1. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> various c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>seed</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong> varieties.<br />

Fig. 2. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>different</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> days to 50% germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Resp<strong>on</strong>se <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all <strong>tomato</strong> cultivars to <str<strong>on</strong>g>different</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g treatments was similar (Tables 1, 2)<br />

(Fig. 1). Earlier and synchr<strong>on</strong>ized germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and<br />

emergence was observed <strong>in</strong> the treated <strong>seed</strong>s<br />

compared with that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>trol as depicted by lower<br />

MET, T50 and MGT, and higher GI, FEP, FGP <strong>in</strong><br />

treated <strong>seed</strong>s compared with untreated <strong>on</strong>es (Tables<br />

1, 2), which is primarily attributed to dormancy<br />

breakdown as fresh <strong>seed</strong>s were used and dormancy<br />

has been reported <strong>in</strong> freshly harvested <strong>tomato</strong> <strong>seed</strong>s<br />

(Liu et al., 1996). Higher root and shoot length was<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> treated <strong>seed</strong>s might be the result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

earlier germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and emergence (Tables 1, 2).<br />

Osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g has been found to improve germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

rate and speed <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong> especially when freshly<br />

harvested <strong>seed</strong>s are used (Liu et al., 1996).<br />

Osmotically primed <strong>tomato</strong> <strong>seed</strong>s showed improved<br />

stand establishment, early <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g growth and<br />

yield, <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>gs from primed <strong>seed</strong>s emerged earlier<br />

and more uniformly than <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>gs from untreated<br />

<strong>seed</strong>s (Alvardo et al., 1987). Enhanced <strong>seed</strong><br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and improved <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g performance<br />

has also been recorded <strong>in</strong> freshly harvested <strong>tomato</strong><br />

<strong>seed</strong>s compared with the untreated c<strong>on</strong>trol (Liu et<br />

al., 1996). The earlier and better synchr<strong>on</strong>ized<br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> is associated with <strong>in</strong>creased metabolic<br />

activities <strong>in</strong> the osmoprimed <strong>seed</strong>s (Alvardo et al.,<br />

1987; Liu et al., 1996).<br />

Zeb et al. Page 5


Int. J. Agr<strong>on</strong>. Agri. R.<br />

Faster emergence rate after osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g may be<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>ed by an <strong>in</strong>creased rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cell divisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />

root tips as previously found for wheat (Bose and<br />

Mishra, 1992). In earlier studies, it was observed that<br />

<strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>gs from primed <strong>tomato</strong> <strong>seed</strong>s ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

greater mean plant dry weights, leaf areas and ground<br />

cover percentage than untreated <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>gs throughout<br />

the pre-flower<strong>in</strong>g period (Alvardo et al., 1987). The<br />

beneficial aspects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> prim<strong>in</strong>g are primarily due to pre<br />

enlargement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the embryo (Khan, 1992), and<br />

Improvement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> rate (Gray and Steckle,<br />

1977).<br />

Fig. 3. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>different</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong>.<br />

From the present <strong>in</strong>vestigati<strong>on</strong> it may be c<strong>on</strong>cluded<br />

that germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g vigor can be enhanced<br />

by osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g treatments <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>different</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong><br />

cultivars by dormancy breakdown. However<br />

osmoprim<strong>in</strong>g with <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> was more effective than<br />

hydro prim<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Fig. 4. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>different</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> mean germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> time.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

From this study it can be c<strong>on</strong>cluded that germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

and <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g vigor may be enhanced by <strong>seed</strong><br />

pretreatment with <str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> both the <strong>tomato</strong><br />

cultivars NARC-2012 and NARC-2013.However,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> with 10 ppm was more effective than all other<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>k<strong>in</strong>et<strong>in</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> treatments.<br />

Zeb et al. Page 6


Int. J. Agr<strong>on</strong>. Agri. R.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

We authors highly acknowledge Mr. Hamid Ali,<br />

Lecturer and Lab Incharge at Molecular Genetics Lab,<br />

Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Genetics, Hazara University,<br />

Mansehra, Pakistan for cooperati<strong>on</strong> and k<strong>in</strong>d support<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g research work.<br />

Abbreviati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Mean germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> time = MGT, Mean emergence<br />

time = MET, Speed <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex = GI, Time<br />

taken for 50 % germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> = T5o, F<strong>in</strong>al germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

percentage = FGP, F<strong>in</strong>al emergence percentage = FEP<br />

References<br />

Alvarado AD, KJ Bradford. 1987. Prim<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

storage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong> (Lycopersic<strong>on</strong> esculeutum) <strong>seed</strong>s.<br />

Seed Science and Technology, 16, 601-612.<br />

Afzal I, Basra SMA, Ahmad N. 2011. Horm<strong>on</strong>al<br />

prim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duces salt tolerance <strong>in</strong> wheat through<br />

enhanced antioxidant defense system. Cereal<br />

Research and Communicati<strong>on</strong>, 39: 334–342.<br />

Afzal I, Basra SMA, Ahmad N, Cheema MA,<br />

Warraich EA, Khaliq A. 2002. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> prim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and growth regulator treatment <strong>on</strong> emergence and<br />

<strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>g growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid maize (Zea mays).<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Agriculture and Biology 4,<br />

303-306.<br />

Arteca RN. 1996. Plant Growth Substances.<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and Applicati<strong>on</strong>s, Chapman and Hall,<br />

Thomsom Publish<strong>in</strong>g, Paris.<br />

Associati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Official Seed Analysis (AOSA).<br />

