ECA Review 2019-01-03
ECA Review 2019-01-03
ECA Review 2019-01-03
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6 J anuary 3'19 Hanna/Coronation/Stettler, a b. e C a review<br />
PRAIRIEVIEW<br />
Notley’s ‘Hail<br />
Mary’ pass<br />
by Herman Schwenk<br />
Rachel Notley, the Alberta premier,<br />
is getting desperate.<br />
She is within six months of having to<br />
call an election.<br />
I think she sees the writing on the<br />
wall.<br />
This is forcing her to come up with<br />
some desperate ideas to get re-elected<br />
or at least leave with a credible legacy.<br />
Since she can’t get a pipeline built<br />
during her tenure she came up with<br />
the idea of buying thousands of rail<br />
cars and trains to pull the cars for<br />
moving oil.<br />
As well, she is asking for proposals<br />
to build a refinery to market some of<br />
our surplus oil.<br />
The upside of this idea is that it<br />
would provide thousands of jobs.<br />
In my opinion, a refinery at this time<br />
is a non-starter.<br />
“<br />
People did not vote<br />
for her [Notley], they voted<br />
against the old, corrupt PC<br />
government that Jason<br />
Kenney and his people<br />
appear to be<br />
resurrecting.<br />
This isn’t really a new idea by the<br />
NDP.<br />
Is there a business case for another<br />
refinery at this time? I think not or it<br />
would have already happened.<br />
Of course being a socialist, her idea<br />
of a proposal would involve government<br />
intervention of some kind, like a<br />
government incentive grant or partial<br />
ownership.<br />
As usual, she has not thought<br />
through the logistics of what she is<br />
asking for.<br />
We’re talking about an investment of<br />
10 to 15 billion dollars.<br />
This would take years of planning<br />
and regulatory approvals, something<br />
that would not and could not happen in<br />
the next six months.<br />
Who does she think would be prepared<br />
to provide the financing needed<br />
for a project of this magnitude?<br />
You would think if she hasn’t<br />
learned anything else in the last 3 1/2<br />
years that she would have figured out<br />
that money doesn’t grow on trees or<br />
maybe she thinks borrowed money is<br />
money growing on trees.<br />
“<br />
VIEWPOINTS<br />
She has the same basic problem with<br />
her railcar idea.<br />
While it would not be a project of the<br />
same magnitude, it would still require<br />
significant financing and there would<br />
be a logistical problem of running<br />
many more trains on existing rail<br />
tracks.<br />
Sooner or later there will be some<br />
pipeline capacity built and by that time<br />
the rail cars would not be needed.<br />
Right now there are somewhere<br />
between 250,000 and 300,000 barrels of<br />
oil being moved daily by rail.<br />
I think that most of that is going to<br />
the USA.<br />
In my mind, it is moving in the<br />
wrong direction.<br />
Last week at the Canadian First<br />
Ministers Conference, the premier of<br />
Quebec, Francois Legault, said it was<br />
socially unacceptable for Alberta’s<br />
‘dirty oil’ to move through Quebec.<br />
However, it is socially acceptable to<br />
transfer over 13 billion dollars to their<br />
coffers, most of which is generated by<br />
Alberta’s ‘dirty oil’.<br />
Legault has demonstrated ignorance<br />
and hypocrisy with his comments<br />
about dirty energy.<br />
Jason Kenney was recently quoted<br />
as saying in an Edmonton Sun editorial,<br />
“It is not acceptable for a province<br />
to block our resources while benefiting<br />
massively from the wealth they<br />
generate”.<br />
If Quebec does not like our oil going<br />
through their province in a pipeline<br />
then Notley should make sure it goes<br />
through the province in the rail cars<br />
we have now instead of going to the<br />
USA.<br />
Quebec may prevent us from<br />
exporting oil by pipeline for now but<br />
they can’t stop us from shipping it<br />
through the province by rail.<br />
I think Rachel Notley is now finally<br />
beginning to figure out what makes<br />
Alberta tick.<br />
Her ultra-socialist concepts just do<br />
not work.<br />
Her accidental election win in 2<strong>01</strong>5<br />
has caused Alberta to lose over $100<br />
billion in investment and almost that<br />
much in deficit financing.<br />
She still thinks she won that election<br />
because the people liked her socialist<br />
policies.<br />
People did not vote for her, they<br />
voted against the old, corrupt PC government<br />
that Jason Kenney and his<br />
people appear to be resurrecting.<br />
However, even with that happening,<br />
Notley’s ‘Hail Mary’ pass still will not<br />
get her re-elected.<br />
The opinions expressed are not necessarily<br />
the opinions of this newspaper.<br />
LEGISLATURE<br />
How not to get it done<br />
by Rick Strankman, MLA<br />
Drumheller Stettler<br />
Ronald Reagan once said that the<br />
nine most terrifying words in the<br />
English language are: “I’m from the<br />
government and I’m here to help.”<br />
His quote aptly describes the typical<br />
inefficiency of government.<br />
Where government fails, private<br />
industry, more often than not, will<br />
