31.12.2018 Views

ECA Review 2019-01-03

ECA Review 2019-01-03

ECA Review 2019-01-03

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 J anuary 3'19 Hanna/Coronation/Stettler, a b. e C a review<br />

PRAIRIEVIEW<br />

Notley’s ‘Hail<br />

Mary’ pass<br />

by Herman Schwenk<br />

Rachel Notley, the Alberta premier,<br />

is getting desperate.<br />

She is within six months of having to<br />

call an election.<br />

I think she sees the writing on the<br />

wall.<br />

This is forcing her to come up with<br />

some desperate ideas to get re-elected<br />

or at least leave with a credible legacy.<br />

Since she can’t get a pipeline built<br />

during her tenure she came up with<br />

the idea of buying thousands of rail<br />

cars and trains to pull the cars for<br />

moving oil.<br />

As well, she is asking for proposals<br />

to build a refinery to market some of<br />

our surplus oil.<br />

The upside of this idea is that it<br />

would provide thousands of jobs.<br />

In my opinion, a refinery at this time<br />

is a non-starter.<br />

“<br />

People did not vote<br />

for her [Notley], they voted<br />

against the old, corrupt PC<br />

government that Jason<br />

Kenney and his people<br />

appear to be<br />

resurrecting.<br />

This isn’t really a new idea by the<br />

NDP.<br />

Is there a business case for another<br />

refinery at this time? I think not or it<br />

would have already happened.<br />

Of course being a socialist, her idea<br />

of a proposal would involve government<br />

intervention of some kind, like a<br />

government incentive grant or partial<br />

ownership.<br />

As usual, she has not thought<br />

through the logistics of what she is<br />

asking for.<br />

We’re talking about an investment of<br />

10 to 15 billion dollars.<br />

This would take years of planning<br />

and regulatory approvals, something<br />

that would not and could not happen in<br />

the next six months.<br />

Who does she think would be prepared<br />

to provide the financing needed<br />

for a project of this magnitude?<br />

You would think if she hasn’t<br />

learned anything else in the last 3 1/2<br />

years that she would have figured out<br />

that money doesn’t grow on trees or<br />

maybe she thinks borrowed money is<br />

money growing on trees.<br />

“<br />

VIEWPOINTS<br />

She has the same basic problem with<br />

her railcar idea.<br />

While it would not be a project of the<br />

same magnitude, it would still require<br />

significant financing and there would<br />

be a logistical problem of running<br />

many more trains on existing rail<br />

tracks.<br />

Sooner or later there will be some<br />

pipeline capacity built and by that time<br />

the rail cars would not be needed.<br />

Right now there are somewhere<br />

between 250,000 and 300,000 barrels of<br />

oil being moved daily by rail.<br />

I think that most of that is going to<br />

the USA.<br />

In my mind, it is moving in the<br />

wrong direction.<br />

Last week at the Canadian First<br />

Ministers Conference, the premier of<br />

Quebec, Francois Legault, said it was<br />

socially unacceptable for Alberta’s<br />

‘dirty oil’ to move through Quebec.<br />

However, it is socially acceptable to<br />

transfer over 13 billion dollars to their<br />

coffers, most of which is generated by<br />

Alberta’s ‘dirty oil’.<br />

Legault has demonstrated ignorance<br />

and hypocrisy with his comments<br />

about dirty energy.<br />

Jason Kenney was recently quoted<br />

as saying in an Edmonton Sun editorial,<br />

“It is not acceptable for a province<br />

to block our resources while benefiting<br />

massively from the wealth they<br />

generate”.<br />

If Quebec does not like our oil going<br />

through their province in a pipeline<br />

then Notley should make sure it goes<br />

through the province in the rail cars<br />

we have now instead of going to the<br />

USA.<br />

Quebec may prevent us from<br />

exporting oil by pipeline for now but<br />

they can’t stop us from shipping it<br />

through the province by rail.<br />

I think Rachel Notley is now finally<br />

beginning to figure out what makes<br />

Alberta tick.<br />

Her ultra-socialist concepts just do<br />

not work.<br />

Her accidental election win in 2<strong>01</strong>5<br />

has caused Alberta to lose over $100<br />

billion in investment and almost that<br />

much in deficit financing.<br />

She still thinks she won that election<br />

because the people liked her socialist<br />

policies.<br />

People did not vote for her, they<br />

voted against the old, corrupt PC government<br />

that Jason Kenney and his<br />

people appear to be resurrecting.<br />

However, even with that happening,<br />

Notley’s ‘Hail Mary’ pass still will not<br />

get her re-elected.<br />

The opinions expressed are not necessarily<br />

the opinions of this newspaper.<br />

LEGISLATURE<br />

How not to get it done<br />

by Rick Strankman, MLA<br />

Drumheller Stettler<br />

Ronald Reagan once said that the<br />

nine most terrifying words in the<br />

English language are: “I’m from the<br />

government and I’m here to help.”<br />

His quote aptly describes the typical<br />

inefficiency of government.<br />

Where government fails, private<br />

industry, more often than not, will<br />

