Weber River Flood Damage Assessment - Riverdale City
Weber River Flood Damage Assessment - Riverdale City
Weber River Flood Damage Assessment - Riverdale City
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>River</strong>dale <strong>City</strong> 2011 <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> October 13, 2011<br />
<strong>Weber</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Damage</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
The human and environmental factors outlined above combined with a record setting snowpack to<br />
cause the severe flooding experienced during the 2011 runoff. Fortunately, the cool, wet weather of last<br />
spring reduced the intensity of runoff and prevented even more severe flooding in <strong>River</strong>dale <strong>City</strong>.<br />
<strong>River</strong>dale <strong>City</strong> residents are not unfamiliar with these types of flooding events; the historic record<br />
indicates that there have been 15 years where peak discharges have been larger than 2011 (Figure 8)<br />
and certainly many residents remember the devastating flood caused by the breach of the <strong>Weber</strong>-Davis<br />
Canal in 1999. The <strong>Weber</strong> <strong>River</strong> Project (USBR) including Rockport and Echo reservoirs has provided<br />
an accumulated $12M in flood control benefits from 1950-1999.<br />
Figure 8-Historic Peak Discharge [cfs]<br />
During our assessment, <strong>River</strong>Restoration identified 14 locations where public infrastructure was<br />
damaged during the 2011 flood event. Table 1 presents the damaged sites and the locations of the<br />
damaged areas are indicated in Figure 9. Individual site assessments are presented in Appendix A.<br />
These assessments described the damage incurred and identify any contributing factors as outlined in<br />
the previous section. The site assessments also identify the actions necessary to repair the damaged<br />
sites to their pre-flood conditions. Where alternative approaches to individual site reparations are<br />
feasible those alternatives are identified. Order of magnitude costs are included in the site assessments.<br />
10