prosper.<br />
In order for prosperity to<br />
have a fighting chance, it<br />
requires an atmosphere<br />
that is free of market<br />
manipulation and<br />
over-regulation.<br />
Examples of over-regulation<br />
and government<br />
manipulation are currently<br />
on display across Canada.<br />
Governments across this<br />
country have bogged down<br />
pipelines for generations.<br />
They are attempting to remedy that<br />
with, you guessed it, a higher level of<br />
government involvement!<br />
The Trans Mountain Pipeline<br />
project is a shining example of how<br />
government can over-regulate and<br />
allow objections to halt a project and<br />
make it no longer viable for private<br />
investors to pursue.<br />
Although it’s important to protect<br />
the environment, landowner rights<br />
and ensure companies are accountable<br />
for their actions, there must be reasonable<br />
limits to how far those actions can<br />
go.<br />
Both the Alberta and Federal governments<br />
have failed to prioritize the<br />
importance of the energy industries<br />
contribution to the Canadian economy.<br />
Now, average Canadians are beginning<br />
to feel the negative effects of<br />
government overreach.<br />
If Alberta and Canada are going to<br />
climb out of the self-imposed regulatory<br />
purgatory, a vastly different<br />
approach needs to be taken.<br />
The difficulties investors in<br />
Canadian energy have encountered<br />
have had inevitable negative consequences<br />
for the Canadian economy.<br />
Unprecedented exodus of investment<br />
dollars to other locations throughout<br />
the world was seen in 2<strong>01</strong>8. It appears<br />
that this will continue in <strong>2<strong>01</strong>9</strong>.<br />
The Canadian energy industry<br />
dilemma has accomplished<br />
only one thing, self-imposed<br />
hardship.<br />
Consumers of the energy<br />
products that have been the<br />
foundation of our economic<br />
success in the global market<br />
depend on a consistent and<br />
reliable supply of those<br />
products.<br />
Canadian energy policies<br />
Strankman are now creating an impression<br />
that our supply is<br />
unreliable and inconsistent.<br />
While the government plays a vital<br />
role in protecting Canadians and their<br />
assets from harm, in recent years they<br />
have grossly overstepped their role in<br />
our lives.<br />
Time and again we are seeing corporations<br />
that meet requirements to<br />
engage in their line of production,<br />
effectively blocked from moving forward<br />
by endless regulations that add<br />
unbudgeted costs and delays.<br />
Nowhere are the words by Ronald<br />
Reagan exemplified better than right<br />
here in Alberta.<br />
Overarching Government regulations<br />
have been at the root of most, if<br />
not all, of the province’s current economic<br />
woes.<br />
If this government truly would like<br />
to help move industry and Albertans<br />
forward, their best course of action<br />
would be to create and stick to a reasonable<br />
set of regulations that allow<br />
our industries to fairly compete in the<br />
global market.<br />
R<br />
R<br />
R<br />
R<br />
R<br />
Published by<br />
Coronation<br />
<strong>Review</strong><br />
Limited<br />
72 pt<br />
East Central Alberta<br />
EVIEW<br />
60 pt<br />
48 pt<br />
36 pt<br />
LETTERS POLICY • Letters to the Editor are<br />
welcomed • Must be signed and a phone<br />
number included so the writer’s identity can be<br />
verified. • <strong>ECA</strong> <strong>Review</strong> reserves the right to edit<br />
letters for legal considerations, taste and brevity.<br />
Letters and columns submitted are not<br />
necessarily the opinion of this newspaper.<br />
MeMber of:<br />
Office Hours Mon. - Fri. 9 am - 5 pm<br />
R<br />
30 pt<br />
Subscriptions:<br />
4921 - Victoria Avenue<br />
$42.00 in Canada; $74.20 in US; Tel. (4<strong>03</strong>) 578-4111<br />
R<br />
24 pt<br />
$135.15 Overseas. (All prices include GST) Mail: Box 70, Coronation, AB Canada, T0C 1C0 Website <strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />
Alberta Press Council<br />
Do you have a concern or<br />
complaint about a newspaper<br />
article or ad? If after bringing<br />
your concerns to the attention<br />
of this newspaper, you are not<br />
satisfied, you may contact<br />
the Alberta Press Council<br />
at www.albertapresscouncil.ca<br />
or toll free in Alberta at<br />
1-888-580-4104 for<br />
information.<br />
JoyCe webSter brenda SCHiMke<br />
Publisher/Editor Editorial Writer<br />
publisher@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />
bonny williaMS<br />
Circulation Manager<br />
terri HuXley<br />
Reporter 587-321-0<strong>03</strong>0<br />
news1@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />
yvonne tHulien<br />
Manager<br />
office@eCareview.com<br />
liSa MyerS-Sortland<br />
Graphic Artist<br />
Gayle Jaraway Judy walGenbaCH<br />
Marketing 4<strong>03</strong>-578-4111 Marketing 4<strong>03</strong>-740-2492<br />
advertise@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com marketing@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />
R<br />
18 pt