1983. Seed vigor Test<strong>in</strong>g Handbook. C<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> No.<br />

32 to the handbook <strong>on</strong> Seed Test<strong>in</strong>g. Associati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Official Seed Analysis. Spr<strong>in</strong>gfield, IL.<br />

Associati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Official Seed Analysis (AOSA).<br />

1990. Rules for test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>seed</strong>s. Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Seed<br />

Technology 12, 1-112.<br />

Astegiano ED, Favaro JC, Bouzo CA. 2001.<br />

Estimati<strong>on</strong> del area foliar en dist<strong>in</strong>tos cultivars de<br />

<strong>tomato</strong> (Lycopersic<strong>on</strong> esculentum Mill.) utilized<br />

medias foliares l<strong>in</strong>e ales. Investigati<strong>on</strong> Agrarian:<br />

Producti<strong>on</strong> Protecti<strong>on</strong> Vegetables 16(2), 249-256.<br />

Bewley JD, Black M. 1994. Seeds: Physiology <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Development and Germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>. (New York: Plenum<br />

Press).<br />

Bradford KJ. 1986. Manipulati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>seed</strong> water<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>s via osmotic prim<strong>in</strong>g to improve germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

under stress c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. Horticultural Sciences, 21,<br />

1105-1112.<br />

Bose B, Mishra T. 1992. Resp<strong>on</strong>se <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> wheat <strong>seed</strong> to<br />

pre sow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>seed</strong> treatment with Mg (No3)2 .Ann.<br />

Agric. Res, 13, 132-136.<br />

Brault M, Mald<strong>in</strong>ey R. 1999. Mechanisms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

cytok<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong> acti<strong>on</strong>. Plant Physiology & Biochemistry,<br />

37: 403-412.<br />

Coolbear PA, Francis, Griers<strong>on</strong> D. 1984. The<br />

effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> low temperature pre-sow<strong>in</strong>g treatment under<br />

the germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> performance and membrane<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> artificially aged <strong>tomato</strong> <strong>seed</strong>s. Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Experimental Botany. 35, 1609-1617.<br />

Corb<strong>in</strong>eau FM, Black, Come D. 1993. Inducti<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thermodormancy <strong>in</strong> Avena sativa <strong>seed</strong>s. Seed<br />

Science Research. 3, 111-117.<br />

Ellis RA, Roberts EH. 1981. The quantificati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

age<strong>in</strong>g and survival <strong>in</strong> orthodox <strong>seed</strong>s. Seed Science<br />

and Technology 9, 373-409.<br />

Ghassemi-Golezani K, Esmaeilpour B. 2008.<br />

The effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salt prim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> the performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>different</str<strong>on</strong>g>ially matured cucumber (Cucumis sativus)<br />

<strong>seed</strong>s. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj Napuca. 36(2),<br />

67-70.<br />

Gutierrez TA, Lav<strong>in</strong> AA. 2000. Medici<strong>on</strong>es<br />

l<strong>in</strong>eales en la hoja para la estimati<strong>on</strong> no destructive<br />

del area foliar en vides cv. Chard<strong>on</strong>nay. Agricultural<br />

Técnica, 60(1), 69-73.<br />

Gray D, Steckel JRA. 1977. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> presow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

treatments <strong>on</strong> the germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> and establishment<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parsnips. Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Horticultural Sciences 52,<br />

525-534.<br />

Zeb et al. Page 7


Int. J. Agr<strong>on</strong>. Agri. R.<br />

Heydekker W, Higg<strong>in</strong>s J, Gulliver RL. 1973.<br />

Accelerated germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> by osmotic <strong>seed</strong> treatment.<br />

Nature. 246, 42-44.<br />

Khan AA. 1992. Pre-plant physiological <strong>seed</strong><br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong><strong>in</strong>g. In Horticultural Reviews J. Janick<br />

(Ed.), John Willey and S<strong>on</strong>s, NY, 131-181.<br />

Khajeh-Hosse<strong>in</strong>i M, Powell AA, B<strong>in</strong>gham IJ.<br />

2003. The <strong>in</strong>teracti<strong>on</strong> between sal<strong>in</strong>ity stress and<br />

<strong>seed</strong> vigour dur<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> soybean <strong>seed</strong>s.<br />

Seed Science and Technology 31, 715-725.<br />

Liu Ya, B<strong>in</strong>o RJ, Vanderburg WJ, Groot SPC,<br />

Hilhorst HWM. 1996. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> osmotic prim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>on</strong> dormancy and storability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>tomato</strong><br />

(Lycopersic<strong>on</strong> esculentum Mill) <strong>seed</strong>s. Seed Science<br />

Research 6, 49-55.<br />

Nakaune M, Hanada A, Y<strong>in</strong> YG, Matsukura C,<br />

Yamaguchi S, Ezura H. 2012. Molecular and<br />

physiological dissecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> enhanced <strong>seed</strong><br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g short-term low c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> salt<br />

<strong>seed</strong> prim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>tomato</strong>. Plant Physiology and<br />

Biochemistry 52, 28-37.<br />

Parera CA, Cantliffe DJ. 1994. Presow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>seed</strong><br />

prim<strong>in</strong>g. Horticulture Review. 16, 109-141.<br />

Ruan S, Xue Q, Tylkowska K. 2002. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effect</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>seed</strong> prim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

and health <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rice (Oryza sativa L.) <strong>seed</strong>s. Seed<br />

Science and Technology, 30, 451-458.<br />

Salunkhe DK, Desai BB, Bhat NR. 1987.<br />

Vegetable and flower <strong>seed</strong> producti<strong>on</strong>. 1st. Edn.,<br />

Agricole pub. Acad., New Delhi, India. 135 P.<br />

Zeb et al. Page 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!