prosper.<br />

In order for prosperity to<br />

have a fighting chance, it<br />

requires an atmosphere<br />

that is free of market<br />

manipulation and<br />

over-regulation.<br />

Examples of over-regulation<br />

and government<br />

manipulation are currently<br />

on display across Canada.<br />

Governments across this<br />

country have bogged down<br />

pipelines for generations.<br />

They are attempting to remedy that<br />

with, you guessed it, a higher level of<br />

government involvement!<br />

The Trans Mountain Pipeline<br />

project is a shining example of how<br />

government can over-regulate and<br />

allow objections to halt a project and<br />

make it no longer viable for private<br />

investors to pursue.<br />

Although it’s important to protect<br />

the environment, landowner rights<br />

and ensure companies are accountable<br />

for their actions, there must be reasonable<br />

limits to how far those actions can<br />

go.<br />

Both the Alberta and Federal governments<br />

have failed to prioritize the<br />

importance of the energy industries<br />

contribution to the Canadian economy.<br />

Now, average Canadians are beginning<br />

to feel the negative effects of<br />

government overreach.<br />

If Alberta and Canada are going to<br />

climb out of the self-imposed regulatory<br />

purgatory, a vastly different<br />

approach needs to be taken.<br />

The difficulties investors in<br />

Canadian energy have encountered<br />

have had inevitable negative consequences<br />

for the Canadian economy.<br />

Unprecedented exodus of investment<br />

dollars to other locations throughout<br />

the world was seen in 2<strong>01</strong>8. It appears<br />

that this will continue in <strong>2<strong>01</strong>9</strong>.<br />

The Canadian energy industry<br />

dilemma has accomplished<br />

only one thing, self-imposed<br />

hardship.<br />

Consumers of the energy<br />

products that have been the<br />

foundation of our economic<br />

success in the global market<br />

depend on a consistent and<br />

reliable supply of those<br />

products.<br />

Canadian energy policies<br />

Strankman are now creating an impression<br />

that our supply is<br />

unreliable and inconsistent.<br />

While the government plays a vital<br />

role in protecting Canadians and their<br />

assets from harm, in recent years they<br />

have grossly overstepped their role in<br />

our lives.<br />

Time and again we are seeing corporations<br />

that meet requirements to<br />

engage in their line of production,<br />

effectively blocked from moving forward<br />

by endless regulations that add<br />

unbudgeted costs and delays.<br />

Nowhere are the words by Ronald<br />

Reagan exemplified better than right<br />

here in Alberta.<br />

Overarching Government regulations<br />

have been at the root of most, if<br />

not all, of the province’s current economic<br />

woes.<br />

If this government truly would like<br />

to help move industry and Albertans<br />

forward, their best course of action<br />

would be to create and stick to a reasonable<br />

set of regulations that allow<br />

our industries to fairly compete in the<br />

global market.<br />

R<br />

R<br />

R<br />

R<br />

R<br />

Published by<br />

Coronation<br />

<strong>Review</strong><br />

Limited<br />

72 pt<br />

East Central Alberta<br />

EVIEW<br />

60 pt<br />

48 pt<br />

36 pt<br />

LETTERS POLICY • Letters to the Editor are<br />

welcomed • Must be signed and a phone<br />

number included so the writer’s identity can be<br />

verified. • <strong>ECA</strong> <strong>Review</strong> reserves the right to edit<br />

letters for legal considerations, taste and brevity.<br />

Letters and columns submitted are not<br />

necessarily the opinion of this newspaper.<br />

MeMber of:<br />

Office Hours Mon. - Fri. 9 am - 5 pm<br />

R<br />

30 pt<br />

Subscriptions:<br />

4921 - Victoria Avenue<br />

$42.00 in Canada; $74.20 in US; Tel. (4<strong>03</strong>) 578-4111<br />

R<br />

24 pt<br />

$135.15 Overseas. (All prices include GST) Mail: Box 70, Coronation, AB Canada, T0C 1C0 Website <strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />

Alberta Press Council<br />

Do you have a concern or<br />

complaint about a newspaper<br />

article or ad? If after bringing<br />

your concerns to the attention<br />

of this newspaper, you are not<br />

satisfied, you may contact<br />

the Alberta Press Council<br />

at www.albertapresscouncil.ca<br />

or toll free in Alberta at<br />

1-888-580-4104 for<br />

information.<br />

JoyCe webSter brenda SCHiMke<br />

Publisher/Editor Editorial Writer<br />

publisher@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />

bonny williaMS<br />

Circulation Manager<br />

terri HuXley<br />

Reporter 587-321-0<strong>03</strong>0<br />

news1@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />

yvonne tHulien<br />

Manager<br />

office@eCareview.com<br />

liSa MyerS-Sortland<br />

Graphic Artist<br />

Gayle Jaraway Judy walGenbaCH<br />

Marketing 4<strong>03</strong>-578-4111 Marketing 4<strong>03</strong>-740-2492<br />

advertise@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com marketing@<strong>ECA</strong>review.com<br />

R<br />

18 pt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!